Table 3

Spearman's rank correlation (r) of the marker order for the comparison among the three population-specific B. napus maps, BnaSNDH_05_2010a, BnaSGDH_03_2010a and BnaDYDH_05_2010a, comparison between each of the three population-specific maps and each of the two integrated maps, BnaWAIT_01_2010a generated by JoinMap and BnaWAIT_01_2010b generated by MergeMap and comparison between the two integrated maps, BnaWAIT_01_2010a and BnaWAIT_01_2010b.

LG

Map

BnaSNDH_05_2010a

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

BnaWAIT_01_2010a


A01

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.96****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.97***

0.97***

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.97****

0.98****

0.99****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

0.99****

1.00****

1.00****

0.97***


A02

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.95****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.94*

1.00

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.99****

0.99****

1.00****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

0.99****

1.00****

0.99****


A03

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.99****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.97***

0.96**

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

1.00****

0.99****

1.00****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

1.00****

0.98****

0.99****


A04

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.93****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

-------------

0.20

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.99****

0.97****

0.86****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

1.00****

0.98****

0.95****


A05

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.90****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.20

1.00

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.94****

0.97****

1.00****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

0.99****

1.00****

0.96****


A06

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.84****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

1.00

1.00

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.96****

0.94****

1.00****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

0.97****

0.98****

1.00****

0.95****


A07

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.54

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

1.00

-0.80

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.87****

0.76****

1.00****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

0.98****

0.98****

0.85****


A08

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.98****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.70

0.80

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.79****

0.46****

0.58****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

0.98****

0.98****

0.64****


A09

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.75****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.95***

0.93**

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.86****

0.91****

0.97****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

0.96****

0.99****

1.00****

0.92****


A10

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.97****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.93**

0.90

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.99****

0.99****

0.92****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

1.00****

0.98****

0.97****


C01

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.97****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

1.00

0.93**

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.99****

0.96****

0.97****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

0.99****

1.00****

0.97****


C02

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.64*

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.70

1.00

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.99****

0.88****

0.99****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

0.99****

1.00****

0.96****


C03

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.91****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.66

0.93****

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.96****

0.96****

0.95****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

0.98****

1.00****

1.00****

0.96****


C04

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.86****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

1.00

0.96**

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.89****

0.96****

0.99****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

0.99****

0.98****

1.00****

0.92****


C05

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.95****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

0.70

1.00***

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.99****

0.98****

0.47***

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

1.00****

1.00****

0.81****


C06

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.69*

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

1.00

1.00

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.63****

0.82****

1.00****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

0.97****

0.97****

1.00****

0.72****


C07

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.91****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

1.00

0.78**

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.99****

0.99****

0.99****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

0.98****

1.00****

0.99****


C08

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.96****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

1.00

0.70

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.92****

0.96****

1.00****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

1.00****

1.00****

1.00****

0.94****


C09

BnaSGDH_03_2010a

0.94****

BnaDYDH_05_2010a

1.00

1.00

BnaWAIT_01_2010a

0.99****

0.99****

0.98****

BnaWAIT_01_2010b

0.99****

1.00****

1.00****

0.99****


The level of significance is shown by asterisks. Significance is shown as: * < 0.05; ** < 0.01; *** < 0.001; **** < 0.0001.

Wang et al. BMC Genomics 2011 12:101   doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-101

Open Data