Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genomes of three tomato pathogens within the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex reveal significant evolutionary divergence

BMC Genomics volume 11, Article number: 379 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The Ralstonia solanacearum species complex includes thousands of strains pathogenic to an unusually wide range of plant species. These globally dispersed and heterogeneous strains cause bacterial wilt diseases, which have major socio-economic impacts. Pathogenicity is an ancestral trait in R. solanacearum and strains with high genetic variation can be subdivided into four phylotypes, correlating to isolates from Asia (phylotype I), the Americas (phylotype IIA and IIB), Africa (phylotype III) and Indonesia (phylotype IV). Comparison of genome sequences strains representative of this phylogenetic diversity can help determine which traits allow this bacterium to be such a pathogen of so many different plant species and how the bacteria survive in many different habitats.

Results

The genomes of three tomato bacterial wilt pathogens, CFBP2957 (phy. IIA), CMR15 (phy. III) and PSI07 (phy. IV) were sequenced and manually annotated. These genomes were compared with those of three previously sequenced R. solanacearum strains: GMI1000 (tomato, phy. I), IPO1609 (potato, phy. IIB), and Molk2 (banana, phy. IIB). The major genomic features (size, G+C content, number of genes) were conserved across all of the six sequenced strains. Despite relatively high genetic distances (calculated from average nucleotide identity) and many genomic rearrangements, more than 60% of the genes of the megaplasmid and 70% of those on the chromosome are syntenic. The three new genomic sequences revealed the presence of several previously unknown traits, probably acquired by horizontal transfers, within the genomes of R. solanacearum, including a type IV secretion system, a rhi-type anti-mitotic toxin and two small plasmids. Genes involved in virulence appear to be evolving at a faster rate than the genome as a whole.

Conclusions

Comparative analysis of genome sequences and gene content confirmed the differentiation of R. solanacearum species complex strains into four phylotypes. Genetic distances between strains, in conjunction with CGH analysis of a larger set of strains, revealed differences great enough to consider reclassification of the R. solanacearum species complex into three species. The data are still too fragmentary to link genomic classification and phenotypes, but these new genome sequences identify a pan-genome more representative of the diversity in the R. solanancearum species complex.

Background

The rapidly accumulating complete genomes in databases provide unique opportunities to study relationships among organisms. Since DNA sequences are conserved between closely related organisms, comparative genomic analyses are a powerful tool for understanding the complex evolutionary events in specific phylogenetic lineages.

R. solanacearum, formerly known as Pseudomonas solanacearum and Burkholderia solanacearum, is the causal agent of bacterial wilt [1]. This soil-borne vascular pathogen is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical climates and affects an unusually broad range of crops, including both monocot and dicot plants [2–4]. Many affected hosts are critical for developing countries because of their strategic importance as cash crops or as subsistence foods like potato (Solanum tuberosum), tomato (S. lycopersicum), eggplant (S. melongena), cooking banana (Musa spp.) and peanut (Arachis hypogea). In the 1990s, potato brown rot strains of R. solanacearum historically known as race 3/biovar 2 (r3b2) were introduced in Europe and North America [5, 6]. Due to their adaptation to tropical highland climates, these strains, which are more virulent at cool temperatures (~20°C) than tropical strains [7], may pose major threats in temperate zones. Therefore, R. solanacearum was listed as a quarantine organism in Europe and Canada and as a Bioterrorism Select Agent in the U.S. [8].

R. solanacearum and the closely related species R. syzygii (a pathogen of clove in Indonesia) and the banana blood disease bacterium (BDB) form a complex in the R. picketii lineage [9–12]. This species complex includes thousands of genetically distinct strains that can differ from each other by more than 30%, and thus do not belong in the same species by conventional definition [13]. This species complex includes strains with broad and narrow host ranges, which are ecologically different as well: potato strains are cold-tolerant and banana strains are insect-transmitted, and with different geographic origins. Because R. solanacearum strains have been isolated from virgin jungle soils in both Asia and the Americas, the origin of the species complex is believed to predate the geological separation of the continents [14]. Based on analyses of the 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, egl and hrpB genes and on comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), the R. solanacearum species complex is hierarchically classified in four phylogenetic groups called phylotypes, which reflect their origins as follows: Asia (phylotype I), the Americas (phylotype II), Africa (phylotype III) or Indonesia (phylotype IV, which includes R. syzygii and BDB) [15, 16]. Each phylotype can be further subdivided into sequevars, or sequence variants, which may contain isolates with similar virulence patterns or common geographic origin [12].

