Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of BCG, MPL and cationic liposome adjuvant systems in leishmanial antigen vaccine formulations against murine visceral leishmaniasis

BMC Microbiology volume 10, Article number: 181 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The development of an effective vaccine against visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by Leishmania donovani is an essential aim for controlling the disease. Use of the right adjuvant is of fundamental importance in vaccine formulations for generation of effective cell-mediated immune response. Earlier we reported the protective efficacy of cationic liposome-associated L. donovani promastigote antigens (LAg) against experimental VL. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of two very promising adjuvants, Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) plus trehalose dicorynomycolate (TDM) with cationic liposomes, in combination with LAg, to confer protection against murine VL.

Results

All the three formulations afforded significant protection against L. donovani in both the visceral organs, liver and spleen. Although comparable level of protection was observed in BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM+LAg immunized mice, highest level of protection was exhibited by the liposomal LAg immunized group. Significant increase in anti-LAg IgG levels were detected in both MPL-TDM+LAg and liposomal LAg immunized animals with higher levels of IgG2a than IgG1. But BCG+LAg failed to induce any antibody response. As an index of cell-mediated immunity DTH responses were measured and significant response was observed in mice vaccinated with all the three different formulations. However, highest responses were observed with liposomal vaccine immunization. Comparative evaluation of IFN-γ and IL-4 responses in immunized mice revealed that MPL-TDM+LAg group produced the highest level of IFN-γ but lowest IL-4 level, while BCG+LAg demonstrated generation of suboptimum levels of both IFN-γ and IL-4 response. Elicitation of moderate levels of prechallenge IFN-γ along with optimum IL-4 corresponds with successful vaccination with liposomal LAg.

Conclusion

This comparative study reveals greater effectiveness of the liposomal vaccine for protection against progressive VL in BALB/c. Again, evaluation of the immune responses by vaccination emphasizes the need of stimulation of potent cellular immunity based on both Th1 and Th2 cell responses to confer protection against VL.

Background

Leishmaniases are a wide spectrum of diseases caused by trypanosomatid parasites of the genus Leishmania with two million new cases of human infection worldwide each year [1]. The clinico-pathological categories range from self-healing cutaneous lesions to visceral leishmaniasis (VL), the latter being an invariably fatal disease in the absence of drug treatment. Currently available chemotherapeutic agents are usually associated with high cost and toxicity [2]. Moreover, the emergence of drug resistance has raised an urgent demand for development of a safe and effective vaccine to combat the disease.

Recently, a great deal of effort has been directed towards generation of subunit vaccines that may be safer than whole cell vaccines [3]. A major limiting factor for the development of subunit vaccines is the appropriate adjuvant to enhance and tailor the effective and long lasting immune response. Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) are two immunostimulatory adjuvants that act directly on the immune system to augment cell-mediated response to the associated antigens. BCG, in addition to being the most widely used vaccine in the world since 1921, is an immune-modulator stimulating several Toll-like receptors (TLRs) that can potentiate Th1 biased immune response [4–6]. BCG alone can protect mice against leishmaniasis [7, 8], and it has also long been used as an adjuvant in field efficacy trials of candidate vaccines against leishmaniasis [9]. MPL, the non-toxic derivative of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Salmonella minnesota is a safe and well-tolerated adjuvant approved for human use. It signals via TLR4 for the activation of T-cell effector response. Several immunization trials including Leishmania, malaria, human papillomavirus (HPV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), tuberculosis and HIV with different formulations of MPL have established the safety and efficacy of this promising adjuvant [10]. Cationic liposomes are lipid-bilayer vesicles with a positive surface charge that have emerged as a promising new adjuvant technology having low toxicity and biodegradability. They are very effective antigen-deliver systems and serve to markedly enhance the uptake and presentation of antigens by antigen presenting cells. Thus, they potentiate cell-mediated and humoral immune response to poorly immunogenic protein and peptide antigens [11–14] and generate solid and durable immunity against experimental VL [15–18].

Investigations of immune protection mechanisms against leishmaniasis reveals that a shift in the balance from interleukin (IL)-4 to interferon (IFN)-γ provides the key to vaccine success in cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) [19]. Protective immunity in VL also correlates with a Th1 and IFN- γ production [20]. But immune response to VL is a more complex reaction where an exclusive generation of a vaccine-induced Th1 is insufficient to ensure protection, and cannot predict vaccine success [21, 22]. Although induction of IL-4 in infected BALB/c and noncuring models has been reported [23, 24], beneficial roles of IL-4 have also been described for L. donovani infection [25, 26].

Our earlier studies showed that leishmanial antigens (LAg) entrapped in cationic liposomes induced protection against progressive models of VL [15]. With the aim of improving vaccine formulation against this disease potential human-compatible adjuvants, BCG and MPL, were selected for combination with LAg. Thus, in the present study the protective efficacy of LAg with BCG and MPL-TDM were evaluated and compared with LAg entrapped in cationic liposomes when given by same intraperitoneal route against experimental challenge of L. donovani in BALB/c mice. A comparative evaluation of the immune responses elicited by the three different vaccine formulations was investigated to understand the immune mechanisms responsible for the differences in their protective abilities.

