Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Recent and historical recombination in the admixed Norwegian Red cattle breed

BMC Genomics volume 12, Article number: 33 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Comparison of recent patterns of recombination derived from linkage maps to historical patterns of recombination from linkage disequilibrium (LD) could help identify genomic regions affected by strong artificial selection, appearing as reduced recent recombination. Norwegian Red cattle (NRF) make an interesting case study for investigating these patterns as it is an admixed breed with an extensively recorded pedigree. NRF have been under strong artificial selection for traits such as milk and meat production, fertility and health.

While measures of LD is also crucial for determining the number of markers required for association mapping studies, estimates of recombination rate can be used to assess quality of genomic assemblies.

Results

A dataset containing more than 17,000 genome-wide distributed SNPs and 2600 animals was used to assess recombination rates and LD in NRF. Although low LD measured by r2 was observed in NRF relative to some of the breeds from which this breed originates, reports from breeds other than those assessed in this study have described more rapid decline in r2 at short distances than what was found in NRF. Rate of decline in r2 for NRF suggested that to obtain an expected r2 between markers and a causal polymorphism of at least 0.5 for genome-wide association studies, approximately one SNP every 15 kb or a total of 200,000 SNPs would be required. For well known quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for milk production traits on Bos Taurus chromosomes 1, 6 and 20, map length based on historic recombination was greater than map length based on recent recombination in NRF.

Further, positions for 130 previously unpositioned contigs from assembly of the bovine genome sequence (Btau_4.0) found using comparative sequence analysis were validated by linkage analysis, and 28% of these positions corresponded to extreme values of population recombination rate.

Conclusion

While LD is reduced in NRF compared to some of the breeds from which this admixed breed originated, it is elevated over short distances compared to some other cattle breeds. Genomic regions in NRF where map length based on historic recombination was greater than map length based on recent recombination coincided with some well known QTL regions for milk production traits.

Linkage analysis in combination with comparative sequence analysis and detection of regions with extreme values of population recombination rate proved to be valuable for detecting problematic regions in the Btau_4.0 genome assembly.

Background

The historical pattern of recombination in the population of genomes of a species or breed contain an enormous amount of information on history of population size, including expansions and contractions, gene flow between other breeds, and selection [1]. It has also been demonstrated that rate of recombination is not uniform across a chromosomal segment, rather recombination events tend to occur in recombination hotspots [2, 3]. The pattern of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the current generation of a species reflects all of these processes. While the pattern of LD therefore contains much information, deciphering the relative contribution of each process to the current pattern of LD is challenging [1, 4–11].

Some additional insight into the relative contribution of each process can be gained from comparing historical patterns of recombination inferred from LD to recent patterns of recombination inferred from genetic maps. One hypothesis would be that in genome regions where large discrepancies are observed between map distances inferred from LD and genetic map distances, strong selection is occurring. Norwegian Red cattle (NRF) was developed mainly through crosses of old Norwegian breeds with other Scandinavian breeds like Swedish Red and White, Black and White Swedish and Finnish Ayrshire. Pedigree data has been recorded since formation of NRF, and the breed has been under strong artificial selection for traits such as milk and meat production, fertility and health. A further attraction of using NRF for this type of study is the extensive pedigree data available, assisting determination of frequency of recombination events between adjacent markers. The extent of LD in cattle has been investigated in a number of studies [7, 12–15]. Relative to humans cattle display elevated LD, which is likely due to small recent effective population size generally observed in livestock populations [7, 12–16]. Previous studies have shown some variation between cattle breeds in rate of decline in LD with increasing distance between genetic markers [15, 17, 18], which is also at least partly attributable to population history.

Another application for recombination rate estimates is within validation of positioning and assembly of genome contigs by linkage analysis. The bovine genome has recently been sequenced by a combined bacterial artificial chromosome and whole-genome shotgun approach [19]. The resulting Btau_4.0 assembly has contig and scaffold N50 sizes of 48.7 kb and 1.9 Mb respectively, and represents 95% of the total genome sequence placed on the 29 autosomes and the X chromosome. Construction of genetic maps in NRF was used to assess quality of the Btau_4.0 assembly and indicated a positional error rate of less than 0.8% [19].

The sequencing and assembly of larger genomes is a complex task with many challenges, and will usually result in imperfect assemblies. The desire to build a complete assembly is often at odds with the application of stringent merging criteria, and a compromise strategy resulting in longer scaffolds containing some assembly errors is usually the end result [20–22].

Aim of this study was to provide maps of historic and recent recombination rate in NRF, and then to attempt to use these to infer aspects of population history. Recombination rate information was also used to assess quality of the Btau_4.0 assembly.

Results and discussion

A total of 2,480 paternal half-sib NRF sires and 109 founding NRF sires were genotyped using the Affymetrix 25 K MIP array. The final male genetic map contained 17,347 SNPs distributed on the 29 Bos Taurus chromosomes (BTAs) [19], and distributions of spacing between adjacent SNPs and minor-allele frequency (MAF) for the SNPs are presented in additional files 1 and 2. In order to examine the relationships between NRF and cattle breeds that have contributed to the development of NRF, 53 Holstein, 40 Finnish Ayrshire, 19 Sided Troender and Nordland Cattle and 39 Icelandic bulls were also genotyped. Icelandic cattle are believed to have been derived from old Norwegian breeds approximately 1000 years ago. Genetic distances between breeds were investigated using a principal component analysis of the genomic relationship matrix among individuals of different and the same breed [23]. Principal component 1 (PC1), PC2 and PC3 are plotted in Figure 1. For PC1 and PC2, the Finnish Ayrshires and NRF animals group together, likely reflecting the high level of contribution of Finnish Ayrshire to NRF. Icelandic cattle appear genetically distinct, perhaps reflecting the 1000 years of genetic isolation of this breed from the other breeds. PC3 separates Holsteins from the other breeds. The principal component analysis also clearly demonstrates heterogeneity in composition among NRF. For example, some NRF animals have higher than average levels of relationship to Finnish Ayrshires, while other NRF animals have high levels of relationship with Holsteins.

Figure 1
figure 1

Principal component analysis. Principal component (PC) analysis of genomic relationships among Norwegian Red cattle (black), Holsteins (light blue), Sided Troender and Nordland Cattle (green), Finnish Ayrshires (dark blue), and Icelandic Cattle (yellow). Plots are PC2 versus PC1, PC3 versus PC1 and PC3 versus PC2.

Full size image

The extent of LD in each breed was assessed by average r2 for pairs of markers binned by distance between them (Figure 2). At short distances (<100 kb) Icelandic cattle had highest LD, likely reflecting small effective population size. NRF had lower levels of LD at comparable distances, especially distance greater than 100 kb, than any of the other breeds. The low levels of LD observed in NRF relative to the other breeds is likely due to elevated heterogeneity in NRF from historic admixture, recent attempts to control inbreeding and gene flow through import of sires from other Nordic countries [24].

Figure 2
figure 2

Extent of linkage disequilibrium. Extent of linkage disequilibrium (r2) in Norwegian Red cattle (black), Holsteins (light blue), Sided Troender and Nordland Cattle (green), Finnish Ayrshires (dark blue), and Icelandic Cattle (yellow).

Full size image

For NRF the highest and lowest chromosomal mean values for r2 were found on BTA22 and BTA1, and highest and lowest mean values of r2 for inter marker distances less than 10 Mb were found for BTA5 and BTA19. Chromosomal mean values for NRF for r2, and for r2 for inter marker distances less than 10 Mb, for all chromosomes are presented in Additional file 3.

At very short inter-marker distances, the level of LD in NRF was high (Table 1). A mean r2 of 0.5 or more was observed for SNPs positioned less than 10 kb apart while a mean r2 of 0.3 or more was observed for SNPs positioned less than 30 kb apart. The results suggest that to obtain an expected r2 between markers and a causal polymorphism of at least 0.5 for genome-wide association studies, approximately one SNP every 15 kb or a total of 200,000 SNPs would be required for the 2.87 Gb genome. A report of decline in r2 with increasing distance between SNPs in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle [15] describes quite similar results as for NRF at these short distances. Reports from other breeds have described similar or more rapid decline in r2 at short distances than what was found in NRF [17, 18]. However, long range LD (Figure 2) is lower in NRF than in these other breeds.

Table 1 Expected linkage disequilibrium by inter-marker distance
Full size table

To investigate recombination patterns across genomic regions, maps describing historic LD levels were constructed for each chromosome based on population recombination rate in the NRF data. By the method presented by Auton and McVean [25], estimates of scaled population recombination rate (ρ = 4cNe) [9] were found for each interval between adjacent SNPs for all 29 BTAs with the LDhat software [26]. Following Pritchard and Przeworski [8], historical scaled recombination rate (ρ(h)) was compared with recent scaled recombination rate (ρ(r)) calculated from the genetic map by plotting their cumulative values against physical position (Figure 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Recent and historic recombination rate. Cumulative values of recent recombination rate (blue) and historic recombination rate (black) across each bovine autosomal chromosome is plotted against physical chromosome position (Mb). Chromosome numbers are indicated above each plot.

