Skip to main content
Download PDF

Characterization of the lipoxygenase (LOX) gene family in the Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) and comparison with other members of the Rosaceae

BMC Genomics volume 15, Article number: 444 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Lipoxygenases (LOXs), a type of non-haem iron-containing dioxygenase, are ubiquitous enzymes in plants and participate in the formation of fruit aroma which is a very important aspect of fruit quality. Amongst the various aroma volatiles, saturated and unsaturated alcohols and aldehydes provide the characteristic aroma of the fruit. These compounds are formed from unsaturated fatty acids through oxidation, pyrolysis and reduction steps. This biosynthetic pathway involves at least four enzymes, including LOX, the enzyme responsible for lipid oxidation. Although some studies have been conducted on the LOX gene family in several species including Arabidopsis, soybean, cucumber and apple, there is no information from pear; and the evolutionary history of this gene family in the Rosaceae is still not resolved.

Results

In this study we identified 107 LOX homologous genes from five Rosaceous species (Pyrus bretschneideri, Malus × domestica, Fragaria vesca, Prunus mume and Prunus persica); 23 of these sequences were from pear. By using structure analysis, phylogenic analysis and collinearity analysis, we identified variation in gene structure and revealed the phylogenetic evolutionary relationship of this gene family. Expression of certain pear LOX genes during fruit development was verified by analysis of transcriptome data.

Conclusions

23 LOX genes were identified in pear and these genes were found to have undergone a duplication 30–45 MYA; most of these 23 genes are functional. Specific gene duplication was found on chromosome4 in the pear genome. Useful information was provided for future research on the evolutionary history and transgenic research on LOX genes.

Background

Pear, a member of the subfamily Pomaceae in the Rosaceae, is a temperate fruit crop of major economic importance in the world market. As global economic markets develop, the current breeding objects are moving from the traditional focus on fruit yield to fruit quality, especially flavor. Such flavor is a genetically and biochemically highly complex trait, which involves the interaction of sugars, acids and aroma. Aroma, as a very important component of flavor is receiving more and more attention. The aroma of the fruit is a complex mixture of more than 1000 volatile compounds, including esters, aldehydes, terpenes, alcohols, carbonyl compounds, and some sulfur compounds [1, 2], and the type and relative proportion of each aroma component determine the specific aroma of different fruit. Although intensive research has been conducted on the physiological and biochemical analysis of fruit aroma, the molecular genetic basis and inheritance of aroma patterns are still unknown.

However, biosynthetic pathways leading to the formation of plant flavor volatiles such as esters, alcohols and aldehydes have been thoroughly investigated [3]. As judged by either quality or quantity, the main fruit volatiles are substantially derived from saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. Straight-chain alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, acids, esters and lactones are primarily formed by the fatty acid oxidation pathway by lipoxygenase, via α and β- oxidation. The lipoxygenase pathway of fatty acids involves at least four enzymes, namely lipoxygenase (LOX), hydroperoxide lyase (HPL), alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and alcohol acetyl transferase (AAT).

LOXs are lipid-oxidizing enzymes, a type of non-haem iron-containing dioxygenase, which is ubiquitous in the animal and plant kingdoms [4]; they are even found in fungi [5] and bacteria [6]. LOX is a common plant lipoxygenase that oxidizes linoleate and alpha- linolenate, the two most common polyunsaturated fatty acids found in plants. The patterns of LOX gene expression vary according to the tissue and stage of development [7–10].

According to enzyme classification, LOX is defined as a Linoleic: Oxygen oxidoreductase, which catalyzes (Z, Z) -1,4-pentadiene structural units of unsaturated fatty acids plus oxygen to produce unsaturated fatty acid peroxides [11]. It is a multifunctional enzyme, involved in at least three different types of catalytic reaction: 1) oxidation of the lipid double plus (peroxidase reaction); 2) a secondary lipid peroxide conversion (reaction of hydrogen peroxidase) [12]; 3) formation of epoxy leukotrienes (leukotriene synthesis reaction) [13].

It is known that in complex eukaryotes LOXs are generally encoded by a multigene family [10, 14]. With the rapid development in sequencing and functional genomics research, LOX genes are being identified, cloned and studied in more and more plant species.

