Skip to main content
Download PDF

Quantification of bacterial species of the vaginal microbiome in different groups of women, using nucleic acid amplification tests

BMC Microbiology volume 12, Article number: 83 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The vaginal microbiome plays an important role in urogenital health. Quantitative real time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) assays for the most prevalent vaginal Lactobacillus species and bacterial vaginosis species G. vaginalis and A. vaginae exist, but qPCR information regarding variation over time is still very limited. We set up qPCR assays for a selection of seven species and defined the temporal variation over three menstrual cycles in a healthy Caucasian population with a normal Nugent score. We also explored differences in qPCR data between these healthy women and an ‘at risk’ clinic population of Caucasian, African and Asian women with and without bacterial vaginosis (BV), as defined by the Nugent score.

Results

Temporal stability of the Lactobacillus species counts was high with L. crispatus counts of 108 copies/mL and L. vaginalis counts of 106 copies/mL. We identified 2 types of ‘normal flora’ and one ‘BV type flora’ with latent class analysis on the combined data of all women. The first group was particularly common in women with a normal Nugent score and was characterized by a high frequency of L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii, and L. vaginalis and a correspondingly low frequency of L. gasseri and A. vaginae. The second group was characterized by the predominance of L. gasseri and L. vaginalis and was found most commonly in healthy Caucasian women. The third group was commonest in women with a high Nugent score but was also seen in a subset of African and Asian women with a low Nugent score and was characterized by the absence of Lactobacillus species (except for L. iners) but the presence of G. vaginalis and A. vaginae.

Conclusions

We have shown that the quantification of specific bacteria by qPCR contributes to a better description of the non-BV vaginal microbiome, but we also demonstrated that differences in populations such as risk and ethnicity also have to be taken into account. We believe that our selection of indicator organisms represents a feasible strategy for the assessment of the vaginal microbiome and could be useful for monitoring the microbiome in safety trials of vaginal products.

Background

The resident Lactobacillus species are the dominant constituents of the healthy vaginal microbiome and play an important role in the defense against sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV [1–3]. Lactobacilli comprise part of the larger innate and adaptive mucosal immune system of the female lower genital tract [4]. The protective mechanisms are still undefined but in addition to the production of lactic acid and the creation of a hostile acid environment, Lactobacillus species producing H2O2 have been shown to inhibit the growth of various micro-organisms, including HIV in vitro [5, 6]. Bacterial vaginosis (BV), defined as the colonization of the vagina by several types of anaerobes, including Gardnerella vaginalis, together with a reduction in Lactobacillus species, has been associated with increased susceptibility to STI and HIV acquisition in both epidemiological studies and in vitro assays [3, 6, 7].

The findings that alterations in the vaginal microbiome can be associated with negative health outcomes underscores the need for monitoring the composition of the microbiome during trials of vaginal products. The Nugent score is a quick and cheap microscopic tool to assess the presence of Lactobacillus species, G. vaginalis Bacteroides spp. and curved Gram-negative bacilli [8]. Currently this method is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of BV and has been very useful in research but it does not provide reliable identification and quantification of the bacteria at the species level. Molecular techniques based on the amplification of the 16 S ribosomal RNA and 16 S-23 S ribosomal RNA genes from resident bacteria have made it possible to detect and quantify both cultivable and cultivation resistant organisms at the species level [9–11]. Using quantitative real time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) assays with primers targeting species specific 16 S ribosomal DNA regions, it has been confirmed that a healthy microbiome is dominated by several Lactobacillus species [12–15]. Recent pyrosequencing studies suggest that there are a variety of ‘healthy’ microbiomes in the human vagina [14, 16]. Ravel et al. proposed five microbiome groups (I to V) in asymptomatic women in the US, distinguishable both by the dominance of Lactobacillus species and by the presence of a particular Lactobacillus species [14]. Communities in group I are dominated by L. crispatus, whereas communities in group II, III, and V are dominated by L. gasseri L. iners, and L. jensenii, respectively. Communities in group IV are the most diverse and have a higher proportion of strictly anaerobic bacteria in combination with Lactobacillus species. Although all five bacterial communities were found in these asymptomatic women, higher Nugent scores were mostly associated with those in group IV.

