Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Escherichia coliYmdB regulates biofilm formation independently of its role as an RNase III modulator

BMC Microbiology volume 13, Article number: 266 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ribonuclease III (RNase III) activity modulates hundreds of genes in Escherichia coli (E. coli). YmdB, a member of the macrodomain protein family, is one of known trans-acting regulators of RNase III activity; however, the significance of its regulatory role in specific bacterial cellular processes and related genes has not been determined. YmdB overexpression was used to model YmdB-induced RNase III inhibition in vivo, and microarray analysis identified gene targets and cellular processes related to RNase III inhibition.

Results

The expression of >2,000 E. coli genes was modulated by YmdB induction; 129 genes were strongly regulated, of which 80 have not been reported as RNase III targets. Of these, ten are involved in biofilm formation. Significantly, YmdB overexpression also inhibited biofilm formation via a process that is not uniquely dependent upon RNase III inhibition. Moreover, biofilm formation is interdependently regulated by RpoS, a known stress response regulator and biofilm inhibitor, and by YmdB.

Conclusions

This is the first global profile of target genes modulated by YmdB-induced RNase III inhibition in E. coli, and the data reveal a novel, hitherto unrecognized regulatory role for YmdB in biofilm modulation.

Background

RNase III family members cleave double-stranded RNAs to yield 5′ phosphate and 3′ hydroxyl termini, and are extensively conserved in prokaryotes and eukaryotes [1–7]. During bacterial ribosome biogenesis, RNase III processes the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) precursors [8], and also mediates the maturation and/or degradation of different types of transcripts [9], small RNAs [10, 11], and mRNAs containing rnc[12, 13] or pnp genes [14]. The structural and mechanistic features of RNase III have been extensively studied [1–14]; however, questions remain concerning the cellular control of RNase III activity under different physiological conditions.

In E. coli, some proteins are known as regulators for endo-RNase activity [15–18]. For example, RraA and RraB negatively regulate RNase E activity [15, 16]. In case of RNase III, bacteriophage T7 protein kinase [17] and YmdB [18] identified as an either activator or inhibitor of RNase III function. The activation process by bacteriophage T7 protein kinase is through binding to RNase III and phosphorylates the enzyme on serine [17]. YmdB was the first RNase III-binding inhibitor to be identified in vivo using a novel genetic screening approach and, in common with other RNase regulators, YmdB expression is modulated by cold- or growth-stress [18]. YmdB, acting in concert with other uncharacterized stress-mediated trans-acting factors, facilitates the regulation of RNase III activity under growth- [18] or osmotic stress conditions [19]. Several protein identities are proposed for the trans-acting inhibitor(s) and potential targets of their inhibition has been suggested; for example, cellular targets of RNase III activity, such as the RNase III gene itself, rnc[12, 13], pnp[14], and rRNA processing by YmdB [18] and the level of bdm mRNA encoding a protein that promotes biofilm formation by unknown trans-acting factor(s) [19]. The cellular processes required for RNase III inhibition by trans-acting factor(s) during stress responses are unclear; however, one post-transcriptional pathway has been proposed [7], which involves the general stress-responsive regulator, RpoS [20]. By cleaving the rpoS mRNA 5′-leader [21], RNase III reduces RpoS production; the presence of YmdB limits this reaction and as a consequence, increases RpoS levels, which supports entry into the stationary phase [7]. This hypothesis behind this process came from a study that used an RNase III mutant [21]; however, to clarify and identify new targets of RNase III inhibition, it is essential to adopt a model that mimics physiological RNase III inhibition via the induction of trans-acting factor(s).

The present study investigated RNase III inhibition via the ectopic expression of the regulatory protein, YmdB, and identified novel targets of inhibition. We also explored the mechanism(s) by which biofilm formation is regulated. Gene expression profiling of the entire E. coli open reading frame (ORF) following YmdB overexpression was performed using DNA microarray analysis, and revealed that ~2,000 transcripts were modulated. Of these, 129 genes spanning ten cellular processes were strongly modulated by YmdB expression. About 40 of these were similarly controlled by RNase III, including five novel targets. Moreover, among the YmdB-modulated genes, ten are reported to be related to biofilm formation, the presence of which is a universal feature of bacteria and a component of multicellular communities [22]. Biochemical analyses indicate that induction of YmdB strongly inhibits biofilm formation in a manner similar to that of RpoS, which is a regulator of general stress responses [20] and a biofilm inhibitor [23–25]. Inhibition occurred via two mechanisms that were either dependent or independent of RNase III activity. Genetic studies revealed that the YmdB- and RpoS-induced decrease in biofilm formation required RpoS and YmdB, respectively. In conclusion, we have identified a novel role for YmdB as a modulator of biofilm formation, and revealed how a trans-acting factor can regulate RNase III activity, as well as function independently to enable a rapid response to changing cellular needs.

