Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Characterization of copper-resistant bacteria and bacterial communities from copper-polluted agricultural soils of central Chile

Abstract

Background

Copper mining has led to Cu pollution in agricultural soils. In this report, the effects of Cu pollution on bacterial communities of agricultural soils from Valparaiso region, central Chile, were studied. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of the 16S rRNA genes was used for the characterization of bacterial communities from Cu-polluted and non-polluted soils. Cu-resistant bacterial strains were isolated from Cu-polluted soils and characterized.

Results

DGGE showed a similar high number of bands and banding pattern of the bacterial communities from Cu-polluted and non-polluted soils. The presence of copA genes encoding the multi-copper oxidase that confers Cu-resistance in bacteria was detected by PCR in metagenomic DNA from the three Cu-polluted soils, but not in the non-polluted soil. The number of Cu-tolerant heterotrophic cultivable bacteria was significantly higher in Cu-polluted soils than in the non-polluted soil. Ninety two Cu-resistant bacterial strains were isolated from three Cu-polluted agricultural soils. Five isolated strains showed high resistance to copper (MIC ranged from 3.1 to 4.7 mM) and also resistance to other heavy metals. 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses indicate that these isolates belong to the genera Sphingomonas, Stenotrophomonas and Arthrobacter. The Sphingomonas sp. strains O12, A32 and A55 and Stenotrophomonas sp. C21 possess plasmids containing the Cu-resistance copA genes. Arthrobacter sp. O4 possesses the copA gene, but plasmids were not detected in this strain. The amino acid sequences of CopA from Sphingomonas isolates (O12, A32 and A55), Stenotrophomonas strain (C21) and Arthrobacter strain (O4) are closely related to CopA from Sphingomonas, Stenotrophomonas and Arthrobacter strains, respectively.

Conclusions

This study suggests that bacterial communities of agricultural soils from central Chile exposed to long-term Cu-pollution have been adapted by acquiring Cu genetic determinants. Five bacterial isolates showed high copper resistance and additional resistance to other heavy metals. Detection of copA gene in plasmids of four Cu-resistant isolates indicates that mobile genetic elements are involved in the spreading of Cu genetic determinants in polluted environments.

Background

Copper is widely distributed in nature and it is often found in the Earth’s crust. Cu is an essential trace element for living organism, playing a role in an important number of biological processes [1, 2]. The properties of the metallic form of copper, such as its electricity and heat conductivity, resistance to corrosion, malleability and ductility, have been useful for a wide variety of applications. Elevated levels of Cu from natural and industrial sources have been reported in several Cu-producing countries such as Chile, China, Indonesia, Russia, Zambia, and Australia [38]. The mining activities and the use of pesticides to control plant diseases have increased the Cu levels in agricultural soils. Cu could bind to soil components (organic matter, clay minerals, Fe, Al and Mn oxides) leading a significant accumulation in the soil surface [9]. Soil bacteria are responsible for diverse ecological processes, such as biochemical cycling of the elements, plant growth, decomposition of organic matter, maintenance of soil structure, detoxification and pest control [1013]. Cu accumulation could induce harmful effects on soil bacteria damaging the biological processes and the soil quality [10, 14, 15].

Culture independent molecular techniques such as DGGE have been used to study microbial communities. DGGE is based on an amplification step with specific primers to amplify a specific gene (for example, a highly variable region of the 16S rRNA gene) and a denaturing gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Studies of soil bacterial community by DGGE revealed that heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils close to copper and zinc smelters may provoke changes in the composition of soil bacterial community and a decrease of the bacterial diversity [11, 16]. However, changes in the soil bacterial community exposed to heavy metal may vary depending of soil properties, heavy metal bioavailability and the indigenous microbial groups in soil [9].

The genes conferring copper resistance in bacteria are often present in plasmids and organized in an operon [1719]. The copper resistance is encoded by the cop genes (copA, copB, copC and copD) in Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato PT23, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria E3C5 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and by the pco genes (pcoA, pcoB, pcoC and pcoD) in Escherichia coli strain RJ92 [2024]. The copA gene encoding a multi-copper oxidase (pcoA gene in E. coli) is one of the main genetic determinants involved in Cu-resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. It encodes the multi-copper oxidase that oxidase Cu(I) to the less toxic chemical form of Cu(II) [1, 25, 26]. A different copA gene that encodes a Cu-transporting P-type ATPase involved in Cu homeostasis has been described in E. coli and other bacteria [17]. The copA gene encoding a multi-copper oxidase is widely present in Cu-resistant bacterial strains and may represent a relevant marker to study the Cu-resistance in bacteria [26]. The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of long-term Cu pollution on the bacterial community and the characterization of Cu-resistant bacteria from agricultural sites located close to copper smelters from the Aconcagua valley, central Chile.

Methods

Chemicals

The metal salts CuSO4·5H2O, ZnCl2, K2CrO4, NiCl2·H2O, HgCl2, CoCl2·6H2O, CdCl2·2H2O (analytical grade) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and used to prepare stock solutions of Cu2+, Zn2+, CrO42-, Ni2+, Co2+, Cd2+ (800 mM), and Hg2+ (150 mM). HNO3, HClO4 and H2SO4 (Suprapur) and standard Titrisol solution were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Taq DNA polymerase and bovine serum albumin for PCR were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Taq DNA polymerase Stoffel fragment was obtained from Applied Biosystems (Darmstadt, Germany). Tryptic soy broth (TSB) and R2A medium were purchased from BD Diagnostic Systems (Heidelberg, Germany). Formamide and ammonium persulfate (APS), N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and urea from Bio Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). Acrylamide was obtained from Winkler (Santiago, Chile).