We set up qPCR assays for the monitoring of the vaginal microbiome during clinical trials of vaginal products based on the following indicator organisms: Lactobacillus genus, L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii, L. gasseri L. vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae. Our aim was to define baseline qPCR values for these bacterial species in a typical healthy population of women not using hormonal contraception and without BV, as defined by the Nugent score, and to describe any temporal variations over 3 menstrual cycles [8, 17]. Published data on how quickly the composition of vaginal flora changes are scarce and therefore interpretation of ‘normal’ versus ‘pathological’ in the context of a phase I clinical trial is difficult [18–20]. We also wanted to compare the baseline values in the “healthy population” with available data obtained from a population of women deemed to be “at risk” of STI and HIV on the basis of their attendance at a local low threshold STI and voluntary HIV testing and counseling clinic

Methods

Clinical set up

We followed our usual strategy for the recruitment of a classical ‘healthy population’ for phase I microbicide trials [21]. Thirty women were enrolled and followed approximately nine weeks. They were aged between 18 and 35 years, were not using hormonal contraception, did not have vaginal infections at screening, and had a regular menstrual cycle. Any kind of sexual activity was permitted and condoms were provided. After screening, the women received appointments for five follow up visits that were planned on day 7 and 21 of the two next cycles and on day 7 of the third cycle. At each visit the women completed a written questionnaire about their sexual activity during the previous 72 hours.

The second group of women had been recruited six months earlier at a local STI clinic and HIV testing and counseling centre. Women attending the clinic were asked to participate in a study analysing the vaginal microbiome before and after BV treatment. A total of 41 women were enrolled and vaginal samples were taken and tested for STIs and BV on two occasions: at baseline and approximately two weeks later. BV was defined on the basis of a Nugent score of 7 or more and women with BV were treated with a single dose of 2 gram oral metronidazole.

A clinician collected two high vaginal specimens from each woman during every visit, with flocked synthetic swabs (COPAN innovation, Italy). A third vaginal specimen was collected from the healthy women for Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing. The swabs were stored at 2-8 °C and then transported within 12 hours to the laboratory, where they were stored dry at minus 20 °C until testing.

Laboratory methods

DNA extraction

After thawing the swabs at room temperature for 30 minutes, 1200 μL diluted PBS [pH 7.4] (1:9, PBS:saline) was added to the swabs and gently vortexed for at least 15 seconds. The eluates of both swabs were pooled and a final volume of 2000 μL of specimen eluate was obtained. After finalising the samples from the women attending the STI clinic, we learned that DNA yield of Gram positive microorganisms could be improved by adding a lysis step prior to the extraction. This strategy was then applied to the samples of the healthy women and as a result DNA extraction methods differed between the two groups of women. An aliquot of 250 μL eluate of the specimens collected from the healthy population was processed using the easyMag (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) after an initial lysing step with mutanolysin (Sigma Aldrich, Bornem, Belgium) and proteinase K (PK)(Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands). Briefly, the aliquot was centrifuged for 10 min at 12500 rpm, and 250 μL mutanolysin/PK buffer was added to the pellet. After vortexing 2.5 μL mutanolysin (25U/μL) was added and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. Thereafter, a volume of 12.5 μL PK (25 mg/mL) was added and incubated for 15 min at 55 °C including vortexing every 5 minutes. Finally, 1750 μL of Nuclisens Easymag buffer was added prior to the extraction, following the manufacturer’s instructions. For the specimens collected from the clinic population, an aliquot of 500 μL was processed according to the Boom extraction using the miniMAG system (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantitative PCR

