Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Microbiology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Novel screening assay for in vivo selection of Klebsiella pneumoniae genes promoting gastrointestinal colonisation

Erik J Boll1, Lene N Nielsen13, Karen A Krogfelt1 and Carsten Struve12*

  • * Corresponding author: Carsten Struve cas@ssi.dk

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300, Copenhagen, Denmark

2 WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Escherichia and Klebsiella, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300, Copenhagen, Denmark

3 Present address: Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Microbiology 2012, 12:201  doi:10.1186/1471-2180-12-201


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/12/201


Received:21 February 2012
Accepted:6 September 2012
Published:11 September 2012

© 2012 Boll et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important opportunistic pathogen causing pneumonia, sepsis and urinary tract infections. Colonisation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a key step in the development of infections; yet the specific factors important for K. pneumoniae to colonize and reside in the GI tract of the host are largely unknown. To identify K. pneumoniae genes promoting GI colonisation, a novel genomic-library-based approach was employed.

Results

Screening of a K. pneumoniae C3091 genomic library, expressed in E. coli strain EPI100, in a mouse model of GI colonisation led to the positive selection of five clones containing genes promoting persistent colonisation of the mouse GI tract. These included genes encoding the global response regulator ArcA; GalET of the galactose operon; and a cluster of two putative membrane-associated proteins of unknown function. Both ArcA and GalET are known to be involved in metabolic pathways in Klebsiella but may have additional biological actions beneficial to the pathogen. In support of this, GalET was found to confer decreased bile salt sensitivity to EPI100.

Conclusions

The present work establishes the use of genomic-library-based in vivo screening assays as a valuable tool for identification and characterization of virulence factors in K. pneumoniae and other bacterial pathogens.

Keywords:
Klebsiella pneumoniae; Genomic library; Mouse model of gastrointestinal colonisation

Background

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important cause of opportunistic infections, such as pneumonia, sepsis and urinary tract infections [1]. Studies also link K. pneumoniae infections to inflammatory bowel diseases as well as liver abscesses [2-5]. Moreover, multiresistant strains are frequently observed, stressing the need to find new ways to prevent and treat K. pneumoniae infections [6-8].

Characteristically, most K. pneumoniae infections are preceded by colonisation of the patients gastrointestinal (GI) tract which is also considered the main reservoir for transmission of the pathogen [9,10]. In order to persist in this extremely competitive environment, any invading pathogen must be able to compete with the indigenous microbiota for nutrients, grow at a rate sufficient to avoid washout, or, alternatively, adhere to the mucosal surface [11]. The specific factors important for the ability of K. pneumoniae to colonize and reside in the GI tract of the host are largely unknown. The presence of an urease has been shown to be important for GI colonisation by the pathogen [12], as well as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [13], whereas studies on the role of capsule are contradictory [14,15]. It is to be expected that other still unknown factors are required for K. pneumoniae to colonize and reside in the GI tract. An increased knowledge of such factors is an important step in the search for new strategies to prevent colonisation and subsequent infection of susceptible patients with K. pneumoniae.

One approach to identify novel pathogenic virulence mechanisms is to employ screening of genomic libraries. Such libraries are constructed by digesting genomic DNA, cloning it into vectors and transforming them into cells that can be screened for a desired phenotype [16-19]. In a previous study, we constructed a library of K. pneumoniae DNA expressed in Escherichia coli and successfully used it to screen for K. pneumoniae genes involved in biofilm formation in vitro[18].

The objective of this study was to identify genes involved in K. pneumoniae intestinal colonisation by screening of the K. pneumoniae genomic library in a well-established mouse model of GI colonisation. To our knowledge, this is the first use of a genomic library as a positive-selection-based in vivo screening model. We demonstrate successful in vivo selection of clones containing GI colonisation promoting K. pneumoniae genes, thus validating this novel screening approach.