Soil sampling

Three composite soil samples were collected from four different agricultural sites in Valparaiso region (central Chile). Each composite sample contained 12 bulk soil cores from the surface stratum (0–10 cm depth) taken from three sampling points located in an area of 250 m2 per site. The three Cu-polluted sites were located in the neighborhood of an active or an abandoned Cu smelter in the Aconcagua valley (Figure 1). These soils were sampled from a pasture soil located in North Chagres (longitude 70º57’29.95” W and latitude 32º46’37.42” S), an artichoke plantation soil from South Chagres (longitude 70º57’57.169” W and latitude 32º48’30.254” S) located 3.5 km distant from North Chagres site and an olive plantation soil from Ñilhue (longitude 70º54’40.628” W and latitude 32º41’44.577” S) located 10.8 and 13.5 km distant from North and South Chagres sites, respectively. Soils were sampled on 6 August 2009. These soils had a Cu content that ranged from 379 to 784 mg kg-1 dry weight soil (d.w.s). The concentrations exceed the standard acceptable level of 40 mg kg-1 for soil by the Québec regulatory authorities (Ministère de l’ Environnement du Québec, 1999). A pasture soil from a non-polluted site was sampled from the Casablanca valley, central Chile on 5 August 2010. The non-polluted site was located in La Vinilla (longitude 71º24’36” W and latitude 32º19’30.254” S) located 62–68 km distant from the three polluted sites. Soil samples were air-dried and sieved to 2 mm and homogenized. The soil samples were stored in polyethylene bags and preserved in a dark room at 4°C until analyses.

Figure 1
figure 1

Location of sampling sites of agricultural soils in Valparaíso region, central Chile. North Chagres, South Chagres and Ñilhue are Cu-polluted sites. La Vinilla is a non-polluted site.

Soil chemical analyses

Soil pH was measured using a 1:2 (w/v) a soil/deionized water mixture. The organic matter content was determined by the dichromate oxidation [27]. For heavy metal analyses (Cu, Zn, Pb, Cr and Ni), soils were digested with a 10:4:1 HNO3/HClO4/H2SO4 mixture. Exchangeable Cu from soils (1 g d.w.s) was extracted with 10 ml of MgCl2 solution (1 M, pH 7) at room temperature with continuous agitation for 1 h. Total heavy metal content and the exchangeable Cu were quantified by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) using Spectraa-800 spectrophotometer Varian (Santa Clara, CA, USA).

DNA extraction from soil

Metagenomic DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of soil in triplicate using the FastDNA Spin Kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, Solon, Ohio, USA). Cells were disrupted using the FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, Solon, Ohio, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Subsequently, the DNA extract was purified by GeneClean Spin Kit (MP Biomedicals, Solon, Ohio, USA). DNA was quantified using Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Bacterial community analyses

Bacterial communities from soils were evaluated using DGGE. The universal primers 27f (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492r (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) were used for PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes followed by a nested DGGE-PCR targeting the V6 region of the 16S rRNA genes using GC-F968-984 (5′-CGCCCGGGGCGCGCCCCGGGCGGGGCGGGGCACGGGGGGAACGCAAGACCTTAC-3′) and R1378-1401 (5′-CGGTGTGTACAAGGCCCGGGAACG-3′) primers [28]. Amplification of 16S rRNA gene was conducted in a volume of 25 μl containing F27 and R1492 primers (0.6 μM), deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (400 μM each), PCR buffer, Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 U), MgCl2 (3.0 mM), bovine serum albumin (0.1 mg ml-1), soil DNA template (20 ng) and ultra pure water. DNA amplification was performed in an Eppendorf Mastercycler thermocycler (Hamburg, Germany) using the following conditions: 1 cycle of 94°C for 5 min, and 25 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, 72°C for 2 min, plus a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The amplification of V6 region was conducted using, GC-F968-984 and R1378-1401 primers (0.6 μM), deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (200 μM each), Stoffel buffer, Taq DNA polymerase Stoffel fragment (2.5 U), MgCl2 (3.0 mM), and bovine serum albumin (0.4 mg ml-1), 1 μl template DNA (obtained from a 1:10 dilution of 16S rRNA amplicon) and ultra pure water. DNA amplification was carried out using the following conditions: 1 cycle of 94°C for 5 min, and 20 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, plus a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.

DGGE was performed using the method previously reported [28] with minor modifications. The BioRad DCode DGGE system was used with an 8% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel containing a denaturing gradient from 30% to 60% (100% denaturant contains 40% (v/v) formamide and 7 M urea). Equal amounts of DNA were loaded on each well. Amplicons were separated at constant voltage of 70 V for 13 h at 58°C. The gel was stained with GelRed (Biotium Inc., Hayward, CA, USA) 1:10,000 (v/v) for 30 min, digitally photographed under UV light and analyzed in a Gel Doc XR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Bands of DGGE profiles were analyzed by using the software Phoretix 1D v11.2 (Non Linear Dynamics, Newcastle, UK). Background noise was subtracted by rolling ball algorithm with a radius of 50 pixels; the automatic band detection was performed with a minimum slope of 100 and a noise reduction of 5, and peaks smaller than 2% of the maximum peak were discarded. Bands were manually corrected and matched to create an absent/present binary matrix. A dendrogram was constructed by Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA), clustering using percentage of similarity averages with MultiVariate Statistical Package (MVSP) version 3.13 h (GeoMem, Blairgowrie, United Kingdom). The diversity of bacterial communities were determined by the Shannon index (H’) that considers the total number of species in a bacterial community (S, richness) and the frequency of the species (abundance). The richness of bacterial community was determined by the number of bands present in DGGE profiles of soils [15]. Three soil replicates were analyzed for each DGGE soil sample.

Detection of copA gene in metagenomic DNA from soils

Metagenomic DNA extracted from each soil was used for copA gene amplification. The degenerated primers forward Coprun F2 (5’-GGSASDTACTGGTRBCAC-3’) and reverse Coprun R1 (5’-TGNGHCATCATSGTRTCRTT-3’) [26] were used for copA gene amplification from soil metagenomic DNA. Degenerated Coprun primers were designed for the amplification of copA genes that encode the multi-copper oxidase from Proteobacteria. DNA amplification was performed using the following conditions: 1 cycle of 94°C for 3 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, plus a final extension at 72°C for 7 min.

Enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria and isolation of Cu-tolerant bacteria from soils

Bacterial cells were extracted from 1 g of each soil suspended in 9 ml of phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7) and vigorously shaken in an orbital shaker (200 rpm) for 30 min. After decantation for 1 min, serial dilutions were prepared from the supernatant. The total cultivable heterotrophic bacteria were grown in R2A medium supplemented with cycloheximide (100 mg l-1) [29]. The Cu-tolerant bacteria were grown in same conditions supplemented with Cu2+ (0.8 mM) [30]. Ninety two bacterial strains (29 to 31 from each polluted soil) were isolated based on their capability to grow in presence of Cu2+ (0.8 mM) and the colony morphology. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA (OriginPro 8 for Windows). Differences were considered to be significant at P ≤ 0.05.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Cu and other heavy metals for bacterial strains

Bacterial isolates were grown in diluted (1:10) TSB liquid medium. An aliquot (10 μl) of each culture grown until stationary phase were placed onto the agar plates with low phosphate Tris mineral salts (LPTMS) medium [31], supplemented with Cu2+ concentrations ranged from 0.8 to 4.7 mM (in increasing concentration of 0.4 mM steps). Inoculated plates were incubated at 30°C and checked for growth after 72 h. Experiments were done in duplicate. The lowest heavy metal concentration that prevented growth was recorded as the MIC [31].

The MIC values to Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Hg2+ and CrO42- were studied in bacterial isolates that were capable to grow in presence of Cu2+ (2.8 mM). LPTMS medium supplemented with different concentrations of each heavy metal was used following a protocol previously described [31]. The concentrations of Co2+ ranged from 0.8 to 6.8 mM (in increasing concentration of 0.2 mM steps), Ni2+ ranged from 0.8 to 17 mM (in increasing concentration of 0.3 mM steps), Zn2+ ranged from 0.8 to 17 mM (in increasing concentration of 0.3 mM steps), Cd2+ ranged from 0.4 to 3.6 mM (in increasing concentration of 0.2 mM steps), Hg2+ ranged from 0.005 to 0.5 mM (in increasing concentration of 0.025 mM steps), and CrO42- ranged from 0.4 to 8.6 mM (in increasing concentration of 0.2 mM steps). The plates were incubated at 30°C for 72 h. The MIC analyses were done in duplicate.

PCR amplification of 16S rRNA and heavy metal resistance genes from bacterial isolates

PCR reactions were conducted in a volume of 25 μl containing specific primers (0.6 μM each), deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (400 μM each), PCR buffer, Taq polymerase (1.25 U), MgCl2 (3 mM). Genomic DNA was prepared from single colonies re-suspended in 100 μl of Tris-EDTA buffer (TE, pH 7.5), heated at 95°C for 5 min and centrifuged briefly. The supernatant (2 μl) was used for PCR reactions. The universal primers forward 27f and reverse 1492r were used for 16S rRNA gene amplification. The primers forward Coprun F2 and reverse Coprun R1 were used for the amplification of the copA gene. The forward primer 5’-GTCGTTAGCTTGCCAACATC-3’ and the reverse primer 5’-CGGAAAGCAAGATGTCGAATCG-3’ [31] were used for chrB gene (chromate resistance) amplification. The forward primer 5’-ACCATCGGCGGCACCTGCGT-3’ and the reverse primer 5’-ACCATCGTCAGGTAGGGGAACAA-3’ were used for merA gene (inorganic mercury resistance) amplification [32]. The forward primers 5’-TCGCCCATATATTTTAGAAC-3’ and the reverse primer 5’-GTCGGGACAGATGCAAAGAAA-3’ were used for merB gene (organic mercury resistance) amplification [32]. DNA amplification of chrB, merA and merB was carried out using the following conditions: 1 cycle of 94°C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 57°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, plus a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. C. metallidurans MSR33 was used as positive control for copA, chrB, merA and merB genes [31]. PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis followed by staining with GelRed (1:10,000 v/v).

16S rRNA and copA genes sequence analyses

The PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis. Bands were cut from the gel with a scalpel and DNA was recovery using Zimoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Irvine, CA, USA). The purified DNA was sequenced directly by an Applied Biosystem 3730XL DNA sequence (Carlsbad, CA, USA), using the primers 27f and 1492r for 16S rRNA gene and Coprun F2 and Coprun R1 for copA gene sequencing, respectively. The nucleotide sequences of 16S rRNA genes were aligned with sequences available in the GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The nucleotide sequence of copA gene was translated into a protein sequence using blastx. Then, partial sequences of CopA were aligned with other CopA sequences from Cu-resistant bacteria [18]. A phylogenetic analysis was performed to study the evolutionary relationships of the sequences based on the alignments calculated by CLUSTAL W using the default options. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 5.05 software [33]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strains O12, A32, A55, C21 and O4 were submitted to the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database under accession number EMBL:HE608567, EMBL:HE608568, EMBL:HE608569, EMBL:HE608570 and EMBL:HE608571, respectively. The copA gene sequence of strains O12, A32, A55, C21 and O4 were submitted to the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database under accession number EMBL:HE716432, EMBL:HE716433, EMBL:HE16434, EMBL:HE16435, EMBL:HE16436, respectively.

Plasmid isolation from bacterial strains

Plasmid isolation from bacterial strains was performed using the method of Kado and Liu [34] with minor modifications [31]. Plasmids were visualized in agarose gel electrophoresis. Bands were cut from the gel with a scalpel and plasmids were recovery from the gel using Zimoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Irvine, CA, USA). The presence of copA gene in plasmids was assessed by PCR using the protocol described above.

Results

The bacterial communities of three Cu-polluted agricultural soils and one non-polluted soil from Valparaíso region, central Chile, were characterized. The three polluted agricultural sites from Aconcagua valley are located close to an active or an abandoned Cu smelter. An agricultural soil located far away from mining activities in Casablanca valley was selected as a non-polluted site. Soils from Aconcagua valley (loam) and from Casablanca valley (sandy loam) were neutral. Soils from South Chagres and Ñilhue showed higher organic matter content (4.5%) than soils from North Chagres and La Vinilla (2.3%). The total Cu concentrations of the Aconcagua valley soils ranged from 379 to 784 mg kg-1, whereas the total Cu concentration in the La Vinilla soil was only 21 mg kg-1. The exchangeable Cu concentration of the North and South Chagres soils was 2.0 and 1.9 mg kg-1, respectively, and 1.2 mg kg-1 for the Ñilhue soil. The exchangeable Cu concentration observed in the La Vinilla soil was below the detection limit (0.1 mg kg-1). The total concentrations of Zn (ranged from 97 to 205 mg kg-1), Pb (ranged from 33 to 73 mg kg-1) and Cr (ranged from 13 to 19 mg kg-1) in Cu-polluted soils from Aconcagua valley were high, whereas in La Vinilla soil heavy metals were present at low concentration.