Quantitative PCR for total Lactobacillus species, L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii, L. gasseri, L. vaginalis, G. vaginalis, and A. vaginae were performed with the primers as described in Table 1. The primers were synthesized by Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium. The 25 μL PCR mixture contained QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands) with the exception of the PCR mixture for L. vaginalis which contained Thermo Scientific Absolute SYBR Green Mix (ABgene, Epsom, UK), 5 μL DNA extract, primers, and Milli-Q water. The amplification reactions were performed using the Corbett Life Science Rotor-Gene™ 6000 (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands) and the amplification programs as described in Table 1. Each sample was run in duplicate. For each of the organisms standard curves were constructed and included in each run. A total of 6 standards were prepared by a tenfold dilution and within a range of 102 copies/5 μL to 107 copies/5 μL. Reference strains (L. crispatus (LMG 9479T), L. jensenii (LMG 6414T), L.iners (LMG 18914 T), L. gasseri (LMG 9203T), L. vaginalis (LMGT 12891), G. vaginalis (LMG 7832 T), A. vaginae (CCUG 38953)) were cultured on Columbia agar (Beckton Dickinson, Le pont de Claix, France) supplemented with 5% Defibrinated Horse Blood (E&O laboratories Ltd, Burnhouse, Bonnybridge, Scotland) and incubated in an anaerobic atmosphere (Anaerocult A, Merck Chemicals, Darmstadt, Germany) for 24 hours at 35°C. A suspension was made in 400 μL molecular biology water and DNA was extracted as described above. The DNA concentration was determined by using the Nanodrop ND-1000 (Nanodrop Technnologies, Wilmington, USA). The number of cells in each dilution was calculated taking into account the genome size of the bacterial species. The quantitative result obtained with the qPCR was expressed in number of copies/5 μL and was back calculated taking into account the total specimen elute volume, the volume extracted, the DNA extract volume obtained, and volume of DNA amplified.

Table 1 Primers for Quantitative PCR
Full size table

Prostate specific antigen

The PSA testing was performed using the Seratec® PSA semiquant assay (Seratec Diagnostica, Göttingen, Germany). A volume of 500 μL of PSA buffer was added to the thawed swab and was shaken for 2 hours. After centrifugation of 300 μL for 1 min at 13000 g, 200 μL of supernatant was used for testing, following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Data analysis

Baseline characteristics were described using means (ranges) and proportions. We analyzed changes in the profile of the Lactobacillus species in the healthy population by defining groups of women based on the consistent presence (present in samples in at least 4 out of 5 visits) or absence of each Lactobacillus species. We looked for any predictors of “consistently having a particular species” using logistic regression and predictors of the Lactobacillus counts in these women using linear mixed effects models. We compared the presence of individual microbiome species at the baseline visit between ‘healthy population (HP)’ women and ‘clinic population (CP)’ using logistic regression models. We then compared the counts between CP women with (CPBVpos) and without (CPBVneg) bacterial vaginosis using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. No comparisons in counts between HP and CP species were performed due to the differences in nucleic acid extraction techniques. Using the presence or absence of each of the microbiome species, we divided the study population (CP and HP combined) in groups with Latent Class Analysis, a statistical technique related to cluster analysis, and assessed the distribution of the different groups in the women by BV status and ethnic origin [22]. We assessed the relationship between Nugent scores and the presence of each of the microbiome species in the CP population using scatter plots, and we added a trend-line and a Spearman correlation coefficient R.

Ethical approval

IRB approval was obtained from the Institute of Tropical Medicine and from the Ethics Committee at the University Hospital of Antwerp. All study participants gave their written informed consent.

Results

Study populations

Baseline characteristics of the two study populations are presented in Table 2. All women recruited into the HP group were Caucasian. They were all asymptomatic at baseline and no diagnosis of BV was made in this group, neither at baseline nor during any of the follow up visits. Five of the 30 HP women (12.5%) had a sexual preference for the same gender and four of them were currently sexually active. Of the remaining 25 heterosexual women, 17 (68%) were currently sexually active. Follow up of the HP women was high, with 28 out of 30 women completing all visits. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was detected on 12 occasions in 7 women. Of the women recruited at the clinic (CP), 49% were Caucasian, 32% were of black African origin and living in Belgium, 12% of Asian origin, and for 7%, ethnicity was not recorded. 50% percent of the women at the clinic presented with a complaint of vaginal discharge at baseline and 29% had BV as assessed by Nugent score. The presence of self-reported smelly discharge was significantly associated with BV (p = 0.001) but no association was seen between BV and ethnicity.