Results

Clones containing colonisation promoting genes are selected in the mouse GI colonisation model

We initially assessed the colonisation abilities of K. pneumoniae clinical isolate C3091 and E. coli laboratory strain EPI100 in the mouse model of GI colonisation. We found that while both strains persistently colonized the intestines of the infected mice, the bacterial counts in faeces were more than 100-fold higher for C3091 than for EPI100 (Figure 1). Thus K. pneumoniae C3091 is a superior coloniser of the intestinal tract likely via possession of genes not present in the E. coli strain and which promote enhanced colonisation ability.

thumbnailFigure 1. Colonisation of the intestine byK. pneumoniaeC3091 andE. coliEPI100. The two strains were fed individually to sets of three mice. Colonisation was quantified from plating of faeces on selective media. Symbols for day 0 represent the size of inoculum. The results are presented as the mean log (CFU/g faeces) ± sum of means (SEM).

To identify GI colonisation promoting genes, a library consisting of 1,152 fosmids, each containing approximately 40 kb random K. pneumoniae C3091 DNA, expressed in E. coli EPI100 was screened in the mouse GI colonisation model. The library was arrayed in 12 pools each containing 96 fosmid clones. The 12 pools were fed individually to a set of two mice, and following 17 days of colonisation, fosmids were purified from colonies picked from platings of faecal samples and characterised. The 17-day colonisation period was chosen to ensure enough time for detectable selection of clones containing colonisation promoting genes. Indeed, restriction enzyme analysis revealed that from each pool only a single fosmid clone was present in high numbers in the faeces of mice originally inoculated with 96 individual clones (Figure 2). Thus a striking selection had occurred in the mouse intestine, indicating that the selected clones contain K. pneumoniae genes promoting GI colonisation.

thumbnailFigure 2. Specific fosmid clones are selected during intestinal colonisation. Restriction enzyme analysis of fosmid pools before and after inoculation into mice. 10 colonies were randomly picked from plating of the inoculum fed to two mice on day 0 (A, lanes 2–11). On day 17 postfeeding, 4 colonies were picked from plating of faeces from each of the two mice (B and C, lanes 2–5). Fosmids were isolated and cut with restriction enzyme SalI. The presented data (shown here for fosmid pool 1) are representative for all 12 fosmid pools.

Restriction enzyme analysis and partial sequencing of the in vivo selected clones revealed that some of the clones contained overlapping inserts of C3091 DNA. As the GI colonisation promoting genes among these clones were expected to be identical, one clone from each group of clones with overlapping inserts was selected. Thus a total of five clones were further characterised (hereon referred to as clones 1–5).

We then sought to confirm the presence and expression of K. pneumoniae C3091 genes promoting GI colonisation in the five selected clones. In separate experiments, each clone was fed to two mice simultaneously with EPI100 carrying the empty fosmid vector. All five clones displayed markedly increased colonisation ability and rapidly outcompeted the EPI100 vector control strain, thereby verifying the acquisition of colonisation promoting K. pneumoniae genes (Figure 3).

thumbnailFigure 3. The selectedK. pneumoniaeC3091-derived fosmids confer enhanced GI colonisation to EPI100. The ability of each EPI100 fosmid clone (filled symbols) to outcompete EPI100 carrying the empty pEpiFOS vector (open symbols) was tested by feeding sets of two mice with equal amounts of the control strain and one of the fosmid clones. The presented data is for fosmid clone 2. Three days post-feeding, the bacterial counts of the control strain were below the detection limit of 50 CFU/g faeces (dashed horizontal line). Similar results were obtained for all fosmid clones.

It could be speculated that the enhanced GI colonisation abilities of the selected clones was due to a generally enhanced growth rate. To test this, each of the five clones were evaluated for their ability to outgrow EPI100 carrying the empty fosmid vector when grown competitively in LB broth. Four of the clones grew to the same level as the control strain. However, the bacterial counts for the fifth clone were a 100-fold higher than the control strain at the end of the in vitro growth experiment, indicating that the K. pneumoniae genes present in this particular clone have a general growth promoting effect.

Identification of the K. pneumoniae genes promoting enhanced GI colonisation

Each fosmid contains approximately 40 kb of K. pneumoniae DNA. Thus, to identify the specific GI colonisation promoting genes, a library of 96 subclones, containing 4–12 kb C3091 DNA fragments inserted into cloning vector pACYC184, were constructed from each of the five fosmid clones. The subclones within each library were then pooled and fed to a set of three mice in separate experiments. Following 5–7 days of infection, plasmids from stool samples were isolated and submitted to SalI digestion profiling. While we were unable to obtain clonal selection from the subclone library derived from fosmid clone 5, we successfully observed selection of a single clone in each of the four other experiments (data not shown). The colonisation promoting abilities of the C3091 DNA fragments in these four subclones were verified in the mouse model in pair-wise growth-competition experiments against EPI100 carrying the empty pACYC184 vector. Each of the four selected subclones retained the GI colonisation advantage of the respective fosmid clones from which they were derived (data not shown), thus once again confirming the acquisition of GI colonisation promoting genes.