Full size image

Correlation between total cumulative ρ(h) and ρ(r) over all chromosomes was found to be 0.84. A reduced ρ(r) relative to ρ(h) for a genomic region could be an indication that animals in the observed pedigree have been under strong artificial selection for traits affected by polymorphisms in that particular region. Regions where ρ(r) was most strikingly reduced relative to ρ(h) were in the middle of BTA1 and in the middle of BTA20. Reduced ρ(r) relative to ρ(h) was also found on BTAs 6, 10,15, 16, 18, 19, 27 and 29, while elevated ρ(r) relative to ρ(h) was found on BTAs 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, and 17.

On BTA1 several QTLs affecting milk production traits have been reported [27–32], and a meta-analysis reported by Khatkar et al.[33] indicated presence of three QTLs for milk yield on this chromosome. The BTA20 region centres around a mutation reported to affect protein percentage in the GHR gene [34]. Hayes et al.[35] reported evidence for strong selection in this region in a study of divergence between dairy cattle and beef cattle. On BTA6 two QTLs affecting milk production traits have been reported in NRF [36, 37] and signatures of strong selection have been detected [38].

Elevated population recombination rate may be due to population expansion or gene conversion, while reduced recombination rate may be due to directional selection, genetic drift, gene flow, population substructure or low effective population size [1]. Regions under strong selection in both historic and recent generations might not show differences between ρ(h) and ρ(r).

It was also investigated whether recombination rates per physical distance were related to chromosomal region or chromosome size. Telomeres showed significantly higher values for both recent and historic recombination rate per physical distance than the genome average (p-values 5.72e-12 and 2.97e-8). A negative correlation between recombination rate and chromosome length is expected [10, 39–41], and for ρ(h) and ρ(r) correlations of -0.6 and -0.83 was found between length of genetic map and physical chromosome length. Identification of chromosomes with unexpectedly elevated or reduced recombination rate could be identified by looking at outliers deviating from the expected linear relationship between recombination rate and chromosome length. In Figure 4 total cumulative values of recombination rate for ρ(h) and ρ(r) are plotted against physical chromosome length for each bovine chromosome. Expected recombination map lengths relative to chromosome lengths with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are also indicated in the figure.

Figure 4
figure 4

Recombination maps versus physical chromosome length. Length of historic recombination map (left) and recent recombination map (right) are plotted against physical chromosome length for each bovine autosomal chromosome. The straight black lines indicate expected recombination map lengths relative to chromosome length and the darker grey regions their 95% confidence intervals.

Full size image

It can be seen that ρ(h) is elevated for BTAs 1, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20 and 29, while ρ(r) is elevated for BTAs 3, 7, 13, 18 and 19. Further, reduced ρ(h)is observed for BTAs 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 14, 17, 23, 24 and 26, while ρ(r)is reduced for BTAs 20 and 24. Consistently elevated ρ(h) and ρ(r) are found for BTAs 13, 18 and 19 and consistently reduced ρ(h) and ρ(r) are found for BTA24. In accordance with results described above, ρ(r) is significantly reduced relative to ρ(h) for BTA1, BTA6 and BTA20.

In addition to chromosome region and chromosome size, sex-specific differences in recombination rates have been reported [42–44]. In this study male genetic maps for NRF were used, which might differ from female genetic maps. The patterns of recombination described here might also be sex-specific.

Moreover, rate of recombination is not uniform across a chromosomal segment and recombination events tend to occur in recombination hotspots [2, 3]. It has been estimated that these hotspots occur on average every 50 - 100 kb in the human genome [45, 46]. Although the procedure applied here for estimation of ρ(h) incorporates a model accounting for variable recombination rates across chromosomes [26], a SNP density higher than obtained in this study would be required in order to detect such fine-scale recombination hotspots in the bovine genome.

Quality assessment of Btau_4.0

Approximately 5% of the genomic sequence is expected to be missing in Btau_4.0 [19], and positioning of previously un-positioned contigs could aid completion of the assembly by pointing towards regions of special interest for re-sequencing efforts. Here a comparative analysis of the Btau_4.0 assembly with the human genome Build 19 allowed 4,276 previously un-positioned bovine contigs to be given putative genome positions. Determining recombination events between adjacent markers in an extensive pedigree can be used to construct dense genetic maps, and sufficient information was available from our NRF linkage analysis to validate the positions of 321 of these contigs [19]. Comparative analysis and linkage analysis identified 130 new contig positions as being less than 5 Mb apart (Additional file 4). Even though large synteny blocks exist between species comparative analysis will yield spurious positions. Here 40% of positions identified by comparative analysis were validated by linkage analysis.