Table 2 Baseline Characteristics of Study Populations
Full size table

Changes over time in species presence and species counts in the healthy women

In general, the presence or absence of a particular Lactobacillus species in the HP remained constant throughout the study visits (Figure 1). L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri were present at least once in 90%, 77%, 73%, and 70% of women, respectively. G. vaginalis was present at least at one visit in 47% of women and A. vaginae in 20% of women. L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri were consistently present (minimum 4 out of 5 visits) in 60%, 67%, 63%, and 67% of women. We categorised the latter group of women, “women with consistent Lactos”. We explored sexual preference; current sexual activity; presence of PSA; time in the menstrual cycle; and age as predictors for being a “women with consistent Lactos”. None of these factors were found to be associated with the consistent presence of lactobacilli. G. vaginalis was consistently present in 23% of women and A. vaginae in 7% of women. Risk factor analysis was not performed due to low numbers. Longitudinal analysis of the “women with consistent Lactos” showed that L. crispatus counts were 0.22 log higher (p < 0.001) and L. iners counts were 0.83 log lower (p < 0.001) in the post-ovulatory phase of the cycle. Furthermore, L. crispatus counts were decreased by 0.42 log after intercourse (PSA present) (p = 0.002), while those of L. iners (+0.73 log, p = 0.033) and of L. gasseri (+0.59 log, p = 0.058) were increased.

Figure 1
figure 1

Presence of species by day in the menstrual cycle. cps/mL: copies/mL.

Full size image

Two women developed intermediate Nugent scores at visit 4 (6 and 4), while their scores at the other visits were 0. The bacterial cell counts by visit for these two women are shown in Figure 2. In both of these women, the increase in Nugent score coincided with an increase in L. iners counts. In the first woman, in whom G. vaginalis was present throughout the study, A. vaginae appeared on the same day as the raised Nugent score. This woman complained of a vaginal itch and dysuria, had a white watery discharge on examination, and a raised pH of 6.1. In the second woman, G. vaginalis appeared together with the elevated Nugent score, while A. vaginae remained absent. This woman had a positive PSA test and also had a new sexual partner since the previous visit.

Figure 2
figure 2

Presence of species by day in the menstrual cycle for two women developing an elevated Nugent score. cps/mL: copies/mL.

Full size image

The vaginal microbiome of the healthy women and the women at risk of STIs

The Lactobacillusspecies were present at baseline in all women. The frequencies of the presence of individual microbiome species are summarized in Table 3, which also presents a pairwise comparison between the HP, the CP without BV (CPBVneg), and the CP with BV (CPBVpos). L. crispatus and L. vaginalis were significantly more present in HP women and CPBVneg women compared to the CPBVpos women. L. gasseri was more often present in HP women compared to the CPBVneg women (p = 0.004), but the differences within the CP were not significant. L. iners was less frequently present in the HP compared to the other 2 groups but this was not statistically significant. G. vaginalis was significantly more frequently present in CP women than in HP women. A. vaginae was significantly more present in CPBVpos compared to HP women and CPBVneg women.

Table 3 Presence of species at baseline
Full size table

When analyzing the presence and absence of microflora species at baseline using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) and combining the ‘healthy population’ and the ‘clinic population’, 3 groups were identified (Table 4). The first group is characterized by the predominance of L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii, and L. vaginalis and a low frequency (<30% of women) of L. gasseri and A. vaginae. This group is mostly prevalent in the women with a normal Nugent score, regardless of whether they belonged to the HP group or to the CP group. The second group is mainly characterized by the presence of L. gasseri and L. vaginalis and by a less frequent presence of L. jensenii, L. crispatus, or L. iners. This group is mostly prevalent in the Caucasian women, HP women, as well as CP women without BV. The third group is characterized by the presence of G. vaginalis and A. vaginae and the absence of Lactobacillus species, except for L. iners. Most women with BV belong to this group, as well as a substantial proportion of African and Asian women without BV.

