Research article
Semiparametric approach to characterize unique gene expression trajectories across time
-
* Corresponding author: Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas rodrgzzs@uiuc.edu
1 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA
2 Department of Statistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA
3 Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA
4 Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA
5 Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA
6 Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA
BMC Genomics 2006, 7:233 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-233
Published: 13 September 2006Additional files
Additional File 1:
Apis mellifera (honey bee) gene identification (GB prefix), Drosophila (fruit fly) homologous (CG prefix), semiparametric group membership and Gene Ontology (GO) information of 54 genes with neurobiological function in the mellifera (M) data set and in the ligustica (L) data set if different from M. This table provides the functional classification, honeybee gene identification, corresponding fruit fly gene identification, Gene Ontology description and, semiparametric group assignment in the mellifera (M) and ligustica (L) data sets of 54 genes with neurobiological function studied.
Format: DOC Size: 154KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional File 2:
List of 25 cDNAs with significant (P < 0.00001) linear or quadratic or cubic profiles from day 0 (nurse) to day 17 (forager), estimate of expression at each day in the ligustica (L) and mellifera (M) data sets, gene group, and the relative expression between forager and nurse (FvsN) bees reported by Whitfield et al. (2003). This table provides a list with the identification of 25 cDNAs with significant linear, quadratic or cubic trends across days, the estimated gene expression at each day, semiparametric group, and the relative expression between forager and nurse bees reported in Whitfield et al. (2003) for the L and M data sets.
Format: DOC Size: 127KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional File 3:
Confidence interval limits (95%) of the expected cDNA expression trajectories for each of the 10 groups identified in the ligustica (L) data set. The legend indicates the group number and lower (lc) or upper (uc) confidence interval limits per group. The figure presents the 95% confidence interval limits of the expected cDNA expression trajectories for each of the 10 groups identified in the L data set.
Format: DOC Size: 33KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional File 4:
Confidence interval limits (95%) of the expected cDNA expression trajectories for each of the 10 groups identified in the mellifera (M) data set. The legend indicates the group number and lower (lc) or upper (uc) confidence interval limits per group. The figure presents the 95% confidence interval limits of the expected cDNA expression trajectories for each of the 10 groups identified in the M data set.
Format: DOC Size: 33KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional File 5:
L data set. L data set estimates per cDNA and age.
Format: XLS Size: 77KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Excel Viewer
Additional File 6:
M data set. M data set estimates per cDNA and age.
Format: XLS Size: 77KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Excel Viewer