Table 2

Ciprofloxacin and erythromycin resistance of Campylobacter spp. from two commercial turkey processing plants.

Plant A

Plant B


Species

No. (%)

No. (%) resistant to ciprofloxacin

No. (%) resistant to erythromycin

No. (%)

No. (%) resistant to ciprofloxacin

No. (%) resistant to erythromycin

C. jejuni

217a (49)b

0c (0.0)d

0c (0.0)d

281a (78)b

80c (28)d

1c (0.3)d

C. coli

196 (45)

22 (11)

81 (41)

62 (17)

39 (63)

9 (17)

C. fetus

1 (0.2)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

3 (0.8)

3 (100)

0 (0.0)

C. lari

7 (1.6)

2 (29)

1 (14)

0 (0.0)

n/a

n/a

C. upsaliensis

3 (0.7)

0 (0.0)

0 (7.0)

0 (0.0)

n/a

n/a

Campylobacter spp.

15 (3.4)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

16 (4.4)

15 (94)

0 (0)


Total

439

24c (5.5)e

82c (19)e

362

137c (38)e

10c (2.8)e


aNumber of total isolates tested.

bPercentage of total isolates tested.

cNumber of isolates resistant.

dPercentage of isolates resistant among total tested for that species.

ePercentage of isolates resistant among total tested for that plant.

Lutgen et al. BMC Microbiology 2009 9:203   doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-203

Open Data