Table 4 Latent class analysis for the presence of species at baseline
Full size table

The qPCR counts are graphically represented in Figure 3. Figure 3 panel B, illustrating the CPBVneg and CPBVpos counts, shows that counts for overall Lactobacillus species (p < 0.001), L. crispatus (p < 0.001) and L. vaginalis (p = 0.005) were significantly higher for women without BV compared to those with BV. The counts for G. vaginalis (p < 0.001) and A. vaginae (p < 0.001) were, on the contrary, significantly lower in women without BV compared to those with BV. There were no significant differences in the amount of L. iners, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii related to BV status in the CP.

Figure 3
figure 3

Presence of species at baseline. Panel A: Healthy population. Panel B: Clinic population: BV negative versus BV positive women. Lact = Lactobacillus species. crisp = L. crispatus. iners = L. iners. jens = L. jensenii. gass = L. gasseri. vag = L. vaginalis. Gard = G. vaginalis. Ato = A. vaginae. Wilcoxon rank sum test result: ***: p < 0.001; **: p = 0.005; NS: p > 0.100. cps/mL: copies/mL. BV = 0 or Nugent scoring 0–3; BV = 1 or Nugent scoring 7–10.

Full size image

The correlation of the qPCR log counts of the individual species of the CP population with the Nugent scores is presented in Figure 4. Overall lactobacillus counts (R = −0.553) and counts of L. crispatus (R = −0.411) and L. vaginalis (R = −0.421) decreased with increasing Nugent scores. Counts of G. vaginalis (R = 0.505) and A. vaginae (R = 0.606) increased with increasing Nugent scores. Correlations between Nugent scores and counts of L. iners (R = −0.062), L. jensenii (R = −0.192), and L. gasseri (R = −0.162) were low.

Figure 4
figure 4

Correlation of the qPCR log counts data with the individual species by Nugent score. cps/mL: copies/mL.

Full size image

Discussion

The data from our population of healthy women shows that the composition of the vaginal microbiome over time (5 visits) is very stable. A raised Nugent score (4 and 6) was only recorded on two occasions and we can thus conclude that the microbiome of this population represents a ‘healthy normal flora’.

The increase in L. crispatus and the decrease in L. iners in the post-ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle seems in accord with the results of Srinivasan et al., showing a decrease of L. crispatus (−0.6 log) during menstruation, followed by a reconstitution of L. crispatus after menses [18]. The same authors also noticed that G. vaginalis was present for all the women at one point in the study, albeit at low numbers. We found that in 23% of the healthy women, G. vaginalis was consistently present. It is interesting to note that in the women from the HP with intermediate Nugent scores, the L. iners counts had increased. In the woman with symptoms, this increase was accompanied by a rise in G. vaginalis and in the woman with a new sex partner the numbers of A. vaginae were raised. Intermediate Nugent scores have been associated with frequent presence of G. vaginalis (70% - 92%) and A. vaginae (78% - 84%) [23, 24]. The acquisition of a new sex partner may well be an important risk factor for BV. Larsson et al. found that relapse of BV in a Swedish population was highly associated (OR 9.3) with the acquisition of a new sex partner and Walker et al. saw that incident BV in Australian young women was associated with increasing numbers of sex partners [23, 25].