For example, six lipoxygenases were reported in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana[15]. Studies on cucumber revealed that expression of 13 out of the 23 LOX genes can be detected using RT-PCR. Twelve genes were differentially expressed in response to abiotic stresses and plant growth regulator treatments [16]. Analysis of the grape (Vitis vinifera L.) genome revealed that a LOX family consisting of 18 individual members [17]. A shared polyploidy relationship between Glycine max and Medicago truncatula was revealed by analysis of this gene family [18]. There are three different types of LOX in soybean LOX1, LOX2, and LOX3, while the LOX2 isozyme is primarily responsible for the “beany” flavor of most soybean seeds. A single nucleotide-amplified polymorphism (SNP) marker was found to identify the lack of the LOX2 isozyme, and can be used to assist the breeding and selection in this species [19]. A total of 25 LOX genes were identified in apple by mining the whole assembled apple genome [20].

With the intention to extend the knowledge of the formation of aroma-related volatiles and to understand the structure and evolutionary history of the LOX gene family, we investigated this gene family in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) and compared pear LOXs with those of another four fully sequenced Rosaceae species (Malus × domestica, Fragaria vesca, Prunus mume and Prunus persica). Structure analysis, synteny analysis, phylogenetic analysis and positive selection analysis were conducted on LOX homologous genes and the effects on function are discussed. Using the pear genome information, we also utilised the transcriptome dataset of pear fruit to verify our results.

Results

Sequence identification and collection

Using the domain of “Lipoxygenase” from Pfam (http://pfam.janelia.org/), we searched for the LOX homologous genes in five fully sequenced genome of Rosaceae species, namely peach (Prunus persica) [21], apple (Malus × domestica) [22], woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) [23], mei (Prunus mume) [24] and pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) [25] (Table 1). By employing the “multiple segment Viterbi” (MSV) algorithm; implemented in HMMER3 software package, 128 sequences were identified. After filtering the length of the homologous genes, 19 genes were removed for shortness and two sequences were removed for not having the complete domain of LOX as tested by SMART (http://smart.embl/heidelberg.de/). Finally, 107 genes were identified as LOX homologous genes (Additional file 1: Table S1).23 LOX genes were identified in pear with 36 in apple, 18 in mei, 16 in peach and 14 in strawberry. The chromosome number of apple and pear is 34 compared with 16 in peach and mei, and 14 in strawberry. The number of LOX genes in pear and apple are almost double the number of in peach and mei. Pear and apple are the most important economic crops in the Rosacease and belong to the Maloideae while mei and peach belong to the Prunoideae, which does not show the expansion of LOX gene family. The species tree of the five Rosaceae species shows the whole genome duplication in the progenitor of pear and apple (Figure 1).

Table 1 The five Rosaceae species in which LOX homologous genes were identified
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

Species tree of five Rosaceae species. Star indicates the occurrence of WGD; Numbers in the figures indicate species divergence time. Unit:MYA (million years ago). The data were downloaded from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) Common Tree in Taxonomy section and the tree was constructed by MEGA5.

Full size image

The pear LOX gene family has 23 members, which are distributed unevenly in the genome. Chromosomes 7, 9 and 10 each have 1 LOX gene while chromosomes 2, 5, 11 and 16 have 2 LOX genes and 4 on scaffold. Most notable is the presence of 8 LOX genes on chromosome 4. We can therefore infer that chromosome 4 has gone through a segmental duplication and the LOX gene family is in that segment.

We also noticed that Pbr020432.1 (Chr4: 1151461–1156749), and Pbr020415.1 (Chr4: 1294295–1299591) encode proteins of the same length (Additional file 1: Table S1), with the same pI (Isoelectric Point) and (Molecular Weight). After further analysis, we found out that these two sequences are identical. Pbr020435.1 (1121034–1124532) and Pbr020412.1 (1326550–1330048) on chromosome 4, Pbr004005.1 (32328–35666) and Pbr004008.1 (60045–63383) on scaffold1189.0, and Pbr004541.1 (22844958–22851334) and Pbr004568.1 (23111942–23118253) on chromsome11 are also identical.

We included all the 25 LOX genes described in the analysis of the LOX gene family in apple [20], with the exception of MDP0000312394, which did not have the complete domain structure.