Bacterial community profiling in agricultural soils by DGGE

DGGE from the four soils showed complex profiles suggesting a high diversity of the bacterial community in Cu-polluted and non-polluted soils (Figure 2A). UPGMA analysis of banding patterns from bacterial DGGE profiles of the four agricultural sites were grouped into four clusters (Figure 2B). Replicates from each agricultural soil showed a very high similarity (approximately 95%). Soils from South Chagres, Ñilhue and North Chagres showed a high similarity (approximately 80%). The non-polluted La Vinilla soil showed a similarity of 73% with the Cu-polluted soils (Figure 2B). The values of Shannon index obtained for each soil were 3.65 ± 0.01 for North Chagres, 3.77 ± 0.01 for South Chagres, 3.65 ± 0.01 for Ñilhue and 3.71 ± 0.03 for La Vinilla. The richness values (S) obtained for each soil were 38.67 ± 0.58 for North Chagres, 43.67 ± 0.58 for South Chagres, 38.33 ± 0.58 for Ñilhue and 40.67 ± 1.15 for La Vinilla (Figure 2B).

Figure 2
figure 2

DGGE of 16S rRNA genes of bacterial communities from agricultural soils. A. DGGE of bacterial communities from North Chagres (lanes N1-N3), South Chagres (lanes S1-S3), Ñilhue (lanes Ñ1-Ñ3) and La Vinilla (V1-V3). B. Dendrogram showing cluster analysis of 16S rRNA gene profiles of bacterial communities from the four agricultural soils. Gel image analysis was performed by using Phoretix 1D software package. Bands were automatically detected and manually corrected. A binary matrix was generated by presence or absence bands. The sample similarities were analyzed by MVSP.

PCR detection of Cu-resistance genes in metagenomic DNA from agricultural soils

The presence of the copA gene in the metagenomic DNA from the four agricultural soils was studied. The copA gene was detected by PCR in the three Cu-polluted soils from Aconcagua valley (data not shown). In contrast, the copA gene was not detected in the non-polluted soil from Casablanca valley.

Copper tolerance of bacterial community

The Cu-tolerance of the bacterial community of the agricultural soils was determined. The cultivable heterotrophic bacteria ranged from 1.2 × 107 to 2.2 × 107 CFU g-1d.w.s in Cu-polluted and non-polluted soils. The Cu-tolerant culti-vable bacteria ranged from 3 to 23% (from 7.4 × 105 to 2.8 × 106 CFU g-1d.w.s) of the total cultivable heterotrophic bacteria in Cu-polluted agricultural soils from Aconcagua valley. In the non-polluted soil from La Vinilla, the Cu-tolerant bacteria were 0.4% (5.9 × 104 CFU g-1d.w.s). The number of Cu-tolerant cultivable bacteria was significantly larger in Cu-polluted soils than in non-polluted soil (P ≤ 0.05). The highest frequency of Cu-tolerant bacteria was found in the Cu-polluted soil of South Chagres, which is the soil with the highest Cu content, while the lowest rate was found in the non-polluted soil from La Vinilla. These results revealed that Cu-tolerant cultivable bacteria in Cu-polluted soils were approximately 13 to 46 fold higher than in the non-polluted soil (Table 1).

Table 1 Number of heterotrophic and copper-tolerant cultivable bacteria of the agricultural soils

Characterization of Cu-resistant bacterial isolates

Cu-resistant bacteria were isolated from the three Cu-polluted soils from the Aconcagua valley. A representative collection of 92 bacterial strains (29 to 31 from each Cu-polluted soil) were isolated by enrichment in R2A medium containing Cu2+ (0.8 mM). The soil bacteria isolated were challenged with successive Cu2+ concentrations from 0.8 to 4.7 mM in LPTMS medium. A marked decrease in the cells number was observed in the medium containing Cu2+ (2.8 mM). Eleven bacteria that were capable of growing in the presence of Cu2+ (2.8 mM) were selected from the 92 isolates for further studies. Two bacterial strains isolated from Ñilhue were capable of tolerate 3.5 mM of Cu2+. Three isolates from South Chagres tolerate 3.5 mM of Cu2+. Six strains from North Chagres were capable of tolerate 2.8 mM of Cu2+. The Cu-resistant isolates were challenged to heavy metals for the determination of the MIC values. Five of the eleven Cu-resistant strains isolated (strain C21 from North Chagres, strains A32 and A55 from South Chagres; strains O4 and O12 from Ñilhue) showed also tolerance to Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Hg2+ and CrO42- (Table 2). These five broad-range heavy metal resistant bacteria should possess diverse mechanisms for heavy metal resistance. Therefore, these isolates were selected for further characterization. Strains that were capable to grow in presence of 0.5 mM of Cu2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ or CrO42- and 0.05 mM of Hg2+ were recorded as tolerant. Strain O12 showed a high MIC to Cu2+ (4.7 mM), Co2+ (2.5 mM), Ni2+ (17 mM), Zn2+ (8.5 mM) and Hg2+ (0.4 mM). Strain A32 and A55 showed a high MIC to Cu2+ (3.9 mM), Co2+ (2.5 mM), Ni2+ (17 mM), Zn2+ (8.5 mM) and Hg2+ (0.4 mM). Strain O4 showed a high MIC to Cu2+ (3.9 mM), CrO42- (4.3 mM), Co2+ (2.5 mM), and Ni2+ (8.5 mM). Strain C21 showed a high MIC to Cu2+ (3.1 mM), CrO42- (4.3 mM) and Co2+ (0.8 mM). All the strains had a low MIC to Cd2+ (lower than 0.4 mM), indicating that these strains were not resistant to this heavy metal.

