Amplified RNA degradation in T7-amplification methods results in biased microarray hybridizations
-
* Corresponding author: Andrej-Nikolai Spiess spiess@ihf.de
BMC Genomics 2003, 4:44 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-4-44
Accesses
- Last 30 days: 51 accesses
- Last 365 days: 560 accesses
- All time: 7278 accesses
Cited by
BioMed Central: 7 citations
|
"Hook"-calibration of GeneChip-microarrays: Chip characteristics and expression measures Hans Binder, Knut Krohn, Stephan Preibisch Algorithms for Molecular Biology 2008, 3:11 (29 August 2008) |
|
Amplification biases: possible differences among deviating gene expressions Séverine A Degrelle, Christelle Hennequet-Antier, Hélène Chiapello, Karine Piot-Kaminski, Francois Piumi, Stéphane Robin, Jean-Paul Renard, Isabelle Hue BMC Genomics 2008, 9:46 (28 January 2008) |
|
Tatiana Subkhankulova, Frederick J Livesey Genome Biology 2006, 7:R18 (7 March 2006) Comparison of the performance of three methods for amplifying single-cell amounts of RNA for use in expression profiling shows that PCT amplification is more reliable than linear amplification. |
|
Limitations of mRNA amplification from small-size cell samples Vigdis Nygaard, Marit Holden, Anders Løland, Mette Langaas, Ola Myklebost, Eivind Hovig BMC Genomics 2005, 6:147 (27 October 2005) |
|
RNA amplification for successful gene profiling analysis Ena Wang Journal of Translational Medicine 2005, 3:28 (25 July 2005) |
|
Johan Wadenbäck, David H Clapham, Deborah Craig, Ronald Sederoff, Gary F Peter, Sara von Arnold, Ulrika Egertsdotter BMC Genomics 2005, 6:61 (4 May 2005) |
|
Evaluation of sense-strand mRNA amplification by comparative quantitative PCR Loyal A Goff, Jessica Bowers, Jaime Schwalm, Kevin Howerton, Robert C Getts, Ronald P Hart BMC Genomics 2004, 5:76 (6 October 2004) |