To further assess assembly accuracy, population recombination rates between adjacent SNPs were assessed. Regions of putative problematic assembly were identified as extreme values of scaled population recombination rate (ρ) relative to inter-marker distance between adjacent SNP pairs. Extreme values of ρ would be expected for intervals where assembled inter-marker distance was shorter than actual inter-marker distance. In Figure 5 ρ is plotted for BTAs 5, 6, 13 and 25. Contig positions predicted by comparative analysis are indicated in light grey, contig positions predicted by linkage analysis are indicated in dark grey and contig positions validated by similar positions from both comparative analysis and linkage analysis are indicated in light blue. Plots for all chromosomes are given in Additional file 5. From Figure 5 it can be seen that several ρ peaks were located near validated positions for previously un-positioned contigs, which further highlights these regions as erroneous in the original assembly. Examples are the three ρ peak regions on BTA6 around 10 Mb, 35 Mb and 100 Mb, the ρ peak region on BTA5 around 120 Mb, the ρ peak region on BTA13 around 10 Mb and the ρ peak region on BTA25 around 35 Mb. Of the putative contig positions found by comparative analysis 24% lay within 1 Mb of an extreme value for population recombination rate (ρ >10) and of positions found by linkage analysis 27% lay within 1 Mb of an extreme value for population recombination rate. For the 130 contigs given similar positions by comparative analysis and linkage analysis 28% of validated positions lay within 1 Mb of an extreme value for population recombination rate.

Figure 5
figure 5

Quality assessment of the bovine genome assembly. Scaled recombination rate versus physical distance (kb) is plotted for chromosomes 5 (top left), 6 (top right), 13 (bottom left) and 25 (bottom right). Contig positions predicted by comparative sequence analysis are indicated in light grey and contig positions predicted by linkage analysis are indicated in dark grey. Contigs given similar positions by both methods are indicated in light blue.

Full size image

Putative contig positions not coinciding with elevated ρ may be due to failure to detect regions with elevated recombination rate, incorrect positioning of un-positioned contigs or un-positioned contigs containing sequence overlap with already assembled contigs. Inability to detect regions with elevated recombination rate could result from surrounding SNPs not containing enough information or from un-positioned contigs being too short to detectably affect ρ. Incorrect positioning of un-positioned contigs could be due to repeat sequence mapping to similar but not equal genomic sequence or random mapping to the wrong position by linkage analysis. Incorrect positioning of un-positioned contigs could also explain why not all of positions found by linkage analysis for the 321 contigs validated positions found by comparative analysis.

An alternative Bos Taurus genome assembly (UMD2) was reported by Zimin et al.[47]. This assembly had 95% identity with the Btau_4.0 assembly but had more genomic sequence placed on the bovine chromosomes. Regions differing between UMD2 and Btau_4.0 were identified by sequence alignments [47] and some of these regions coincide with regions identified as problematic here. Some examples are the region around 105 Mb on BTA7, the region around 70 Mb on BTA12, the region around 10 Mb on BTA13, the region around 30 Mb on BTA18 and the proximal ends of BTA20, BTA21 and BTA28 (Additional file 5).

Genotyping of SNPs positioned on un-positioned contigs in a large pedigree and consequent linkage analyses as described here provide useful information for improving the current bovine genome assembly (Btau_4.0). The approach will gain even higher power and more accurate predictions as denser genetic maps become available. Likewise comparative sequence analysis would be a good supplement for correct contig or scaffold positioning.

Conclusions

Low levels of LD were observed in NRF relative to some of the breeds from which this breed originates. This is likely due to elevated heterogeneity in NRF from historic admixture, recent attempts to maintain a large effective population size through control of inbreeding and gene flow through import of sires from other Nordic countries. Reports from breeds other than those assessed in this study have described more rapid decline in r2 at short distances [17, 18] than was found in NRF. The results suggested that to obtain an expected r2 between markers and a causal polymorphism of at least 0.5 for genome-wide association studies in NRF, approximately one SNP every 15 kb or a total of 200,000 SNPs would be required for the 2.87 Gb genome.

For well known QTL regions for milk production on BTA1, BTA6 and BTA20, map length based on historic recombination was greater than map length based on recent recombination in NRF. Selective sweeps have previously been identified for the QTL regions on BTA20 [35] and BTA6 [38]. Reduced ρ(r) relative to ρ(h) was also found on BTAs 10,15, 16, 18, 19, 27 and 29, while elevated ρ(r) relative to ρ(h) was found on BTAs 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, and 17.

While over 95% of the total genome sequence is included in bovine genomic assembly Btau_4.0, problematic regions exists and should be identified to facilitate assembly completion. Here such regions were identified by combining comparative sequence analysis, linkage analyses and detection of regions with extreme values of population recombination rate.

Methods

Genotyping and initial filtering

The Affymetrix 25 K MIP array [48] was used to genotype 2,589 NRF sires with paternal half-sib pedigree structure. In addition, 53 Holstein, 40 Finnish Ayrshire, 19 Sided Troender and Nordland Cattle and 39 Icelandic sires were genotyped. Genotypes were filtered for discordants (<2.5%), MAF (>0.025) and genotyped percentage (>75%). After initial filtering 17,483 SNPs remained. MAF were calculated for these SNPs with the Haploview 4.1 software [49].