We next sequenced the C3091 DNA fragments of the four selected subclones. Based on these sequences, clones containing only a single C3091 gene or gene cluster were constructed by PCR amplification using specific primers and insertion into pACYC184. These well-defined clones were tested in the mouse model in competition experiments against EPI100 carrying the empty PACYC184 vector (Figure 4). This successfully led to identification of the genes from each of the fosmid clones encoding colonisation promoting Klebsiella proteins. These were: the RecA recombinase; UDP-galactose-4-epimerase (GalE) and galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (GalT) of the galactose operon; the ArcA response regulator; and a cluster of two hypothetical proteins homologous to KPN_01507 and KPN_01508 in the sequenced genome of K. pneumoniae strain MGH78578 and encoding proteins of unknown function. Sequence analysis showed that all six proteins share 99-100% identity with their corresponding homologues in MGH78578. EPI100 carrying pACYC184 with either of these genes or gene clusters outcompeted the corresponding vector control strain within 3 days and persisted in the mouse intestines throughout the experiments (Figure 4).

thumbnailFigure 4. K. pneumoniaeC3091-derived RecA, GalET, ArcA and putative proteins KPN_01507/01508 confer enhanced GI colonisation to EPI100. Sets of mice were fed with equal amounts of EPI100 carrying the empty pACYC184 vector and EPI100 carrying pACYC184-recA, -galET, -arcA, or –kpn_01507/01508, respectively. In all four experiments, the bacterial counts of the control strain were below the detection limit of 50 CFU/g faeces (dashed horizontal lines) one-to-three days post-feeding. The data in Figure 4A-C are expressed as the mean ± SEM for three infected mice.

GalET confer decreased sensitivity to bile salts

We thought to characterise directly the growth enhancing properties of the C3091-derived galET genes. We found that EPI100 carrying pACYC184-galET failed to ferment galactose in vitro (data not shown), suggesting that the colonisation enhancing effect is not attributable to galactose fermentation. However, the GalETKM operon also plays a key role in modifying galactose for assembly into LPS [20], and mutations in LPS synthesis genes have been shown to attenuate the survival of E. coli strain MG1655 in the mouse intestine, partly due to enhanced susceptibility to bile salts [21]. Intriguingly, EPI100 carrying pACYC184-galET demonstrated clearly decreased sensitivity to bile salts in vitro compared to the EPI100 vector control strain (Figure 5). These findings suggest that the C3091-derived galET genes confer enhanced colonisation abilities to EPI100 in the mouse model by decreasing the sensitivity of the strain to bile salts.

thumbnailFigure 5. K. pneumoniaeC3091-derived GalET confer decreased sensitivity to bile salts toE. coliEPI100. EPI100 carrying either pACYC184-galET or the pACYC184 vector control were grown for 18 hrs in LB broth in the presence and absence of increasing concentrations of bile salts after which colonisation was quantified from plating. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for triplicate samples. ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01, as compared to untreated EPI100 vector control.

Discussion

Colonisation of the GI tract plays a key role in the ability of K. pneumoniae to cause disease, stressing the need for an increased understanding of the mechanisms underlying this important feature. In this study, we employed a genomic-library-based approach to identify K. pneumoniae genes promoting GI colonisation. We demonstrated that screening of a K. pneumoniae C3091-based fosmid library, expressed in E. coli strain EPI100, in a mouse model led to the positive selection of clones containing genes which promote GI colonisation. Thus, oral ingestion of pooled library fosmid clones led to a successful selection of single clones capable of persistent colonisation of the mouse GI tract. This is a testament to the remarkably competitive environment of the GI tract where only clones having obtained a colonisation advantage will be able to colonise and persist in high numbers due to the presence of the endogenous microflora. When tested individually in growth competition experiments against EPI100 carrying the empty fosmid vector, each of the selected fosmid clones rapidly outcompeted the control strain. Based on these clones, we were able to identify C3091 genes and gene clusters conferring enhanced GI colonisation, including recA, galET and arcA.