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, primers, and growth conditions

Details of the bacterial strains and plasmids used are given in Additional file 1: Table S1. Primers used for qPCR analysis and DNA sequencing were synthesized by Bioneer (Korea) (Additional file 1: Table S2). All established mutant strains or chromosomal lacZ fusions were derived from E. coli BW25113. Analysis of rpoS promoter activity was based on a plasmid, pKSK001, containing promoter region −92 to +10 of the rpoS gene from the E. coli K12 genome (GenBank U00096.2) sub-cloned into the lacZ transcriptional fusion vector, pSP417 [26], after linearization by EcoRI/BamHI. The lacZ fusion in pKSK001 was recombined onto the chromosome (KSK003) using the transducing λ phage system, λRS45 [27], via a double recombination event and was verified as previously described [18]. Strain ΔymdB was constructed by eliminating the kanamycin cassette (ymdB::kmR) from Keio-ΔymdB as described previously [28]. Verification of Keio-ΔymdB[28], ΔymdB (KSK002), Keio-ΔrpoS[28], or rnc14∙Keio-ΔrpoS (KSK005) was carried out by colony PCR using primer pairs ymdB-F/-R or rpoS-F/-R and Emerald PCR premix (Takara) (Additional file 1: Figure S1), and the PCR products were read by DNA sequencing analysis using the same primers (data not shown). Verification of RNase III mutation was confirmed by Western blot analysis using antibodies against RNase III (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Bacteria were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or on LB plates at 37°C throughout this study. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: kanamycin, 50 μg/mL; tetracycline, 10 μg/mL; and chloramphenicol, 30 μg/mL.

Microarray analysis

Total RNA was extracted from IPTG (0.1 mM final concentration)-induced E. coli BW25113 cells (at an OD600 of 1.0) containing either pCA24N (−gfp) or ASKA-ymdB (−) using an RNeasy® Kit (Qiagen) with two additional DNase treatments. The integrity of the bacterial total RNA was checked by an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. The cDNA probes were prepared by reverse transcription with random priming of total RNA (25 μg) in the presence of aminoallyl-dUTP for 3 h, followed by coupling of probes with Cy3 dye (for the reference) or Cy5 dye (for the test sample) (AP Biotech). The Cy3- or Cy5-labeled cDNA probes were purified, dried, and resuspended in hybridization buffer containing 30% formamide, 5× SSC, 0.1% SDS, and 0.1 mg/mL salmon sperm DNA. The cDNA probes were mixed together and hybridized to customized microarray slides (E. coli K12 3 × 15 K microarray; http://www.Mycroarray.com). The image of the slide was scanned with a GenePix 4000B (Axon Instruments, USA) and analyzed by GenePix Pro 3.0 software (Axon Instruments) to obtain the gene expression ratios (reference vs. test sample). Microarray data analysis was performed using Genowiz 4.0™ (Ocimum Biosolutions). Global lowess (Locally weighted scatter plot smoothing) method was used for data normalization. The cut-off values for up- or down-regulated genes in duplicate hybridizations were 1.5- or 0.6-fold, respectively.

RT-qPCR analysis

The E. coli strains listed in Additional file 1: Table S1 were grown in LB medium to an OD600 of 1.0, and the total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription and qPCR (RT-qPCR) analyses were performed using CFX96 (Bio-Rad) with IQ™ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad), as described previously [29] and gene specific primers designed by PrimerQuest (http://www.idtdna.com; Additional file 1: Table S2). Primer-dimer and self-complementary formations were checked by melting curve analysis (CFX manager v3.0; Bio-Rad). The 16S rRNA primers were used for normalization [29].

Crystal violet biofilm assay

The assay was adapted from Nakao et al.[30] with the following modifications: E. coli were grown in LB broth for 16 h at 37°C and diluted to 5 × 106 CFU/mL in fresh LB broth with or without IPTG. Aliquots (800 μL) dispensed into polystyrene tubes (Falcon 352058, BD Biosciences) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C without shaking. Each data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of ten independent cultures.

β-galactosidase activity assays

The β-galactosidase activity from whole cells of KSK003 (λrpoS’-‘lacZ), KSK004 [SG30013 (λRpoS750::LacZ)] [31], RS8872 (λpnp’-‘lacZ in rnc+) [32], or RS8942 (λpnp’-‘lacZ in rnc14) [32] overexpressing YmdB from ASKA-ymdB (−) was determined as described by Miller [33]. The results are expressed as the means of three independent experiments.

Protein gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis

Overexpression of the YmdB and RpoS proteins was detected on Coomassie blue-stained 12% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast gels (Bio-Rad). Western blots for RNase III, YmdB, RpoS, or 6x Histidine-tagged YmdB were prepared as described [18], probed with antibodies (1:2,500 dilution) against YmdB, RNase III [18], RpoS (1RS1: Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or 6x Histidine-tagged YmdB (6xHis Epitope Tag Antibody: Thermo Scientific) and developed with Clarity™ western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad). To normalize the signals, antibodies against S1 protein [34] was used as a reference probe (1:100,000 dilution). Anti-rabbit IgG:HRP or anti-mouse IgG:HRP conjugates (Promega; 1:5000 dilution) were used for YmdB/RNase III/S1 proteins or RpoS/6xHistidine tagged YmdB, respectively. Specific proteins were imaged using MyECL and quantified with myImage Analysis software (Thermo Scientific).