Genetic map construction

Genetic maps for each of the 29 BTAs were constructed by use of the CRI-MAP 2.4 package [50]. The map file created by use of the CRI-MAP fixed option was checked for elevated recombination rates between adjacent SNPs. Elevated recombination rates could be an indication of a wrongly positioned contig in the assembly. SNPs with genetic distance >6 cM between its two flanking SNPs or a genetic distance >4 cM between itself and one of its flanking SNPs were identified as suspicious and temporarily taken out of the genetic map. The CRI-MAP chrompic option was used to identify double recombinants. Double recombinants were manually inspected and corrected. SNPs showing up as double recombinants in more than 30 animals from 5 or more families were identified as suspicious and temporarily taken out of the genetic map. The fixed and chrompic procedures were repeated until no SNPs showed a genetic distance >6 cM between its two flanking SNPs or a genetic distance >4 cM between itself and one of its flanking SNPs. The SNPs temporarily taken out of the genetic map were attempted repositioned by use of the CRI-MAP twopoint option. SNPs mapping more strongly to positions within 2.5 Mb of their original positions were not repositioned. The genetic maps has previously been reported in Liu et al.[19].

Haplotypes and missing genotypes

The PHASE software [51] and the locally developed CRIHAP package were applied to utilize both linkage and LD information for determining haplotypes and impute missing genotypes.

Principal component analysis

A principal component analysis of the genomic relationship matrix among individuals of different and the same breed [23] was conducted to evaluate genetic distances between breeds.

Recombination rate distribution

Recombination rates in telomeric regions were compared to average recombination rates across chromosomes. Mean recombination rate per bp in a 10 Mb telomeric region for all autosomes was compared to overall mean recombination rate per bp. A t-test was used to compare means.

Linkage disequilibrium

Estimates of pair-wise linkage disequilibrium measure r2 were calculated with the Haploview 4.1 software [49].

Population recombination rate

Scaled population recombination rate (ρ) between adjacent markers relative to inter marker distances was estimated using the LDhat 2.1 software [26] with haplotypes from 17,347 SNPs distributed on the 29 BTAs. The LDhat 2.1 software incorporates a model which allows for variable recombination rates across chromosomes [26]. The reversible-jump markov chain monte carlo (rjMCMC) chain was run for 10,000,000 iterations, performing 5000 iterations between each sample. A block penalty of 5 was applied and the first 500,000 iterations were discarded as burn-ins. Some extreme values of ρ were observed, which could to be due to wrongly assembled contigs or other assembly artefacts. To determine historical recombination rate (ρ(h)) extreme values were corrected by replacing extreme values of ρ by a maximum value (max interval ρ = 10). Less than 5% of intervals between adjacent SNPs had ρ higher than this maximum value. To determine values of recent scaled population recombination rate from the observed pedigree (ρ(r)), pedigree based estimates of recombination (c) was scaled by a factor corresponding to 4Ne (from ρ = 4cNe) [3, 8]. The applied scaling factor ρ(h)/c = 4Ne was found by taking average values of total cumulative ρ(h) and total cumulative c for all autosomes. Cumulative values of recombination over each interval was used because we were interested in comparing a recent population recombination map based on the observed pedigree with a historic population recombination map, rather than comparing point estimates of recombination rate per distance. Cumulative interval values for ρ(r) and ρ(h) were found by multiplying recombination rate per length unit for each interval with interval length and then calculating cumulative values across each autosomal chromosome.

Positioning previously un-positioned contigs

Positioning of previously un-positioned contigs from the bovine genome sequencing (Btau_4.0) [19] was done both by comparative sequence analysis with the human genome and by linkage analysis with already positioned SNPs in the bovine genome (Btau_4.0). In the comparative sequence analysis positioning of un-positioned bovine contigs was performed by combining MegaBLAST [52] searches for un-positioned contigs against the human genome Build 19 followed by MegaBLAST searches of hits in the human genome against the bovine genome (Btau_4.0). The first search revealed which areas of the human genome was most similar to each unknown contig, while the second search mapped those areas in the human genome sequence back to the bovine genome sequence. When two human sequences from one chromosomal region gave MegaBLAST hits against two sequences of a bovine chromosomal region it was assumed that the sequence between those human sequences on the human chromosome would also have similarity to the bovine genomic sequence between the two hits on the bovine chromosome. Bovine positions were predicted for 4,276 previously un-positioned contigs by this comparative method. Moreover, linkage analysis was conducted to position 568 SNPs distributed on 321 of the un-positioned contigs. The twopoint option in CRI-MAP 2.4 [50] was used to map these 568 SNPs to SNPs already positioned in the bovine genome assembly. The results from linkage analysis were also presented in Liu et al.[19].