Table 2 Minimum inhibitory concentration of heavy metal for soil bacterial isolates

Identification of Cu-resistant isolates

For bacterial identification, comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses of the bacterial isolates were used. The results indicated that isolates O12, A32 and A55 belong to the Sphingomonas genus, showing a high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (98%) to Sphingomonas paucimobilis. Isolate C21 was identified as a Stenotrophomonas strain, showing a high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (98%) to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Isolate O4 was identified as an Arthrobacter strain, with high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (99%) to Arthrobacter oxydans. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the isolates and other bacteria including strains from Stenotrophomonas, Sphingomonas and Arthrobacter genera were used to build a phylogenetic tree (Figure 3). Strains O12, A32 and A55 are closely related to Sphingomonas paucimobilis strain OS-64.a. Strain C21 is closely related with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains HR69 and d109. Strain O4 is closely related with the Gram-positive bacteria Arthrobacter oxydans WA4-3 and Arthrobacter oxydans EA6-10 (Figure 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Identification of bacterial isolates by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using neighbor-joining method. Values of 1000 bootstrap replicates above 60% are given at the branching point. Sequences of the bacterial isolates Sphingomonas sp. strain O12, Sphingomonas sp. strain A32, Sphingomonas sp. strain A55, Stenotrophomonas sp. strain C21 and Arthrobacter sp. strain O4 are highlighted (black circles). Vertical bar represents 0.02 units of evolutionary distance.

PCR detection of heavy metal determinants in genomic DNA from bacterial isolates

The presence of the copA gene encoding a multi-copper oxidase in the bacterial isolates was studied by PCR using the Coprun primers. The bacterial strains O12, A32, A55, C21 and O4 possess the copA genes. The PCR products varied between 1000–1200 bp. The CopA protein sequences were aligned with CopA sequences belonging to Cu-resistant bacteria and were used to construct a phylogenetic tree (Figure 4). Sequence analyses indicate that the copA genes of the isolates encode multi-copper oxidases that are involved in Cu resistance but that are not associated to degradation of phenolic compounds or polymers. The CopA protein of Sphingomonas sp. strains O12, A32 and A55 are closely related to CopA of other α-Proteobacteria, sharing high similarity (93%) with CopA from Sphingomonas sp. S17. The CopA from Stenotrophomonas sp. strain C21 belongs to the Stenotrophomonas and Xanthomonas CopA branch of the γ-Proteobacteria and is closely related to CopA from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia R551-3 (67% similarity). The CopA of strain Arthrobacter sp. O4 is closely related to the CopA of Actinobacteria and possess a 68% similarity with CopA from Arthrobacter sp. strain FB24.

Figure 4
figure 4

Phylogenetic tree showing the relatedness of multi-copper oxidase CopA of the bacterial isolates. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using neighbor-joining method. Values of 1000 bootstrap replicates above 50% are given at the branching point. Sequences of CopA proteins of the bacterial isolates Sphingomonas sp. strain O12, Sphingomonas sp. strain A32, Sphingomonas sp. strain A55, Stenotrophomonas sp. strain C21 and Arthrobacter sp. strain O4 are highlighted (black circles).

Other heavy metal determinants were studied by PCR using specific primers for merA (Hg2+ resistance), merB (organomercurial resistance) and chrB (CrO42- resistance) genes based on C. metallidurans CH34 sequences. Using these specific primers, the merA, merB and chrB genes were not detected in the five Cu-resistant bacterial strains.

Detection of plasmids in bacterial isolates

Sphingomonas sp. strain O12, Sphingomonas sp. strain A32, Sphingomonas sp. strain A55 and Stenotrophomonas sp. strain C21 possessed plasmids (Figure 5). Plasmids were no detected in Arthrobacter sp. strain O4. The plasmids of these four bacterial isolates contained the copA gene encoding a multi-copper oxidase (Figure 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

Detection of plasmids encoding copA genes in copper-resistant bacterial isolates. A. Agarose gel electrophoresis of plasmids isolated from Sphingomonas sp. strain O12 (lane 2) Sphingomonas sp. strain A32 (lane 3), Sphingomonas sp. strain A55 (lane 4) and Stenotrophomonas sp. strain C21 (lane 5). No plasmid was observed in Arthrobacter sp. strain O4 (lane 6). C. metallidurans strain MSR33 that carries the pMOL30, pMOL28 and pTP6 plasmids was used as a positive control (lane 1). B. Detection of copA gene in plasmids of bacterial isolates. The copA gene was detected in Sphingomonas sp. strain O12 (lane 2), Sphingomonas sp. strain A32 (lane 3), Sphingomonas sp. strain A55 (lane 4) and Stenotrophomonas sp. strain C21 (lane 5). C. metallidurans strain MSR33 (lanes1) was used as a positive control.

Discussion

In this report, the bacterial communities in long-term Cu-polluted agricultural soils from Aconcagua valley, central Chile, were studied and compared with the bacterial community of a non-polluted agricultural soil. The bacterial DGGE profiles showed high similarity (approximately 80%) among Cu-contaminated soils suggesting a low variation in the dominant bacterial groups in these soils. A similar number of bands and banding pattern was observed by DGGE fingerprints in polluted and non-polluted soils. Despite of the difference in the Cu content in soils, DGGE studies presented a similar Shannon diversity index (H’) and richness suggesting that the presence of high copper concentration and differences in other soil properties did not affect the diversity of the dominant groups of the bacterial communities detected by DGGE. These results are in agreement with a previous report of soils from abandoned Cu mines from South Australia that show a low impact of Cu on the dominant microbial diversity [35]. Probably, bacterial communities from long-term Cu-polluted soils are well adapted to the high Cu content. Short-term Cu pollution in soil induces significant modifications in bacterial community structure, but these changes were resilient after a few weeks or months [9]. Our results are in agreement with previous studies showing that Cu, Pb and Zn did not change significantly the bacterial diversity after long-term contamination [36, 37].