Using LCA, we identified 2 types of ‘normal flora’ and one ‘BV type flora’. The first group of ‘normal flora’ was characterized by the predominance of a combination of four Lactobacillus species excluding L. gasseri, whereas in the second group L. gasseri and L. vaginalis predominated. The third group, associated with BV, was dominated by A. vaginae, G. vaginalis, and L. iners. Group 1 in our study was similar to community groups I, III, and V as defined by Ravel et al.; group 2 corresponded to community group II, and group 3 was similar to community group IV [14]. All 3 microbiome groups were represented in the different groups of women (HP, CP without BV, and CP with BV). However, among the women without BV there appeared to be large differences in the relative distribution of the different LCA groups according to ethnicity. Caucasian women mostly belonged to group 1 or 2, while African/Asian women mostly belonged to group 3. We should therefore not assume that all microbiomes with low Nugent scores are similar. Our data are in line with the findings of Ravel et al., who reported that healthy African/Asian women have a higher probability of belonging to group 3, the ‘BV type flora’ group [16, 26].

The results of this study are in line with published literature showing that L. crispatus is consistently present with high counts of >108 copies/mL in a healthy vaginal ecosystem as defined by the Nugent score (0–3) whereas G. vaginalis and A. vaginae are highly present in women with BV [11, 24]. We explored the correlation of specific species with the individual Nugent scores and showed that L. vaginalis (R = −0.421) shows the same inverse correlation as L. crispatus (R = −0.411) with increasing Nugent scores. A low correlation was seen for L. gasseri and the Nugent score and this may reflect the confounding effect of ethnicity. This study is among the first to show that L. vaginalis is highly represented in the normal healthy vaginal flora with typical counts of 106 copies/mL. L. crispatus, L. jensenii, L. gasseri, and L. vaginalis were less frequently present in women at higher risk of an STI, while L. iners remained present. The fact that L. iners is always present, even when A. vaginae and G. vaginalis are present, makes us wonder whether L. iners increases susceptibility to BV. This would be in line with the findings of Antonio et al. who recently demonstrated that only L. crispatus had a protective effect against acquisition of BV [27].

We observed higher bacterial counts with the combined lysis-Boom extraction compared to the Boom extraction alone (results not shown). The extra lysis step particularly improved the efficiency of the DNA extraction from Gram positive microorganisms. As a result of these different methods of extraction, we were unable to directly compare the quantitative counts from the HP and CP group (Figure 3) and this represents a weakness of this study. This shortcoming illustrates that results across studies can only be compared after ascertaining that laboratory methods are consistent [28, 29]. Another limitation of this study is the small sample size and limited statistical power. Furthermore, the two groups of women differed in aspects such as contraception, the number of follow up visits and time points in the cycle that were sampled. Finally, our definition of bacterial vaginosis was based on the Nugent score, and although this scoring system is considered to be the gold standard for research, we recognize it is not perfect.

Conclusion

We have shown that qPCR can be used to quantify and describe the bacterial species associated with the non-BV vaginal microbiome. We have also shown that risk status and ethnicity can also impact upon the number and type of organisms present and therefore also need to be taken into account. The analysis of seven indicator organisms by qPCR is a feasible approach for the assessment of the vaginal microbiome and could be used for analyzing the composition of the microbiome during the safety assessments of vaginal products.

