Table 2 |
||||
|
BLAT Results: TIGR BtGI TCs vs. full-CDS bFLICs with identities > = 300 |
||||
|
A |
B |
|||
|
|
||||
|
No bFLIC TC membership requirement |
bFLIC required to be member in query TC |
|||
|
|
||||
|
933 total bFLICs in all alignments |
855 total bFLICs in all alignments |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Fractional coverage of bFLICs by any single TC |
Number of bFLICS |
Average Contig Length |
Number of bFLICS |
Average Contig Length |
|
|
||||
|
> = .95 |
414 |
1470 |
401 |
1474 |
|
|
||||
|
< .95 |
672 |
1782 |
456 |
1865 |
|
< .90 |
639 |
1797 |
409 |
1909 |
|
< .80 |
615 |
1810 |
360 |
1964 |
|
< .50 |
531 |
1846 |
264 |
2081 |
|
< .25 |
389 |
2139 |
163 |
2484 |
|
< .20 |
97 |
2430 |
29 |
2664 |
|
< .15 |
29 |
2781 |
8 |
2920 |
|
|
||||
|
In order to quantify how well the TCs cover the bFLICs, the number of bFLICs matched by TCs at different fractional coverage levels was determined. Fractional coverage of a bFLIC by a TC = number of identities in the BLAT match/bFLIC length. |
||||
|
Harhay et al. BMC Genomics 2005 6:166 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-6-166 |
||||
