Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch article

Carbon and arsenic metabolism in Thiomonas strains: differences revealed diverse adaptation processes

Christopher G Bryan* 1,4 email, Marie Marchal* 1 email, Fabienne Battaglia-Brunet2 email, Valérie Kugler1 email, Christelle Lemaitre-Guillier3 email, Didier Lièvremont1 email, Philippe N Bertin1 email and Florence Arsène-Ploetze1 email

1Génétique Moléculaire, Génomique et Microbiologie, UMR 7156 CNRS and Université de Strasbourg, 28, rue Goethe, 67000 Strasbourg, France

2BRGM, Environnement et Procédés, Unité Ecotechnologie, Avenue Claude Guillemin, 45060 Orléans, France

3Plateforme Protéomique, IFR 1589 CNRS, 15 rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg, France

4Current address: Centre for Bioprocess Engineering Research, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa

author email corresponding author email* Contributed equally

BMC Microbiology 2009, 9:127doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-127

Published: 23 June 2009

Abstract

Background

Thiomonas strains are ubiquitous in arsenic-contaminated environments. Differences between Thiomonas strains in the way they have adapted and respond to arsenic have never been studied in detail. For this purpose, five Thiomonas strains, that are interesting in terms of arsenic metabolism were selected: T. arsenivorans, Thiomonas spp. WJ68 and 3As are able to oxidise As(III), while Thiomonas sp. Ynys1 and T. perometabolis are not. Moreover, T. arsenivorans and 3As present interesting physiological traits, in particular that these strains are able to use As(III) as an electron donor.

Results

The metabolism of carbon and arsenic was compared in the five Thiomonas strains belonging to two distinct phylogenetic groups. Greater physiological differences were found between these strains than might have been suggested by 16S rRNA/rpoA gene phylogeny, especially regarding arsenic metabolism. Physiologically, T. perometabolis and Ynys1 were unable to oxidise As(III) and were less arsenic-resistant than the other strains. Genetically, they appeared to lack the aox arsenic-oxidising genes and carried only a single ars arsenic resistance operon. Thiomonas arsenivorans belonged to a distinct phylogenetic group and increased its autotrophic metabolism when arsenic concentration increased. Differential proteomic analysis revealed that in T. arsenivorans, the rbc/cbb genes involved in the assimilation of inorganic carbon were induced in the presence of arsenic, whereas these genes were repressed in Thiomonas sp. 3As.

Conclusion

Taken together, these results show that these closely related bacteria differ substantially in their response to arsenic, amongst other factors, and suggest different relationships between carbon assimilation and arsenic metabolism.


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.