Despite their considerable phylogenetic diversity, R. solanacearum strains are unified by their common pathology. All cause bacterial wilt disease, which is characterized by bacterial colonization of the plant xylem vessels to very high cell densities (109 - 1010 CFU/ml xylem fluid), vascular browning, stunting, wilting, and often rapid death [3]. The bacterium is transmitted by soil, surface water, and infected propagation materials like potato tubers or ornamental cuttings. It most commonly infects plants through the roots, but some strains are insect-transmitted [17]. Bacterial wilt is difficult to control because the bacterium survives for years in infested soils and weed hosts. Breeding for host resistance, the best management strategy is complicated by the pathogen's high genetic diversity. For example, tomatoes resistant to R. solanacearum strains in one region are often susceptible to those in another [18].

Genome sequences of R. solanacearum strains can answer historic questions about what traits allow this bacterium to be such an aggressive and lethal pathogen of so many different plants, and to survive in such different habitats as soil, water, non-host plant rhizospheres and host xylem vessels. The bi-partite genome of R. solanacearum strain GMI1000 (phylotype I, sequevar 18) was sequenced and analyzed [19, 20] . The genome has two replicons, called the chromosome and the megaplasmid, with a mosaic structure that implies many rearrangements and horizontal gene transfers. Several factors have been shown to contribute to bacterial wilt virulence, especially the type III secretion system (TTSS) and associated effectors [21], and production of extracellular polysaccharides and enzymes [22]. The GMI1000 genome encodes more than a hundred TTSS effectors or putative effectors [23]. Draft genomes are available for two additional R. solanacearum strains: IPO1609/UW551, which cause potato brown rot disease in cool-temperate climates and Molk2, which causes Moko disease of banana and plantain [24, 25]. These respectively belong to phylotype IIB sequevar 1 (IIB-1) and sequevar 3 (IIB-3).

To better understand how this highly diverse and scattered species complex has evolved and diverged without losing its fundamental pathological qualities, we sequenced the genomes of three additional broad host range strains from other phylotypes, namely: American strain CFBP2957 (IIA-36), African strain CMR15 (III-29) and Indonesian strain PSI07 (IV-10). All were originally isolated from tomato. Their complete genomes were manually annotated and analyzed with the aim of investigating the conserved, variable, and specific gene repertoires of these strains and the three previously sequenced ones, with a special emphasis on genes involved in virulence and pathogenicity. In addition, the genomes of 51 R. solanacearum strains (including the six sequenced strains) were compared by CGH on a pan-genomic microarray. These comparative genomic approaches produced new insights into the evolution and taxonomy of the R. solanacearum species complex.

Results and Discussion

It has long been known that R. solanacearum is a highly heterogeneous group of strains and thus no one genome sequence could represent the entire species complex. Initial genomic studies revealed that R. solanacearum strains have a substantial backbone of common housekeeping and virulence functions, but also carry a divergent set of genomic modules that likely confer distinct ecological phenotypes and host specificity [19, 24]. Comparing multiple bacterial genomes distributed around the phylogenetic tree was therefore essential to understand the evolutionary driving forces and mechanisms that have produced such a phenotypically and genotypically diverse group. Four existing genome sequences represented phylotype I (tomato isolate GMI1000) and phylotype II (IPO1609/UW551 and Molk2, from potato and banana, respectively) [19, 24, 25]. The phylotype-sequevar subclassification system provided rational criteria for choosing more strains to sequence to cover significant additional diversity in the species complex. We therefore sequenced genomes of strains that cause bacterial wilt of tomato from Indonesia (PSI07, phylotype IV), Cameroon (CMR15, phylotype III), and the French West Indies (CFPPB2957, phylotype II).

Overview of genomes of CFBP2957, CMR15 and PSI07

The two-replicon (chromosome and megaplasmid) genome architecture of these three tomato strains was identical to that found in the three previously sequenced strains. As in the GMI1000 genome [20], most -but not all- housekeeping genes were carried on the chromosome. However, the capture or creation of the megaplasmid by Ralstonia spp. appears to be an ancient event, since all strains in the R. pickettii lineage studied to date have two replicons (Lucas et al, unpublished). Moreover, CGH microarray analyses by Guidot et al. [16] established that both replicons have a long history of coevolution within the R. solanacearum species complex.

The sizes of the chromosomes and megaplasmids, and therefore the entire genome, are similar in all strains The average genome size for the sequenced R. solanacearum strains was approximately 5.7 Mb including the chromosome (3.6 Mb) and the megaplasmid (2.1 Mb) (Table 1). Additional data on genome characteristics are provided in supplemental material [Additional file 1]. R. solanacearum strains CFBP2957, CMR15 and PSI07 had genome lengths of 5,683,402 bp, 5,606,288 bp and 5,593,041 bp, respectively, with a common average G+C content of 66.7% in both replicons. With an average protein coding density of 86.8%, chromosomes contained about 3500 predicted coding sequences (CDS), and megaplasmids contained about 1800. Only one rRNA operon was detected in each R. solanacearum genome, except in strains GMI1000 and CMR15, which had 4 and 3 rRNA operons, respectively. Additional ribosomal operons can permit faster adaptation to new environmental conditions by increasing protein synthesis capacity [26]. In CMR15, two rRNA operons were on the chromosome and one on the megaplasmid; GMI1000 has three on the chromosome and one on the megaplasmid. The three CMR15 rRNA operons were 99.5% identical at the nucleotide level. Fifty-nine, 49 and 56 tRNA genes were identified in strains CFBP2957, CMR15 and PSI07, respectively.

Table 1 General features of genomes of R. solanacearu m strains CFBP2957, CMR15, PSI07, GMI1000, IPO1609 and Molk2
Full size table

Automatic re-annotation of the R. solanacearum sequences in the public domain identified 517 additional coding sequences (CDS) in GMI1000 (263 on the chromosome and 254 on the megaplasmid [Additional file 2]). These newly identified genes, encoding mostly proteins of unknown function, were encoded 'RALSO' to distinguish them from previously-annotated CDS ('RSc' and 'RSp').

The R. solanacearum pan-genome

The new genome sequences from strains CMR15, CFBP2957 and PSI07 were combined with existing sequences from strains GMI1000, IPO1609, and Molk2 to identify a total of 9093 unigenes which constitute the known pan-genome of R. solanacearum: that is, the set of all genes present in a group of organisms. The pan-genome is composed of the core-genome (genes present in all strains), the dispensable genome (genes present in some strains, but not all) and the specific genome (unique genes present in only one strain) [27]. As reported in figure 1, among these 9093 genes, 2543 were highly conserved (bidirectional best hit (BBH)) in the six genomes and constituted the R. solanacearum core-genome, which thus makes up 28% of the pan-genome. Ninety-three percent of the core genome CDS were located on the chromosome. The dispensable genome contained 3538 genes (39% of the pan-genome). This is in general agreement with a previous conserved genome estimate of 2690 genes that was based on CGH analyses of 18 strains [16]. The overestimate by the CGH approach is probably due to nonspecific hybridizations and lower technical precision of hybridization compared to sequencing. The number of strain-specific genes was variable, ranging from 391 for Molk2 to 640 for GMI1000 (figure 1). For these six R. solanacearum strains, a total of 3012 genes were identified as strain-specific genes, which represents a third of the current pan-genome. Depending on the strain, the number of proteins of unknown function (or conserved proteins of unknown function) encoded by the strain-specific genes ranged from 73 to 84% in. These genes likely hold many clues to the traits and mechanisms underlying the biological diversity of the R. solanacearum species complex, but because so few of these CDS can be functionally annotated, gene by gene mutagenesis and phenotype analysis will be needed to determine their roles.

Figure 1
figure 1

Number of genes in the R. solanacearum pan-genome.

Full size image

Genome plasticity and genomic islands

Working from the GMI1000 genome, we identified syntenic CDS in all six R. solanacearum genomes and also in some bacterial species most closely related to the R. picketii lineage (figure 2A). The six R. solanacearum genomes were highly syntenic: 55 to 65% of the CDS on the megaplasmid and 70 to 80% of the CDS on the chromosome were in synteny. This percentage decreased to below 55% on the chromosome and 20% on the megaplasmid in other closely related species, except for R. picketii, where 68 and 40% of CDS, on the chromosome and the megaplasmid respectively, were in synteny with GMI1000. R. pickettii is closely related to, but not a member of the R. solanacearum species complex; both belong to the R. pickettii lineage (as distinct from the R. eutropha lineage) [9]. Cupriavidus spp. and R. eutropha are the closest relatives to the R. pickettii lineage, but in these genomes the number of CDS in synteny with GMI1000 was dramatically lower on both replicons. Further, the size of syntenic regions was greater within the R. solanacearum species complex; an average of 11 to 16 CDS per synton was observed on chromosomes of these strains (figure 2B, black bar). The exception was the African strain, CMR15, where we found an average of 25 CDS per synton with GMI1000. For the other related species, the mean number of CDS in one synton was fewer than 8. For all comparisons, we found that the megaplasmids always contained fewer CDS in synteny than the chromosomes. Multiple alignments of R. solanacearum genomes revealed that many genomic rearrangements occurred in the history of these organisms, including intra- and inter-replicon rearrangements (figure 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

Synteny in the R. solanacearum species complex. Figure 2A shows the percentage of CDS in synteny in each strain compared with strain GMI1000. Figure 2B shows the mean number of CDS in 1 synton compared with GMI1000. Results for chromosome and megaplasmids are depicted in black and grey, respectively.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Multiple genome alignment for strains GMI1000, CMR15, PSI07 and CFBP2957. Fine colored lines represent rearrangements or inversions relative to the GMI1000 genome. Chromosomes are separated from megaplasmids by the thick red line.

Full size image

R. solanacearum is naturally competent for DNA transformation [28–30] which allows cells to acquire foreign genetic material directly from their environment. Nakamura et al [31] estimated that nearly 16% of GMI1000 genes were horizontally transferred. Genomic islands are parts of genomes that display evidence of horizontal acquisition. They have a minimal length of 5 kb and contain CDSs with no BBH and no synteny with genomes of compared organisms. Table S3 [Additional file 3] provides a complete list of the numerous genomic islands detected in CFBP2957, CMR15 and PSI07, and a schematic representation of genomic island locations is given in figure 4. The density of genomic islands was two-fold greater on megaplasmids than on chromosome. Many of these genomic islands were IS or phage sequences containing almost exclusively proteins of unknown function. However, some genomic islands carried type III effectors (or putative effectors), including, in CMR15: GALA8, an unknown effector, similar to other GALA effectors (GR1 on the chromosome); popP2 (GR11 on the chromosome); as well as putative effectors (GR29 or GR32 on the megaplasmid). Two supplementary rRNA operons (GR12-chromosme and GR2-megaplasmid) and nosZRDFYL, an operon involved in the anaerobic denitrification pathway (GR12-megaplasmid) were also located on genomic islands in CMR15. In PSI07, three putative type III effectors were detected on chromosomal genomic islands (GR12 and GR31) and one on the megaplasmid (GR38). In CFBP2957, only two putative effectors were detected in genomic islands (GR4-chromosome and GR3-megaplasmid). These results are still too fragmentary to determine any relationship between host ranges and the presence or absence of repertoires of specific effectors. However, acquisition of new effectors could theoretically contribute to rapid adaptability and diversification, especially in virulence and aggressiveness, as well as to saprophytic fitness.

Figure 4
figure 4

Localization of the principal Genomic Islands detected in strains GMI1000, CMR15, CFBP2957 and PSI07. From inside to outside: genomic islands from GMI1000 (in blue), from CFBP2957 (in purple), from CMR15 (in orange) and from PSI07 (in red). Chromosomes and megaplasmids are represented in green and yellow, respectively.

Full size image

Interestingly, the megaplasmids of CFBP2957 and PSI07 also harbor a genomic island containing the rhi operon. This operon was composed of 9 genes: rhiB (20274 pb), rhiC (97185 pb), rhiI (867 pb), rhiD (12468 pb), rhiH (1458 pb), rhiE (12657 pb), rhiF (7824 pb), rhiA (7158 pb) and rhiG (1983 pb). The rhi genes were previously unknown in Ralstonia strains, but are present in Pseudomonas fluorescens[32] and in Burkholderia rhizoxinica where they encode a non-ribosomal peptide synthase (NRPS) that synthesizes the antimitotic toxin rhizoxin [33]. Although this operon spans more than 80 kb, it could have been horizontally acquired since R. solanacearum can exchange and integrate DNA fragments of 30 to 90 kb by natural transformation [29]. The insertion of such a toxin operon in the genome of R. solanacearum could provide a competitive advantage in the soil environment.

Comparison of some metabolic properties

To better understand metabolic diversity among the sequenced strains, we used Principal Compenents Analysis (PCA), a type of factorial analysis that analyzes a data matrix by several quantitative variables [34]. We applied PCA to a matrix describing the completion (measured as a percentage) of all known metabolic pathways present in the six R. solanacearum genomes (figure 5). The first two resulting factors captured over 67% of the data's total variability. The axes were interpreted with the help of external information, such as each strain's host, phylotype, and the laboratory of annotation. The first factorial axis separated strain GMI1000 from the five other strains. This result accounted for the metabolic functions corresponding to the red-colored vectors. The list of pathways that these vectors represent can be consulted in Table S4 A and B [additional file 4], and generally have a maximum of two or three reactions. None of these pathways appear to be complete in GMI1000. This suggests that this factorial axis is in fact an artifact of insufficient or erroneous enzymatic function annotations. This should help guide future annotation efforts. The second factorial axis separated the strains according to their hosts: banana and potato for Molk2 and IPO1609, and tomato for PSI07, CMR15 and CFBP2957. As would be expected, Molk2 and IPO1609, which are close together in the factorial plane, actually belong to the same phylotype (IIB).

Figure 5
figure 5

Principal Component Analysis of six R. solanacearum genomes, performed from a two dimensional matrix, combining genomes and metabolic pathways. Individual points represent genomes, and colored vectors symbolize completion of some pathways (number of reaction for pathway x in a given organism/total number of reactions in the same pathway x defined in the MetaCyc database) in the data (see method section). Pathways with similar completions (vectors with similar orientation) have been clustered and drawn in a same color. Thus, genomes can be associated with their representative and characteristic groups of metabolic pathways (i.e. vectors pointing in their direction). The corresponding pathway functions are listed in Suppl.Table S4.A.

Full size image

Careful examination of the metabolic potential of the studied genomes has revealed some specificity capabilities for compound degradation. Although R. solanacearum is a highly adapted and ancient plant pathogen, this organism can also survive well in soil and rhizospheres and, consequently, its genome encodes ability to metabolize diverse organic compounds as energy sources. Pathway analyses indicate that this bacterium can utilize a wide range of substrates including amino acids, sugars, and fatty acids as well as glycerol, ethanol, methylglyoxal, and beta-ketoadipate ([Additional file 4, sheet B], also Genin and Boucher [20]). GMI1000 was predicted to grow on various aromatic compounds including ferulate, vanillate, and protocatechuate [20], which are released when lignin degrades in soil. However strains CMR15 and GMI1000 do not harbour the benABCD and catABC genes involved in benzoate and catechol degradation to beta-ketoadipate. Another contrasting example is D-galactonate degradation, which can serve as energy and sole carbon source for many enteric bacteria [35]. In soil, bacteria such as Azotobacter vinelandii and Sinorhizobium meliloti convert D-galactose to D-galactonate via the De Ley-Doudoroff pathway, and finally to D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and pyruvate. Our data indicate that D-galactonate degradation is functional only in strains GMI1000, CMR15 and PSI07 [Additional file 4, sheet B]. However, this substrate must be taken up whole from the environment because no degradation enzymes upstream in the pathway were apparent in these genomes. Curiously, it seems that the D-galactonate transport system is different in CMR15, which harbors only one likely transport gene in the corresponding synton, and in GMI1000 and PSI07, which each have 3 genes highly similar to the L-arabinose ABC transporter (annotated as araFGH).

Urease, which is necessary for utilization of urea as sole nitrogen source, has three main subunits and five accessory proteins. Genetic determinants for this enzymatic activity were found in all strains except Molk2, the only banana wilt pathogen sequenced to date. All six strains appear able to metabolize inorganic nutrients such as sulfate and nitrate, consistent with experimental data [14]. However, the denitrification pathway was complete only in strains GMI1000 and CMR15, because the nosZ gene encoding nitrous oxide reductase was absent from the four other strains; this heterogeneity was previously noted [25]. Genes for periplasmic nitrate reductase (nap), nitrate reductase (nar), nitric oxide reductase (nor) and nitrite reductase (nir) were present on the megaplasmids of all six sequenced R. solanacearum strains.

Finally, all six genomes contain genes involved in the detoxification of noxious compounds and in metal resistance, which likely support colonization and survival in specific ecological niches. An interesting example is arsenic resistance which in bacteria is mediated in part by ars genes. Among these, arsC encodes an arsenate reductase [As(V)→As(III)], arsA and arsB encode an arsenite efflux pump, and arsR encodes a transcriptional regulator [36]. As(III) is known to induce oxidative stress, to cause DNA damage, and to inhibit the DNA repair system [37]. It is generally further oxidized by the arsenite oxidase [As(III)→As(V)] encoded by aoxAB genes. The arsC gene is the sole gene in this pathway present in all six strains, with two tandem copies in PSI07. In addition, only PSI07 can oxidize arsenite: on the PSI07 megaplasmid is a cluster containing two arsC genes, aoxAB, and arsR. The annotation of the arsC-like gene is probably erroneous in the other Ralstonia species (and in many other bacterial genomes as well).

Virulence factors

Many traits contribute to virulence of R. solanacearum strains. The best known are the type III secreted effectors, well described in this bacterium and in other plant pathogens [23]. However, other traits, such as production of EPS and cell wall-degrading enzymes, are also important for wilt disease development. Based on the literature, we created an inventory of 128 genes involved in virulence from the six sequenced R. solanacearum genomes [Additional file 5: Supplemental Table S5]. Some genes are involved in swimming motility, twitching motility and chemotaxis. Table S5 gives a representative pair of genes for each of those functions. Virulence genes were subdivided into 5 categories: type III effectors (TTE) and putative effectors, the exopolysaccharide (EPS) biosynthetic genes, the cell wall-degrading enzyme (CWDE) genes, response to host defence genes and key virulence regulators. Scrutiny of the genomes shows that all six strains have all genes needed for functional type II and III secretion systems. Similarity distances between each sequenced strain were computed on the basis of gene presence/absence data for these 128 virulence genes (data not shown). Phylogenetic analysis constructed on the basis of: 1) all known or putative Type 3 effector genes in the pan-genome, and 2) all known virulence factor genes of all kinds in the pan-genome, resulted in trees that were significantly different from each other, and significantly different from trees based on well-conserved genes like mutS and egl sequences, or on the entire genome sequences (data not shown). This result suggests that virulence factor genes have evolved or been lost or added at substantially different rates than R. solanacearum genes as a whole. A more fine-scale case-by-case analysis will likely be needed to trace the evolutionary history of individual virulence traits. Analysis of strains hosted by plants phylogenetically distant from tomato (a common host for all strains analyzed here except Molk2) may elucidate roles of individual virulence factors in determining host range.

Type III-secreted effectors are an important potential source of host range variability in R. solanacearum strains; these have mainly been described in GMI1000 and UW551 to date [23, 25]. Specific effectors that are important in CMR15, CFBP2957 and PSI07 are unknown. We attempted to detect new type III effectors with the Effective software [38], but this did not work well for R. solanacearum strains, giving about 50% false negative on previously annotated effectors (data not shown).

Plasmids in Ralstonia solanacearum strains

Genin and Boucher [20] suggested that the presence of small plasmids in R. solanacearum cells, initially described by Morales and Sequeira [39], was more an exception than a rule. However, we found small plasmids (<50 kb) in the African and Indonesian strains. These plasmids were named pRSC35 (35 kb, GC% = 61.3) in strain CMR15 and pRSI13 (12.8 kb, GC% = 61.0) in strain PSI07. The presence of small plasmids is therefore maybe less rare in R. solanacearum strains than previously thought. These small plasmids may have remained undetected until now because their very low copy number makes them difficult to purify (unpublished results).

Despite their low copy numbers, the stability of these plasmids is apparently ensured by two different toxin/antitoxin (TA) systems. On pRSC35, two CDS had a limited homology with zeta-toxin and epsilon-antitoxin (<40%), which form a post-segregational mechanism for plasmid maintenance in bacteria [40, 41]. The regulator ω was not detected in the CMR15 genome. This zeta/epsilon TA system is well described and a similar system confers a bactericidal effect on Bacillus subtilis, and bacteriostatic effects on E. coli[42].

The plasmid pRSC35 was broadly syntenic with plasmids from many plant-associated bacteria including pXcB of Xanthomonas citri pv. aurantifolii (65% of CDS in synteny), diverse P. putida plasmids (from 58 to 62% synteny), a X. citri pv. citri plasmid (58% synteny) and a plasmid from X. euvesicatoria (51% synteny). Among the 44 CDS present on this plasmid (figure 6A), 14 appeared to be involved in the Type IV secretion system: 10 genes make up the virB operon (virB1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11) ranging from 5 to 15 kbp, and four genes form the tra operon (traA, B, C and D) from 28 to 34 kbp. Eight CDS coded for proteins potentially involved in DNA metabolism (such as partition proteins parA, parB and parR, a DNA methyltransferase, and a DNA mismatch endonuclease). Finaly, one CDS had a strong homology to a Zn-metalloprotease (mpr), also carried on plasmids in several human and/or animal pathogenic bacteria or opportunistic bacteria: P. putida, Yersina pestis, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, etc. Metalloproteases like those encoded on pRSC35 are essential for the infection process of many eukaryotes [43–46].

Figure 6
figure 6

Circular representation of plasmids pRSC35 and pRSI13. A: pRSC35, B: pRSI13; in blue: Type IV Secretion System; in green: proteins involved in DNA metabolism; in purple: toxin/antitoxin systems; in red: proteins of unknown function; in orange: the metalloprotease gene of pRSC35.

Full size image

The unexpected Type IV Secretion System is unique among R. solanacearum strains studied to date and could play diverse important roles in virulence and adaptation. The CMR15 Type IV secretion system genes, which are clustered together with the virB operon, have nearly the same organization as on pXAC64 of Xanthomonas citri pv citri[47]. The type IV secretion system is a bacterial conjugation apparatus [48] and the DNA thus efficiently imported through the cell envelope can directly increase the fitness or virulence of bacteria by mediating the acquisition of new traits like effectors or antibiotic resistance genes. Type IV secretion systems can also be directly involved in virulence via direct injection of effectors or DNA into plant cells [49, 50]. No obvious type IV effectors were found on pRSC35 or in the complete genome of CMR15, but some proteins of unknown function could be Type IV effectors. Additional experiments are needed to investigate (i) the distribution of this plasmid in African phylotype III strains, (ii) the ecological and pathogenic role of this plasmid in the phenotype of phylotype III strain CMR15, and (iii) the occurrence of such plasmids in strains belonging to other phylotypes.

A second low-copy number plasmid, pRSI13, was present in PSI07. It was syntenic with a plasmid found in Nitrobacter hamburgensis X14 (34% of CDS in synteny), Burkholderia pseudomallei 9 and 91 (30 and 26% respectively), Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1 (26%), Acidovorax sp. JS42 (26%) and E. coli pOLA52 (26%). pRSI13 contained 23 CDS, 16 of which encoded for proteins of unknown function and one for a putative transcriptional regulator. Other pRSI13 CDS coded for proteins putatively involved in DNA metabolism or conjugation (figure 6B). Thus, the functional annotation reveals no obvious role for this plasmid in either the ecology of the bacteria (saprophytic life in the soil) or during pathogenesis. The maintenance of this plasmid seems likely due to the TA system rather than to increased fitness.

New insight into the phylogeny of the R. solanacearum species complex

Genomes were compared pairwise using the average nucleotide identity (ANI) calculation (figure 7); the dendrogram summarizes the results, which grouped together strains GMI1000 (Asia) and CMR15 (Africa), with ANI values above 96%. New World (American) strains CFBP2957, Molk2 and IPO1609 (phylotype II) were likewise clustered together (above 98% ANI between Molk2 and IPO1609 and above 96% between CFBP2957 and Molk2-IPO1609). Indonesian strain PSI07 was closest to the phylotype II group, but the ANI values between PSI07 and any other strain were always less than 95%. The topology of the species complex phyogenetic tree computed from ANI values was fully consistent with that observed in previous trees computed with CGH microarray data [16] and with mut S and hrp B sequences [15]. Thus, working with a smaller number of strains but with much more data per strain, these genome sequences confirm the phylotype classification scheme and their phylogenetic position, i.e. phylotype I is closest to phylotype III, and phylotype IV is closest to the phylotype IIA and IIB. Kanstantinidis and Tiedje [51] and Goris et al. [52] demonstrated that ANI values above 95% are equivalent to the 70% DNA-DNA hybridization cut-off value traditionally used to differentiate bacterial species. Using this standard, our data identify three evolutionarily distinct groups within the R. solanacearum species complex: GMI1000-CMR15; CFBP2957-IPO1609-Molk2; and strain PSI07. Separate ANI analysis of replicons gave the same result as whole genome analyses (data not shown). As proposed by Stakebrandt et al [53], genomic data can be used to propose new species, provided that there is sufficient congruence with DNA-DNA reassociation.

Figure 7
figure 7

Phylogeny based on pairwise comparison of average nucleotide identity (ANI). Strains grouped with an ANI value >95% are in the same color. Bootstrap values are indicated in blue. ANI analyses were conducted using perl scripts (Konstantinidis and Tiedje, 2004).

Full size image

We used CGH of a spotted microarray reflecting the pan-genome of GMI1000, IPO1609, and Molk2 to further define phylogenetic relationships among a set of 51 strains selected to span the known diversity within the species complex, and to verify that the three new genomes selected were truly representative of their respective phylotypes. Hierarchical clustering of these 51 strains (figure 8) differentiated five clusters, which each cluster matching to a phylotype (or a phylotype subdivision). This dendrogram is fully congruent with the validated phylogeny of the species complex [15, 54] and deepens a previous analysis performed on a smaller set of strains with a less complete CGH microarray based only on the GMI1000 genome [16]. Furthermore, the position of each sequenced strain within its own phylotype cluster allowed us to extend ANI results to the other 46 strains. The taxonomy of the species complex can now be reviewed based on these consistent results from several different techniques. The analyse of genetic distance between genome sequences of much strain, especially in phylotype IV, should be decisive, but our CGH data suggest that there is a solid phylogenetic basis for dividing this group into three species, according to the phylotype scheme: one species containing Phylotype II, a second containing Phylotypes I and III, and a third containing R. solanacearum strains from Phylotype IV.