The copA gene that encodes for the multi-copper oxidase is one of the main genetic determinants involved in Cu-resistance [1, 25, 26]. In this report, the presence of copA gene was studied in metagenomic DNA from agricultural soils. The copA gene was detected in the three Cu-polluted soils. In contrast, the copA gene was not detected in metagenomic DNA from soils with low Cu content. The number of heterotrophic cultivable bacteria was constant in all agricultural soils, whereas, the number of Cu-resistant heterotrophic bacteria was significantly higher in Cu-polluted soils than in the non-polluted soil. These results suggest that the presence of high levels of Cu in Aconcagua valley soils is exerting a selective pressure on the bacterial communities, which favors the selection of Cu-tolerant bacteria.

Cu-tolerant bacteria were isolated from the Cu-polluted agricultural soils. Most of bacterial isolates were not capable to grow in LPTMS medium supplemented with Cu2+ (2 mM). Our results are consistent with a previous study that indicates that the number of resistant bacteria decreased at higher Cu2+ concentration [38]. Five isolates, Sphingomonas sp. strain O12, Sphingomonas sp. strain A32, Sphingomonas sp. strain A55, Stenotrophomonas sp. strain C21 and Arthrobacter sp. strain O4, were resistant to high Cu2+ concentration (≥ 2.8 mM) and other heavy metals. Bacteria that tolerate Cu concentrations higher than 2 mM should possess an effective resistance system for Cu detoxification. The isolates Sphingomonas sp. strain O12, Sphingomonas sp. strain A32 and Sphingomonas sp. strain A55, showed a high MIC to Cu2+ (ranged from 3.9 to 4.7 mM), Co2+ (2.5 mM), Ni2+ (17 mM), Zn2+ (8.5 mM) and Hg2+ (0.4 mM) (Table 2). The MIC of the heavy metal resistant bacterium C. metallidurans strain MSR33 to Cu2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Hg2+ is 3.8, 20, 6.0, 17 and 0.1 mM, respectively. Stenotrophomonas sp. strain C21 and Arthrobacter sp. strain O4 showed a high MIC to Cu2+ (ranged from 3.1 to 3.9 mM) and CrO42- (4.3 mM). C. metallidurans strain MSR33 has a MIC to CrO42- of 0.7 mM. These high levels of heavy metal resistances may be useful for surviving and adapting to acute heavy metal contamination events in the soil. The mechanisms involved in heavy metal resistance of the strains isolated should be studied. Sphingomonas macrogoltabidus strain S1n isolated from rhizosphere of Alyssum murale, showed a high MIC to Cu2+ (5 mM) and Ni2+ (15 mM) [38]. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain SM777 isolated from a contaminated culture, showed high MIC to Cu2+ (5 mM), Ni2+ (10 mM), Zn2+ (4 mM), and Hg2+ (0.05 mM) [39]. Arthrobacter sp. strain E9 isolated from a battery-manufacturing contaminated site, showed a high MIC to Cu2+ (5.8 mM), Co2+ (2.5 mM), Zn2+ (3 mM) and Hg2+ (0.06 mM) [40]. Arthrobacter sp. strain S189 isolated from rhizosphere of Alyssum murale, showed a high MIC to Cu2+ (10 mM), Co2+ (5 mM), Ni2+ (15 mM), Zn2+ (10 mM) and Hg2+ (0.5 mM) [38].

The high level of heavy metal resistance of Sphingomonas sp. strain O12, Sphingomonas sp. strain A32, Sphingomonas sp. strain A55, Stenotrophomonas sp. strain C21 and Arthrobacter sp. strain O4 suggests that these strains possess diverse heavy metal determinants. The use of specific primers based on heavy metal determinants from C. metallidurans strain MSR33 did not yield amplicons. In future studies, the presence of heavy metal resistance genes will be studied using more general primers.

In this study, the presence of multi-copper oxidase gene was evaluated in the five isolates using degenerated primers designed for copA sequences from Proteobacteria. The presence of multi-copper oxidase copA genes in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria was determined. The presence of copA gene in both bacterial groups suggests that the cop system involved in Cu-resistance could be widespread in soil probably through horizontal genes transfer among soil bacteria. The sequence analysis indicates that the CopA proteins from Sphingomonas isolates (O12, A32 and A55), Stenotrophomonas strain (C21) and Arthrobacter strain (O4) are closely related to CopA from Sphingomonas, Stenotrophomonas and Arthrobacter strains, respectively. The copA genes of the fives isolates encode multi-copper oxidases that oxidize Cu(I) to Cu(II) but not phenolic compounds or polymers as other multi-copper oxidases reported [41, 42].

Phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA gene sequences indicate that the isolates belong to Sphingomonas, Stenotrophomonas and Arthrobacter genera. The phylogenetic tree obtained from the sequence analysis of 16S rRNA gene was similar to those results predicted from the sequence analysis of CopA protein (Figure 3 and 4), showing a high concordance between structural and functional genes.

Mobile genetic elements (MGE) could be involved in the spreading of Cu resistance determinants, facilitating the adaptation of bacterial communities to copper [43]. Bacteria exposed to copper for a long period of time may acquire MGE such as plasmids carrying copper determinants and, therefore, they become copper-resistant bacteria [4345]. In agreement with this hypothesis, this study showed the presence of the copA gene in metagenomic DNA from the three Cu-polluted soils and the absence of copA gene in metagenomic DNA from the non-polluted soil. This study demonstrates that Gram-negative Cu-resistant strains isolated from long-term Cu-contaminated soils carried plasmid with Cu-resistance determinants. The presence of plasmids encoding copA genes in Sphingomonas sp. strain O12, Sphingomonas sp. strain A32, Sphingomonas sp. strain A55 and Stenotrophomonas sp. C21 (Figure 5) confirm that MGE are involved in copper resistance in these isolates. The copA (pcoA) genes encoding multi-copper oxidases have been characterized in plasmids such as pPT23D, pRJ1004 and pMOL30 from Escherichia coli RJ92, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato PT23 and Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34, respectively [20, 21, 24]. The multi-copper oxidase copA gene was present in the genome of the Gram-positive bacterium Arthrobacter sp. O4, but plasmids were not detected in this strain. The CopA protein sequence from Arthrobacte r sp. O4 possesses a high similarity (68%) with the multi-copper oxidase gene of Arthrobacter sp. FB24, which is located in a plasmid [46, 47]. As plasmid isolation in some bacterial strains is difficult, the presence of the copA gene from Arthrobacte r sp. O4 in a plasmid could not be excluded.