Results

Analysis of the E. coli transcriptome under conditions mimicking those of an RNase III mutant

To identify which pathways and related genes are mediated by YmdB-modulated RNase III inhibition, a genome-wide analysis of mRNA abundance at single gene resolution was performed. In these experiments, total steady-state RNA extracted from IPTG-induced exponentially grown cells expressing either ASKA-ymdB (a part of the ASKA (−) library: a complete set of cloned individual E. coli genes encoding proteins with 6x histidines at the N-terminal end and no GFP fusion at the C-terminal end [35]); or pCA24N (a control vector without GFP at the C-terminal end) [29] were analyzed on customized ORF microarray chips. Duplicate arrays were performed with biological replicates to minimize experimental artifacts, and the gene expression profiles of 4,289 genes were averaged and analyzed. YmdB overexpression modulated the relative abundance of more than 2,000 transcripts (data not shown). Of these, 129 genes were strongly regulated (changes in expression of either >1.5 or <0.6 fold) (Additional file 1: Table S3). YmdB was previously identified as an RNase III regulator [18]; thus, we examined the number of YmdB-modulated genes that were related to the down-regulation of RNase III activity to identify RNase III/YmdB-regulatory genes. The microarray data related to YmdB overexpression were compared with the tiling array data for an RNase III mutant [36], in which 592 genes were affected by the absence of RNase III. Of 127 coding genes from the tiling array data, 47 are known RNase III targets and, of these, 37 were similarly regulated by YmdB and the RNase III mutant (Additional file 1: Table S3). This suggests that YmdB modulates these genes by down-regulating RNase III activity. However, 80 genes that were not previously regarded as RNase III targets also appeared to be modulated via an as yet uncharacterized YmdB function(s). When the 80 genes were classified according to the biological process in which they are involved, we identified ten different cellular processes that were modulated by YmdB induction (Table 1). Therefore, the data indicate that YmdB, either as an RNase III regulator or by itself, participates in the regulation of multiple cellular processes within E. coli.

Table 1 Classification of up- or down-regulated 80 genes when YmdB was overexpressed
Full size table

Identification of new RNase III targets regulated by YmdB

Using the results shown in Additional file 1: Table S3, genes that showed the highest changes in expression (>2-fold change) were selected for quantification by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). These genes comprised confirmed (mltD, pnp, plsX, and ahpF) [14, 36] and unconfirmed (pspA, pspB, pspC, pspD, and ahpC) RNase III targets. For all known RNase III-target genes, increased expression was observed in the RNase III mutant (rnc14), which correlated with the YmdB overexpression data (Table 2). Moreover, gene expression decreased or remained at the same level in a ymdB knockout strain in which RNase III activity was upregulated, suggesting that YmdB-mediated inhibition of RNase III activity is not involved in the regulation of genes of previously known to be RNase III targets. The abundance of mRNAs for the unconfirmed RNase III target genes was measured in the RNase III mutant and then compared with the data regarding YmdB overexpression (Table 2). From five genes, the expression of the pspB, pspC, and ahpC genes was slightly increased upon both YmdB overexpression and RNase III knockout, further indicating that these genes might be new RNase III targets regulated by YmdB.

Table 2 Relative abundance of RNase III-dependent or -independent transcripts by different level of YmdB or RNase III
Full size table

Identification of YmdB as a protein that inhibits biofilm formation

The results obtained thus far suggest a role for YmdB in biofilm synthesis. Ten genes related to biofilm formation [37–40] were modulated by YmdB overexpression (Table 1); in particular, genes induced within the biofilm were strongly upregulated, including rpoE[41] and pspABCDE[41, 42]. Additionally, rpoS and bdm, both known targets of RNase III and related to either the down- or up-regulation of biofilm formation [19, 21, 36], were upregulated (by ~1.5- and 1.8-fold, respectively). To investigate this further, biofilm formation by BW25113 cells containing either pCA24N (−gfp) or ASKA-ymdB (−) was measured after 24 h of growth without agitation in LB containing different concentrations of IPTG (0 to 0.1 mM). Compared with cells harboring the control vector, increased expression of YmdB inhibited biofilm formation by up to 80% in the presence or absence of IPTG (Figure 1A). The effect was linearly correlated with IPTG concentration (10-6 to 10-1 mM), with no further reduction observed above 1 mM IPTG (data not shown). The physiological relevance of this inhibitory effect of YmdB is shown in Figure 1B. The total relative level of YmdB protein was assessed by Western Blotting [18] and was found to increase by 2.2- to 5.7-fold in the presence of increasing concentrations of IPTG (Figure 1B) (increased YmdB expression in the absence of IPTG results from the leaky lac promoter in the ASKA plasmids) [35]. The changes in YmdB levels are similar to those observed in vivo following growth- or cold-stress (2- to 8-fold) [18] and are thus physiologically relevant.