References

  1. Myer L, Kuhn L, Stein ZA, Wright TC, Denny L: Intravaginal practices, bacterial vaginosis, and women’s susceptibility to HIV infection: epidemiological evidence and biological mechanisms. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005, 5: 786-794. 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70298-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taha TE, Hoover DR, Dallabetta GA, Kumwenda NI, Mtimavalye LA, Yang LP, Liomba GN, Broadhead RL, Chiphangwi JD, Miotti PG: Bacterial vaginosis and disturbances of vaginal flora: association with increased acquisition of HIV. AIDS. 1998, 12: 1699-1706. 10.1097/00002030-199813000-00019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van de Wijgert JH, Morrison CS, Brown J, Kwok C, Van Der PB, Chipato T, Byamugisha JK, Padian N, Salata RA: Disentangling contributions of reproductive tract infections to HIV acquisition in African Women. Sex Transm Dis. 2009, 36: 357-364. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a4f695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mirmonsef P, Gilbert D, Zariffard MR, Hamaker BR, Kaur A, Landay AL, Spear GT: The effects of commensal bacteria on innate immune responses in the female genital tract. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011, 65: 190-195. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00943.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Rabe LK, Klebanoff SJ, Eschenbach DA: The normal vaginal flora, H2O2-producing lactobacilli, and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis. 1993, 16 (Suppl 4): S273-S281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klebanoff SJ, Coombs RW: Viricidal effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on human immunodeficiency virus type 1: possible role in heterosexual transmission. J Exp Med. 1991, 174: 289-292. 10.1084/jem.174.1.289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cherpes TL, Hillier SL, Meyn LA, Busch JL, Krohn MA: A delicate balance: risk factors for acquisition of bacterial vaginosis include sexual activity, absence of hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli, black race, and positive herpes simplex virus type 2 serology. Sex Transm Dis. 2008, 35: 78-83. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318156a5d0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nugent R, Krohn M, Hillier S: Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991, 29: 297-301.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hugenholtz P, Goebel BM, Pace NR: Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 4765-4774.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sha BE, Chen HY, Wang QJ, Zariffard MR, Cohen MH, Spear GT: Utility of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, and quantitative PCR for Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Lactobacillus spp. for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 4607-4612. 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4607-4612.2005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Claeys G, Verschraegen G, Delanghe J, Van Simaey L, De Ganck C, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M: Cloning of 16 S rRNA genes amplified from normal and disturbed vaginal microflora suggests a strong association between Atopobium vaginae, Gardnerella vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis. BMC Microbiol. 2004, 4: 16-10.1186/1471-2180-4-16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Thomas KK, Oakley BB, Marrazzo JM: Targeted PCR for detection of vaginal bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45: 3270-3276. 10.1128/JCM.01272-07.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hummelen R, Fernandes AD, Macklaim JM, Dickson RJ, Changalucha J, Gloor GB, Reid G: Deep sequencing of the vaginal microbiota of women with HIV. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e12078-10.1371/journal.pone.0012078.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, Brotman RM, Davis CC, Ault K, Peralta L, Forney LJ: Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108 (Suppl 1): 4680-4687.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Spear GT, Gilbert D, Landay AL, Zariffard R, French AL, Patel P, Gillevet PM: Pyrosequencing of the genital microbiotas of HIV-seropositive and -seronegative women reveals Lactobacillus iners as the predominant Lactobacillus Species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011, 77: 378-381. 10.1128/AEM.00973-10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou X, Brown CJ, Abdo Z, Davis CC, Hansmann MA, Joyce P, Foster JA, Forney LJ: Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy Caucasian and black women. ISME J. 2007, 1: 121-133. 10.1038/ismej.2007.12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamont R, Sobel J, Akins R, Hassan S, Chaiworapongsa T, Kusanovic J, Romero R: The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques. BJOG. 2011, 118: 533-549. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02840.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Srinivasan S, Liu C, Mitchell CM, Fiedler TL, Thomas KK, Agnew KJ, Marrazzo JM, Fredricks DN: Temporal variability of human vaginal bacteria and relationship with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e10197-10.1371/journal.pone.0010197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Claeys G, De Backer E, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M: Longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microflora in pregnancy suggests that L. crispatus promotes the stability of the normal vaginal microflora and that L. gasseri and/or L. iners are more conducive to the occurrence of abnormal vaginal microflora. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9: 116-10.1186/1471-2180-9-116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Santiago GL, Cools P, Verstraelen H, Trog M, Missine G, El Aila N, Verhelst R, Tency I, Claeys G, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M: Longitudinal study of the dynamics of vaginal microflora during two consecutive menstrual cycles. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e28180-10.1371/journal.pone.0028180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jespers VA, Van Roey JM, Beets GI, Buve AM: Dose-ranging phase 1 study of TMC120, a promising vaginal microbicide, in HIV-negative and HIV-positive female volunteers. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007, 44: 154-158. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31802bb35f.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McCutcheon AL: Latent Class Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series N° 64. 1987, Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, edition