Notably, EPI100 harbours deletions in recA, suggesting that the selection of K. pneumoniae C3091-derived recA reflects complementation of this missing E. coli gene. RecA plays an essential role in chromosomal recombination and repair, and E. coli RecA mutant strains have been shown to exhibit attenuated growth rates in vitro[22,23]. Indeed, EPI100 carrying pACYC184-recA also showed a clear growth advantage compared to the vector control when grown in LB broth. This finding verifies that RecA plays a significant role in bacterial growth in general and thus the GI colonisation promoting effect of recA is most likely due to a generally enhanced growth rate of the recA containing clone. Nevertheless, while the selection of RecA in the mouse model is not a surprising finding it serves as a proof of principle, regarding the validity of the screening approach.

The fact that pACYC184-galET was unable to ferment galactose in vitro was to be expected since EPI100 harbours deletions in galactokinase (GalK) and UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (GalU), both of which are necessary for growth on galactose [24-26]. Instead, we observed an intriguing decreased sensitivity to bile salts in vitro conferred by C3091-derived GalET. Further studies are needed to characterise the mechanism underlying this phenotype and its physiological implications. However, we speculate that incorporation of C3091 GalET-mediated sugar-residues into the bacterial membrane, i.e. as a part of LPS as previously described [20], may have an enhancing effect on the membrane stability, thus promoting decreased sensitivity to bile salts and possibly other compounds such as antimicrobial peptides present in the mouse GI tract. In support of this, enterohaemorrhagic E. coli gal mutant strains have been shown to be 500-fold less able to colonise the GI tract of rabbits and 100-fold more susceptible to antimicrobial peptides than the parent strain [26].

Together with the sensor transmitter protein ArcB, ArcA constitutes a two-component ArcAB system which functions as a global regulator of genes involved in metabolism in response to oxygen availability, primarily favouring anaerobic growth [27]. ArcA homologues have, moreover, been implicated in regulating the expression of virulence factors and proteins involved in serum resistance [28,29]. To our knowledge, the EPI100 strain does not harbour mutations in ArcAB, thus indicating a cumulative effect of native and K. pneumoniae-derived ArcA activity promoting enhanced colonisation. To assess whether this effect was due to enhanced adaption to anaerobic growth in general, we tested EPI100 carrying pACYC184-arcA for its potential enhanced ability to grow under anaerobic conditions in LB broth in competition with the EPI100 vector control. We did not observe any significant differences in the growth rate between the two strains. Thus, although a growth promoting effect of ArcA in the intestinal environment cannot be excluded from these in vitro assays, the effect of ArcA on GI colonisation may instead be via the regulation of colonisation factors not related specifically to anaerobic growth. Notably, during screening of a K. pneumoniae C3091 mutant library we previously found an arcB transposon mutant to be markedly attenuated in GI colonisation [13]. The identification of the arcAB regulon by two fundamentally different screening approaches emphasizes the key role of ArcAB in GI colonisation and furthermore underscores the validity of the screening approaches.

Our screening assay also identified a Klebsiella two-gene cluster of unknown function, here designated kpn_01507 and kpn_01508, which conferred enhanced GI colonisation ability to EPI100. KPN_01507 is a putative membrane protein, whereas the use of SignalP 4.0 predicted the presence of a secretory signal peptide in KPN_01508, a signal targeting its passenger domain for translocation across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane [30]. These findings, therefore, suggest that KPN_01508 may be translocated and/or secreted from the cell. Interestingly, homologues of both genes are found among several sequenced strains of K. pneumoniae but do not appear to be present in E. coli. Future studies may reveal the function of these genes in GI colonisation.

The fact that genes associated with metabolism were selected in the in vivo screening assay is not surprising since the ability to obtain nutrients for growth is essential for any GI colonizing organism. However, many highly conserved proteins involved in metabolism are increasingly recognized as having additional roles, some of which are related to bacterial virulence [31]. The GalET cluster may be viewed as an example of such so-called moon-lighting proteins as the colonisation enhancing effect was not associated with galactose fermentation per se but was due to increased resistance against bile salt possibly mediated by the modification of LPS core synthesis.

