Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009

Open Access Poster presentation

The effect of the ventricular system on the electric current in deep brain stimulation

Nada Yousif1*, Dipankar Nandi12, Alexander Green3, Tipu Aziz3 and Xuguang Liu12

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, UK

2 Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation Unit, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK

3 Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10(Suppl 1):P184  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-S1-P184

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:13 July 2009

© 2009 Yousif et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.


In deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders, the electrode is implanted in the basal ganglia and thalamus, where the electrode is surrounded by gray and white matter. In contrast, when DBS is used for suppressing neuropathic pain, the electrodes are implanted in the periventricular/periaqueductal gray (PVG/PAG) region and are usually situated very close to the third ventricle and the aqueduct [1]. These structures are filled with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), having higher conductivity and lower reactivity than that of brain tissue. We hypothesized that the proximity of these CSF volumes would have a significant effect on the current distribution and the predicted volume of tissue activated (VTA).


We constructed a finite element model of the electrode and surrounding tissue including the ventricular system, based upon a post-operative MRI of the patient [2]. This geometrical domain was used to solve the Laplace equation and to visualize the potential distribution induced by DBS [3-5]. In order to quantify the VTA, we used coupled compartmental neuronal models based on cable theory to predict the volume around the electrode in which neuronal firing could be modulated [6].


Results showed that the high-conductivity CSF regions attenuated the distribution of the induced potential in the surrounding tissue, and the electric field lines were skewed towards the ventricles. This in turn affected the VTA as predicted by the compartmental axon models, such that the amplitude of the stimulus had to be doubled in the model including the ventricles in order to stimulate the same number of nearby axons. Factors such as position, size and shape of the CSF-filled space relative to the electrode position were quantified to uncover general principles of current spread in the model.


The pain suppression effect of DBS highly depends on the location of the DBS electrode. This patient specific model indicates the influence of previously overlooked biophysical features of the surrounding brain tissues on the predictions made by FEM models of DBS. We speculate that the significant alteration of the stimulation current by the high-conductivity ventricular volumes may also have a significant impact on achieving the therapeutic outcomes.


This study was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council of the UK, id.78512.


  1. Owen SL, Green AL, Nandi DD, Bittar RG, Wang S, Aziz TZ: Deep brain stimulation for neuropathic pain.

    Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007, 97:111-116. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  2. Green AL, Wang S, Owen SL, Xie K, Bittar RG, Stein JF, Paterson DJ, Aziz TZ: Stimulating the human midbrain to reveal the link between pain and blood pressure.

    Pain 2006, 124:349-359. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Yousif N, Bayford R, Bain PG, Liu X: The perielectrode space is a significant element of the electrode-brain interface in deep brain stimulation: A computational study.

    Brain Res Bull 2007, 74:361-368. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Yousif N, Bayford R, Wang S, Liu X: Quantifying the effects of the electrode-brain interface on the crossing electric currents in deep brain recording and stimulation.

    Neuroscience 2008, 152:683-91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Yousif N, Bayford R, Liu X: The influence of reactivity of the electrode-brain interface on the crossing electric current in therapeutic deep brain stimulation.

    Neuroscience 2008, 156:597-606. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Butson CR, McIntyre CC: Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation.

    Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:1-11. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL