Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Structure and evolution of the mouse pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (Psg) gene locus

BMC Genomics volume 6, Article number: 4 (2005) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (Psg) genes encode proteins of unknown function, and are members of the carcinoembryonic antigen (Cea) gene family, which is a member of the immunoglobulin gene (Ig) superfamily. In rodents and primates, but not in artiodactyls (even-toed ungulates / hoofed mammals), there have been independent expansions of the Psg gene family, with all members expressed exclusively in placental trophoblast cells. For the mouse Psg genes, we sought to determine the genomic organisation of the locus, the expression profiles of the various family members, and the evolution of exon structure, to attempt to reconstruct the evolutionary history of this locus, and to determine whether expansion of the gene family has been driven by selection for increased gene dosage, or diversification of function.

Results

We collated the mouse Psg gene sequences currently in the public genome and expressed-sequence tag (EST) databases and used systematic BLAST searches to generate complete sequences for all known mouse Psg genes. We identified a novel family member, Psg31, which is similar to Psg30 but, uniquely amongst mouse Psg genes, has a duplicated N1 domain. We also identified a novel splice variant of Psg16 (bCEA). We show that Psg24 and Psg30 / Psg31 have independently undergone expansion of N-domain number. By mapping BAC, YAC and cosmid clones we described two clusters of Psg genes, which we linked and oriented using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Comparison of our Psg locus map with the public mouse genome database indicates good agreement in overall structure and further elucidates gene order. Expression levels of Psg genes in placentas of different developmental stages revealed dramatic differences in the developmental expression profile of individual family members.

Conclusion

We have combined existing information, and provide new information concerning the evolution of mouse Psg exon organization, the mouse Psg genomic locus structure, and the expression patterns of individual Psg genes. This information will facilitate functional studies of this complex gene family.

Background

In mammalian pregnancy the interaction between the maternal uterine tissues and foetal trophoblasts is regulated by a wide variety of cellular and endocrinological mechanisms. These mechanisms underpin trophoblastic invasion and remodelling of maternal tissues, placental angiogenesis, and the modulation of maternal immune responses. Central to these processes is the production by trophoblast of a variety of hormones that are found in abundance in the maternal bloodstream during pregnancy [1].

The pregnancy-specific glycoproteins (PSG) are the most abundant foetal proteins in the maternal bloodstream in late pregnancy [2]. They are synthesised in the syncytiotrophoblast of the human placenta and giant cells and spongiotrophoblast in the rodent placenta [3–5]. The PSG family of glycoproteins belongs to the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family, which also includes the CEA-related adhesion molecules (CEACAMs). The CEA family is itself part of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily [6]. The Ig domain structure of the human and rodent PSGs differs. Containing both V-like Ig domains (N), C2-like Ig domains (A and B) and relatively hydrophilic tails (C), domain arrangements in human PSGs are type I (N-A1-A2-B2-C), type IIa (N-A1-B2-C), type IIb (N-A2-B2-C), type III (N-B2-C) and type IV (A1-B2-C) [7]. In contrast, rodent PSGs are typically comprised of 3, and in a few cases of 5 or 7 N-domains followed by an A-domain [8]. In the primate / rodent ancestor, the initial duplication of the CEACAM / PSG primordial gene has been estimated to have occurred about 90 Myr ago [9], approximately at the time of human-rodent divergence. The most probable PSG ancestor in rodents and primates is a CEACAM15-like molecule based on the organisation of N and A domains. CEACAM15 is not classified as a PSG because comparisons of N and A domain sequence identity clearly delineate members of the CEACAM and PSG subfamilies (Roland Zebhauser, WZ, AM, TM, to be published elsewhere). It has been suggested that human and rodent PSG multigene families evolved independently via further gene duplication and exon shuffling events [10].

There are 11 members of the PSG family in humans that are encoded by genes clustered on chromosome 19q13.2 [11, 12]. PSG proteins have a similar domain structure to the CEACAMs, but lack a membrane anchor and are therefore secreted. However, a few variants have been described that are retained within the cell. Conversely, a small number of human and mouse CEACAM variants lack a membrane anchor and are secreted. Membrane-anchored CEACAMs are widely expressed during embryonic development and in adult tissues, and are implicated in carcinogenesis, angiogenesis and regulation of immune functions [13, 14]. In contrast, PSGs and some CEACAMs are expressed almost exclusively in trophoblasts of the haemochorial placenta of rodents and primates [4, 5, 15].

The biochemical properties and physiological functions of the PSGs remain to be fully elucidated, although functional experiments and clinical observations are beginning to provide some clues. Low PSG levels in the maternal circulation are associated with threatened abortions, intrauterine growth retardation and foetal hypoxia [16–19]. The importance of PSGs for the maintenance of pregnancy is also underlined by the observation that the application of anti-PSG antibodies or vaccination with PSG induces abortion in mice and monkeys, respectively, and reduces the fertility of non-pregnant monkeys [20, 21]. The majority of PSG functional studies have focussed on determining whether PSGs are able to modulate the maternal immune system to prevent rejection of the allotypic foetus. Early studies with complex PSG mixtures isolated from placenta indicated an inhibitory effect on phytohaemagglutinin or allogeneically stimulated lymphocytes [22, 23]. In further experiments it was shown that human monocytes secreted anti-inflammatory cytokines in response to PSG exposure. Moreover, recombinant mouse PSG18 was found to induce the production of interleukin (IL)-10 in the mouse macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 [24]. Human PSG1, PSG6 and PSG11 all induced secretion of IL-10, IL-6 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 [25]. Whilst IL-10 and TGF-β1 are anti-inflammatory [26], IL-6 is usually considered to be a proinflammatory cytokine. However IL-6 does have some well-described anti-inflammatory properties [27]. Furthermore, IL-6 has been shown to indirectly promote trophoblast growth by upregulation of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) release by the trophoblast, and induction of granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [28, 29]. Further evidence implicating PSGs in immune modulation arises from PSG mediated suppression of T cells in purulent septic complications of abortion [30] and elevated circulating PSG levels are correlated with improved symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis [31]. PSG induction of alternative monocyte activation is of particular importance as it implies a PSG-mediated switching of the immune system from a predominantly TH1 response to a predominately TH2 response which is more compatible with a successful pregnancy [32].

The only PSG receptor identified to date is the integrin-associated CD9 receptor, which was found to bind the N1 domain of both PSG17 [33] and PSG19 (unpublished data). Additionally, the presence of the conserved tripeptide motif Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) on a solvent-exposed loop in the N-terminal Ig domain in the majority of human and some lower-primate PSGs implicates a function that involves integrin-related receptors [34]. Thus it has been speculated that the RGD domain may enable some PSGs to disrupt cell-matrix interactions [35]. However, no rodent PSG isolated to date possesses an RGD domain. Evidence supporting the hypothesis that the RGD domain may be involved in receptor binding was provided by the discovery that a peptide containing the RGD motif, from human PSG9, bound to a receptor on the surface of a promonocytic cell line [36]. In common with integrin interactions, this was dependent on the presence of divalent cations and showed sensitivity to cytoskeletal signalling. However, the expected sizes of the receptor subunits differed from those of known integrins, therefore, the identity of the receptor remains elusive.

Much current work has focussed on human PSGs due to their possible relevance to disorders of pregnancy. However, the study of rodent PSGs is important because, the evident differences between primate and rodent PSG protein domain structures notwithstanding, there appears to be considerable conservation in terms of expression in trophoblast, independent gene family expansions in mammalian lineages with haemochorial placentation, and postulated immune functions during pregnancy. Moreover, the application of gene targeting and mutagenesis in the mouse is likely to be informative with respect to elucidating the cellular and physiological functions of PSGs. Such experiments will require an accurate genomic map of the mouse Psg locus, which we undertook to produce in the work described herein. It is also pertinent to ask whether the independent expansions of PSG gene families in different mammalian lineages reflect selection for increased gene dosage or for diversification of function mediated through different protein structures or developmental expression patterns. We therefore undertook to examine and correlate protein domain evolution and expression profiles of the various mouse Psg genes to attempt to address this question. Our results suggest that different family members have very different expression levels at different stages of development, which we consider may be supportive of the hypothesis that mouse Psg genes may have evolved divergent functions in mammalian pregnancy. However, mutagenesis of individual family members will be necessary to rigorously test this hypothesis.

Results

Identification of novel mouse Psg genes

For comparative studies of the human PSG family it is relatively easy to compare coding sequences (CDS) and peptide sequences because complete sequence information is available. However the data available for mouse PSGs is not complete, making such analyses difficult. Thus, we firstly collated the currently available public data, and we then attempted to identify sequences for PSGs that were not completely resolved in the databases. Full-length cDNA sequences of Psg17, Psg18, Psg19, Psg21, Psg23, Psg28 and Psg30 were identified via basic name searches of the RefSeq RNA database. Their identity was then verified by comparison to cDNA fragment sequences, which were obtained during the course of this work and deposited in GenBank [37], as misnaming of genes is commonplace in the databases. The cDNA sequence of Psg22 was then identified via BLAST analysis of the mouse RefSeq RNA database using the GenBank partial sequence referenced in Beauchemin et al. [37]. Psg31 was identified by BLAST analysis of the same database using the full-length Psg30 sequence and found to be the XM_355864.1 predicted transcript. However, there was a discrepancy between the predicted transcript and the sequences of EST clones CK032208 and CN694284. Comparison of these EST sequences with genomic contig NT_039395.2, using pairwise BLAST analysis, revealed that there had been a duplication of the N1 domain exon. We refer to the two N1 domains of Psg31 as N1 and N1* hereafter.

The gene and full-length cDNA coding sequences of the remaining mouse genes (Psg20, Psg24, Psg25, Psg26, Psg27 and Psg29) were deduced manually by systematic BLAST analysis of the mouse genome database as described in Methods. None of these predicted cDNAs were observed in the mouse EST database, although all except Psg20 were observed in the Trace Archive EST sequences. A novel splice variant of Psg16 was also found. BLAST analysis of the mouse High Throughput Genomic Sequences (HTGS) database identified contig AC148976.2, which appears to contain the whole Psg16 gene. An alternative exon 1 was discovered upstream of the previously described initiating exon by a pairwise BLAST comparison of this contig with full-length Psg17 coding sequence. The use of this alternative exon 1 produced a transcript that encodes a typical PSG polypeptide complete with a predicted secretory-peptide signal sequence and cleavage site. Multiple hits identified from subsequent BLAST analysis of the mouse EST and Trace Archives EST databases provided evidence that this novel splice variant was placentally expressed in vivo. In contrast, only one hit was obtained by identical analysis using the coding sequence of the brain-specific transcript described in Chen et al. [38]. This transcript (BC030357) was derived from a retinal cDNA library. The brain-expressed splice variant is generated from an alternative initiation site within exon 2 of the dominant placentally-expressed form of the gene. Alternative promoter usage would explain the brain and placenta-specific expression patterns of these variants of Psg16. Unlike the brain-specific variant, the placentally-expressed variant possesses a predicted secretory signal peptide at the N-terminus, like most other Psg gene family members.

The comparison of the brain derived Psg16 coding sequence with the genomic sequence (AC148976.2) also revealed differences in the encoding of the A-domain. The placental transcript is predicted to be encoded by 5 exons, as are the majority of mouse Psg mRNAs. However, a weak splice donor signal sequence within the fifth exon permits splicing to a strong splice acceptor sequence downstream of the sixth exon, as seen in the brain-expressed transcript. Trace Archive EST data reveals multiple hits to sequences from placental cDNA libraries using the 3' end of the placental Psg16 coding sequence as bait. This confirms the existence of our predicted transcript. Conversely, similar analysis using the brain-expressed variant yielded no hits. The sixth exon is present on a separate randomly ordered gene fragment within the AC148976.2 contig.

Psg-ps1 was previously considered to be a pseudogene, based on a point deletion at nucleotide position 30, downstream from the canonical Psg translational start site [8]. However, despite this frame shift, the open reading frame of this unusual Psg continues 105 bp upstream of the site of the mutation to an alternative ATG. Inspection of the sequence revealed a Kozak consensus, and BLAST analysis of the public EST and Trace Archive EST databases yielded many mRNA clones that contain this region in addition to downstream exons. Hence, this gene is clearly expressed, and we now propose to rename Psg-ps1 as Psg32 hereafter. We note that this mutation and amino terminal extension abolishes the canonical PSG secretory signal and peptide cleavage site. We therefore suggest that if Psg32 is indeed translated, the resulting protein is retained within the cytoplasm. To determine if the deletion observed in BALB/c mice was also present in other murine strains, we amplified and sequenced a 146 bp fragment by PCR using a set of primers specific for the 5'-untranslated region and the leader peptide of Psg32. The deletion observed in the Psg32 cDNA is also present in the genomic DNA of A/J, C57BL6/J, YBR/Ei, and SWR/J inbred mouse strains (data not shown).

The nomenclature (past and current) and accession numbers of nucleotide sequences of all the murine PSGs are documented in Table 1. The genome sequence and predicted CDS and translation products for Psg16, Psg20, Psg26 and Psg31 are listed in Additional file 1. The complete CDS data for all known mouse Psgs (except the brain-specific splice variant of Psg16) are listed in Additional file 2. The complete protein primary sequences for all known mouse Psgs (except the brain-specific splice variant of Psg16) are listed in Additional file 3.

Table 1 Summary of mouse PSG nomenclature and sequence accession numbers
Full size table

Domain structure of mouse PSG proteins

A schematic representation of the mouse Psg domain structures is shown in Fig. 1. Of the seventeen mouse Psgs, thirteen encode a common structure of three Ig variable (IgV)-like domains (N-domains) and a single Ig constant (IgC)-like domain (A-domain). Psg24, Psg30 and Psg31 have an expanded structure created by the duplication of IgV-like domains. An unrooted phylogenetic tree indicates three main branches of IgV-like domain evolution (Fig. 2). There is a group consisting of N1 domains, a group of N2 domains and N2-derived domains, and a group of N3 domains and N3-derived domains. Therefore, in agreement with the most common structure observed in Fig. 1, the ancestral mouse Psg would be expected to have had an N1-N2-N3-A arrangement of domains. The expansion of Psg24, Psg30 and Psg31 has occurred mostly through duplications of the N2 and N3 IgV-like domains, with the exception of Psg24 N5 and Psg31 N1 domains.

Figure 1
figure 1

Domain organization of mouse PSGs. Mouse PSGs are composed of 3 – 8 IgV-like N domains and one IgC-like A domain. The relative position of potential N-glycosylation sites (consensus amino acid sequence: asparagine-X-threonine / serine; X any amino acid except proline) were identified using the NetNGlyc 1.0 Server online software http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/ and indicated by lollipops. Although PSG32 is probably not routed through the endoplasmic reticulum, the putative N-glycosylation sites are shown for comparison. Of the two PSG16 splice variants, only the variant expressed in the placenta is shown.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

Evolutionary relationships between mouse PSG IgV-like domains. An unrooted evolutionary tree based on ClustalX amino acid sequence alignments showing the relationships between all mouse PSG N-domains. The three main groups N1, N2 and N3 have been ringed for clarity. The scale bar represents 0.1 amino acid substitutions per site.

Full size image

In order to characterise the evolution of the mouse Psg s with expanded domain numbers, Neighbor-Joining (NJ) trees with bootstrap values of 1000 were prepared (Fig. 3A) and ClustalW amino acid sequence alignments (Fig. 3B) were studied to identify the origin of the novel IgV-like domains in these three exceptional Psg s. From examination of the data in Fig. 3A(i) it was not apparent from which progenitor domain the Psg24 N5 domain evolved due to lack of confidence in the branch on which it lies. However, using the alignment identities in Fig. 3B(i) it can be seen that, although generally poorly conserved, the best match of 51.2% was obtained by alignment with the N2 domain. Therefore, our evolutionary model assumes that the Psg24 N5 domain arose from an early duplication of the N2 domain. Also, based on agreement of the data in Fig. 3A(i) and 3B(i), the N2 domain duplicated again more recently to yield the N3 domain. This latter duplication explains why the Psg24 N4 domain is N3-like. The order of these events is shown schematically in Fig. 3C(i).

Figure 3
figure 3

Domain expansion of Psg24 , Psg30 and Psg31. A. NJ-trees based on ClustalX amino acid sequence alignments showing: (i) the evolution of PSG24 IgV-like domains compared to those of PSG17; (ii) the evolution of PSG30 IgV-like domains compared to those of PSG17; (iii) the evolution of PSG31 IgV-like domains compared to those of PSG17. The trees were rooted using an outgroup consisting of the N-domain amino acid sequences of human PSG1, PSG2 and PSG3. Alignments were bootstrapped 1000 times yielding node values which are represented as follows < 50%: no mark; 50–74%: marked *; 75–94%: marked **; ≥ 95%: marked ***. The scale bar represents 0.1 amino acid substitutions per site. B. The arrangement of domains represented by boxes shaded: cyan for leader (L) peptides; light pink for the N1-domains; dark pink for N2 and N2-like domains; red for N3 and N3-like domains; blue for A-domains. (i) Comparison of Psg17 and Psg24 exon arrangement including identities of amino acid sequence alignments. (ii) Comparison of Psg30 and Psg31 exon arrangements including identities of amino acid sequence alignments. C. Predicted model of IgV-like domain expansion by exon duplications in (i) Psg24 and (ii) Psg30 and Psg31.

Full size image

Using a similar analysis we propose a model for the expansion of domains within Psg30 and Psg31 (Fig. 3C(ii)). We suggest that the N4 and N6 domains of Psg30 and Psg31 are derived from a progenitor N2 domain. Similarly, the N5 and N7 domains are derived from a progenitor N3 domain. Expansion is predicted to have occurred in 2 or 3 separate events in a common ancestor of Psg30 and Psg31. In the first instance the progenitor N3-like and N2-like domains were duplicated, either at different points in evolution or at the same time. The final step was a duplication of both of these daughter domains to create Psg30 and the precursor of Psg31. The precursor of Psg31 then underwent another duplication, this time of the N1 domain.

Expression of Psg genes in mouse placenta at different developmental stages

On the basis that all mouse Psg genes originated from a common ancestor, and expanded into a multigene family by duplication and subsequent divergence, the question as to whether the expression patterns have also diversified is relevant to determining the selective forces underlying Psg gene family expansion. As Psg genes are expressed predominantly in the placenta, cDNA was prepared from total RNA extracted from mouse placenta at four stages of development between E10.5 and E17.5. Psg cDNA sequences were then amplified with PCR primers designed to amplify Psg16 – Psg29 inclusive. Size fractionation of PCR products on an ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel, indicates that mouse Psg genes are predominantly expressed from around E15.5, increasing in expression through to at least E17.5 (Fig. 4). However, after blotting the products onto nylon membranes and hybridising radiolabelled oligonucleotide probes specific for individual Psg genes (Table 2), we observed significant differences in expression profiles of different genes during development. This method is probably semi-quantitative at best but does give some indication of relative expression levels. We observed that Psg16 and Psg26 are weakly expressed at E15.5 but strongly expressed at E17.5. In contrast, Psg17, Psg18, Psg21 and Psg23 are expressed strongly at E15.5, further increasing by E17.5. Psg27 shows a similar expression pattern to these four Psgs, but at a relatively low level. Very weak expression was observed on E17.5 for Psg19, Psg20, Psg24, Psg25 and Psg29, whereas Psg22 and Psg28 were undetectable. Psg30, Psg31 and Psg32 domain structures had not been finalised and therefore their expression was not analysed in this experiment.

Figure 4
figure 4

Expression of Psg mRNAs during placental development. Total RNA (1 μg) from day 10.5, 12.5, 15.5 and 17.5 BALB/c placentae was reverse transcribed using an oligo (dT) oligonucleotide (reverse PCR primer). After addition of the degenerate Psg-all oligonucleotide (forward PCR primer), which anneals to the cDNA of all known members of the mouse Psg family, Psg cDNAs were amplified by PCR (see schematic diagram depicting generalised mouse Psg cDNA amplification). Aliquots were size-separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. a, PCR products were visualised by ethidium bromide staining. b-o, the amplification products were blotted onto nylon membranes and individual blots were hybridised with single gene-specific 32P-labelled oligonucleotides from the N1 domain regions (Table 2). The location of the primers used for amplification of the Psg cDNAs and the region from which the sequences of the gene-specific oligonucleotides were derived are shown together with a schematic representation of mouse Psg mRNA. The 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions are shown as bold lines. L, leader; N1-N3, IgV-like domains; A, IgC-like domain.

Full size image
Table 2 Oligonucleotides used in this study
Full size table

To supplement the PCR-based Psg expression studies, we performed 'virtual northern' analysis in silico by screening the public EST database for sequences matching Psg N1 or A-domains and counting the numbers of matches (Fig. 5). There was generally good concordance of the virtual data with the RT-PCR data; notably, Psg21 and Psg23 are highly represented in both datasets. However, disagreements were also evident e.g. Psg16 expression was low in the RT-PCR data, but high in the virtual data. A random sample of twenty of the large number of Psg16 EST sequences in the database indicated that all were of placental origin, ruling out contamination with brain-derived sequences as an explanation for the disparity between RT-PCR and virtual analysis. There was also generally good agreement with the results from screening the EST database with N1 and A domain sequences, although the numbers of A-domain hits were 4–5 fold lower than the N1-domain hits. The only exception to this observation was that Psg30 and Psg31 sequences were identified in 2-fold greater abundance when screened with the A domain compared with the N1 domain. Despite some discrepancies, therefore, the combined RT-PCR and virtual Northern data demonstrate that developmental onset of expression, and maximum expression levels, vary considerably within the Psg family.

Figure 5
figure 5

Virtual Northern analysis of the mouse Psg genes. The nucleotide sequences of the Psg exons encoding the N1 or the A domains were used in NCBI-BLAST searches of the GenBank mouse EST database (March 16, 2004) for the presence of Psg transcripts (virtual Northern analysis). A hit was registered when a 100% match for a sequence > 150 bp was observed. Obvious mismatches such as unidentified nucleotides (N) or single nucleotide insertions or deletions (especially at the end of a sequence run) were ignored.

Full size image

Mouse Psg locus genomic organisation

The published mouse Psg gene locus is contained on contig NT_039395. However, the complement of Psg genes is incomplete and the majority of gene sequences within the contig are unordered. We therefore decided to determine the organisation of Psg genes within the locus by screening BAC, YAC and cosmid clones using hybridisation with gene-specific oligonucleotide probes. We defined two separate contigs (subclusters) within which the order of Psg genes was determined to the fullest extent possible. The orientation of the two subclusters with respect to each other and the chromosome 7 centromere was determined by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis. These data are summarised in Fig. 6. All of the known mouse Psg genes are located within cytobands A1 and A2 on proximal chromosome 7 and are interspersed with other genes, particularly Ceacams, as determined by comparison with the published mouse genomic sequence on contig NT_039395. We did not observe any obvious correlation between the relative positions of the Psg genes at the locus and their domain arrangements or expression patterns.

Figure 6
figure 6

Physical map of mouse Psg gene locus. A. The order of the Psg genes was inferred from the presence of the various genes on overlapping cosmid, BAC and YAC clones. The position of Psgs represented by filled boxes is unequivocal, whereas the position of those represented by open boxes is ambiguous. Arrows between pairs of genes indicate that their order remains unresolved. The distances between individual genes are not shown to scale. Chimeric YACs mapping to separate chromosomes are indicated by stippled and solid lines. The solid lines correspond to chromosome 7 regions containing the Psg genes indicated above. The locations of the non-chromosome 7 regions are not known. Only the sizes of non-chimeric YACs have been determined and are shown (size bar corresponds to 100 kb). The centromere (cen) / telomere (ter) order and the relative orientation of the two Psg gene subclusters were resolved by FISH mapping. B. Two-colour FISH prophase mapping of relative orientation of the two Psg gene subclusters using mouse m5S cells and C57BL/6CrSlc mouse lymphocytes. (i) FISH pattern representative of 38 experiments where BAC 310D2 in subcluster 1, labelled with rhodamine (R), is centromeric to BAC 600E2 from subcluster 2, labelled with fluorosceine (F). (ii) FISH pattern representative of 38 experiments where BAC 310D2 in subcluster 1, labelled with rhodamine, is centromeric to YAC F10104 from subcluster 2, labelled with fluorosceine. (iii) Orientation of subcluster 2 determined by relative positions of BAC 572D4, labelled with rhodamine, which is telomeric to YAC F10104, labelled with fluorosceine.

Full size image

There is a discrepancy with respect to the distance between the two subclusters. The currently poorly resolved data covering this region in the the Ensembl assembly implies the presence of a gap between Psg29 and Psg32. However, we determined that the subclusters are fused between Psg32 and Psg30/Psg18. YAC F10104 (which is non-chimeric) is about 460 kb long and contains only two Psg genes which indicates the presence of a non-Psg genomic region. We estimate the gap between the subclusters to be approximately 400 kb based on the size of cosmids containing two Psg genes (ca. 40 kb).

Discussion

The human PSG genomic data in the public databases are relatively complete. For each PSG gene, there are annotated RefSeq resources comprising information on genomic structure, transcripts and translation products. The nomenclature is also standardised [37]. Further, there are accurate chromosome 19 locus assignments allowing complete visualisation of the PSG locus and surrounding genes. In contrast, a substantial quantity of mouse Psg genomic data in the public domain is fragmented, incomplete and somewhat unreliable. We sought to collate the existing genomic data, to present novel data to fill in gaps, and to provide a coherent resource of mouse Psg genomic data.

To determine whether the existing set of mouse Psg genes was complete we performed systematic BLAST searches of a variety of public DNA sequence databases. This analysis revealed the existence of a novel expressed Psg gene, which we name Psg31 in line with the accepted nomenclature convention [37]. Psg31 apparently evolved from a duplication of the whole of the Psg30 gene followed by a subsequent internal duplication of the N1 domain. We were also able to predict the complete coding sequences of four Psg genes for which previously only partial fragments were described. The gene, CDS and protein sequences of these predictions, coupled with a complete reference of all known mouse Psg CDS and primary protein sequences are provided in three attached Additional Files.

Using the full CDS information obtained for the complete set of mouse Psg gene sequences, domain structures for all family members were predicted. All of the PSG proteins possess previously described arrangements of Ig-like domains. Except for two members, discussed below, all are predicted to encode N-terminal secretory signal sequences. Our predicted novel splice variant of Psg16 has a complete N1 domain and secretory signal peptide sequence. Trace Archive EST database BLAST analysis confirmed that this variant is expressed in the placenta. In contrast, the brain-expressed variant [38] has only a partial N1 domain and no secretory signal peptide. The previously described Psg-ps1 pseudogene [8] was found to be expressed in the placenta using Trace Archive EST database BLAST analysis and possesses an excellent Kozak sequence at the predicted translational initiation site. This evidence therefore indicates that this gene, which we rename Psg32, is not a pseudogene but a bona fide expressed Psg gene family member. The Psg32 transcript may encode a protein that is retained within the cytoplasm. We note that a precedent in the human exists in the form of a non-secreted splice variant of PSG11 [7].

Psg31 has the unusual N1-N1*-N2-N3-N4-N5-N6-N7-A domain structure. This newly characterised Psg gene has evolved from a duplication of the entire Psg30 gene followed by an internal duplication of the N1 domain. There may be functional significance associated with the N1 domain duplication. The complex nature of Psg gene evolution, including putative gene conversion and recombination events between family members [34], makes it difficult to analyse their evolution. Despite this, the data generated from ClustalX alignments and NJ trees enabled us to generate trees that allow prediction of the order of events of domain duplications in Psg24, Psg30 and Psg31. We note that the apparent route to domain number expansion differed between Psg24, and Psg30 and Psg31. The extra N-domains of Psg24 are derived from two duplications of the N2 domain. However, for Psg30 and Psg31, independent duplications of each of the N2 and N3 domains were probably followed by a secondary duplication of the daughter domains, possibly as a single event.

Gene expression data from RT-PCR of placental RNA and EST database analysis revealed considerable differences in the expression levels of different Psg genes. In this analysis Psg21 and Psg23 were the most abundant, consistent with a previous report of abundant Psg23 expression [39]. Whilst there was generally good agreement between the two methods of expression analysis we cannot determine, based on current data, whether Psg gene expression differences reflect selection for divergent functions, or increased gene dosage for enhancement of an existing function, because expression levels were uniformly low for many family members, and there was a general trend of increased expression during gestation. Psg transcripts are found from day 6.5 of embryonic development onward in primary trophoblast giant cells, later (from day 10.5) in spongiotrophoblast cells and, to a lesser extent, in a cell population in the deciduas basalis at day 14.5 [40]. At present, it is unclear whether the various Psg genes exhibit different cellular expression patterns, which might indicate divergent functions of the various PSGs. There are interesting parallels between the expansion of the Psg gene family and similar expansions of other placentally-expressed gene families such as the prolactin and growth hormone families [1], and the aspartic and cysteine proteases [41]. Such duplications may be a manifestation of parent-offspring conflict or inter-sibling rivalry over maternal investment [42].

Having collated all known mouse Psg gene protein coding sequences and protein domain structures, the mouse Psg genomic locus on chromosome 7 remained to be determined to complete a comprehensive resource for the analysis of Psg function. The NCBI build 32 composite mouse assembly data revealed that only four Psg s had been mapped. Other Psg s on contig NT_039395 are currently unordered. We therefore screened cosmid, YAC and BAC libraries, and orientated Psg-containing clones to identify, where possible, the order of Psg genes within the locus. We were not able to resolve all ambiguities in gene order on our map; however, where public database information is available, our data are in good agreement. We found no clear relationship between gene location and gene expression level suggesting that, within the Psg locus, each Psg gene is autonomously regulated.

Conclusions

The evolution and physiological functions of the relatively understudied mouse Psg gene family are poorly understood. This is a feature shared with other placentally-expressed, multigene families such as the prolactin and growth hormone genes [1]. In order to provide a comprehensive resource to facilitate functional studies of mouse Psg genes, including the generation of mouse mutants with modified Psg gene expression profiles, we have collated the entire set of mouse Psg genes, their predicted encoded proteins, and their evolutionary histories. The complete CDS data will enable the cloning, over-expression, and gene targeting of individual or multiple mouse Psg genes. This will facilitate the elucidation of their function and, by extrapolation, their human homologues, which may be involved in diseases of pregnancy.

Methods

Isolation of cosmid, YAC and BAC clones

Cosmid libraries in pWE15 which were made from liver DNA of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Dr. Edwin N. Geissler, Boston, MA, USA, and Stratagene (Heidelberg, Germany), respectively. They were screened for the presence of Psg gene-containing cosmids using a 32P-labelled, full-length Psg cDNA (2.1 kb Kpn I/Xba I fragment of pCea2b [8]) as a probe. The final wash was in 4x NaCl/Cit (1x NaCl/Cit is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate pH 7.0), 0.1% SDS at 65°C. Psg gene-containing YAC clones were identified by hybridisation of DNA from YAC clones which were spotted at high density onto nylon membranes [43] with the same Psg cDNA probe under medium stringency conditions with a final wash in 4x SSPE (1x SSPE is 180 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate pH7.4, 1 mM EDTA), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 65°C. The membranes with arrayed YAC clone DNAs were kindly provided by Dr. H. Lehrach, Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Berlin. Two libraries were screened, 902 and 903, both in the vector pYAC4 [44] composed of 9216 clones each, containing spleen DNA of C3H and C57BL/6 mice, respectively. Filters with arrayed BAC clones containing genomic DNA from the embryonic stem cell line CJ7 (129/Sv strain) (CloneRanger™ BAC Human CTC, Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) were screened by hybridisation with a 32P-labelled probe consisting of the N1 domain exon sequences of 14 mouse Psg genes (Psg17–Psg29 and Psg32). The N1 domain exons were amplified individually by PCR using the degenerate primer pair PsgN1-F/PsgN1-R or Psg32N1-F/PsgN1-R (4 mM each) for Psg32 (Table 2) and cosmid clones (10 ng) with individual Psg genes as template in the presence of 1 U Taq polymerase and 4 mM MgCl2 in a total volume of 30 ml (annealing: 50°C, 30 s). N1 exons of Psg28 and Psg29 were released by digestion with Sal I and Kpn I from pUC18 (see below).

Southern blot analysis of cosmid and YAC DNAs

DNA from YAC clones was isolated by CsCl equilibrium density gradient centrifugation in the presence of ethidium bromide, essentially as described [45], except that spheroblast formation was achieved by incubation for 90 min with 0.17 mg/ml lyticase (approx. 6,000 U/mg) from Arthrobacter luteus (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany). Two mg of cosmid or 0.5 mg of YAC DNA were digested with restriction endonucleases, size fractionated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels and blotted onto positively charged nylon membranes. To identify N1 and A domain exon-containing DNA fragments, the digested DNAs on the membranes were hybridised with 32P-labelled N1 (cosmid DNA blots only) and A domain probes from Psg17 and washed under medium stringency conditions (4x SSPE, 0.1% SDS, 65°C). The Psg17 N1 and A domain cDNA fragments used as probes were obtained by PCR (denaturation: 94°C, 15 s; extension: 72°C, 3 min; 30 cycles) using the mPsg-5'/mPsg-3' (annealing: 50°C; 30s) and Psg17A5'/Psg17A3' (annealing: 60°C, 30 s), primer pairs respectively, and the Psg17 cDNA clone pCea2b as template (Table 2; [8]).

Identification of new Psg genes from YAC clones

N1 exons from unknown Psg genes were amplified by PCR (annealing: 52°C, 30 s; 30 cycles) in a total volume of 100 μl using 200 ng of YAC clone DNA as template, 1 U Taq polymerase, 3 mM MgCl2 and 4 mM each of PsgN1-F and PsgN1-R degenerate oligonucleotides (Table 2) which bind to the N1, but not N2 and N3 exons of all known mouse Psg genes (except Psg32). The product was purified by electrophoresis on a 1.8% agarose gel and subcloned into pUC18 after blunt-ending (SureClone ligation kit: Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany). The N1 exons from two of the 10 newly identified Psg genes (Psg28, Psg29) were analysed by sequencing recombinant plasmids which did not hybridise with oligonucleotide probes specific for known Psg genes (Table 2).

Mapping of the Psg locus

The presence of the different Psg genes within YAC, BAC and cosmid clones was first determined by PCR followed by hybridisation with oligonucleotides specific for individual Psg genes. DNA from Psg-containing YAC (100 ng) and cosmid clones (10 ng) were used to amplify the N1 domain exons of all known Psg genes in a total volume of 60 μl as described above. The N1 exon of Psg32 was amplified in a separate reaction using Psg32N1-F and PsgN1-R (Table 2) as primers under the same conditions used for the amplification of the other N1 exons. For the analysis of BAC clones, PCR was performed directly from the BAC-containing bacterial clones according to the supplier's protocol. Aliquots (3.5 μl) from the various PCR reactions were alkali-denatured, dot-blotted onto nitrocellulose and hybridised with individual 32P-labelled (final concentration: 0.3–1.2 × 106 dpm/ml), gene-specific oligonucleotides (Table 2) in 0.5 M sodium phosphate pH 7.2, 7% SDS, 1 mM EDTA over night at 40°C. The filters were washed twice for 20 min each in 2x SSPE at room temperature, followed by two washes in 6x SSPE, 0.1% SDS at a temperature 4°C below the calculated melting temperature of the hybrids [46]. Oligonucleotides containing at least 3 mismatches in comparison with the corresponding sequences of all known Psg and Cea subgroup members were designed using the computer program Primer [47]. The only exception is the Psg19-specific oligonucleotide which exhibits only 2 mismatches to the Psg22 sequence. However, the stringency of the post-hybridisation washes only allowed binding of oligonucleotides with a maximum of one mismatch. The specificity of the oligonucleotides and the hybridisation conditions was demonstrated on cosmid DNAs containing individual Psg genes. The identity of the Psg genes was verified by sequencing. No cross-hybridisation with other Psg genes was observed. The size of the YACs was determined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis followed by Southern blot hybridisation with the Psg17 cDNA clone pCea2b (see above) essentially as described previously [48].

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analyses

The chromosomal location and chimerism of YAC clones were determined by FISH analyses, using B1-PCR of YAC DNA for probe preparation essentially as described [49]. Orientation and order relative to the chromosome 7 centromere and to each other of the two Psg gene subclusters was defined by FISH analysis using probes described in Fig. 6. FISH was performed essentially as described [50] on m5S cells [51] and concanavalin A-stimulated lymphocytes [52] from the C57BL/6CrS1c mouse strain.

RNA isolation, RT-PCR and specific detection of Psg cDNAs

BALB/c mice were mated overnight, and the next day plugged females were designated as day 0.5 of gestation. Pregnant females were killed by cervical dislocation and placentae were dissected free of maternal tissue, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70°C. Total RNA was extracted by the acid phenol method [53]. The expression of individual Psg genes was studied by RT-PCR followed by hybridisation of the products with gene-specific oligonucleotides. Total RNA (1 μg) from placentae of different gestational stages was reverse transcribed in a total volume of 10 μl by avian myoblastosis virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) in the presence of 6 U/μl RNasin (Promega) using a degenerate oligo (dT)30 oligonucleotide (1 μM) as primer (Table 2). The reaction mix was adjusted to 1x Taq buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl, 16 mM (NH4)2SO4, pH 8.6), 3 mM MgCl2 and 0.4 mM dNTPs in a total volume of 100 μl. Amplification of all known Psg cDNAs (except for the cDNA of Psg32 (Cea6), which at the time of the experiment was presumed to be a pseudogene [8]) was achieved by PCR (denaturation: 94°C, 15 s; annealing: 58°C, 30 s; extension: 72°C, 3 min; 30 cycles) using Taq polymerase after addition of 400 pmoles of Psg-all (Table 2) and 50 pmoles of the oligo (dT) oligonucleotide as 5'- and 3'-primer, respectively. Ten μl aliquots each were size fractionated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and hybridised with individual 32P-labelled, gene-specific oligonucleotides (Table 2) as described above.

DNA sequence determination

Nucleotide sequences were determined on both strands with flanking universal and internal oligonucleotides as primers using a T7 polymerase sequencing kit (Pharmacia) or a Taq Dye Deoxyterminator cycle sequencing kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

Assessment of availability of full-length mouse Psg sequences in the public databases

All bioinformatics searches described below used the online software and databases available at the NCBI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Where fully annotated, Psg cDNA sequences were identified by name searches of the RefSeq RNA database. Attempts were then made to identify remaining known Psg cDNA sequences via BLAST analyses of the mouse RefSeq RNA database using the GenBank partial-sequences referenced in [37]. Any PSG cDNA sequences that could still not be identified by this method were determined by BLAST analysis of the mouse genome database using known fragments of the sequence to be determined. This identified genomic contigs that could be interrogated for the 'missing' exonic sequences by pairwise BLAST analysis using the Psg17 cDNA sequence, or fragments thereof, as a probe. A similar procedure was applied to situations where the existence of alternatively spliced exons was suspected to reside within in a Psg gene-containing contig. In the cases where Psg mRNA sequences were built from genomic sequence, or splice variants were predicted, evidence for the existence of such mRNA species in vivo was tested by BLAST analysis using the mouse EST and Trace Archive EST databases.

Bioinformatic analysis of the mouse PSG Ig domains

The coding sequences of the PSG domains were aligned using Clustal X [54]. For the production of rooted neighbour-joining (NJ) evolutionary trees, alignments were bootstrapped 1000 times. Evolutionary trees were constructed from the alignments using TreeView http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treeview.html.

Analysis of the Psg32 exon 1 sequence

Four hundred nanograms of DNA obtained from four inbred mouse strains (A/J, C57BL6/6J, YBR/Ei, and SWR/J) (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA) were amplified using the oligonucleotide primers 5'-AAGGAAGGACAGCAAAT and 5'- AGCTGTGAGCAGAAGAC (denaturation: 94°C, 30 s; annealing: 50°C, 30 s; extension: 72°C, 30 s; 30 cycles) with Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) following the manufacturer's instructions. The 146 bp PCR products were subcloned into PCR-Script (Stratagene). Clones that hybridized to a Psg32-specific oligonucleotide, Psg32-exon 1, which binds to a sequence internal to the PCR primers were sequenced.