Phylogenetic analyses

In order to investigate phylogenetic relationships and the molecular evolutionary history of the sequences in these five Rosaceae species (pear, apple, peach, mei and strawberry), a phylogenetic analysis was conducted and a phylogenetic tree was generated using the neighbor joining (NJ) method (Figure 2); the maximum-likelihood (ML) method was also performed in MEGA5. The tree remained consistent using these two methods. A Bootstrap test was set as 1000 to test the confidence of the tree. The NJ tree showed that these 107 sequences clustered into 3 main groups and the ML tree confirmed this result.

Figure 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic tree of LOX homologous genes in five Rosaceae species. Chr- denotes chromosome and S-denotes scaffold. The phylogenetic tree of 107 genes is shown in this figure. The phylogenetic tree was generated using the neighbor joining (NJ) method in MEGA5. A Bootstrap test was set as 1000 to test the confidence of the tree. The bootstrap values of confidence level, as percentages, are given at branch nodes.

Full size image

We can determine from this phylogeny that the LOX genes were present prior to the evolution of these five species, since all the branches have LOX genes from different species rather than each branch having only the genes from a single species. All the LOX genes fall into two major clades: Type1 and Type2. The first group corresponds to type1 LOX, and the groups 2 and 3 corresponds to type2 LOX. We named the pear LOX genes according to the published studies on apple [20, 26]. The genes were divided into 9 subfamilies while LOX4 is not included in our research since this gene is not really a LOX gene, a conclusion supported by Vogt (2013). However, we identified an additional cluster of LOX genes and named it LOX10.

Structure and biochemical features of LOX genes

The structure of the LOX gene sequence comprises two domains, the “Lipoxygenase” domain PF00305 in Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/), and domain PF01477 which is named PLAT (Polycystin-1, Lipoxygenase, Alpha-Toxin) or LH2 (Lipoxygenase homolog). We identified 107 LOX genes that all the functional domain, PF00305. However, 12 out of 107 did not have the PLAT/LH2 domain which is found in a variety of membrane or lipid associated proteins (Additional file 1: Table S1). All the LOX homologous genes in pear have both domains.

In order to examine the motif structure in pear we constructed a six motif figure by submitting the genomic data and the coding sequence data of LOX genes of pear to the PIECE and MEME website (Figure 3). All the LOX genes have all the six motifs, except Pbr016256.1 which is missing one motif at the beginning of the sequence (Figure 3a). The MEME results (Figure 3b) also confirmed the results. The protein encoded by Pbr016256.1 has 734 AAs which is the shortest one. However, Pbr016256.1 is expressed at all the six stages (Table 2) in our transcriptome research, so is a functional gene.

Figure 3
figure 3

Structure of LOX genes in pear. a. Motif of LOX genes using PIECE. 0, 1, 2 denote the phase of the exon. The blue part indicates the exons and different colors indicate different motifs, six motifs are shown in this figure. Pbr016256.1 has one motif missing, all the others have six motifs. b. Logo of motifs in LOX genes of pear using MEME. The line represents the coding sequence and six motifs are shown. All the results were obtained from the amino acid sequence. The total number of pear LOX genes is 23, while the sites means how many in them have this motif and the width is the length of the motif. The Maximum motif width was set as 50 in this study. Pbr016256.1 has one motif missing, all the others have six motifs.

Full size image
Table 2 Expression of LOX genes at six stages of fruit development in pear. Values shown are RPKM (reads per kilobase per million) values
Full size table

Collinearity analyses

We found 72 paired collinearity relationships from these 107 sequences, of which 58 pairs are collinear between pear and other species (Table 3). All the collinearity relationships are formed by WGD or segmental duplication according to the result of MCscan. This corresponds to the chromosome collinearity between pear and apple.

Table 3 Collinearity relationship of pear LOX genes to the other four species
Full size table

The three pear genes Pbr004541.1, Pbr004568.1 and Pbr020415.1 have a collinearity relationship with LOX genes in all the other 4 species used in this analysis. We used Pbr020415.1 as an example to show the collinearity relationship of different species (Figure 4a).

Figure 4
figure 4

Collinearity relationships of LOX genes in pear. A region of 100 kb on each side flanking the LOX genes (the red one) is shown in this figure. Homologous gene pairs are connected with bands. The genes on the scaffold are not included. The black horizontal scale line represents the chromosome segment with the chromosome name under the line, and the broad line with arrowhead represents genes and its transcriptional orientation. The gene names suffix is the text besides the line. The LOX genes are shown in red, homologous genes are shown in yellow and other genes shown in green. Pbr- denotes a pear gene, MDP- apple, ppa- peach, Pm- Mei and mrna- strawberry. a. The example of Pbr020415.1 to show the synteny relationship among different species. b. The collinearity relationships of LOX genes in pear.

Full size image

Collinearity relationships were also found among the same species (Table 4). 7 pairs are among pear, 6 pairs are among the apple and 1 in strawberry. Pbr004005.1 on scaffold1189.0 is collinear with Pbr004008.1 and Pbr035580.1. All the 4 pairs of LOX paralogous genes in pear were shown to have a collinear relationship. An illustration of the collinearity relationship of LOX genes on the pear chromosome is given in (Figure 4b). This collinearity occurs in either the sense or antisense direction.

Table 4 The collinearity relationship among LOX genes in the same species
Full size table

Expression of LOX genes in pear

We sequenced RNA from mixed pear fruit samples to obtain transcriptome data from six stages of fruit development (15 days after flowering (DAF), 36DAF, 80DAF, 110DAF, 145DAF, 167DAF) (Table 2). Of the 23 LOX homologous genes identified in pear, 18 were found to be expressed in the fruit, while the Pbr004005.1, Pbr004008.1, Pbr020412.1, Pbr020434.1 and Pbr020435.1 are not expressed; 10 of the 18 were found to be expressed in all the six stages. The average expression RPKM (reads per kilobase per million) value of all the pear genes is 35.17 while the average RPKM value of the LOX gene family is 77.82 which is double the average value. Therefore, most LOX genes are functionally active.We also examined the expression level figure of these genes (Figure 5). The results showed that the expression of LOX genes in pear was usually low expression in the early development stage (15 DAF), increased to a peak at the middle development stage (80 DAF or 110 DAF), reduced to near zero near ripening (145 DAF) and then increased slightly at ripening (167 DAF). This is believed to correspond to the pattern of changes in the volatile components of pear fruit aroma.

Figure 5
figure 5

Expression level of LOX genes in pear fruit. The value on the y-axis is the RPKM (reads per kilobase per million) value for each gene. The x-axis represents the six stages of pear fruit development, 15 days after flowering (DAF), 36 DAF, 80 DAF, 110 DAF, 145 DAF, and 167DAF.

Full size image

Discussion

The LOX gene family is involved in the development of various plant organs, in the fruit ripening process also in the response to abiotic stresses, and is also involved in the synthesis of aldehydes and alcohols. Most importantly, it plays a key role at the early stage in the synthetic pathway for fruit aroma compounds and therefore the development of fruit flavor.

By using the MSV algorithm in HMMER3, we searched the whole genome sequences of five Rosaceae species; a total of 107 LOX homologous genes were identified. The LOX gene family exists before the evolutionary distinction of these five species. Phylogenetic analysis, structure analysis, collinearity analysis, and transcriptome expression analysis were conducted on all the 107 LOX genes. In summary, this study provides a characterization of LOX gene family in pear and the evolutionary history of LOX in Rosaceae.

36 LOX genes were identified in apple and 23 genes in pear, 18 in mei, 16 in peach and 14 in woodland strawberry. The number of LOX genes in pear and apple was almost double the number in mei, peach and strawberry. In pear we identified 23 LOX genes, which is a comparatively large gene family. The LOX gene family has gone through an expansion which corresponds to the variation in chromosome number. For example, the chromosome number of apple and pear is 34 compared to 16 in peach and mei, and 14 in strawberry. Considering a recent WGD (whole genome duplication) event was shared by apple and pear at 30-45MYA (million years ago) (Figure 1) [25], LOX gene family expansion in apple and pear is believed to have occurred at that time.

From the observation of the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), the LOX genes of pear from the same chromosome (chromosome 4 and chromosome 11) cluster together, which indicates the similarity of the genes on the same chromosome. Also the duplicated copies on chromosome 4 (Pbr020432.1 - Pbr020415.1, Pbr020435.1 - Pbr020412.1), chromosome 11 (Pbr004541.1 - Pbr004568.1) and scaffold1189.0 (Pbr004005.1 - Pbr004008.1) of the pear genome are paralogous genes. The two pairs of LOX genes located on chromosome 4 (Additional file 1: Table S1) have the same sequence and their order on the chromosome is the same. All these 4 pairs of genes are distributed on the same chromosome or scaffold and from comparison of their position on the chromosome it can be concluded that tandem duplication or segmental duplication has happened in this area of chromosome. Pear LOX genes showed an obvious trend of expansion with duplication as the most common occurrence. It can be concluded that a tandem duplication or segmental duplication has happened in the pear genome. However, the specific type of duplication is still unknown.

In addition, transcriptome data showed that 18 of the LOX genes in pear were expressed. This confirms that these genes are functionally active, with 10 of them being expressed in all six stages of fruit development. Though one motif was missing, gene Pbr016256.1 is still expressed in our study at all the six stages; this suggests that the loss of this N-terminal domain does not affect its function. The change in expression level shown in Figure 5 is believed to correspond to the change in aroma volatile components in the fruit. The aroma is very low at the early stage of fruit development and then increases significantly during the middle stage of development. Then subsequently the aroma substances are converted to volatile components. Fruit immediately prior to and during ripening and ripening time have a low level of LOX expression but because of the accumulation of precursors at these development stages the fruit keep emitting an aroma.

Collinearity analyses showed that 331 blocks and 9257 gene pairs have a collinear relationship between pear and apple. Also the chromosomes in pear are collinear to each other, a conclusion confirmed by the pear genome sequencing project, which demonstrated strong collinearity between segments of several chromosomes. In addition, we discovered that a segment in chromosome 4 of the pear genome is believed to be collinear with chromosome 6 in the peach genome. The LOX gene family members Pbr020432.1 and Pbr020415.1 on chromosome 4 of pear are collinear with ppa001311m on chromosome 6 of peach; and Pbr020414.1 and Pbr020435.1 on chromosome 4 of pear are collinear with ppa001216m on chromosome 6 of peach. All these data indicated the collinear relationship of these two chromosomes.

The present analysis included all the LOX genes previously described in apple [20]; and only one was not analysed because it lacked the complete domain structure. We obtained identical phylogenetic results as those in the previous analysis in apple. Furthermore, we also identified a new cluster of LOX genes which were not described in the previous study.

Currently, research studies on fruit volatile substances are focused on the analytical determination of volatile aromatic substances and on how the various cultivation practices and storage conditions affect the aroma of the fruit. Most of this research is focused on the European pear (Pyrus communis), with few reports on the Asiatic pear. There is still little knowledge of the molecular mechanism of the volatile aromatic substances. However in this paper we used the material of the Asiatic pear genome of Pyrus bretschneideri which is the first pear genome to be sequenced.

We aimed to study the variation in gene sequence structure and to analyse the phylogenic evolutionary relationship of the LOX gene family in the Rosaceae. This information can be used to guide future research on the evolutionary history on LOXs and associated transgenic research. This study of LOX genes is one part of the whole analysis of aroma of pear fruit. Future work will be conducted on the study of the identification of genes of the aroma pathway and the interaction network between these genes.

Conclusions

107 genes were identified as LOX homologous genes from five Rosaceae species; 23 of these sequences were from pear. Specific gene duplication was found on chromosome4 in the pear genome. All the LOX genes fall into three groups according to phylogenetic analysis. The first group corresponds to type1 LOX, and the groups 2 and 3 corresponds to type2 LOX. Of the 23 LOX homologous genes identified in pear, 18 were found to be expressed in the fruit. The express pattern in six stages was found to correspond to the pattern of changes in the volatile components of pear fruit aroma. The research on the LOX gene family could lead to a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of aroma in fruit. Moreover, the findings of this study may facilitate the research on evolutionary history and transgenic research on LOX genes and other aroma genes.

Methods

Sequence identification and collection

By searching “Lipoxygenase” in Pfam (http://pfam.janelia.org/), seeds of Lipoxygenase domain PF00305 were downloaded to our local server. By employing the “multiple segment Viterbi” (MSV) algorithm; implemented in HMMER3 software package [27], we searched for the LOX homologous genes in fully sequenced genome of five Rosaceae species, namely peach (Prunus persica), apple (Malus × domestica), woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca), mei (Prunus mume) and pear (Pyrus bretschneideri). 128 genes were obtained with an E value < 1e-10. After filtering according to length, 19 sequences were removed due to their shortness, and two sequences were removed for not having the LOX domain tested by SMART (http://smart.embl/heidelberg.de/). Finally 107 LOX homologous genes were identified in this study.

Phylogenic analysis

Coding sequence alignment was performed using MUSCLE (Multiple Sequence Caparison by Log-Expectation) with default parameters in Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis-MEGA5 [28]. The neighbor joining trees were constructed with bootstrap 1000 using MEGA5. Maximum-likelihood trees with bootstrap 1000 were also generated using MEGA5 with default settings.

The tree of the five Rosaceae species was obtained by downloading data from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/): Common Tree in the Taxonomy section. The tree was constructed using MEGA5.

Motif and analysis of the LOX genes and proteins

Motif analysis was conducted on the website Plant Intron Exon Comparison and Evolution database (PIECE, http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/piece/FAQ.php) [29]. Coding sequences against the genomic sequence were used to plot the figure with motif number six. Based on the Pfam motif, a phylogenetic tree was reconstructed for each gene category by integrating exon-intron and protein motif information. We also combined this database with the MEME (http://meme.nbcr.net) web servers to draw motifs of the sequences and the information of the motifs was collected.

Basic data about the LOX proteins was calculated as follows: amino acid number (aa number); molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI).

Collinearity analysis

The whole genome sequences of the five Rosaceae species were downloaded to our local server. Then MCscan (Multiple Collinearity Scan) [30] was used to obtain the collinearity relation of each pair of species. The resulting collinearity chains were evaluated using a procedure in ColinearScan and an E-value < 1e-10 was used as the cutoff.

Transcriptome sequencing

To examine the expression of pear genes, pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) fruit samples at 15 d, 36 d, 80 d, 110 d, 145 d and 167 d after flowering (DAF) were used. Three or more fruits were collected at each stage from the Nanjing Agricultural University experimental farm in 2011. Fruits of the same stage were combined and total RNA was extracted for RNA sequencing. RNA sequencing libraries were constructed using an Illumina standard mRNA-Seq Prep Kit (TruSeq RNA and DNA Sample Preparation Kits version 2). During the production of sequencing libraries, small RNAs ligated with adaptors were used to run RT-PCR. After that, the products were purified and sequenced on an Illumina Hi-seq 2000 Sequencer.

Availability of supporting data

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article (and its additional files) and raw RNA-seq reads available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information repository under accession PRJNA185970 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA185970).

References

  1. Chervin C, Speirs J, Loveys B, Patterson BD: Influence of low oxygen storage on aroma compounds of whole pears and crushed pear flesh. Postharvest Biol Tec. 2000, 19 (3): 279-285. 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00096-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lara I, Miró RM, Fuentes T, Sayez G, Graell J, López ML: Biosynthesis of volatile aroma compounds in pear fruit stored under long-term controlled-atmosphere conditions. Postharvest Biol Tec. 2003, 29 (1): 29-39. 10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00230-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwab W, Davidovich-Rikanati R, Lewinsohn E: Biosynthesis of plant-derived flavor compounds. Plant J. 2008, 54 (4): 712-732. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03446.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Needleman P, Turk J, Jakschik BA, Morrison AR, Lefkowith JB: Arachidonic acid metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986, 55: 69-102. 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.000441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisakowski B, Perraud X, Kermasha S: Characterization of hydroperoxides and carbonyl compounds obtained by lipoxygenase extracts of selected microorganisms. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1997, 61 (8): 1262-1269. 10.1271/bbb.61.1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Porta H, Rocha-Sosa M: Lipoxygenase in bacteria: a horizontal transfer event?. Microbiology. 2001, 147 (12): 3199-3200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vick BA, Zimmerman DC: The biosynthesis of jasmonic acid: a physiological role for plant lipoxygenase. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 1983, 111 (2): 470-477. 10.1016/0006-291X(83)90330-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner HW: Recent investigations into the lipoxygenase pathway of plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991, 1084 (3): 221-239. 10.1016/0005-2760(91)90063-N.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siedow JN: Plant lipoxygenase: structure and function. Annu Rev Plant Phys. 1991, 42 (1): 145-188. 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.001045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhn H, Thiele BJ: The diversity of the lipoxygenase family: many sequence data but little information on biological significance. FEBS Lett. 1999, 449 (1): 7-11. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00396-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grechkin A: Recent developments in biochemistry of the plant lipoxygenase pathway. Prog Lipid Res. 1998, 37 (5): 317-352. 10.1016/S0163-7827(98)00014-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhn H, Wiesner R, Rathmann J, Schewe T: Formation of ketodienoic fatty acids by the pure pea lipoxygenase-1. Eicosanoids. 1991, 4 (1): 9-14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shimizu T, Radmark O, Samuelsson B: Enzyme with dual lipoxygenase activities catalyzes leukotriene A4 synthesis from arachidonic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984, 81 (3): 689-693. 10.1073/pnas.81.3.689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Feussner I, Wasternack C: The lipoxygenase pathway. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002, 53 (1): 275-297. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bannenberg G, Martinez M, Hamberg M, Castresana C: Diversity of the enzymatic activity in the lipoxygenase gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Lipids. 2009, 44 (2): 85-95. 10.1007/s11745-008-3245-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang XY, Jiang WJ, Yu HJ: The expression profiling of the lipoxygenase (LOX) family genes during fruit development, abiotic stress and hormonal treatments in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Int J Mol Sci. 2012, 13 (2): 2481-2500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Podolyan A, White J, Jordan B, Winefield C: Identification of the lipoxygenase gene family from Vitis vinifera and biochemical characterisation of two 13-lipoxygenases expressed in grape berries of Sauvignon Blanc. Funct Plant Biol. 2010, 37 (8): 767-784. 10.1071/FP09271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin JH, Van K, Kim DH, Kim KD, Jang YE, Choi B-S, Kim MY, Lee S-H: The lipoxygenase gene family: a genomic fossil of shared polyploidy between Glycine max and Medicago truncatula. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8 (1): 133-10.1186/1471-2229-8-133.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shin JH, Van K, Kim KD, Lee YH, Jun TH, Lee SH: Molecular sequence variations of the lipoxygenase-2 gene in soybean. Theor Appl Genet. 2012, 124 (4): 613-622. 10.1007/s00122-011-1733-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vogt J, Schiller D, Ulrich D, Schwab W, Dunemann F: Identification of lipoxygenase (LOX) genes putatively involved in fruit flavour formation in apple (Malus × domestica). Tree Genet Genom. 2013, 9 (6): 1493-1511. 10.1007/s11295-013-0653-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Verde I, Abbott AG, Scalabrin S, Jung S, Shu S, Marroni F, Zhebentyayeva T, Dettori MT, Grimwood J, Cattonaro F, Zuccolo A, Rossini L, Jenkins J, Vendramin E, Meisel LA, Decroocq V, Sosinski B, Prochnik S, Mitros T, Policriti A, Cipriani G, Dondini L, Ficklin S, Goodstein DM, Xuan P, Fabbro CD, Aramini V, Copetti D, Gonzalez S, Horner DS, et al: The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat Genet. 2013, 45 (5): 487-494. 10.1038/ng.2586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Affourtit J, Dhingra A, Cestaro A, Kalyanaraman A, Fontana P, Bhatnagar SK, Troggio M, Pruss D, Salvi S, Pindo M, Baldi P, Castelletti S, Cavaiuolo M, Coppola G, Costa F, Cova V, Dal Ri A, Goremykin V, Komjanc M, Longhi S, Magnago P, Malacarne G, Malnoy M, Micheletti D, Moretto M, Perazzolli M, Si-Ammour A, Vezzulli S, et al: The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Nat Genet. 2010, 42 (10): 833-839. 10.1038/ng.654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shulaev V, Sargent DJ, Crowhurst RN, Mockler TC, Folkerts O, Delcher AL, Jaiswal P, Mockaitis K, Liston A, Mane SP, Burns P, Davis TM, Slovin JP, Bassil N, Hellens RP, Evans C, Harkins T, Kodira C, Desany B, Crasta OR, Jensen RV, Allan AC, Michael TP, Setubal JC, Celton JM, Rees DJ, Williams KP, Holt SH, Ruiz Rojas JJ, Chatterjee M, et al: The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat Genet. 2011, 43 (2): 109-116. 10.1038/ng.740.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Q, Chen W, Sun L, Zhao F, Huang B, Yang W, Tao Y, Wang J, Yuan Z, Fan G, Xing Z, Han C, Pan H, Zhong X, Shi W, Liang X, Du D, Sun F, Xu Z, Hao R, Lv T, Lv Y, Zheng Z, Sun M, Luo L, Cai M, Gao Y, Wang J, Yin Y, Xu X, et al: The genome of Prunus mume. Nat Commun. 2012, 3: 1318-

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu J, Wang Z, Shi Z, Zhang S, Ming R, Zhu S, Khan MA, Tao S, Korban SS, Wang H, Chen NJ, Nishio T, Xu X, Cong L, Qi K, Huang X, Wang Y, Zhao X, Wu J, Deng C, Gou C, Zhou W, Yin H, Qin G, Sha Y, Tao Y, Chen H, Yang Y, Song Y, Zhan D, et al: The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Res. 2013, 23 (2): 396-408. 10.1101/gr.144311.112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schaffer RJ, Friel EN, Souleyre EJ, Bolitho K, Thodey K, Ledger S, Bowen JH, Ma JH, Nain B, Cohen D, Gleave AP, Crowhurst RN, Janssen BJ, Yao JL, Newcomb RD: A genomics approach reveals that aroma production in apple is controlled by ethylene predominantly at the final step in each biosynthetic pathway. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144 (4): 1899-1912. 10.1104/pp.106.093765.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eddy SR: Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011, 7 (10): e1002195-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28 (10): 2731-2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, You FM, Lazo GR, Luo MC, Thilmony R, Gordon S, Kianian SF, Gu YQ: PIECE: a database for plant gene structure comparison and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41 (D1): D1159-D1166. 10.1093/nar/gks1109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang H, Bowers JE, Wang X, Ming R, Alam M, Paterson AH: Synteny and collinearity in plant genomes. Science. 2008, 320 (5875): 486-488. 10.1126/science.1153917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Project was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Science and Young scholar Technology Innovation Fund of Nanjing Agricultural University (Grant No.KJ2013014), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.31301748), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No.2014M551607) and National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2013AA102606-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China

    Meng Li, Leiting Li, Xin Qiao, Xing Liu & Shaoling Zhang

  2. School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, UK

    Jim M Dunwell

Authors
  1. Meng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leiting Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jim M Dunwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xin Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shaoling Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaoling Zhang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LM carried out the experimental design and management, data analysis, and drafted and revised the manuscript. LLT participated in the collinearity analysis. JD adjusted the experimental design and revised the manuscript. QX contributed to the preparation of figures, LX participated in data analysis. ZSL designed and managed the experiments. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

12864_2014_6157_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Additional file 1: Table S1: Structural and biochemical information of LOX homologous genes in five Rosaceae species. aa: amino acid; MW: molecule weight; pI: isoelectric point. ‘0’ means gene has no PLAT/LH2 domain and ‘1’ means the gene has PLAT/LH2 domain. LOX domain is the same. Pbr- denotes a pear gene, MDP- apple, ppa- peach, Pm- Mei and mrna- strawberry. LOX domain is PF00305 in Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/), and domain PF01477 is PLAT (Polycystin-1, Lipoxygenase, Alpha-Toxin) or LH2 (Lipoxygenase homology). 23 genes were identified in pear, 36 in apple; 18 in mei, 16 in peach, and 14 in strawberry. (XLSX 17 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., Li, L., Dunwell, J.M. et al. Characterization of the lipoxygenase (LOX) gene family in the Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) and comparison with other members of the Rosaceae. BMC Genomics 15, 444 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-444

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-444

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us