Figure 1
figure 1

YmdB inhibits biofilm formation. (A) Inhibition of biofilm formation by YmdB overexpression. E. coli cells containing either pCA24N (−gfp) or ASKA-ymdB (−) were grown at 37°C for 24 h in LB medium containing 0 to 10-1 mM IPTG. Biofilm formation was analyzed, and mean values calculated (n = 10, p = 0.05). (B) Western blot analysis of YmdB expression levels. Total cellular proteins from the cells described in (A) were reacted with antibodies against YmdB or S1. Changes in YmdB protein levels from ASKA-ymdB induced by IPTG were determined relative to the levels of chromosomally-encoded YmdB protein derived from pCA24N (-gfp) vector-containing cells (indicated below).

Full size image

RNase III does not affect biofilm inhibition by YmdB

The YmdB protein regulates RNase III activity through the formation through the proposed formation of an RNase III/YmdB heterocomplex [18]; hence, it was important to clarify whether the biofilm phenotype mediated by ectopic expression of YmdB is similar to that mediated by RNase III inhibition. Biofilm formation in the absence of RNase III (rnc14) increased by ~52% (Figure 2A), implying that inhibition of biofilm formation is independent of RNase III/YmdB heterocomplex, and that an alternative, hitherto uncharacterized, function of YmdB exists. To verify this possibility, we measured the inhibition of biofilm formation in the presence of YmdB overexpression (confirmed in Figure 2B) against an rnc + and rnc14 background. The results showed that inhibition was almost the same between the wild-type strain (~70%) and the strain lacking RNase III (~67%) (Figure 2A). By contrast, processing of pnp’-‘lacZ mRNA, a known target for YmdB-mediated inhibition of RNase III activity [18], is fully dependent on RNase III (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Taken together, these results indicate that YmdB overexpression inhibits biofilm formation via an RNase III-independent pathway.

Figure 2
figure 2

YmdB inhibits biofilm formation in an RNase III-independent manner. (A) Effect of the presence or absence of RNase III on YmdB-mediated inhibition of biofilm formation. Biofilm formation by BW25113 (rnc+) or KSK001 (rnc14) cells with or without plasmid [pCA24N (−gfp) or ASKA-ymdB (−)] was measured using cells grown at 37°C for 24 h in LB medium containing IPTG (0.1 mM final) Mean values (n = 10, p = 0.05) are shown. “Relative biofilm formation” for KSK001 and ASKA-ymdB (in BW25113 or KSK001) was determined relative to the biofilm formation by each control set (BW25113 or pCA24N; set to 1.0). (B) Expression levels of YmdB. The expression of YmdB (His-YmdB) in total cell lysates (from A) was detected by immunoblotting with 6xHis Epitope Tag antibody as described in Methods. S1 protein level was used as loading control.

Full size image

RpoS is required for the inhibition of biofilm formation by YmdB

While it was clear that YmdB induction decreased biofilm formation (Figure 1), biofilm formation also decreased by ~ 35% in the absence of ymdB (ΔymdB) gene in the chromosome (Figure 3A). This could indicate that YmdB is involved in, but not essential for, the inhibition of biofilm formation in E. coli, or that increased levels of YmdB affect biofilm formation by modulating associated cellular proteins and their pathways. To test this hypothesis, we sought to identify candidate genes whose mRNA levels were increased by YmdB (Table 1) and which have a known effect on the biofilm phenotype. One strong candidate is RpoS, a stress-responsive sigma factor [21], which when overexpressed led to a reduction in biofilm formation (Figures 3B,C; [25]). To determine whether YmdB-mediated inhibition of biofilm formation is dependent on the presence or absence of rpoS, we measured biofilm formation in an rpoS knockout strain (Keio-ΔrpoS). Biofilm formation was activated in the rpoS knockout (Figures 3A,C). Subsequent introduction of a plasmid overexpressing YmdB only decreased biofilm inhibition by 12% in the rpoS knockout (Figure 3B) whereas it resulted in 70% inhibition in wild-type cells (Figure 2A); thus, the inhibition of biofilm formation by YmdB is RpoS-dependent.

Figure 3
figure 3

Interdependency on YmdB and RpoS for biofilm formation. (A) Effect of knocking out ymdB or rpoS on biofilm formation. Biofilm formation was measured in wild-type (ymdB + or rpoS+), KSK002 (∆ymdB) and rpoS mutant (Keio-∆rpoS) cells. (B) Dependency of RpoS and YmdB phenotype on biofilm formation. The effect of ectopic expression of RpoS or YmdB in the absence of ymdB or rpoS, respectively, on biofilm formation was determined. (C) Expression of RpoS and YmdB. Protein expression was detected by immunoblotting using antibodies against RpoS and 6xHistidine tagged YmdB (His-YmdB) as described in Methods. S1 protein level was used as a loading control. All biofilm formation data were obtained as described in Methods. Data represent the mean values from ten independent experiments.