Conclusions

This study have shown that the bacterial community diversity of agricultural soil of central Chile analyzed by DGGE was similar in Cu-polluted and non-polluted soils. The copA gene encoding multi-copper oxidase was detected only in metagenomic DNA of Cu-polluted soils suggesting that copA genes are widely spread in contaminated environments. Cu-resistant bacteria were isolated from these long-term polluted soils. The MIC studies on bacterial isolates indicated that Cu-resistant bacteria were also resistant to other heavy metal such as Ni2+, Hg2+ and CrO42-. The copA gene was detected in the Cu-resistant Sphingomonas, Stenotrophomonas and Arthrobacter strains isolated from the polluted agricultural soils. The multi-copper oxidase copA gene is located in plasmids in the four Sphingomonas and Stenotrophomonas strains suggesting that MGEs may spread Cu-resistance determinants in these soils. This study contributes to the understanding of the effect of long-term Cu-pollution on the bacterial community of agricultural soils and to the characterization of novel Cu-resistant bacterial isolates from agricultural soils from the Aconcagua valley.

References

  1. Rensing C, Grass G: Escherichia coli mechanisms of copper homeostasis in a changing environment. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003, 27: 197-213. 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00049-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Solioz M, Stoyanov JV: Copper homeostasis in Enterococcus hirae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003, 27: 183-195. 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00053-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Gregori I, Fuentes E, Rojas M, Pinochet H, Potin-Gautier M: Monitoring of copper, arsenic and antimony levels in agricultural soils impacted and non-impacted by mining activities, from three regions in Chile. J Environ Monit. 2003, 5: 287-295. 10.1039/b211469k.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tembo BD, Sichilongo K, Cernak J: Distribution of copper, lead, cadmium and zinc concentrations in soils around Kabwe town in Zambia. Chemosphere. 2006, 63: 497-501. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Salami IR, Rahmawati S, Sutarto RI, Jaya PM: Accumulation of heavy metals in freshwater fish in cage aquaculture at Cirata reservoir, West Java, Indonesia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008, 1140: 290-296. 10.1196/annals.1454.037.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jernström J, Lehto J, Dauvalter VA, Hatakka A, Leskinen A, Paatero J: Heavy metals in bottom sediments of lake Umbozero in Murmansk region, Russia. Environ Monit Assess. 2010, 161: 93-105. 10.1007/s10661-008-0730-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mudd GM, Patterson J: Continuing pollution from the Rum Jungle U-Cu project: a critical evaluation of environmental monitoring and rehabilitation. Environ Pollut. 2010, 158: 1252-1260. 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.01.017.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hao X, Zhou D, Wang Y, Shi F, Jiang P: Accumulation of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd in edible parts of four commonly grown crops in two contaminated soils. Int J Phytoremediat. 2011, 13: 289-301. 10.1080/15226514.2010.483260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ranjard L, Echairi A, Nowak V, Lejon D, Nouaim R, Chaussod R: Field and microcosm experiments to evaluate the effects of agricultural Cu treatment on the density and genetic structure of microbial communities in two different soils. FEMS Microb Ecol. 2006, 58: 303-315. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00157.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Giller KE, Witter E, McGrath SP: Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils: a review. Soil Biol Biochem. 1998, 30: 1389-1414. 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00270-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Shi J, Wang H, Lin Q, Chen X, Chen Y: The influence of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition near a copper smelter. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2007, 67: 75-81. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Morgante V, López-López A, Flores C, González M, González B, Vásquez M, Rosselló-Mora R, Seeger M: Bioaugmentation with Pseudomonas sp. strain MHP41 promotes simazine attenuation and bacterial community changes in agricultural soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010, 71: 114-126. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00790.x. Erratum in FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2010, 72:152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hernández M, Jia Z, Conrad R, Seeger M: Simazine application inhibits nitrification and changes the ammonia-oxidizing bacterial communities in a fertilized agricultural soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011, 78: 511-519. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01180.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Niklinska M, Chodak M, Laskowski R: Characterization of the forest humus microbial community in a heavy metal polluted area. Soil Biol Biochem. 2005, 37: 2185-2194. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dell'Amico E, Mazzocchi M, Cavalca L, Allievi L, Andreoni V: Assessment of bacterial community structure in a long-term copper-polluted ex-vineyard soil. Microbiol Res. 2008, 163: 671-683. 10.1016/j.micres.2006.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Z, Xu J, Tang C, Wu J, Muhammad A, Wang H: Application of 16S rRNA PCR amplification and DGGE fingerprinting for detection of shift microbial community diversity in Cu-, Zn-, and Cd-contaminated paddy soil. Chemosphere. 2006, 62: 1374-1380. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.07.050.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Magnani D, Solioz M: How bacteria handle cooper. Molecular microbiology of heavy metals. Edited by: Nies DH, Silver S. 2007, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 259-285.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei G, Fan L, Zhu W, Fu Y, Yu J, Tang M: Isolation and characterization of the heavy metal resistant bacteria CCNWRS33-2 isolated from root nodule of Lespedeza cuneata in gold mine tailings in China. J Hazard Mater. 2009, 162: 50-56. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.040.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dupont CL, Grass G, Rensing C: Copper toxicity and the origin of bacterial resistance-new insights and applications. Metallomics. 2011, 3: 1109-1118. 10.1039/c1mt00107h.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tetaz TJ, Luke RK: Plasmid-controlled resistance to copper in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1983, 154: 1263-1268.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mellano MA, Cooksey DA: Nucleotide sequence and organization of copper resistance genes from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. J Bacteriol. 1988, 170: 2879-2883.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Voloudakis AE, Reignier TM, Cooksey DA: Regulation of resistance to copper in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 782-789. 10.1128/AEM.71.2.782-789.2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Teitzel GM, Geddie A, de Long SK, Kirisits MJ, Whiteley M, Parsek MR: Survival and growth in the presence of elevated copper: transcriptional profiling of copper-stressed Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 7242-7256. 10.1128/JB.00837-06.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Monchy S, Benotmane MA, Janssen P, Vallaeys T, Taghavi S, van der Lelie D, Mergeay M: Plasmids pMOL28 and pMOL30 of Cupriavidus metallidurans are specialized in the maximal viable response to heavy metals. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 7417-7425. 10.1128/JB.00375-07.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nies D: Microbial heavy-metal resistance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999, 51: 730-750. 10.1007/s002530051457.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lejon DP, Nowak V, Bouko S, Pascault N, Mougel C, Martins JM, Ranjard L: Fingerprinting and diversity of bacterial copA genes in response to soil types, soil organic status and copper contamination. FEMS Microb Ecol. 2007, 61: 424-437. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00365.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flores C, Morgante V, González M, Navia R, Seeger M: Adsorption studies of the herbicide simazine in agricultural soils of the Aconcagua valley, central Chile. Chemosphere. 2009, 74: 1544-1549. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.10.060.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Heuer H, Wieland G, Schönfeld J, Schönwälder S, Gomes NCM, Smalla K: Bacterial community profiling using DGGE or TGGE analysis. Environmental Molecular Microbiology: Protocols and Applications. Edited by: Rouchelle P. 2001, Horizon Scientific Press, Wymondham, 177-190.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hernández M, Villalobos P, Morgante V, González M, Reiff C, Moore E, Seeger M: Isolation and characterization of novel simazine-degrading bacterium from agricultural soils of central Chile, Pseudomonas sp. MHP41. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008, 286: 184-190. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01274.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Konstatinidis KT, Isaacs N, Fett J, Simpson S, Long DT, Marsh TL: Microbial diversity and resistance to copper in metal-contaminated lake sediment. Microb Ecol. 2003, 45: 191-202. 10.1007/s00248-002-1035-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rojas LA, Yáñez C, González M, Lobos S, Smalla K, Seeger M: Characterization of the metabolically modified heavy metal-resistant Cupriavidus metallidurans strain MSR33 generated for mercury bioremediation. PLoS One. 2011, 14: e17555-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liebert C, Wireman J, Smith T, Summers A: Phylogeny of mercury resistance (mer) operons of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from the fecal flora of primates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63: 1066-1076.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28: 2731-2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kado C, Liu S: Rapid procedure for detection and isolation of large and small plasmids. J Bacteriol. 1981, 145: 1365-1373.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Guo Z, Meghari M, Beer M, Ming H, Rahman MM, Wu W, Naidu R: Heavy metal impact on bacterial biomass based on DNA analysis and uptake by wild plants in the abandoned copper mine soil. Bioresour Technol. 2009, 100: 3831-3836. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.043.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ellis RJ, Morgan P, Weightman AJ, Fry JC: Cultivation-dependent and -independent approaches for determining bacterial diversity in heavy-metal-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 69: 3223-3230. 10.1128/AEM.69.6.3223-3230.2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Deng H, Li XF, Cheng WD, Zhu YG: Resistance and resilience of Cu-polluted soil after Cu perturbation, tested by a wide range of soil microbial parameters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009, 70: 137-148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Abou-Shanab RI, van Berkum P, Angle J: Heavy metal resistance and genotypic analysis of metal resistance genes in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria present in Ni-rich serpentine soil and in the rhizosphere of Alyssum murale. Chemosphere. 2007, 68: 360-367. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.051.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pages D, Rose J, Conrod S, Cuine S, Carrier P, Heulin T, Achouak W: Heavy metal tolerance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. PLoS One. 2008, 3: e1539-10.1371/journal.pone.0001539.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Trajanovska S, Britz M, Bhave M: Detection of heavy metal ion resistance genes in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria isolated from a lead-contaminated site. Biodegradation. 1997, 8: 113-124. 10.1023/A:1008212614677.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Claus H: Laccases and their occurrence in prokaryotes. Arch Microbiol. 2003, 179: 145-150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Giardina P, Faraco V, Pezzella C, Piscitelli A, Vanhulle S, Sannia G: Laccases: a never-ending story. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010, 67: 369-385. 10.1007/s00018-009-0169-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Smalla K, Haines AS, Jones K, Krögerrecklenfort E, Heuer H, Schloter M, Thomas CM: Increased abundance of IncP-1β plasmids and mercury resistance genes in mercury-polluted river sediments: first discovery of IncP-1β plasmids with a complex mer transposon as the sole accessory element. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72: 7253-7259. 10.1128/AEM.00922-06.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Campbell JIA, Jacobsen CS, Sørensen J: Species variation and plasmid incidence among fluorescent Pseudomonas strains isolated from agricultural and industrial soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1995, 18: 51-62. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1995.tb00163.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. de Lipthay JR, Rasmussen LD, Oregaard G, Simonsen K, Bahl MI, Kroer N, Sørensen SJ: Acclimation of subsurface microbial communities to mercury. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008, 65: 145-155. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00501.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jerke K, Nakatsu CH, Beasley F, Konopka A: Comparative analysis of eight Arthrobacter plasmids. Plasmid. 2008, 59: 73-85. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2007.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Henne KL, Nakatsu CH, Thompson DK, Konopka AE: High-level chromate resistance in Arthrobacter sp. strain FB24 requires previously uncharacterized accessory genes. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9: 199-212. 10.1186/1471-2180-9-199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from USM 131109, 13948 and 130836 (MS), FONDECYT 1110992 and 1070507 (MS), FONDECYT 3090071 (CY) and Center of Nanotechnology and Systems Biology (MS, FA). LAR acknowledges a MECESUP FSM0710 postdoctoral fellowship. FA and GB acknowledge CONICYT PhD fellowships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Seeger.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Authors' contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: FA, CY, MG, MS. Soil sampling: FA, CY, GB. Performed the experiments: FA, MG, LAR, GB. Analyzed the data: FA, CY, GB, MG, LAR, MS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MS, MG, CY. Wrote the paper: FA, LAR, MS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Altimira, F., Yáñez, C., Bravo, G. et al. Characterization of copper-resistant bacteria and bacterial communities from copper-polluted agricultural soils of central Chile. BMC Microbiol 12, 193 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-193

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-193

Keywords