Table 1

Comparison between results of the current study and results from other studies
Findings from different studies Overlapped CNVRs of this study
Study Breed Sample Count Total length (Mb) Count Percentage of count Total length (Mb) Percentage of length
CGH-based Studies Fadista et al. [25]a 4 20 266 16.6 27 9.7% 1.71 8.7%
Liu et al. [24]b 17 90 177 28.1 16 5.8% 1.58 8.1%
SNP-based Studies Hou et al. [26] 21 521 682 139.8 55 19.8% 5.35 27.3%
Bae et al. [23] 1 265 368 63.1 35 12.6% 2.00 10.2%
Hou et al. [58] 1 472 811 141.8 51 18.3% 3.41 17.4%
Jiang et al. [60] 1 2047 101 23.8 14 5.0% 2.50 12.8%
Hou et al. [55] 27 674 3346 142.7 119 42.8% 7.59 38.7%
Resequencing-based Studies Bickhart et al. [8] 3 5 1265 55.6 19 6.8% 0.855 4.4%
Zhan et al. [5] 1 1 520 3.6 13 4.7% 0.253 1.3%
Stothard et al. [4] 2 2 790 3.3 14 5.0% 0.380 1.9%
This study 278 19.6

Based on Btau4.0 bovine genome assembly.

a: CNVRs on Chr Un and mitochondrial sequence are excluded;

b: CNVRs on Chr Un are excluded.

Jiang et al.

Jiang et al. BMC Genomics 2013 14:131   doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-131

Open Data