Full size image

Both YmdB and RpoS interdependently regulate gene expression and activity on biofilm formation

Since YmdB is transcriptionally activated by RpoS [18] and the level of rpoS transcripts was increased by YmdB overexpression, it is possible that YmdB modulates RpoS expression. YmdB could affect this change in rpoS transcript levels by either acting as an as yet unknown transcription factor or by acting as an effector protein for the factor(s) involved in rpoS transcription. We found that YmdB overexpression had no effect on rpoS promoter activity (data not shown), thereby excluding any role as a transcription factor. A linear relationship between rpoS transcript levels and RpoS protein levels was then investigated following YmdB induction, and similar increases (~2.5-fold) in the induced β-galactosidase activity of the rpoS’-‘lacZ protein fusion and the RpoS protein level were observed (Figures 4A,B). Moreover, the steady-state level of rpoS transcript (Figure 4C) was oppositely regulated in the absence of chromosomal ymdB. Additionally, the level of rpoS transcript following YmdB overexpression was lower than that in the RNase III mutant strain. These data suggest that YmdB-mediated regulation of RNase III activity alone cannot fully regulate the processing of the 5′ UTR of rpoS mRNA. Because RpoS can negatively regulate biofilm formation by itself (Figure 3B) and is also required for complete YmdB function (Figure 3B), it is a matter of debate whether YmdB can modulate RpoS activity. When the RpoS protein was overexpressed in a wild-type and in an ymdB knockout strain, RpoS-mediated inhibition of biofilm formation was decreased from 70% to 43% (Figure 3B). This, when taken together with the other data, suggests that the regulation of RpoS function during biofilm formation is dependent upon YmdB. Moreover, RpoS overexpression phenotype on biofilm inhibition was not dependent upon the presence of RNase III activity (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Thus, YmdB is a novel post-transcriptional regulator of RpoS levels that acts independently of RNase III.

Figure 4
figure 4

Regulation of RpoS levels and activity by YmdB. (A) Effect of YmdB on in vivo expression levels of RpoS. KS004 [SG30013 (λRpoS750::LacZ] [31] strains containing either pCA24N (−gfp) or ASKA-ymdB (−) were grown to OD600 = 0.2, induced by IPTG (0.1 mM final), and further grown to OD600 = 1.0. Aliquots were then assayed for β-galactosidase activity. Data represent the mean values from n = 3 experiments (p = 0.05). (B) Expression level of RpoS. Total lysates prepared from the cell described in (A) and from Keio-∆rpoS cells were immunoblotted antibodies against RpoS and S1. The Keio-∆rpoS strain is included to show the specificity of the antibody. The relative levels of RpoS normalized against S1 protein are shown. ND, not determined. (C) Determination of steady-state levels of rpoS transcript induced by YmdB. cDNA synthesized from total RNA obtained from BW25113, KSK002 (∆ymdB), KSK001 (rnc14) or BW25113 cells containing either pCA24N (−gfp) or ASKA-ymdB (−) were qPCR amplified using the rpoS- or 16S RNA-specific primer sets listed in Additional file 1: Table S2 and then compared. Data represent the mean values from triplicate experiments.

Full size image

Discussion

The results presented herein demonstrate that YmdB is a major regulator of RNase III activity in E. coli, modulating more than 30% of the genes targeted by RNase III. In addition, the results of a microarray analysis following YmdB overexpression (which identified changes in biofilm-related genes and a decrease in biofilm formation) indicate a novel role for YmdB as a modulator of biofilm formation. Previous results indicated that overexpression of RpoS was associated with decreased biofilm formation [25]. Our microarray, qPCR, and Western blotting data showed that overexpression of YmdB increased the levels of RpoS (Additional file 1: Tables S3, Figures 2, 3 and 4). Moreover, YmdB modulated RpoS levels and activity of biofilm formation (Figures 3, 4). Thus, we propose a model to illustrate the multiple roles played by YmdB during gene expression and biofilm formation (Figure 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

A schematic model of biofilm formation and gene expression involving YmdB, RpoS, and RNase III . Two different pathways for biofilm formation are proposed: an RNase III-dependent pathway in which other uncharacterized factor(s) inhibit RNase III activity, thereby upregulating biofilm formation, and an RNase III-independent pathway in which both YmdB and RpoS interdependently regulate the inhibition of biofilm formation. In terms of gene expression, the level of RpoS is post-transcriptionally regulated by YmdB either directly or indirectly via the inhibition of RNase III activity [18, 20], while the level of YmdB is regulated transcriptionally by the RpoS protein [18].

Full size image

The 5′ UTR of rpoS mRNA is a known target of RNase III and its levels increase when RNase III activity is ablated [21]. Because biofilm formation is influenced by RpoS levels, it may be proposed that the rpoS mRNA is responsive to YmdB-directed RNase III inhibition. However, this is not the case because the decrease in biofilm formation following YmdB expression was not reversed in the absence of RNase III (Figure 2), suggesting that regulation of RNase III activity by YmdB is not essential for the inhibition of biofilm formation. Thus, the major mechanism underlying biofilm regulation by YmdB appears to be RNase III-independent (Figure 5).

