Table 2 |
|||||
|
Association between tumor histologic grade and intrinsic subtype in the 315-sample combined test set. |
|||||
|
Intrinsic Subtype |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Two-way contingency table |
LumA (#of pts.) |
LumB (#of pts.) |
IFN (#of pts.) |
HER2+/ER- (#of pts.) |
Basal-like (#of pts.) |
|
|
|||||
|
Grade |
|||||
|
1 (well) |
29 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 (intermediate) |
45 |
26 |
8 |
6 |
16 |
|
3 (poor) |
15 |
32 |
16 |
21 |
67 |
|
Statistics for two-way contingency table analysis |
|||||
|
p-value† <0.0001 |
|||||
|
Cramer's V†† 0.42 |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
†p-value calculated from Chi-square test on contingency table. ††Cramer's V statistic (value can range from 0 to 1) measures the strength of association between the two variables analyzed in the contingency table, with 1 indicating perfect association and 0 indicating no association. |
|||||
|
Hu et al. BMC Genomics 2006 7:96 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-96 |
|||||