A key limitation of the library-based technique is its inability to identify interactions among distant genetic loci. This limitation could be circumvented by using co-expressed plasmid- and fosmid-based genomic libraries as recently described [16]. Thus, future studies combining the C3091 fosmid library with a co-expressed plasmid-based C3091 library may lead to the selection of more GI-enhancing genes than those obtained in this study.

The fact that our screening method is based on a laboratory E. coli strain, as opposed to a commensal E. coli isolate, raises another important point. Genes mutated in the laboratory strain, e.g. recA, would most likely not have been selected if the screening had been carried out using a commensal strain. However, since commensal E. coli are already excellent GI colonisers, it is possible that genes which are important for K. pneumoniae GI colonisation but also present in E. coli commensal strains will not be selected in the screening. However, if the objective is to specifically identify K. pneumoniae virulence genes, using a commensal E. coli strain as a host in the screening will be a favourable approach.

Using E. coli as a host has several advantages when it comes to construction, cloning, and expression of the fosmid library. However, a shortcoming is that although the assay identifies genes promoting colonisation in E. coli, additional studies involving the construction of specific mutants are warranted to verify the role of these genes in K. pneumoniae. Although future studies are needed to characterise the role of galET and kpn_01507/01508 in K. pneumoniae colonisation, as discussed above, both recA and arcA are expected to play a significant role in K. pneumoniae colonisation.

Conclusions

A novel screening approach to identify genes involved in GI colonisation was successfully applied. Thus, by screening a clone library of a K. pneumoniae genome for enhanced GI colonisation abilities in a mouse model, a selection of single clones containing GI colonisation promoting genes was obtained. The methodology was validated as K. pneumoniae genes complementing deleted genes in the E. coli EPI100 background and genes previously identified to promote GI colonisation were selected in the assay. Furthermore, previously unrecognized genes involved in GI colonisation were identified. Moreover, our findings demonstrate the usefulness of this screening approach for the identification of genes involved in metabolic pathways and that these genes may have additional biological actions beneficial to the pathogen.

The methodology can easily be adapted to other bacterial pathogens and infection models. Thus in vivo screening of genomic libraries may be a valuable tool for future studies to identify and characterise virulence factors in bacterial pathogens.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The following two streptomycin-resistant strains were used: C3091, a clinical K. pneumoniae isolate from a patient with urinary tract infection [32]; and EPI100 [F– mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) ϕ80dlacZΔM15 ΔlacX74 recA1 endA1 araD139 Δ(ara, leu)7697 galU galK λ– rpsL nupG tonA], a laboratory E. coli strain (Epicentre).

The genomic library consists of 1,152 E. coli EPI100 clones, each carrying a fosmid containing approximately 40 kb of K. pneumoniae C3091 DNA as previously described [18].

Bacteria were routinely cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or on LB or MacConkey agar plates containing the following antibiotics where appropriate: 30 μg/ml chloramphenicol, 25 μg/ml kanamycin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin.

Mouse model of GI colonisation

Six- to eight-week old female outbred CFW1 (Harlan) mice were used for GI colonisation experiments as previously described [15,33]. Briefly, mice were caged in groups of two or three and given sterile water containing 5 g/L streptomycin sulphate throughout the experiment. Streptomycin treatment selectively removes facultative anaerobes while leaving the anaerobic microbiota essentially intact [34]. After 24 h, 100 μl bacterial suspensions of approximately 109 colony forming units (CFU) were administered orally. Faeces were collected every second or third day, homogenised in 0.9% NaCl, and serial dilutions were plated on selective media. None of the inoculated mice developed any symptoms during the colonisation period. All animal experiments were conducted under the auspices of the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate, the Danish Ministry of Justice.

Construction of subclone libraries

Purified fosmids were submitted to partial digestion with BfuCI, after which ~4-12 kb DNA fragments were excised and purified from low-melting point agarose gels, and then ligated into the BamHI site of pACYC184 and transferred to E. coli EPI100. EPI100 subclones were selected by growth on LB plates containing 30 μg/ml chloramphenicol.

Cloning of fosmid-derived colonisation promoting K. pneumoniae C3091 genes

Genes or gene clusters were PCR amplified from the K. pneumoniae C3091 gene fragments of the respective selected fosmid-derived subclones. All primers used, and the restriction sites introduced at their 5’ ends, are listed in Table 1. The PCR products were digested with the respective restriction enzymes and ligated into the corresponding sites of pACYC184.