A screen of potential regulatory gene(s) with a YmdB-mediated phenotype demonstrated that RpoS is necessary for inhibiting biofilm formation (Figure 3); RpoS activates the transcription of ymdB[18]; thus, it is highly plausible that the RpoS gene is an upstream regulator of YmdB transcription and the resultant phenotypes. Conversely, the possibility that YmdB is a transcription factor that activates rpoS transcription was initially suggested by observations that RpoS levels were increased by YmdB overexpression, and that YmdB and RpoS are both required for the decrease in biofilm formation. However, this theory was rejected because increases in YmdB expression had no effect on promoter activity (data not shown). Hence, YmdB-induced modulation of RpoS levels must occur via post-transcriptional regulation (Figure 4). It is also possible that YmdB modulates other rpoS transcription factor(s), although we have not identified which other transcription factors are required for this response. Overall, the data suggest that YmdB and RpoS are co-regulators of biofilm formation (Figure 5).

The identification of a novel role for YmdB is not altogether surprising, since eukaryotic macrodomain proteins can have multiple roles [43, 44], and YmdB has additional functions in bacteria [45, 46]. For instance, in E. coli YmdB deacetylates the sirtuin product of O-acetyl-ADP-ribose and reforms ADP ribose [45]. The present study reveals that YmdB modulates the expression of genes involved in physiologically important pathways (Table 1); hence, YmdB could act as a general regulator in a variety of cellular processes. Further examination of such a potential role for YmdB and its family members in bacteria is necessary. YmdB is also required to be coexpressed for the complementation of a function of ClsC, a recently identified cardiolipin synthase in E. coli[45]. ClsC utilizes phosphatidylethanolamines (PE) as the phosphatidyl donor to phosphatidylglycine (PG) to form cardiolipin (CL) [46]. While YmdB is apparently not a direct modulator of that pathway (since changes in clsC (ymdC) gene expression in the microarrays were negligible (a 1.1-fold increase only); (data not shown), it may modulate it indirectly via the action of the fatty acid biosynthesis gene, fabD (Table 1), on the CL synthesis-regulating gene; however, such a role has not been confirmed.

The ectopic expression of YmdB almost completely regulates RNase III activity with respect to several targets, including pnp, rnc and ribosomal RNA processing (Additional file 1: Figure S2) [6]; however, biofilm formation is not solely dependent upon YmdB-directed RNase III regulation, suggesting that gene expression data will be useful for identifying unknown RNase III-independently regulated YmdB functions.

Several trans-acting factors that modulate the RNase activity of both exo- and endo-RNases have been identified in E. coli[15–18, 47, 48]. Among these four trans-acting regulatory proteins for endo-RNase activity have been well characterized in E. coli: RraA [15] and RraB [16] for RNase E, and bacteriophage T7 protein kinase [17] and YmdB [18] for RNase III. The presence of homologs in other species suggests such regulation of endo-RNase activity is generally required for bacterial physiology. Recently, gene expression profiling revealed a role for RraA in regulating the SOS response, a mechanism which responds to the stress caused by DNA damage [15, 49]. RNase III modulates approximately 12% (592 genes) of the E. coli genome [35]; using YmdB-mediated down-regulation of RNase III rather than an RNase III mutant retains the ability to measure the effect of trans-acting factor(s) and hence the correct physiological modulation of RNase III. Because YmdB regulates the turnover of approximately 30% of the target genes of RNase III (Additional file 1: Table S3) and the rpoS level is not completely regulated by YmdB (Figure 4), either other regulator(s) that result RNase III mutant-like conditions must be present or YmdB partially regulates the physiology of the RNase III-mutant to induce the up-regulation of an RNase III activator that has yet to be identified.

Conclusions

The data presented herein show that YmdB functions both to regulate RNase III activity and to modulate bacterial biofilm formation; therefore, YmdB seems to be a multifunctional bacterial macrodomain protein, similar to that in eukaryotic cells. Furthermore, this protein will make it possible to design a more intelligent synthetic scaffold for producing bacterial cells that modulate difficult-to-treat pathogens that depend upon biofilm production.

Availability of supporting data

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and in Additional file 1.

