Table 10

Comparison of performance without and with the inclusion of the acquired knowledge methodology (InAKnow).

Without InAKnow

With InAKnow


Ac

Pr

Se

Sp

Adj

Ac

Pr

Se

Sp

Adj


Arabidopsis thaliana

91.52

31.68

91.94

91.49

91.72

92.78

68.88

75.29

94.98

85.13

(1.88)

(4.46)

(1.71)

(2.02)

(0.33)

(2.42)

(11.00)

(8.41)

(3.66)

(2.64)


Caenorhabditis elegans

90.16

15.08

89.42

90.17

89.79

93.60

74.57

85.27

94.82

90.04

(0.12)

(0.15)

(0.87)

(0.14)

(0.40)

(1.08)

(12.50)

(21.51)

(2.81)

(9.48)


Drosophila melanogaster

93.21

42.09

90.92

93.31

92.11

93.06

85.13

79.26

95.86

87.56

(2.64)

(13.96)

(6.16)

(2.99)

(1.95)

(3.74)

(13.86)

(13.54)

(5.99)

(5.12)


Homo sapiens

93.53

42.15

91.93

93.60

92.76

93.31

89.00

72.97

97.43

85.19

(2.70)

(10.84)

(2.96)

(2.94)

(0.60)

(2.34)

(9.91)

(22.26)

(2.83)

(10.03)


Nasonia vitripennis

85.00

83,64

100

53.00

76.5

87.5

88.64

96.67

73.00

84.83

(16,66)

(19,67)

(0)

(47,75)

(23,88)

(16.77)

(20.02)

(10.00)

(41.96)

(20.50)


Silva et al. BMC Genomics 2011 12(Suppl 4):S9   doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-S4-S9

Open Data