Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009

Open Access Poster presentation

Eye dominance induces pinwheel crystallization in models of visual cortical development

Lars Reich12*, Siegrid Löwel3 and Fred Wolf12

Author Affiliations

1 Max-Planck-Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Germany

2 Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Göttingen, Germany

3 Institute of General Zoology and Animal Physiology, University Jena, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10(Suppl 1):P354  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-S1-P354

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:13 July 2009

© 2009 Reich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.


The formation of orientation preference maps during the development of the visual cortex is sensitive to visual experience and impulse activity [1]. In models for the activity dependent development of these maps orientation pinwheels initially form in large numbers but subsequently decay during continued refinement of the spatial pattern of cortical selectivities [2]. One attractive hypothesis for the developmental stabilization of orientation pinwheels states that the geometric relationships between different maps, such as the tendency of iso-orientation domains to intersect ocular dominance borders at right angles can prevent extensive orientation map rearrangement and pinwheel decay [2,3]. Here we present a analytically tractable model for the coupled development of orientation and ocular dominance maps in the visual cortex. Stationary solutions of this model and their dynamical stability are examined by weakly nonlinear analysis. We find three different basic solutions, pinwheel free orientation stripes, and rhombic and hexagonal pinwheel crystals locked to a hexagonal pattern of ipsilateral eye domains. Using amplitude equations for these patterns, we calculate the complete stability diagram of the model. In addition, we study the kinetics of pinwheel annihilation or preservation using direct numerical simulations of the model in model cortical areas encompassing several hundred orientation hypercolumns. When left and right eye representations are symmetrical, inter-map coupling per se is not capable of stabilizing pinwheels, in this model. However, when the overrepresentation of the contralateral eye exceeds a critical value intermap coupling can stabilize hexagonal or rhombic arrays of orientation pinwheels. In this regime, we find a transition from a dominance of low pinwheel density states (4/cos(60°)) to high density states (6/cos(60°)) with increasing strength of inter-map coupling. We find that pinwheel stabilization by inter-map coupling and contralateral eye dominance leads to the formation of perfectly repetitive crystalline geometrical arrangements of pinwheel centers. These results suggest that while inter-map coupling can prevent pinwheel annihilation it is not sufficient to explain the spatially aperiodic arrangement of pinwheel centers in the visual cortex.


  1. White LE, Fitzpatrick D: Vision and cortical map development.

    Neuron 2007, 56:327-338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Wolf F, Geisel T: Spontaneous pinwheel annihilation during visual development.

    Nature 1998, 395:73-78. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Farley B, Yu H, Jin D, Sur M: Alternation of visual input result in a coordinated reorganization of multiple visual cortical maps.

    J. Neurosci 2007, 27:10299-10310. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL