BMC Genomics Volume 6
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Delta Ct miscalculation?
Bruno Maranda
(24 February 2006) Hopital Ste-Justine 
To the editor:
It was with great pleasure that I read this article. Working also on quantitative real-time PCR I attempted to use their formula with my own data. The authors present their calculations for corrected Ct in great details. However, I do not obtain the same fold change results. PCR doubles the amount of DNA at each cycle if amplification efficiency is near 100%. If we observe a difference of one Ct (-1) it represents half of the reference amount of DNA and not simply a loss of one copy. In their case, it represents a microdeletion. If you observe a positive difference of one Ct (+1), this represent twice the amount of refence DNA. In their case it would be 4 copies of the genes in the 22q11.2 region and not three copies as the authors suggest. I have not found any patient with trisomy 22 as reported in reference 25, but one patient with 4 copies of 22q11.2 region. I wonder if this is the patient that they have used to study gain of copies. I would like to get further information about their calculations and the patient with gain of copy(ies).
Competing interests
None declared
top
|