References

  1. Ardlie KG, Kruglyak L, Seielstad M: Patterns of linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2002, 3 (4): 299-309. 10.1038/nrg777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffreys AJ, Holloway JK, Kauppi L, May CA, Neumann R, Slingsby MT, Webb AJ: Meiotic recombination hot spots and human DNA diversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004, 359 (1441): 141-152. 10.1098/rstb.2003.1372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Myers S, Bottolo L, Freeman C, McVean G, Donnelly P: A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome. Science. 2005, 310 (5746): 321-324. 10.1126/science.1117196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Slatkin M: Linkage disequilibrium in growing and stable populations. Genetics. 1994, 137 (1): 331-336.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Grossman SR, Shylakhter I, Karlsson EK, Byrne EH, Morales S, Frieden G, Hostetter E, Angelino E, Garber M, Zuk O, et al: A composite of multiple signals distinguishes causal variants in regions of positive selection. Science. 2010, 327 (5967): 883-886. 10.1126/science.1183863.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patin E, Barreiro LB, Sabeti PC, Austerlitz F, Luca F, Sajantila A, Behar DM, Semino O, Sakuntabhai A, Guiso N, et al: Deciphering the ancient and complex evolutionary history of human arylamine N-acetyltransferase genes. Am J Hum Genet. 2006, 78 (3): 423-436. 10.1086/500614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tenesa A, Knott SA, Ward D, Smith D, Williams JL, Visscher PM: Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in a sample of the United Kingdom dairy cattle population using unphased genotypes. J Anim Sci. 2003, 81 (3): 617-623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pritchard JK, Przeworski M: Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 69 (1): 1-14. 10.1086/321275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hudson RR: Two-locus sampling distributions and their application. Genetics. 2001, 159 (4): 1805-1817.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu A, Zhao C, Fan Y, Jang W, Mungall AJ, Deloukas P, Olsen A, Doggett NA, Ghebranious N, Broman KW, et al: Comparison of human genetic and sequence-based physical maps. Nature. 2001, 409 (6822): 951-953. 10.1038/35057185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mueller JC: Linkage disequilibrium for different scales and applications. Brief Bioinform. 2004, 5 (4): 355-364. 10.1093/bib/5.4.355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farnir F, Coppieters W, Arranz JJ, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Grisart B, Karim L, Marcq F, Moreau L, Mni M, et al: Extensive genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in cattle. Genome Res. 2000, 10 (2): 220-227. 10.1101/gr.10.2.220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vallejo RL, Li YL, Rogers GW, Ashwell MS: Genetic diversity and background linkage disequilibrium in the North American Holstein cattle population. J Dairy Sci. 2003, 86 (12): 4137-4147. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74028-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Odani M, Narita A, Watanabe T, Yokouchi K, Sugimoto Y, Fujita T, Oguni T, Matsumoto M, Sasaki Y: Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in two Japanese beef cattle breeds. Anim Genet. 2006, 37 (2): 139-144. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01400.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khatkar MS, Nicholas FW, Collins AR, Zenger KR, Cavanagh JA, Barris W, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Raadsma HW: Extent of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle based on a high-density SNP panel. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 187-10.1186/1471-2164-9-187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, McPartlan HC, Goddard ME: Novel multilocus measure of linkage disequilibrium to estimate past effective population size. Genome Res. 2003, 13 (4): 635-643. 10.1101/gr.387103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Murdoch BM, Matukumalli LK, Aerts J, Coppieters W, Crews D, Dias Neto E, Gill CA, Gao C, et al: Whole genome linkage disequilibrium maps in cattle. BMC Genet. 2007, 8: 74-10.1186/1471-2156-8-74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS, Jansen GB, Schaeffer LR: Extent of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle in North America. J Dairy Sci. 2008, 91 (5): 2106-2117. 10.3168/jds.2007-0553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y, Qin X, Song XZ, Jiang H, Shen Y, Durbin KJ, Lien S, Kent MP, Sodeland M, Ren Y, et al: Bos taurus genome assembly. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 180-10.1186/1471-2164-10-180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Blakesley RW, Hansen NF, Gupta J, McDowell JC, Maskeri B, Barnabas BB, Brooks SY, Coleman H, Haghighi P, Ho SL, et al: Effort required to finish shotgun-generated genome sequences differs significantly among vertebrates. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 21-10.1186/1471-2164-11-21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chain PS, Grafham DV, Fulton RS, Fitzgerald MG, Hostetler J, Muzny D, Ali J, Birren B, Bruce DC, Buhay C, et al: Genomics. Genome project standards in a new era of sequencing. Science. 2009, 326 (5950): 236-237. 10.1126/science.1180614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillippy AM, Schatz MC, Pop M: Genome assembly forensics: finding the elusive mis-assembly. Genome Biol. 2008, 9 (3): R55-10.1186/gb-2008-9-3-r55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D: Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2 (12): e190-10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. GENO. [http://www.geno.no]