    Google Scholar 

  23. Larsson PG, Brandsborg E, Forsum U, Pendharkar S, Krogh-Andersen K, Nasic S, Hammarstrom L, Marcotte H: Extended antimicrobial treatment of bacterial vaginosis combined with human lactobacilli to find the best treatment and minimize the risk of relapses. BMC Infect Dis. 2011, 11: 223-10.1186/1471-2334-11-223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Menard JP, Fenollar F, Henry M, Bretelle F, Raoult D: Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008, 47: 33-43. 10.1086/588661.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Walker J, Hocking J, Fairley C, Tabrizi S, Chen M, Bowden F, Gunn J, Donovan B, Kaldor J, Bradshaw C: The prevalence and incidence of bacterial vaginosis in a cohort of young Australian women. Sex Transm Infect. 2011, Vol 87: Suppl 1-

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou X, Hansmann MA, Davis CC, Suzuki H, Brown CJ, Schutte U, Pierson JD, Forney LJ: The vaginal bacterial communities of Japanese women resemble those of women in other racial groups. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010, 58: 169-181. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00618.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Antonio M, Petrina M, Meyn L, Hillier S: Lactobacillus crispatus colonisation reduces risk of bacterial vaginosis (BV) acquisition. Sex Transm Dis. 2011, Vol 87 (Suppl 1): A304-A305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zariffard MR, Saifuddin M, Sha BE, Spear GT: Detection of bacterial vaginosis-related organisms by real-time PCR for Lactobacilli, Gardnerella vaginalis and Mycoplasma hominis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2002, 34: 277-281. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2002.tb00634.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Byun R, Nadkarni MA, Chhour KL, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N: Quantitative analysis of diverse Lactobacillus species present in advanced dental caries. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 3128-3136. 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3128-3136.2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tamrakar R, Yamada T, Furuta I, Cho K, Morikawa M, Yamada H, Sakuragi N, Minakami H: Association between Lactobacillus species and bacterial vaginosis-related bacteria, and bacterial vaginosis scores in pregnant Japanese women. BMC Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 128-10.1186/1471-2334-7-128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. De Backer E, Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Alqumber MA, Burton JP, Tagg JR, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M: Quantitative determination by real-time PCR of four vaginal Lactobacillus species. Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae indicates an inverse relationship between L. gasseri and L. iners. BMC Microbiol. 2007, 7: 115-10.1186/1471-2180-7-115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Commission [European Microbicides Project 503558, EUROPRISE and CHAARM 242135] and by the Foundation Dormeur, Switzerland. We are grateful to the participants and the study’s physicians, Dr. Ilse Collier, Dr. Christiane Van Ghijseghem and Dr. Kristien Wouters.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, ITM HIV/AIDS Centre, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium

    Vicky Jespers, Sabrina Poradosú, Liselotte Hardy & Anne Buvé

  2. Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium

    Joris Menten

  3. HIV/STI Reference Laboratory, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium

    Hilde Smet, Saïd Abdellati & Tania Crucitti

  4. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Rita Verhelst

Authors
  1. Vicky Jespers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joris Menten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hilde Smet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabrina Poradosú
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Saïd Abdellati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rita Verhelst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Liselotte Hardy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anne Buvé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tania Crucitti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicky Jespers.

Additional information

Authors’ contributions

VJ, TC, and AB conceived and designed the study. VJ wrote the first version of the manuscript. JM provided statistical support for the design of the study and performed the statistical analyses. TC supervised the laboratory analytical procedures and validated the laboratory results. TC, HS, SA and RV set up and carried out the qPCRs. SP and LH participated in the design and clinical coordination of the study. All authors contributed to the editing, and approved the final paper.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jespers, V., Menten, J., Smet, H. et al. Quantification of bacterial species of the vaginal microbiome in different groups of women, using nucleic acid amplification tests. BMC Microbiol 12, 83 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-83

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-83

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us