References

  1. Robertson HD, Webster RE, Zinder ND: Purification and properties of ribonuclease III from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1968, 243: 82-91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Court D: RNA processing and degradation by RNase III. Control of Messenger RNA Stability. Edited by: Belasco JG, Brawerman G. 1993, New York: Academic Press, 71-116. 1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholson AW: Structure, reactivity, and biology of double-stranded RNA. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1996, 52: 1-65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholson AW: Function, mechanism and regulation of bacterial ribonucleases. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1999, 23: 371-390. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00405.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Drieder D, Condon C: The continuing story of endoribonuclease III. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004, 8: 195-200. 10.1159/000086700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MacRae IJ, Doudna JA: Ribonuclease revisited: structural insights into ribonuclease III family enzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007, 17: 138-145. 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholson AW: Ribonuclease III and the role of double-stranded RNA processing in bacterial systems. Ribonucleases. Edited by: Nicholson AW. 2011, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 269-297. [Bujnicki JM (Series Editor): Nucleic Acids and Molecular Biology]

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn JJ: Ribonuclease III. The Enzymes. Edited by: Boyer P. 1982, New York: Academic Press, 485-499.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Régnier P, Grunberg-Manago M: Cleavage by RNase III in the transcripts of the metY–nusA–infB operon of Escherichia coli releases the tRNA and initiates the decay of the downstream mRNA. J Mol Biol. 1989, 210: 293-302. 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90331-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Murchison EP, Hannon GJ: miRNAs on the move: miRNA biogenesis and the RNAi machinery. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004, 16: 223-229. 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Viegas SC, Silva IJ, Saramago M, Domingues S, Arraiano CM: Regulation of the small regulatory RNA MicA by ribonuclease III: a target-dependent pathway. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: 2918-2930. 10.1093/nar/gkq1239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsunaga J, Dyer M, Simons EL, Simons RW: Expression and regulation of the rnc and pdxJ operons of E. coli. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 22: 977-989. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.01529.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsunaga J, Simons EL, Simons RW: RNase III autoregulation: Structure and function of rncO, the posttranscriptional ‘operator. RNA. 1996, 2: 1228-1240.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Régnier P, Portier C: Initiation, attenuation and RNase III processing of transcripts from the Escherichia coli operon encoding ribosomal protein S15 and polynucleotide phosphorylase. J Mol Biol. 1986, 187: 23-32. 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90403-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee K, et al: RraA, a protein inhibitor of RNase E activity that globally modulates RNA abundance in E. coli. Cell. 2003, 114: 623-634. 10.1016/j.cell.2003.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao J, et al: Differential modulation of E. coli mRNA abundancy by inhibitory proteins that alter the composition of the degradosome. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 61: 394-406. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05246.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayer JE, Schweiger M: RNase III is positively regulated by T7 protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1983, 258: 5340-5343.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim KS, Manasherob R, Cohen SN: YmdB: a stress-responsive ribonuclease-binding regulator of E. coli RNase III activity. Genes Dev. 2008, 22: 3497-3508. 10.1101/gad.1729508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sim SH, et al: Escherichia coli ribonuclease III activity is downregulated by osmotic stress: consequences for the degradation of bdm mRNA in biofilm formation. Mol Microbiol. 2010, 75: 413-425. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06986.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Resch A, et al: Translational activation by the noncoding RNA DsrA involves alternative RNase III processing in the rpoS 5′-leader. RNA. 2008, 14: 454-459. 10.1261/rna.603108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Battesti A, Majdalani N, Gottesman S: The RpoS-mediated general stress response in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011, 65: 189-213. 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102946.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. López D, Vlamakis H, Kolter R: Biofilms. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010, 2: a000398-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Corona-Izquierdo FP, Membrillo-Hernandez J: A mutation in rpoS enhances biofilm formation in Escherichia coli during exponential phase of growth. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002, 211: 105-110. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11210.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheldon JR, Yim MS, Saliba JH, Chung WH, Wong KY, Leung KT: Role of rpoS in Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain H32 biofilm development and survival. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012, 78: 8331-8339. 10.1128/AEM.02149-12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferrières L, Thompson A, Clarke DJ: Elevated levels of σS inhibit biofilm formation in Escherichia coli: a role for the Rcs phosphorelay. Microbiology. 2009, 155: 3544-3553. 10.1099/mic.0.032722-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Podkovyrov SM, Larson TJ: A new vector-host system for construction of lacZ transcriptional fusions where only low-level gene expression is desirable. Gene. 1995, 156: 151-152. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00053-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Simons RW, Houman F, Kleckner N: Improved single and multicopy lac-based cloning vectors for protein and operon fusions. Gene. 1987, 53: 85-96. 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90095-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baba T, et al: Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006, 2: 2006.0008-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim KS, et al: A novel fluorescent reporter system for monitoring and identifying RNase III activity and its target RNAs. RNA Biol. 2011, 9: 1167-1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakao R, Senpuku H, Watanabe H: Porphyromonas gingivalis gale is involved in lipopolysaccharide O-antigen synthesis and biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2006, 74: 6145-6153. 10.1128/IAI.00261-06.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sledjeski DD, Gupta A, Gottesman S: The small RNA, DsrA, is essential for the low temperature expression of RpoS during exponential growth in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 3993-4000.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Beran RK, Simons RW: Cold-temperature induction of Escherichia coli polynucleotide phosphorylase occurs by reversal of its autoregulation. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 39: 112-125. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02216.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller JH: A short course in bacterial genetics: A laboratory manual and handbook for Escherichia coli and related bacteria. 1992, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