  25. Auton A, McVean G: Recombination rate estimation in the presence of hotspots. Genome Res. 2007, 17 (8): 1219-1227. 10.1101/gr.6386707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. McVean G, Auton A: LDhat 2.1: A package for the population genetic analysis of recombination. Department of Statistics, Oxford, OX1 3TG, UK. 2007

    Google Scholar 

  27. Georges M, Nielsen D, Mackinnon M, Mishra A, Okimoto R, Pasquino AT, Sargeant LS, Sorensen A, Steele MR, Zhao X, et al: Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics. 1995, 139 (2): 907-920.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. de Koning DJ, Schulmant NF, Elo K, Moisio S, Kinos R, Vilkki J, Maki-Tanila A: Mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci by simple regression in half-sib designs. J Anim Sci. 2001, 79 (3): 616-622.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nadesalingam J, Plante Y, Gibson JP: Detection of QTL for milk production on Chromosomes 1 and 6 of Holstein cattle. Mamm Genome. 2001, 12 (1): 27-31. 10.1007/s003350010232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodriguez-Zas SL, Southey BR, Heyen DW, Lewin HA: Interval and composite interval mapping of somatic cell score, yield, and components of milk in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2002, 85 (11): 3081-3091. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74395-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Viitala SM, Schulman NF, de Koning DJ, Elo K, Kinos R, Virta A, Virta J, Maki-Tanila A, Vilkki JH: Quantitative trait loci affecting milk production traits in Finnish Ayrshire dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2003, 86 (5): 1828-1836. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73769-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schulman NF, Viitala SM, de Koning DJ, Virta J, Maki-Tanila A, Vilkki JH: Quantitative trait Loci for health traits in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2004, 87 (2): 443-449. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73183-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Khatkar MS, Thomson PC, Tammen I, Raadsma HW: Quantitative trait loci mapping in dairy cattle: review and meta-analysis. Genet Sel Evol. 2004, 36 (2): 163-190. 10.1186/1297-9686-36-2-163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Blott S, Kim JJ, Moisio S, Schmidt-Kuntzel A, Cornet A, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Ford C, Grisart B, Johnson D, et al: Molecular dissection of a quantitative trait locus: a phenylalanine-to-tyrosine substitution in the transmembrane domain of the bovine growth hormone receptor is associated with a major effect on milk yield and composition. Genetics. 2003, 163 (1): 253-266.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hayes BJ, Chamberlain AJ, Maceachern S, Savin K, McPartlan H, MacLeod I, Sethuraman L, Goddard ME: A genome map of divergent artificial selection between Bos taurus dairy cattle and Bos taurus beef cattle. Anim Genet. 2009, 40 (2): 176-184. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01815.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Olsen HG, Nilsen H, Hayes B, Berg PR, Svendsen M, Lien S, Meuwissen T: Genetic support for a quantitative trait nucleotide in the ABCG2 gene affecting milk composition of dairy cattle. BMC Genet. 2007, 8: 32-10.1186/1471-2156-8-32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Nilsen H, Olsen HG, Hayes B, Sehested E, Svendsen M, Nome T, Meuwissen T, Lien S: Casein haplotypes and their association with milk production traits in Norwegian Red cattle. Genet Sel Evol. 2009, 41 (1): 24-10.1186/1297-9686-41-24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hayes BJ, Lien S, Nilsen H, Olsen HG, Berg P, Maceachern S, Potter S, Meuwissen TH: The origin of selection signatures on bovine chromosome 6. Anim Genet. 2008, 39 (2): 105-111. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01683.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Weissenbach J, Gyapay G, Dib C, Vignal A, Morissette J, Millasseau P, Vaysseix G, Lathrop M: A second-generation linkage map of the human genome. Nature. 1992, 359 (6398): 794-801. 10.1038/359794a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kong A, Gudbjartsson DF, Sainz J, Jonsdottir GM, Gudjonsson SA, Richardsson B, Sigurdardottir S, Barnard J, Hallbeck B, Masson G, et al: A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat Genet. 2002, 31 (3): 241-247.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Broman KW, Murray JC, Sheffield VC, White RL, Weber JL: Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63 (3): 861-869. 10.1086/302011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Poissant J, Hogg JT, Davis CS, Miller JM, Maddox JF, Coltman DW: Genetic linkage map of a wild genome: genomic structure, recombination and sexual dimorphism in bighorn sheep. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11 (1): 524-10.1186/1471-2164-11-524.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Paigen K, Szatkiewicz JP, Sawyer K, Leahy N, Parvanov ED, Ng SH, Graber JH, Broman KW, Petkov PM: The recombinational anatomy of a mouse chromosome. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4 (7): e1000119-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Mank JE: The evolution of heterochiasmy: the role of sexual selection and sperm competition in determining sex-specific recombination rates in eutherian mammals. Genet Res. 2009, 91 (5): 355-363. 10.1017/S0016672309990255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Myers S, Spencer CC, Auton A, Bottolo L, Freeman C, Donnelly P, McVean G: The distribution and causes of meiotic recombination in the human genome. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006, 34 (Pt 4): 526-530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R, Panayi M, Myers S, Donnelly P: Human recombination hot spots hidden in regions of strong marker association. Nat Genet. 2005, 37 (6): 601-606. 10.1038/ng1565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zimin AV, Delcher AL, Florea L, Kelley DR, Schatz MC, Puiu D, Hanrahan F, Pertea G, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, et al: A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurus. Genome Biol. 2009, 10 (4): R42-10.1186/gb-2009-10-4-r42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, O'Connell J, Moore SS, Smith TP, Sonstegard TS, et al: Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (4): e5350-10.1371/journal.pone.0005350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (2): 263-265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Green P, Falls K, Crooks S: Documentation for CRI-MAP, version 2.4. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo., USA. 1990