References

  1. Soares MJ: The prolactin and growth hormone families: pregnancy-specific hormones/cytokines at the maternal-fetal interface. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2004, 2: 51-10.1186/1477-7827-2-51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin TM, Halbert SP, Spellacy WN: Measurement of pregnancy-associated plasma proteins during human gestation. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1974, 54: 576-582.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lei KJ, Sartwell AD, Pan CJ, Chou JY: Cloning and expression of genes encoding human pregnancy-specific glycoproteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1992, 267: 16371-16378.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rebstock S, Lucas K, Weiss M, Thompson J, Zimmermann W: Spatiotemporal expression of pregnancy-specific glycoprotein gene rnCGM1 in rat placenta. Developmental Dynamics. 1993, 198: 171-181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kromer B, Finkenzeller D, Wessels J, Dveksler G, Thompson J, Zimmermann W: Coordinate expression of splice variants of the murine pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (PSG) gene family during placental development. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1996, 242: 280-287. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0280r.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brummendorf T, Rathjen FG: Cell adhesion molecules. 1: immunoglobulin superfamily. Protein Profile. 1994, 1: 951-1058.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Teglund S, Zhou GQ, Hammarstrom S: Characterization of cDNA encoding novel pregnancy-specific glycoprotein variants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995, 211: 656-664. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1862.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudert F, Saunders AM, Rebstock S, Thompson JA, Zimmermann W: Characterization of murine carcinoembryonic antigen gene family members. Mammalian Genome. 1992, 3: 262-273. 10.1007/BF00292154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rudert F, Zimmermann W, Thompson JA: Intra- and interspecies analyses of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) gene family reveal independent evolution in primates and rodents. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 1989, 29: 126-134.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmermann W: The nature and expression of the rodent CEA families: evolutionary considerations. Cell adhesion and communication mediated by the CEA family. Edited by: Stanners CP. 1998, Amsterdam, Harwood Academic Publishers, 31-55.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Teglund S, Olsen A, Khan WN, Frangsmyr L, Hammarstrom S: The pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (PSG) gene cluster on human chromosome 19: fine structure of the 11 PSG genes and identification of 6 new genes forming a third subgroup within the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family. Genomics. 1994, 23: 669-684. 10.1006/geno.1994.1556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson J, Koumari R, Wagner K, Barnert S, Schleussner C, Schrewe H, Zimmermann W, Muller G, Schempp W, Zaninetta D: The human pregnancy-specific glycoprotein genes are tightly linked on the long arm of chromosome 19 and are coordinately expressed.[erratum appears in Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1990 May 16;168(3):1325]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990, 167: 848-859. 10.1016/0006-291X(90)92103-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Han E, Phan D, Lo P, Poy MN, Behringer R, Najjar SM, Lin SH: Differences in tissue-specific and embryonic expression of mouse Ceacam1 and Ceacam2 genes. Biochemical Journal. 2001, 355: 417-423. 10.1042/0264-6021:3550417.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Horst AK, Wagener C: CEA-related CAMs. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. Edited by: Behrens J and Nielson WJ. 2004, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, Springer, 165: 283-341.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou GQ, Hammarstrom S: Pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (PSG) in baboon (Papio hamadryas): family size, domain structure, and prediction of a functional region in primate PSGs. Biology of Reproduction. 2001, 64: 90-99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wurz H, Geiger W, Kunzig HJ, Jabs-Lehmann A, Bohn H, Luben G: Radioimmunoassay of SP1 (pregnancy-specific beta1-glycoprotein) in maternal blood and in amniotic fluid normal and pathologic pregnancies. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 1981, 9: 67-78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. MacDonald DJ, Scott JM, Gemmell RS, Mack DS: A prospective study of three biochemical fetoplacental tests: serum human placental lactogen, pregnancy-specific beta 1-glycoprotein, and urinary estrogens, and their relationship to placental insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983, 147: 430-436.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Masson GM, Anthony F, Wilson MS: Value of Schwangerschaftsprotein 1 (SP1) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in the clinical management of threatened abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983, 90: 146-149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamsen L, Johansson SG, Axelsson O: Pregnancy-specific beta 1-glycoprotein (SP1) in serum from women with pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth retardation. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 1983, 11: 19-25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bohn H, Weinmann E: Antifertilitatswirkung einer aktiven Immunisierung von Affen mit dem schwangerschaftsspezifischen beta 1-Glykoprotein (SP1) des Menschen. Archiv fur Gynakologie. 1976, 221: 305-312. 10.1007/BF00667024.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hau J, Gidley-Baird AA, Westergaard JG, Teisner B: The effect on pregnancy of intrauterine administration of antibodies against two pregnancy-associated murine proteins: murine pregnancy-specific beta 1-glycoprotein and murine pregnancy-associated alpha 2-glycoprotein. Biomedica Biochimica Acta. 1985, 44: 1255-1259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Majumdar S, Bapna BC, Mapa MK, Gupta AN, Devi PK, Subrahmanyam D: Pregnancy specific proteins: suppression of in vitro blastogenic response to mitogen by these proteins. International Journal of Fertility. 1982, 27: 66-69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris SJ, Anthony FW, Jones DB, Masson GM: Pregnancy-specific-beta 1-glycoprotein: effect on lymphocyte proliferation in vitro. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 1984, 6: 267-270. 10.1016/0165-0378(84)90015-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wessells J, Wessner D, Parsells R, White K, Finkenzeller D, Zimmermann W, Dveksler G: Pregnancy specific glycoprotein 18 induces IL-10 expression in murine macrophages. European Journal of Immunology. 2000, 30: 1830-1840. 10.1002/1521-4141(200007)30:7<1830::AID-IMMU1830>3.0.CO;2-M.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Snyder SK, Wessner DH, Wessells JL, Waterhouse RM, Wahl LM, Zimmermann W, Dveksler GS: Pregnancy-specific glycoproteins function as immunomodulators by inducing secretion of IL-10, IL-6 and TGF-beta1 by human monocytes. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2001, 45: 205-216. 10.1111/j.8755-8920.2001.450403.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Haddad EK, Duclos AJ, Baines MG: Early embryo loss is associated with local production of nitric oxide by decidual mononuclear cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1995, 182: 1143-1151. 10.1084/jem.182.4.1143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xing Z, Gauldie J, Cox G, Baumann H, Jordana M, Lei XF, Achong MK: IL-6 is an antiinflammatory cytokine required for controlling local or systemic acute inflammatory responses. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1998, 101: 311-320.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishino E, Matsuzaki N, Masuhiro K, Kameda T, Taniguchi T, Takagi T, Saji F, Tanizawa O: Trophoblast-derived interleukin-6 (IL-6) regulates human chorionic gonadotropin release through IL-6 receptor on human trophoblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990, 71: 436-441.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Loke YW, King A, Gardner L, Carter NP: Evidence for the expression of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptors by human first trimester extravillous trophoblast and its response to this cytokine. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 1992, 22: 33-45. 10.1016/0165-0378(92)90004-N.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Repina MA, Blagoslovenskii GS, Gnilevskaia ZU, Ivanova LV: Vliianie spetsificheskogo trofoblasticheskogo beta 1-glikoproteida na izmenenie kletochnogo zvena immuniteta pri infitsirovannom aborte. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia. 1989, 47-50.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fialova L, Kohoutova B, Peliskova Z, Malbohan I, Mikulikova L: Serove hladiny trofoblast-specifickeho beta-1-globulinu (SP1) a alfa-1-fetoproteinu (AFP) u tehotnych zen s revmatoidni artritidou. Ceskoslovenska Gynekologie. 1991, 56: 166-170.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Motran CC, Diaz FL, Montes CL, Bocco JL, Gruppi A: In vivo expression of recombinant pregnancy-specific glycoprotein 1a induces alternative activation of monocytes and enhances Th2-type immune response. European Journal of Immunology. 2003, 33: 3007-3016. 10.1002/eji.200323993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Waterhouse R, Ha C, Dveksler GS: Murine CD9 is the receptor for pregnancy-specific glycoprotein 17. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2002, 195: 277-282. 10.1084/jem.20011741.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. McLenachan PA, Lockhart PJ, Faber HR, Mansfield BC: Evolutionary analysis of the multigene pregnancy-specific beta 1-glycoprotein family: separation of historical and nonhistorical signals. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 1996, 42: 273-280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan WN, Teglund S, Bremer K, Hammarstrom S: The pregnancy-specific glycoprotein family of the immunoglobulin superfamily: identification of new members and estimation of family size. Genomics. 1992, 12: 780-787. 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90309-G.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rutherfurd KJ, Chou JY, Mansfield BC: A motif in PSG11s mediates binding to a receptor on the surface of the promonocyte cell line THP-1. Molecular Endocrinology. 1995, 9: 1297-1305. 10.1210/me.9.10.1297.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Beauchemin N, Draber P, Dveksler G, Gold P, Gray-Owen S, Grunert F, Hammarstrom S, Holmes KV, Karlsson A, Kuroki M, Lin SH, Lucka L, Najjar SM, Neumaier M, Obrink B, Shively JE, Skubitz KM, Stanners CP, Thomas P, Thompson JA, Virji M, von Kleist S, Wagener C, Watt S, Zimmermann W: Redefined nomenclature for members of the carcinoembryonic antigen family. Experimental Cell Research. 1999, 252: 243-249. 10.1006/excr.1999.4610.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen DS, Asanaka M, Yokomori K, Wang F, Hwang SB, Li HP, Lai MM: A pregnancy-specific glycoprotein is expressed in the brain and serves as a receptor for mouse hepatitis virus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995, 92: 12095-12099.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ball M, McLellan A, Collins B, Coadwell J, Stewart F, Moore T: An abundant placental transcript containing an IAP-LTR is allelic to mouse pregnancy-specific glycoprotein 23 (Psg23): cloning and genetic analysis. Gene. 2004, 325: 103-113. 10.1016/j.gene.2003.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Finkenzeller D, Fischer B, Lutz S, Schrewe H, Shimizu T, Zimmermann W: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 10 expressed specifically early in pregnancy in the decidua is dispensable for normal murine development. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23: 272-279. 10.1128/MCB.23.1.272-279.2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mason RW, Stabley DL, Picerno GN, Frenck J, Xing S, Bertenshaw GP, Sol-Church K: Evolution of placental proteases. Biological Chemistry. 2002, 383: 1113-1118. 10.1515/BC.2002.120.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Haig D: Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. Quarterly Review of Biology. 1993, 68: 495-532. 10.1086/418300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zehetner G, Lehrach H: The Reference Library System--sharing biological material and experimental data. Nature. 1994, 367: 489-491. 10.1038/367489a0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Larin Z, Monaco AP, Lehrach H: Yeast artificial chromosome libraries containing large inserts from mouse and human DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1991, 88: 4123-4127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Philippsen P, Stotz A, Scherf C: DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods in Enzymology. 1991, 194: 169-182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lathe R: Synthetic oligonucleotide probes deduced from amino acid sequence data. Theoretical and practical considerations. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1985, 183: 1-12. 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90276-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lucas K, Busch M, Mossinger S, Thompson JA: An improved microcomputer program for finding gene- or gene family-specific oligonucleotides suitable as primers for polymerase chain reactions or as probes. Computer Applications in the Biosciences. 1991, 7: 525-529.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Thompson J, Zimmermann W, Osthus-Bugat P, Schleussner C, Eades-Perner AM, Barnert S, Von Kleist S, Willcocks T, Craig I, Tynan K: Long-range chromosomal mapping of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) gene family cluster. Genomics. 1992, 12: 761-772. 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90307-E.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Rettenberger G, Zimmermann W, Klett C, Zechner U, Hameister H: Mapping of murine YACs containing the genes Cea2 and Cea4 after B1-PCR amplification and FISH-analysis. Chromosome Research. 1995, 3: 473-478. 10.1007/BF00713961.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lichter P, Cremer T, Borden J, Manuelidis L, Ward DC: Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries. Human Genetics. 1988, 80: 224-234. 10.1007/BF01790090.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sasaki MS, Kodama S: Establishment and some mutational characteristics of 3T3-like near-diploid mouse cell line. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 1987, 131: 114-122. 10.1002/jcp.1041310117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kagotani K, Takebayashi S, Kohda A, Taguchi H, Paulsen M, Walter J, Reik W, Okumura K: Replication timing properties within the mouse distal chromosome 7 imprinting cluster. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2002, 66: 1046-1051. 10.1271/bbb.66.1046.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N: Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Analytical Biochemistry. 1987, 162: 156-159. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997, 25: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Hameister, Ulm for help with the chromosomal localisation and determination of chimerism within the YAC clones. We acknowledge support from the Deutsche Krebshilfe and the Irish Higher Education Authority Program for Research in Third Level Institutions (HEA PRTLI1 & 3), funded under the National Development Plan. TM is a Wellcome Trust / Irish Health Research Board 'New Blood' Research Fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Biosciences Institute, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland

    Andrew S McLellan, Freda Wynne, Melanie Ball & Tom Moore

  2. Tumor Immunology Group, LIFE Center, University Clinic Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Muenchen, Marchioninistrasse 23, D-81377, Muenchen, Germany

    Wolfgang Zimmermann

  3. Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Bioresources, Mie University, 1515 Kamihama, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan

    Tomomi Hori & Katsuzumi Okumura

  4. Institute of Molecular Medicine and Cell Research, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 17, D-97104, Freiburg, Germany

    Beate Fischer & Wolfgang Zimmermann

  5. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA

    Gabriela Dveksler

  6. Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany

    Beate Fischer

Authors
  1. Andrew S McLellan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beate Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gabriela Dveksler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomomi Hori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Freda Wynne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Melanie Ball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Katsuzumi Okumura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tom Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wolfgang Zimmermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tom Moore or Wolfgang Zimmermann.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

ASM performed bioinformatics relating to Psg locus organisation, phylogenetic analyses, Psg expression studies, and drafted the manuscript. BF characterized Psg genomic clones and performed Psg expression studies. GD isolated the Psg BAC clones and analysed Psg32 exon 1 sequences in mouse strains. MB and FW contributed to Psg expression studies and YAC fragment assembly. TH and KO performed FISH analysis for identification of orientation of Psg subclusters. TM co-conceived the project and coordinated work performed in Cork. WZ co-conceived the project, coordinated all work performed in Germany, and performed bioinformatics relating to Psg phylogeny and expression.

Electronic supplementary material

12864_2004_205_MOESM1_ESM.txt

Additional File 1: The gene sequence and predicted CDS and primary protein sequences for Psg16(placental transcript), Psg20, Psg24, Psg25, Psg26, Psg27, Psg29 and Psg31 A basic text file containing the primary genome data (with source HTGS or WGS information). Predicted CDS sequence is included along with translations. Reverse complement is abbreviated 'RC' in the text. (TXT 232 KB)

12864_2004_205_MOESM2_ESM.txt

Additional File 2: Complete set of mouse Psg CDS sequences A basic text file in FASTA format containing CDS sequences for all known mouse Psgs (not including the brain-specific variant of Psg16). (TXT 28 KB)

12864_2004_205_MOESM3_ESM.txt

Additional File 3: Complete set of mouse PSG primary protein sequences A basic text file in FASTA format containing primary protein sequences for all known mouse Psgs (not including the brain-specific variant of Psg16). (TXT 9 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLellan, A.S., Fischer, B., Dveksler, G. et al. Structure and evolution of the mouse pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (Psg) gene locus. BMC Genomics 6, 4 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-4

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us