Table 1. Primers used in this study for construction of plasmids encoding colonisation promotingK. pneumoniaeC3091 genes

Bile salt sensitivity assay

Overnight cultures were diluted 1:1000 in LB broth in the absence and presence of various concentrations of Bile Salts no. 3 (Difco) and incubated ~18 hrs at 37°C with shaking. The cultures were then diluted 1:10 in LB broth after which serial dilutions were plated.

Statistical analysis

Student’s t-test was used for statistical evaluation and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

EJB participated in the study design, carried out laboratory work, analysed the data, and drafted the manuscript. LNN participated in the study design, carried out laboratory work, analysed the data, and edited the manuscript. KAK participated in the study design, edited the manuscript, and received the funding needed to complete the research. CS conceived the study, carried out laboratory work, analysed the data, and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by the Danish Council for Strategic Research Grant 2101-07-0023 to Karen A. Krogfelt.

References

  1. Podschun R, Ullmann U: Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors.

    Clin Microbiol Rev 1998, 11(4):589-603. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Ebringer A, Rashid T, Tiwana H, Wilson C: A possible link between Crohn’s disease and ankylosing spondylitis via Klebsiella infections.

    Clin Rheumatol 2007, 26(3):289-297. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Lee CH, Leu HS, Wu TS, Su LH, Liu JW: Risk factors for spontaneous rupture of liver abscess caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae.

    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005, 52(2):79-84. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Yang YS, Siu LK, Yeh KM, Fung CP, Huang SJ, Hung HC, Lin JC, Chang FY: Recurrent Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess: clinical and microbiological characteristics.

    J Clin Microbiol 2009, 47(10):3336-3339. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Lee IA, Kim DH: Klebsiella pneumoniae increases the risk of inflammation and colitis in a murine model of intestinal bowel disease.

    Scand J Gastroenterol 2011, 46(6):684-693. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Van’t Veen A, van der Zee A, Nelson J, Speelberg B, Kluytmans JA, Buiting AG: Outbreak of infection with a multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain associated with contaminated roll boards in operating rooms.

    J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43(10):4961-4967. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  7. Lytsy B, Sandegren L, Tano E, Torell E, Andersson DI, Melhus A: The first major extended-spectrum beta-lactamase outbreak in Scandinavia was caused by clonal spread of a multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae producing CTX-M-15.

    APMIS 2008, 116(4):302-308. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Chagas TP, Seki LM, Cury JC, Oliveira JA, Dávila AM, Silva DM, Asensi MD: Multiresistance, beta-lactamase-encoding genes and bacterial diversity in hospital wastewater in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    J Appl Microbiol 2011, 111(3):572-581. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Montgomerie JZ: Epidemiology of Klebsiella and hospital-associated infections.

    Rev Infect Dis 1979, 1(5):736-753. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. De Champs C, Sauvant MP, Chanal C, Sirot D, Gazuy N, Malhuret R, Baguet JC, Sirot J: Prospective survey of colonization and infection caused by expanded-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae in an intensive care unit.

    J Clin Microbiol 1989, 27(12):2887-2890. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  11. Freter R, Brickner H, Fekete J, Vickerman MM, Carey KE: Survival and implantation of Escherichia coli in the intestinal tract.

    Infect Immun 1983, 39(2):686-703. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  12. Maroncle N, Rich C, Forestier C: The role of Klebsiella pneumoniae urease in intestinal colonization and resistance to gastrointestinal stress.

    Res Microbiol 2006, 157(2):184-193. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Struve C, Forestier C, Krogfelt KA: Application of a novel multi-screening signature-tagged mutagenesis assay for identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae genes essential in colonization and infection.

    Microbiology 2003, 149(Pt 1):167-176. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Favre-Bonté S, Licht TR, Forestier C, Krogfelt KA: Klebsiella pneumoniae capsule expression is necessary for colonization of large intestines of streptomycin-treated mice.

    Infect Immun 1999, 67(11):6152-6156. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  15. Struve C, Krogfelt KA: Role of capsule in Klebsiella pneumoniae virulence: lack of correlation between in vitro and in vivo studies.

    FEMS Microbiol Lett 2003, 218(1):149-154. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Nicolaou SA, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET: Coexisting/Coexpressing Genomic Libraries (CoGeL) identify interactions among distantly located genetic loci for developing complex microbial phenotypes.

    Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39(22):e152. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  17. Borden JR, Jones SW, Indurthi D, Chen Y, Papoutsakis ET: A genomic-library based discovery of a novel, possibly synthetic, acid-tolerance mechanism in Clostridium acetobutylicum involving non-coding RNAs and ribosomal RNA processing.

    Metab Eng 2010, 12(3):268-281. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  18. Stahlhut SG, Schroll C, Harmsen M, Struve C, Krogfelt KA: Screening for genes involved in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm formation using a fosmid library.

    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2010, 59(3):521-524. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Hansmeier N, Albersmeier A, Tauch A, Damberg T, Ros R, Anselmetti D, Pühler A, Kalinowski J: The surface (S)-layer gene cspB of Corynebacterium glutamicum is transcriptionally activated by a LuxR-type regulator and located on a 6 kb genomic island absent from the type strain ATCC 13032.

    Microbiology 2006, 152(Pt 4):923-935. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Peng HL, Fu TF, Liu SF, Chang HY: Cloning and expression of the Klebsiella pneumoniae galactose operon.

    J Biochem 1992, 112(5):604-608. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Møller AK, Leatham MP, Conway T, Nuijten PJ, de Haan LA, Krogfelt KA, Cohen PS: An Escherichia coli MG1655 lipopolysaccharide deep-rough core mutant grows and survives in mouse cecal mucus but fails to colonize the mouse large intestine.

    Infect Immun 2003, 71(4):2142-2152. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  22. Rocha EP, Cornet E, Michel B: Comparative and evolutionary analysis of the bacterial homologous recombination systems.

    PLoS Genet 2005, 1(2):e15. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  23. Capaldo FN, Ramsey G, Barbour SD: Analysis of the growth of recombination-deficient strains of Escherichia coli K-12.

    J Bacteriol 1974, 118(1):242-249. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  24. Weissborn AC, Liu Q, Rumley MK, Kennedy EP: UTP: alpha-D-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase of Escherichia coli: isolation and DNA sequence of the galU gene and purification of the enzyme.

    J Bacteriol 1994, 176(9):2611-2618. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  25. Holden HM, Rayment I, Thoden JB: Structure and function of enzymes of the Leloir pathway for galactose metabolism.

    J Biol Chem 2003, 278(45):43885-43888. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Ho TD, Waldor MK: Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 gal mutants are sensitive to bacteriophage P1 and defective in intestinal colonization.

    Infect Immun 2007, 75(4):1661-1666. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  27. Gunsalus RP, Park SJ: Aerobic-anaerobic gene regulation in Escherichia coli: control by the ArcAB and Fnr regulons.

    Res Microbiol 1994, 145(5–6):437-450. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  28. Sengupta N, Paul K, Chowdhury R: The global regulator ArcA modulates expression of virulence factors in Vibrio cholerae.

    Infect Immun 2003, 71(10):5583-5589. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  29. De Souza-Hart JA, Blackstock W, Di Modugno V, Holland IB, Kok M: Two-component systems in Haemophilus influenzae: a regulatory role for ArcA in serum resistance.

    Infect Immun 2003, 71(1):163-172. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  30. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H: SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions.

    Nat Methods 2011, 8(10):785-786. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Henderson B, Martin A: Bacterial virulence in the moonlight: multitasking bacterial moonlighting proteins are virulence determinants in infectious disease.

    Infect Immun 2011, 79(9):3476-3491. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  32. Oelschlaeger TA, Tall BD: Invasion of cultured human epithelial cells by Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from the urinary tract.

    Infect Immun 1997, 65(7):2950-2958. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  33. Licht TR, Krogfelt KA, Cohen PS, Poulsen LK, Urbance J, Molin S: Role of lipopolysaccharide in colonization of the mouse intestine by Salmonella typhimurium studied by in situ hybridization.

    Infect Immun 1996, 64(9):3811-3817. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  34. Hentges DJ, Que JU, Casey SW, Stein AJ: The influence of streptomycin on colonization resistance in mice.

    Microecol Theor 1984, 14:53-62. OpenURL