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P: A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 68 (4): 978-989. 10.1086/319501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W: A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol. 2000, 7 (1-2): 203-214. 10.1089/10665270050081478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Hanne Hamland and Monica Aasland Opsal for sample processing and Torfinn Nome for bioinformatics assistance. Thanks also to Johanna Vilkki and Emma Eyþórsdóttir for proving samples of Finish Ayshire and Icelandic Cattle, respectively. This project has been funded by The Research Council of Norway, GENO Breeding and AI association and BoviBank Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Centre for Integrative Genetics, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, N-1432, Aas, Norway

    Marte Sodeland, Matthew Kent, Ben J Hayes, Harald Grove & Sigbjørn Lien

  2. Biosciences Research Division, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, Melbourne, 3083, Australia

    Ben J Hayes

Authors
  1. Marte Sodeland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Kent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ben J Hayes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Harald Grove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sigbjørn Lien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marte Sodeland.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

MS construction of genetic maps, linkage analyses, linkage disequilibrium analyses for Norwegian Red cattle, recombination rate analyses and writing of manuscript. MK molecular genetic studies and initial data cleaning. BJH principal component analysis, linkage disequilbrium analysis for breed comparison and assistance in drafting the manuscript. HG comparative sequence analysis. SL initial data cleaning, construction of genetic maps, conceived of the study, coordination and assistance in drafting the manuscript. All authors helped finalize the manuscript and read and approved of the final version.

Electronic supplementary material

12864_2010_3172_MOESM1_ESM.PDF

Additional file 1:Inter-marker distance distribution. Genome-wide distribution of distance (bp) between adjacent SNPs. (PDF 97 KB)

12864_2010_3172_MOESM2_ESM.PDF

Additional file 2:Minor allele frequency. Genome-wide distribution of minor allele frequencies after filtering (>0.025). (PDF 128 KB)

12864_2010_3172_MOESM3_ESM.PDF

Additional file 3:Chromosomal linkage disequilibrium. Number of SNPs, number of SNP pairs, mean chromosomal r2 and mean r2 for inter-marker distances <10 Mb for the 29 BTAs. (PDF 149 KB)

12864_2010_3172_MOESM4_ESM.PDF

Additional file 4:Positioning unpositioned contigs. Comparative sequence analysis (CSA) contig positions were compared with the positions predicted by linkage analysis (LA) presented in Liu et al.[19]. The table shows 130 contigs unpositioned in the genome assembly (Btau_4.0) for which contig positions from these two prediction methods are less than 5 Mb apart. Contig, BTA, position given by CSA and position given by LA is presented. (PDF 270 KB)

12864_2010_3172_MOESM5_ESM.PDF

Additional file 5:Quality assessment of the bovine genome assembly Btau_4.0. Scaled recombination rate versus physical distance (kb) is plotted for all 29 autosomal bovine chromosomes. Contig positions predicted by comparative sequence analysis are indicated in light grey and contig positions predicted by linkage analysis are indicated in dark grey. Contigs given similar positions by both methods are indicated in light blue. (PDF 499 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sodeland, M., Kent, M., Hayes, B.J. et al. Recent and historical recombination in the admixed Norwegian Red cattle breed. BMC Genomics 12, 33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-33

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-33

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us