|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 13.
Co-localization of BCG-GFP with LRG47-positive vesicles in the mouse bladder urothelium. Figures 13 A-D are representative photomicrographs obtained 24 hours after bladder
instillation of BCG-GFP (1.5 × 107 CFU) into the bladder of anesthetized mice (see material and methods) and Figures
13 G-J are high magnifications of the same area depicted in Figures A-D. Figures
13 A and 13 G are DAPI [4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole] that was used to highlight
the nucleus. Figures 13B and 13H were stained with LRG-47. Figures 13C and 13I indicate
the presence of BCG in the urothelium as indicated by the fluorescence of GFP in two
major areas delimited by white circles. Figures 13D and 13J are merged photograph
indicating that BCG-GFP is co-localized in vesicles positives for LRG-47 (yellow).
White arrows in Figures 13 A-D point to GFP and rhodamine signals that are co-localized
in the merge picture (Figure 13D). Next, pictures 13B and 13C were submitted to image
analysis by the Interactive 3D Surface Plot [90], a plug-in for ImageJ software [23].
Figure 13E represents the Integrative 3D surface that translates the luminance of
the images in Figure 13 B-C as height for the plot using the nearest neighbor sampling.
For co-localization of BCG-GFP and LRG47-Rhodamine, pictures were converted to 8-bit
gray scale images (fluorescence intensity range: 0 < 255) using Image J software [23]
and the analysis was performed with the co-localization-finder plug-in [24]. The results
presented in Figure 13F were electronically generated by the software resulting in
a merged picture with white areas indicating the co-localization between BCG and LRG-47-positive
vesicles and the Pearson's_correlation and overlap coefficient are provided. These
results indicate that instillation of BCG-GFP into the mouse bladder, in the conditions
described in this manuscript, does not result in urothelial injury and microscopic
extravasation of BCG or cause artifacts, including forcing bacteria into the urothelium.
Saban et al. BMC Immunology 2008 9:4 doi:10.1186/1471-2172-9-4 |