Results

Comparison of parasite burden in differently adjuvanted LAg vaccinated mice after L. donovani challenge infection

To compare the efficacy of vaccination against VL with LAg in three different adjuvants, BALB/c mice were immunized intraperitoneally with BCG + LAg, MPL- TDM+LAg and LAg entrapped in cationic liposomes. The vaccination was repeated twice at 2-week intervals and the mice were challenged intravenously with L. donovani promastigotes 10 days after the last immunization. Control mice received PBS or adjuvants alone. After 2 and 4 months of challenge infection clearance of hepatic and splenic parasite burden was monitored. The parasite loads were quantitated as LDU in liver and spleen biopsies. As shown in Figure 1 control mice receiving PBS or adjuvants alone developed highest parasite load in the liver and spleen as an outcome of progressive disease [15, 16, 27, 28]. In liver, immunization with BCG + LAg and MPL-TDM + LAg did not result in any protection at 2 months post-infection (Figure 1A). However, there was significant and comparable level of decrease in parasite load in both the groups, suggesting a specific partial protection after 4 months of challenge infection as compared with PBS and corresponding free adjuvant immunized groups (P < 0.001). Interestingly, mice immunized with liposomal LAg showed highest reduction in parasite load in liver after 2 as well as 4 months of challenge which is significantly lower than BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM+LAg vaccinated groups (P < 0.001).

Figure 1
figure 1

Evaluation of protection against L. donovani in differently adjuvanted LAg vaccinated mice . Kinetics of liver (A) and spleen (B) parasite burden of mice immunized intraperitoneally three times at 2-week intervals with BCG-LAg, MPL-TDM+LAg and LAg entrapped in cationic liposomes. Control animals received PBS or adjuvant only. At 10 days after the last immunization, mice were challenged intravenously with 2 × 107 promastigotes of L. donovani. At the designated times mice were sacrificed and LDU were calculated from the weight and microscopic examination of impression smears of liver and spleen tissues. Each bar represents the mean ± SE for five individual mice per group. The results are those from one experiment representative of two performed. Asterisks over each bar indicate significant differences in comparison to control groups. Asterisks over line indicate significant differences between groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

Full size image

In BALB/c mice persistence of L. donovani in the spleen causes concomitant development of considerable organ-specific pathology similar to that seen in the human kala-azar. It was, therefore, important to evaluate the effect of vaccination in this organ. Similar to liver, mice immunized with BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM+LAg demonstrated partial and comparable level of protection in spleen after 4 months challenge (Figure 1B; P < 0.01, compared to controls). However, liposomal LAg immunization exhibited the maximum level of reduction in splenic parasite load at both 2 and 4 months after challenge (P < 0.001, compared to controls).

Antigen-specific humoral responses in differently adjuvanted LAg vaccinated mice

To evaluate the humoral immune responses induced by three differently adjuvanted vaccine formulations, the serum levels of leishmanial antigen-specific IgG and its isotypes, IgG1 and IgG2a, from all the vaccinated groups were assessed by ELISA. Following immunization, IgG as well as IgG1 and IgG2a were elevated in all LAg adjuvanted immunized groups, except BCG+LAg, in which they remained at background levels of control groups (Figure 2A). Higher levels of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a were found in MPL-TDM+LAg immunized mice over the control groups (P < 0.05); however, the levels were low compared with liposomal LAg immunized group (P < 0.05). Importantly, the level of IgG2a was higher than that of IgG1 in both MPL-TDM+LAg and liposomal LAg immunized mice. With progressive infection, significant increase in total IgG was detected in all the immunized groups that became comparable to controls after 4 months of challenge infection (Figure 2B and 2C). Increased levels of IgG2a were still maintained in MPL-TDM+LAg and liposomal LAg immunized groups compared to control groups (P < 0.01).

Figure 2
figure 2

Specific antibody responses in differently adjuvanted LAg vaccinated mice . Mice were immunized three times at 2-week intervals. Ten days after immunization mice were challenged with L. donovani. Serum samples were collected after the last booster (A) and 2 (B) and 4 months (C) after infection and assayed for LAg specific IgG and its isotypes IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies by ELISA. Each sample was examined in duplicate. Each bar represents the mean absorbance values at 450 nm ± SE of five individual mice per group at designated time points. The results are those from one experiment representative of two performed. Asterisks over each bar indicate significant differences in comparison to control groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

Full size image

Stimulation of DTH response in differently adjuvanted LAg vaccinated mice

As an index of parasite antigen specific cell mediated response in vivo, DTH response was measured in vaccinated mice 10 days after last immunization and recalled at 2 and 4 months after challenge infection. Vaccinated mice with free LAg and its combination with different adjuvants displayed significant DTH response in comparison to control groups (Figure 3; P < 0.05). However, the response by both BCG and MPL-TDM adjuvanted LAg was comparable but lower than the response induced by liposomal LAg immunization (P < 0.01). With challenge infection the response was increased progressively in LAg and its adjuvanted immunized groups and showed that the levels were significantly higher compared to the control groups at 2 and 4 months post-infection (P < 0.05). Among the differently adjuvanted groups, BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM+LAg immunized mice exhibited comparable levels of response whereas higher response was induced by the liposomal LAg immunized group (P < 0.05) at all time points after challenge infection.