    Google Scholar 

  34. Feng Y, Huang H, Liao J, Cohen SN: Escherichia coli poly(A)-binding proteins that interact with components of degradosomes or impede RNA decay mediated by polynucleotide phosphorylase and RNase E. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 31651-31656. 10.1074/jbc.M102855200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kitagawa M, et al: Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (A Complete Set of E. coli K-12 ORF Archive): Unique Resources for Biological Research. DNA Res. 2006, 12: 291-299. 10.1093/dnares/dsi012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stead MB, et al: Analysis of Escherichia coli RNase E and RNase III activity in vivo using tilling microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: 3188-3203. 10.1093/nar/gkq1242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Uhlich GA, Chen CY, Cottrell BJ, Irwin PL, Philips JG: Peroxide resistance in Escherichia coli serotype O157: H7 biofilms is regulated by both RpoS-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Microbiology. 2009, 158: 2225-2234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yamaguchi Y, Park JH, Inouye M: MqsR, a crucial regulator for quorum sensing and biofilm formation, is a GCU-specific mRNA interferase in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 28746-28753. 10.1074/jbc.M109.032904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang X, Ma Q, Wood TK: The R1 conjugative plasmid increases Escherichia coli biofilm formation through an envelope stress response. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 2690-2699. 10.1128/AEM.02809-07.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Thomason MK, Fontaine F, de Lay N, Storz G: A small RNA that regulates motility and biofilm formation in response to changes in nutrient availability in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2012, 84: 17-35. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.07965.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Beloin C, et al: Global impact of mature biofilm lifestyle on Escherichia coli K-12 gene expression. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 51: 659-674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Darwin AJ: The phage-shock-protein response. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 57: 621-628. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04694.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kalisch T, Amé J, Dantzer F, Schreiber V: New readers and interpretations of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012, 37: 381-390. 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Saikatendu KS, et al: Structural basis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus ADP-Ribose-1″-Phosphate dephosphorylation by a conserved domain of nsP3. Structure. 2005, 13: 1665-1675. 10.1016/j.str.2005.07.022.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen D, et al: Identification of macrodomain proteins as novel O-acetyl-ADP-ribose deacetylases. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286: 13261-13271. 10.1074/jbc.M110.206771.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Tan BK, et al: Discovery of a cardiolipin synthase utilizing phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylglycerol as substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012, 109: 16504-16509. 10.1073/pnas.1212797109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Cairrão F, Chora A, Zihão R, Carpousis AJ, Arraiano CM: RNase II levels change according to the growth conditions: characterization of gmr, a new Escherichia coli gene involved in the modulation of RNase II. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 39: 1550-1561. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02342.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Liang W, Deutscher MP: Post-translational modification of RNase R is regulated by stress-dependent reduction in the acetylating enzyme Pka (YfiQ). RNA. 2012, 18: 37-41. 10.1261/rna.030213.111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Manasherob R, Miller C, Kim KS, Cohen SN: Ribonuclease E modulation of the bacterial SOS response. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e38426-10.1371/journal.pone.0038426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Susan Gottesman for distributing RpoS fusion strain (SG30013). This work is supported by the Basic Science Research program through the NRF Korea (2010–0023011) to K.S.K. and the KRIBB initiative program.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Superbacteria Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), 125 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea

      Taeyeon Kim, Juyeon Lee & Kwang-sun Kim

    2. Department of Molecular Biology, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, 561-756, Korea

      Juyeon Lee

    3. Department of Biosystems and Bioengineering, University of Science and Technology, 217 Gajung-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-350, Korea

      Kwang-sun Kim

    Authors
    1. Taeyeon Kim
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Juyeon Lee
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Kwang-sun Kim
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Kwang-sun Kim.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

    Authors’ contributions

    TYK, JYL, and KSK conceived of and designed all the experiments in the paper, executed experiments, collected, and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Taeyeon Kim, Juyeon Lee contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    12866_2013_2131_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

    Additional file 1: Table S1: Strains and plasmids used in this study. Table S2. List of primers used in this study. Table S3. Differential gene expression profiles of E. coli 129 genes. Figure S1. Verification of rpoS, ymdB, and rnc mutants. PCR validation of (A) Keio-∆rpoS or (B) Keio-∆ymdB and ∆ymdB. (C) Schematic representations of PCR regions. (D) Western-blot analysis verifying RNase III mutation. Figure S2. Dependency of YmdB-mediated down-regulation of RNase III activity upon the presence of RNase III. Figure S3. Interdependency of RpoS and RNase III for biofilm formation. Figure S4. Dependency of YmdB-mediated phenotype upon the absence of RpoS and RNase III. (A) Effect of biofilm formation by double mutation of RpoS and RNase III. (B) Effect of YmdB-mediated inhibition of biofilm formation in double mutation of RNase III and RpoS. (PDF 405 KB)

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Kim, T., Lee, J. & Kim, Ks. Escherichia coliYmdB regulates biofilm formation independently of its role as an RNase III modulator. BMC Microbiol 13, 266 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-266

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-266

    Keywords

    BMC Microbiology

    ISSN: 1471-2180

    Contact us