Figure 3
figure 3

DTH responses in differently adjuvanted LAg vaccinated mice . Mice were immunized three times at 2-week intervals. Ten days after immunization mice were challenged with L. donovani. After the last immunization and 2 and 4 months after infection LAg-specific DTH responses were measured. The response is expressed as the difference (in mm) between the thickness of the test (LAg-injected) and control (PBS-injected) footpads at 24 h. Each bar represents the mean ± SE for five individual mice per group at designated time points. The results are those from one experiment representative of two performed. Asterisks over each bar indicate significant differences in comparison to control groups. Asterisks over line indicate significant differences between groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

Full size image

Generation of IFN-γ and IL-4 response in differently adjuvanted LAg vaccinated mice

Although BCG+LAg failed to induce serological response after immunization, the response was enhanced with infection and become comparable with other groups. Conversely, BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM+LAg immunization induced and maintained comparable level of cell-mediated immune response with challenge infection which led to protection in both the groups. Thus investigation of detailed vaccine induced cell-mediated response after immunization may help to understand the underlying mechanism of different formulations that can correlate with the observed protection. Next, we evaluated the Th1 and Th2 cytokine responses in differently adjuvanted mice. Splenocytes from immunized mice were isolated 10 days after immunization and, IFN-γ and IL-4 levels were measured in vitro following restimulation with LAg. LAg in different adjuvant vaccinated groups produced substantial amounts of IFN-γ compared to controls (Figure 4A; P < 0.001). Interestingly, the most pronounced increase in IFN-γ level was observed in MPL-TDM+ LAg vaccinated groups in comparison to other groups (P < 0.001). Mice immunized with BCG+LAg secreted lower amount of IFN-γ compared with the liposomal LAg immunized group (P < 0.05). Mice receiving BCG+LAg and liposomal LAg immunization showed significant increase in IL-4 production compared to controls (Figure 4B, P < 0.001). However, elicitation of significantly higher IL-4 response was observed in liposomal LAg vaccinated mice compared to BCG+LAg immunized groups (P < 0.01). In contrast to the robust IFN-γ responses observed with MPL-TDM+LAg vaccine, IL-4 level was significantly lower from other vaccinated groups (P < 0.01). Thus, MPL-TDM+LAg triggered highest IFN-γ but lowest IL-4 indicating an exclusive Th1 cell-mediated immune response. BCG+LAg and liposomal LAg generated a mixed Th1/Th2 response as evident from significant production of both IFN-γ and IL-4 post-immunization groups. But compared to the Th1/Th2 response generated by liposomal LAg, the cytokine levels were lower for BCG+LAg immunized groups.

Figure 4
figure 4

IFN-γ and IL-4 responses in differently adjuvanted LAg vaccinated mice . Mice were immunized three times at 2-week intervals. Ten days after last immunization spleens were collected from mice and restimulated in vitro with LAg (10 μg/ml). After 72 h supernatants were collected and concentrations of released IFN-γ (A) and IL-4 (B) levels were determined by ELISA. Each sample was examined in duplicate. Each bar represents the mean ± SE for five individual mice per group. The results are those from one experiment representative of two performed. Asterisks over each bar indicate significant differences in comparison to control groups. Asterisks over line indicate significant differences between groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

Full size image

Discussion

Despite the current knowledge of immunology and pathology related to the parasite Leishmania, till now, a desirable vaccine for humans has not been successfully developed. The main goal of vaccination is the induction of a protective immune response against the pathogen. Successful vaccination strategies for Leishmania have relied on presentation of antigen with appropriate adjuvants to the host immune system to stimulate effective cell-mediated immune responses. The present study is the first direct, head-to-head comparison of vaccine formulations using three different adjuvants, BCG, MPL-TDM and cationic liposomes, with the same leishmanial antigen for their efficacy against L. donovani challenge in BALB/c model.

BCG and MPL were chosen as adjuvants in this study as they are human-compatible potent inducer of cell-mediated immunity. BCG, being almost the only adjuvant licensed for human use and effective against intracellular pathogen infections, was extensively used in clinical trials of vaccination against CL and VL [9]. Amongst the adjuvants recently approved for human vaccines is MPL, a potent stimulator of Th1 response, being evaluated in clinical trials against various diseases including malaria, tuberculosis and leishmaniasis [10]. Previous studies from our laboratory established that cationic liposomes is a potent adjuvant as they have the ability to enhance protective cell-mediated immune response against experimental VL [15–18]. Thus, cationic liposomes was selected to compare its efficacy with two other human-compatible adjuvants BCG and MPL to confer protection against L. donovani infection.

Comparison of the vaccine potentiality of cationic liposomal formulation of LAg with BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM+LAg revealed that all the three vaccines afforded significant protection against challenge with L. donovani. However, cationic liposome was the most potent of the three adjuvants and conferred protection superior to other two adjuvants. The ability of cationic liposomes to induce significant protection with LAg is entirely consistent with results of our previous studies in mice as well as hamster models of VL [15]. However, the level of protection afforded by this formulation was lower than mice immunized with SLA (soluble leishmanial antigens) entrapped in these vesicles or LAg entrapped in neutral and cationic DSPC liposomes [16, 27, 29], suggesting entrapment of more immunogenic antigens or optimization of liposomal formulation could influence the efficacy of cationic liposomes. Cationic liposomes was also shown to be a potent adjuvant to enhance immune response against CL [30]. BCG is the most widely used adjuvant in clinical vaccine trials against leishmaniasis including VL. Although the vaccines were found to be safe and immunogenic, the efficacy was not carried over to a protective effect [31, 32]. Reports on the ability of BCG-vaccine to protect against leishmaniasis even in experimental models vary from effective [33, 34] to partial protection [35, 36]. MPL-SE (stable emulsion) has been found to be safe and efficacious against cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis in mice, non-human primates and humans when vaccinated with Leishmania-derived recombinant polyprotein Leish-111f or its component proteins [37–39]. In experimental model of VL, MPL-SE formulated Leish-111f was effective in reducing splenic parasite burden [37] whereas recombinant sterol 24-c-methyltransferase (rSMT) plus MPL-SE afforded significant protection in both liver and spleen [40]. Furthermore, although MPL formulated 78 kDa antigen of L. donovani was efficacious in liver against challenged with L. donovani infection [41], partial protection was observed with Leishmania antigen in association with MPL-Dimethyl dioctadecylammonium bromide (DDA) in spleen [42], an organ where parasites persist and are more resistant to various immunological interventions and even T cell-dependent chemotherapy.

Serological data show that mice vaccinated with MPL-TDM+LAg and liposomal LAg induced strong humoral responses after immunization that persisted after challenge infection. Conversely and in accordance to previous reports [33, 34], mice vaccinated with BCG-LAg failed to respond with the production of antibodies prior to infection. BCG is known to stimulate APCs through several TLRs as well as to activate and recruit NK cells and neutrophil granulocytes. However, it could not act as a depot for coadministered antigens for generation of antibody response [43].

Successful vaccination for the control of parasite multiplication is often related to antigen induced DTH response as an indication of activation of cell-mediated response. In the present study, results obtained upon vaccination with LAg in association with BCG, MPL-TDM and liposomes demonstrated induction of an appreciable DTH response suggesting the activation of cell-mediated immunity. The induction of DTH was, however, highest in mice immunized with liposomal LAg with lower and comparable levels induced by BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM + LAg. In clinical trials injection of BCG mixed with killed parasites significantly increased cell-mediated immune responses to the vaccine was measured by leishmanin skin test (LST). The LST conversion due to vaccination corresponded with reduced incidence of infection at least in the subpopulation of "responders" to vaccination [32]. Animals successfully vaccinated with BCG and leishmanial antigens similarly elicited DTH reactions [33, 34]. Significant elevation of DTH response in mice immunized with protein antigens and MPL-DDA that provided resistance against VL has also been reported [42]. The significantly higher DTH response induced by liposomal LAg over BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM+LAg before and after challenge infection demonstrates elicitation of strong and persistent cell-mediated immunity by this vaccine, which resulted in greater resistance against disease.

An important leishmanicidal effector mechanism is the production of IFN-γ by Leishmania-specific cells, which in turn activates macrophages to kill intracellular parasites. Immunization of BALB/c mice with BCG, MPL-TDM and liposomal LAg resulted in high IFN-γ production following in vitro restimulation. The levels of IFN-γ, however, varied in the three vaccination groups. Moderate levels of IFN-γ were produced by liposomal vaccine followed by BCG+LAg vaccine. In contrast, robust levels of IFN-γ were observed with MPL-TDM+LAg vaccine. Interestingly, whereas immunization with liposomal as well as BCG+LAg also led to very significant, though variable, levels of IL-4 production, the level of IL-4 by MPL-TDM+LAg vaccine was low. A Th1 phenotypic response was thus elicited by MPL-TDM+LAg whereas liposomal and BCG+LAg elicited a mixed Th1/Th2 response. IFN-γ, a signature cytokine of Th1 response is associated with resistance against L. major. But high IFN-γ production cannot be the sole criterion that might confer protection against L. donovani [19]. Moreover, in contrast to CL, early IL-4 production is not detrimental and may have a protective role in VL [16–18, 25, 27]. The role of IL-4 in conferring protection against L. donovani is also supported from a finding where chemotherapy against VL in IL-4 -/- mice is not effective [26]. Thus, the optimum levels of both the cytokines IFN-γ and IL-4 induced by the liposomal LAg vaccination substantiate earlier observations that a mixed Th1/Th2 response is essential for protection against VL [16–18, 27, 44]. Hence, we believe that the inability of MPL-TDM to stimulate optimal IL-4, as observed with the liposomal vaccine formulation, is probably the major factor for its partial success in protection. The low immunogenecity of BCG+LAg characterized by sub-optimal antigen-specific IFN-γ and IL-4 responses may be responsible for the low level of protection induced by this vaccine.

In order to compare the protective efficacy of BCG and MPL-TDM with liposome, all the three vaccine formulations were administered through the intraperitoneal route. In contrast to liposomes, the success or failure of protection with BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM+LAg was probably not dependent on the route of immunization. Although, intradermal route of immunization is favoured for BCG formulations, intraperitoneal vaccination of BCG with a combination of dehydroepiandrosterone peptide has been reported for the successful prevention of asthma development [45]. Again, subcutaneous administration of MPL vaccine has been found to be successful for vaccinination against leishmaniasis [37]. Further, immunization of MPL-TDM in association with an immunogenic peptide administered either through subcutaneous or intraperitoneal routes was found to induce the same Th1-biased response [46]. Conversely, administration of liposomal LAg through subcutaneous route failed to induce protection in experimental mice model of VL [47]. When the intraperitoneal route is used, peritoneal macrophages are the major population of APCs available. It has been found that induction of the immune response by liposomal delivery of antigen is mainly macrophage dependent and DCs are considered to be less efficient in phagocytosis than cells of the macrophage lineage [48]. Thus intraperitoneal immunization of liposomal antigen could effectively generate a protective immune response. Since BCG and MPL-SE have been used for intradermal, subcutaneous or intramuscular injection and may not be optimal for intraperitoneal injection, their responses with LAg through one of these routes could help in conclusive comparison of liposomes. Further, since MPL is a potent inducer of Th1 response and can function through subcutaneous route also, we speculate that MPL can be combined with liposomes and can be administered through subcutaneous route to overcome the failure of liposomal vaccine through this route. Indeed we have preliminary evidence showing that immunization with liposomal antigens in association with MPL-TDM can induce protection against L. donovani infection in BALB/c mice through subcutaneous route (unpublished observation). AS01, a liposomal formulation containing MPL as a potent inducer of humoral and cell-mediated response is already in clinical trials for malaria [10]. Thus liposomal formulated MPL-TDM+LAg may be the choice of adjuvant for vaccine development against Leishmania and other intracellular pathogens.

Conclusions

This comparative study of BCG+LAg and MPL-TDM + LAg vaccines with cationic liposomal formulation of LAg interestingly reveals a significantly greater effectiveness of the liposomal vaccine for protection against progressive VL in BALB/c. Evaluation of the immune responses emphasize the need for an immunogenic vaccine for elicitation of potent vaccine-induced cellular immunity based on both Th1 and Th2 cell responses to confer protection against the visceral disease. Thus, the cationic liposomes offer a rational choice of adjuvant for the development of vaccines against a range of infectious diseases such as leishmaniasis, malaria and tuberculosis.

Methods

Animals

Female BALB/c mice (4-6 weeks old), bred in the animal facility of Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (Kolkata), were used for experimental purposes with approval of the IICB Animal Ethical Committee and mice were handled according to their guidelines.

Parasites and culture condition

L. donovani, strain AG83 (MHOM/IN/1983/AG83) was originally isolated from an Indian kala-azar patient and maintained in Syrian golden hamsters by serial passage as described elsewhere [15]. Briefly, promastigotes were grown at 22°C in Medium 199 (pH 7.4) supplemented with 20% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 25 mM HEPES, 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulphate (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), and the parasites were subcultured in the same medium at an average density of 2 × 106 cells/ml at 22°C [15].

Preparation of leishmanial antigens

LAg was prepared from L. donovani promastigotes as described earlier [15]. Briefly, stationary phase promastigotes, harvested after the third or fourth passage in liquid culture, were washed four times in cold 20 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2, and resuspended at a concentration of 1.0 g cell pellet in 50 ml of cold 5 mM Tris-HCL buffer (pH 7.6). The suspension was vortexed six times at 2 min each with a 10-min interval on ice and centrifuged at 2,310 × g for 10 min. The crude ghost membrane pellet thus obtained was resuspended in the same Tris buffer and sonicated three times for 1 min each at 4°C in an ultrasonicator (Misonix, New York, USA). The suspension was finally centrifuged for 30 min at 5,190 × g, and the supernatant containing leishmanial antigens (LAg) was harvested and stored at -70°C until used. The amount of protein obtained from a 1.0 g cell pellet was approximately 14 mg, as assayed by the method of Lowry et al. [49] with bovine serum albumin as the standard, in the presence of 1% sodium dodecyl sulphate and appropriate blanks.

Adjuvants

Positively charged liposomes were prepared with egg lecithin, cholesterol, and stearylamine (7:2:2 molar ratio), respectively as reported earlier [15]. MPL (0.5 mg) plus trehalose dicorynomycolate (TDM) (0.5 mg) in 2% oil (squalene)-Tween 80-water was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, USA. Briefly, each vial was reconstituted with 1 ml saline and mixed at 1:1 ratio with LAg in PBS and administered in mice as 50 μg/dose. The mean particle size of the emulsion droplets was 128 ± 6.65 as determined by Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) (Pasteur Institute, Paris, France) was diluted in PBS mixed at 1:1 ratio with LAg in PBS prior to injection to an administrable dose of 5 × 104 cells/mice.

Entrapment of leishmanial antigens into cationic liposomes

For encapsulation of the LAg in the liposomal vesicles the lipid film was dispersed in PBS containing 1 mg/ml LAg and sonicated for 30 s in an ultrasonicator (Misonix) [15]. Liposomes with entrapped LAg were separated from excess free materials by three successive washing in PBS with ultracentrifugation (105,000 × g, 60 min, 4°C). The mean size of the LAg entrapped liposomes was 337.3 ± 10.2 as determined by Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments). The presence of antigen could not influenced the size of the vesicles (empty vesicles mean size 306.8 ± 2.6). The protein content entrapped into liposomes was estimated by the method described by Lowry et al. [49]. The phospholipid content of liposomes was 15.5 mg/ml as determined using the Stewart assay [50]. The average amount of LAg associated per mg of egg lecithin was 33 μg.

Vaccination and challenge infection

BALB/c mice were vaccinated by three intraperitoneal injections of 20 μg of free LAg, incorporated in liposomes, or associated with other adjuvants at 2-week intervals in a total volume of 200 μl. PBS and only adjuvant treated animals were included as controls. Ten days after last immunization the animals were challenged intravenously with 2 × 107 freshly transformed promastigotes [15].

Evaluation of infection

At the times designated in Results, the course of infection was evaluated by microscopic examination of Giemsa-stainted impression smears of liver and spleen samples. The organ parasite burden was expressed as Leishman-Donovan units (LDU) calculated as follows: number of amastigotes per 1,000-host cell nuclei × organ weight (in mg) [51].

Antigen-specific antibody responses by ELISA

For determination of antibody responses, serum samples collected from experimental groups of mice before and after infection were analyzed for the presence of LAg-specific immunoglobulin by ELISA. 96 well microtitration plates (maxisorp plates; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 100 μl of LAg (25 μg/ml) diluted in 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) overnight at 4°C. Non-specific binding sites were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS at room temperature for 3 h. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich), the plates were incubated overnight at 4°C with 1:1000 dilutions of mice sera. The plates were then washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1:5000 and antimouse IgG1 or IgG2a (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, USA) diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer. Finally, colour reaction was developed by the addition of 100 μl/well of substrate solution (o-phenylene diamine dihydrochloride, 0.8 mg/ml in 0.05 M phosphate-citrate buffer, pH 5.0, containing 0.04% H2O2) for 30 min. Absorbance was determined at 450 nm using ELISA plate reader (Thermo, Waltham, USA) [15].

Delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH)

After the last vaccination, 2 and 4 months after challenge infection, delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) was determined as an index of cell-mediated immunity. The response was evaluated by measuring the difference in the footpad swelling at 24 h following intradermal inoculation of the test footpad with 50 μl of LAg (800 μg/ml) from that of control (PBS- injected) footpad with a constant pressure caliper (Starret, Anthol, USA) [15].

Cytokine Assay

Spleens were removed aseptically from experimental mice of each group at 10 days after last immunization and teased between 20 μm pore size sieve into single cell suspension in complete medium prepared with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 10 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulphate, and 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich). Erythrocytes were removed by lysis with 0.14 M Tris buffered NH4Cl. The splenocytes were washed twice, resuspended in culture medium and viable mononuclear cell number was determined by Trypan blue exclusion. Splenocytes were then cultured in a 96-well flat-bottomed ELISA plate (Nunc) at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well in a final volume of 200 μl. The cells were restimulated in vitro with medium alone or with LAg (10 μg/ml) and supernatants were collected after 72 h incubation at 37°C in a humified chamber containing 5% CO2 and stored at -70°C until use. Measurements of IFN-γ and IL-4 concentrations were carried out using Opt EIA Kits (BD Pharmingen) as detailed in manufacturers' instructions [27].

Statistical analysis

One-way ANOVA statistical test was performed to assess the differences among various groups. Multiple comparisons Tukey-Kramer test was used to compare the means of different experimental groups. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Abbreviations

VL:

Visceral leishmaniasis

LAg:

L. donovani promastigote antigens

BCG:

Bacille Calmette-Guerin

MPL:

Monophosphoryl lipid A

TDM:

Trehalose dicorynomycolate

References

  1. Desjeux P: Leishmaniasis: current situation and new perspectives. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004, 27: 305-318. 10.1016/j.cimid.2004.03.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chappuis F, Sundar S, Hailu A, Ghalib H, Rijal S, Peeling RW, Alvar J, Boelaert M: Visceral leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control?. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007, 5: 873-882. 10.1038/nrmicro1748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhowmick S, Ali N: Recent developments in leishmaniasis vaccine delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2008, 5: 789-803. 10.1517/17425247.5.7.789.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heldwein KA, Liang MD, Andresen TK, Thomas KE, Marty AM, Cuesta N, Vogel SN, Fenton MJ: TLR2 and TLR4 serve distinct roles in the host immune response against Mycobacterium bovis BCG. J Leukoc Biol. 2003, 74: 277-286. 10.1189/jlb.0103026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. von Meyenn F, Schaefer M, Weighardt H, Bauer S, Kirschning CJ, Wagner H, Sparwasser T: Toll-like receptor 9 contributes to recognition of Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin by Flt3-ligand generated dendritic cells. Immunobiology. 2006, 211: 557-565. 10.1016/j.imbio.2006.05.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Villarreal-Ramos B: Towards improved understanding of protective mechanisms induced by the BCG vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009, 8: 1531-1534. 10.1586/erv.09.109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smrkovski LL, Larson CL: Effect of treatment with BCG on the course of visceral leishmaniasis in BALB/c mice. Infect Immun. 1977, 16: 249-257.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weintraub J, Weinbaum FI: The effect of BCG on experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis in mice. J Immunol. 1977, 118: 2288-2290.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noazin S, Modabber F, Khamesipour A, Smith PG, Moulton LH, Nasseri K, Sharifi I, Khalil EA, Bernal ID, Antunes CM, Kieny MP, Tanner M: First generation leishmaniasis vaccines: a review of field efficacy trials. Vaccine. 2008, 26: 6759-6767. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reed SG, Bertholet S, Coler RN, Friede M: New horizons in adjuvants for vaccine development. Trends Immunol. 2009, 30: 23-32. 10.1016/j.it.2008.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chikh GG, Kong S, Bally MB, Meunier JC, Schutze Redelmeier MP: Efficient delivery of Antennapedia homeodomain fused to CTL epitope with liposomes into dendritic cells results in the activation of CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2001, 167: 6462-6470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakanishi T, Kunisawa J, Hayashi A, Tsutsumi Y, Kubo K, Nakagawa S, Nakanishi M, Tanaka K, Mayumi T: Positively charged liposome functions as an efficient immunoadjuvant in inducing cell-mediated immune response to soluble proteins. J Control Release. 1999, 61: 233-240. 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00097-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao M, Alving CR: Delivery of lipids and liposomal proteins to the cytoplasm and Golgi of antigen-presenting cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2000, 41: 171-188. 10.1016/S0169-409X(99)00064-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazumdar T, Anam K, Ali N: Influence of phospholipid composition on the adjuvanticity and protective efficacy of liposome-encapsulated Leishmania donovani antigens. J Parasitol. 2005, 91: 269-274. 10.1645/GE-356R1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Afrin F, Ali N: Adjuvanticity and protective immunity elicited by Leishmania donovani antigens encapsulated in positively charged liposomes. Infect Immun. 1997, 65: 2371-2377.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhowmick S, Ravindran R, Ali N: Leishmanial antigens in liposomes promote protective immunity and provide immunotherapy against visceral leishmaniasis via polarized Th1 response. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 6544-6556. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.05.042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhowmick S, Ravindran R, Ali N: gp63 in stable cationic liposomes confers sustained vaccine immunity to susceptible BALB/c mice infected with Leishmania donovani. Infect Immun. 2008, 76: 1003-1015. 10.1128/IAI.00611-07.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhowmick S, Ali N: Identification of novel Leishmania donovani antigens that help define correlates of vaccine-mediated protection in visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e5820-10.1371/journal.pone.0005820.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McMahon-Pratt D, Alexander J: Does the Leishmania major paradigm of pathogenesis and protection hold for New World cutaneous leishmaniases or the visceral disease?. Immunol Rev. 2004, 201: 206-224. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00190.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Engwerda CR, Murphy ML, Cotterell Sara EJ, Smelt Sara C, Kaye PM: Neutralization of IL-12 demonstrates the existence of discrete organ-specific phases in the control of Leishmania donovani. Eur J Immunol. 1998, 28: 669-680. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199802)28:02<669::AID-IMMU669>3.0.CO;2-N.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaye PM, Curry AJ, Blackwell JM: Differential production of Th1 and Th2-derived cytokines does not determine the genetically controlled or vaccine induced rate of cure in murine visceral leishmaniasis. J Immunol. 1991, 146: 2763-2770.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Melby PC, Yang J, Zhao W, Perez LE, Cheng J: Leishmania donovani p36(LACK) DNA vaccine is highly immunogenic but not protective against experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Infect Immun. 2001, 69: 4719-4725. 10.1128/IAI.69.8.4719-4725.2001.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miralles GD, Stoeckle MY, McDermott DF, Finkelman FD, Murray HW: Th1 and Th2 cell-associated cytokines in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Infect Immun. 1994, 62: 1058-1063.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Murray HW, Hariprashad J, Coffman RL: Behavior of visceral Leishmania donovani in an experimentally induced T helper cell 2 (Th2)-associated response model. J Exp Med. 1997, 185: 867-874. 10.1084/jem.185.5.867.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Satoskar A, Bluethmann H, Alexander J: Disruption of the murine interleukin-4 gene inhibits disease progression during Leishmania mexicana infection but does not increase control of Leishmania donovani infection. Infect Immun. 1995, 63: 4894-4899.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Alexander J, Carter KC, Al-Fasi N, Satoskar A, Brombacher F: Endogenous IL-4 is necessary for effective drug therapy against visceral leishmaniasis. Eur J Immunol. 2000, 30: 2935-2943. 10.1002/1521-4141(200010)30:10<2935::AID-IMMU2935>3.0.CO;2-Q.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazumdar T, Anam K, Ali N: A mixed Th1/Th2 response elicited by a liposomal formulation of Leishmania vaccine instructs Th1 responses and resistance to Leishmania donovani in susceptible BALB/c mice. Vaccine. 2004, 22: 1162-1171. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.09.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Afrin F, Ali N: Isotype profiles of Leishmania donovani-infected BALB/c mice: preferential stimulation of IgG2a/b by liposome-associated promastigotes antigens. J Parasitol. 1998, 84: 743-748. 10.2307/3284581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bhowmick S, Mazumdar T, Sinha R, Ali N: Comparison of liposome based antigen delivery systems for protection against Leishmania donovani. J Control Release. 2010, 141: 199-207. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.09.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jaafari MR, Badiee A, Khamesipour A, Samiei A, Soroush D, Kheiri MT, Barkhordari F, McMaster WR, Mahboudi F: The role of CpG ODN in enhancement of immune response and protection in BALB/c mice immunized with recombinant major surface glycoprotein of Leishmania (rgp63) encapsulated in cationic liposome. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 6107-6117. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.05.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Armijos RX, Weigel MM, Calvopina M, Hidalgo A, Cevallos W, Correa J: Safety, immunogenecity, and efficacy of an autoclaved Leishmania amazonensis vaccine plus BCG adjuvant against New World cutaneous leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2004, 22: 1320-1326. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.06.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khalil EA, El Hassan AM, Zijlstra EE, Mukhtar MM, Ghalib HW, Musa B, Ibrahim ME, Kamil AA, Elsheikh M, Babiker A, Modabber F: Autoclaved Leishmania major vaccine for prevention of visceral leishmaniasis: a randomised, double-blind, BCG-controlled trial in Sudan. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1565-1569. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03128-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tripathi P, Gupta SK, Sinha S, Sundar S, Dube A, Naik S: Prophylactic efficacy of high-molecular-weight antigenic fractions of a recent clinical isolate of Leishmania donovani against visceral leishmaniasis. Scand J Immunol. 2008, 68: 492-501. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2008.02171.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kumari S, Samant M, Misra P, Khare P, Sisodia B, Shasany AK, Dube A: Th1-stimulatory polyproteins of soluble Leishmania donovani promastigotes ranging from 89.9 to 97.1 kDa offers long-lasting protection against experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2008, 26: 5700-5711. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.08.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Santos WR, de Lima VM, de Souza EP, Bernardo RR, Palatnik M, Palatnik de Sousa CB: Saponins, IL12 and BCG adjuvant in the FML-vaccine formulation against murine visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2002, 21: 30-43. 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00444-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Aebischer T, Wolfram M, Patzer SI, Ilg T, Wiese M, Overath P: Subunit vaccination of mice against new world cutaneous leishmaniasis: comparison of three proteins expressed in amastigotes and six adjuvants. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 1328-1336. 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1328-1336.2000.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Coler RN, Goto Y, Bogatzki L, Raman V, Reed SG: Leish-111f, a recombinant polyprotein vaccine that protects against visceral Leishmaniasis by elicitation of CD4+ T cells. Infect Immun. 2007, 75: 4648-4654. 10.1128/IAI.00394-07.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ghalib H, Modabber F: Consultation meeting on the development of therapeutic vaccines for post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis. Kinetoplastid Biol Dis. 2007, 6: 7-10.1186/1475-9292-6-7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vélez ID, Gilchrist K, Martínez S, Ramírez-Pineda JR, Ashman JA, Alves FP, Coler RN, Bogatzki LY, Kahn SJ, Beckmann AM, Cowgill KD, Reed SG, Piazza FM: Safety and immunogenicity of a defined vaccine for the prevention of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2009, 28: 329-337. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Goto Y, Bogatzki LY, Bertholet S, Coler RN, Reed SG: Protective immunization against visceral leishmaniasis using Leishmania sterol 24-c-methyltransferase formulated in adjuvant. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 7450-7458. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.08.001.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nagill R, Kaur S: Enhanced efficacy and immunogenicity of 78 kDa antigen formulated in various adjuvants against murine visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2010, 28: 4002-4012. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bhardwaj S, Vasishta RK, Arora SK: Vaccination with a novel recombinant Leishmania antigen plus MPL provides partial protection against L. donovani challenge in experimental model of visceral leishmaniasis. Exp Parasitol. 2009, 121: 29-37. 10.1016/j.exppara.2008.09.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dietrich J, Billeskov R, Doherty TM, Andersen P: Synergistic effect of bacillus calmette guerin and a tuberculosis subunit vaccine in cationic liposomes: increased immunogenicity and protection. J Immunol. 2007, 178: 3721-30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ghosh A, Zhang WW, Matlashewski G: Immunization with A2 protein results in a mixed Th1/Th2 and a humoral response which protects mice against Leishmania donovani infections. Vaccine. 2001, 20: 59-66. 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00322-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cui Y, Choi IS, Koh YA, Lin XH, Cho YB, Won YH: Effects of combined BCG and DHEA treatment in preventing the development of asthma. Immunol Invest. 2008, 37: 191-202. 10.1080/08820130801967833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Oscherwitz J, Hankenson FC, Yu F, Cease K: Low-dose intraperitoneal Freund's adjuvant: toxicity and immunogenicity in mice using an immunogen targeting amyloid-beta peptide. Vaccine. 2006, 24: 3018-3025. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.10.046.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bhowmick S, Mazumdar T, Ali N: Vaccination route that induces transforming growth factor beta production fails to elicit protective immunity against Leishmania donovani infection. Infect Immun. 2009, 77: 1514-1523. 10.1128/IAI.01739-07.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wijburg OL, van den Dobbelsteen GP, Vadolas J, Sanders A, Strugnell RA, van Rooijen N: The role of macrophages in the induction and regulation of immunity elicited by exogenous antigens. Eur J Immunol. 1998, 28: 479-487. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199802)28:02<479::AID-IMMU479>3.0.CO;2-R.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951, 193: 265-275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stewart JC: Colorimetric determination of phospholipids with ammonium ferrothiocyanate. Anal Biochem. 1980, 104: 10-14. 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90269-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stauber LA, Franchino EM, Grun J: An eight day method for screening compounds against Leishmania donovani in the golden hamster. J Protozool. 1958, 5: 269-273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Professors S.K. Bhattacharya and S. Roy, past and present directors of IICB, Kolkata, for supporting this work. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from CSIR and DST, Government of India. Thanks are due to Mr.

Janmenjoy Midya for assisting in animal studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Infectious Diseases and Immunology Division, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4 Raja S. C. Mullick Road, Jadavpur, Kolkata, 700032, India

    Rajesh Ravindran, Sudipta Bhowmick, Amrita Das & Nahid Ali

  2. Current Address: Department of Pathology, Emory Vaccine Center, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA

    Rajesh Ravindran

  3. Current Address: Department of Zoology, Dr. Kanailal Bhattacharyya College, Dharmatala, Ramrajatala, Santragachi, Howrah, 711104, India

    Sudipta Bhowmick

Authors
  1. Rajesh Ravindran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sudipta Bhowmick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amrita Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nahid Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nahid Ali.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

RR performed all the experiments of this study. SB and NA have contributed in designing of the paper. SB and AD wrote the draft of the manuscript. NA conceived the study, coordinated it and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ravindran, R., Bhowmick, S., Das, A. et al. Comparison of BCG, MPL and cationic liposome adjuvant systems in leishmanial antigen vaccine formulations against murine visceral leishmaniasis. BMC Microbiol 10, 181 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-181

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-181

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us