Figure 8
figure 8

Hierarchical clustering of 51 R. solanacearum strains from CGH results. The six sequenced strains are lined by a thin black label. Bootstrap values are figured by grayscale circles.

Full size image

Conclusion

We compared the genome organizations and gene repertoires from six phylogenetically distant and phenotypically divergent strains from the R. solanacearum species complex. These strains shared many structural and genotypic traits observed in the first sequenced strain of R. solanacearum, GMI1000. Our results significantly expanded the known R. solanacearum pan-genome, identifying thousands of genes that more sharply define the common core, the dispensable and the specific (strain-unique) genomes. However, the genomes differed quite significantly. Our ANI and other analyses suggest that this large and heterogeneous species complex spans enough variation that it could be reclassified into at least three distinct taxonomic groups, which each have the equivalent of more than 30% divergence from the other two at the DNA-DNA hybridization level. Post-genomic mining of this pan-genome can combine comparative tools like CGH microarrays with phenotypic experiments to determine the distribution and the biological functions of likely traits identified with in silico analyses. Such combined approaches will increase our understanding of the evolutionary past, the phylogeography, and the biological specialization of R. solanacearum species complex strains. Although four of the six strains sequenced to date were isolated from tomato plants, our analysis did not identify any variations in previously known virulence factors that were unique to tomato pathogens. This could be explained by either 1) an insufficiently large sample of non-tomato pathogen genomes or 2) a biological unity in the core mechanisms of bacterial wilt across all R. solanacearum species complex members, with host specificity and ecological adaptations conferred by traits that remain to be identified. Sequencing of additional species complex members that infect highly divergent plant hosts such as clove trees and plantains will offer additional insights into the traits that confer host specificity on bacterial wilt pathogens.

Methods

Strains

The three sequenced strains were isolated from infected tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) in different geographic locations: CFBP2957 (phylotype IIA-36) was isolated in the French West Indies [Syn. MT5, [55]], CMR15 (phylotype III-29) in Cameroon [56] and PSI07 (phylotype IV-10) in Indonesia [12]. Bacteria were grown at 28°C in B liquid medium [57]. Strains CFBP2957, PSI07 (CFBP7288) and CMR15 (CFBP6941) were deposited at CFBP [58] (Collection Française de Bactéries Phytopathogènes, Angers, France). Table S6 [Additional file 6] provides a list of the 51 R. solanacearum strains used in microarray experiments, with their geographical origin and host of origin.

Sequencing and assembly

Genomic DNA was purified from overnight liquid cultures of each strain using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Sequencing of the R. solanacearum strains CMR15, CFBP2957 and PSI07 was performed using the strategy described by Aury et al. [59]. Around 20× coverage of 454 GSflx reads were mixed with 1× coverage Sanger reads for the scaffolding, which was derived from a 10 kb insert fragment size library. Each library was constructed after mechanical shearing of genomic DNA and cloning of generated inserts into plasmid pCNS (pSU18-derived). Plasmid DNAs were purified and end-sequenced (11520 R. solanacearum PIII, 14592 R. solanacearum PIIA and 7680 R. solanacearum PI) by dye-terminator chemistry with ABI3730 sequencers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) leading to an approximately 1-fold coverage. The sequences were assembled using Newbler (Roche Diagnostics) and validated via the Consed interface [60]. For the finishing phases, we used primer walking of clones and/or PCRs and transposon bombs Template Generation System™ II Kit (TGS™ II Kit) (Finnzyme), Kan3 as well as around 60× coverage using Solexa reads GAI to polish the genome draft.

Automatic and expert annotation of the Ralstonia genomes

Coding sequences (CDS) were predicted using AMIGene (Annotation of Microbial Genomes) software [61]. Each predicted CDS was assigned a unique identifier prefixed with "CMR15_", "CMR15_mp" and "pCMR15_", for R. solanacearum CMR15 (respectively the chromosome, megaplasmid, and plasmid), with "PSI07_", "PSI07_mp" and "pPSI07" for R. solanacearum PSI07 (respectively the chromosome, megaplasmid, and plasmid), and with "RCFBP_", "RCFBP_mp" for R. solanacearum CFBP2957 (respectively the chromosome and megaplasmid). The set of predicted genes were submitted to automatic functional annotation using the tools listed in Vallenet et al. [62]. Apart from the plasmid-encoded genes, the functional assignment was first based on the reference genome of Cupriavidus taiwanensis annotations [63] for strong orthologs i.e., 85% identity over at least 80% of the length of the smallest protein. All these data (syntactic and functional annotations, and results of comparative analysis, see below) are stored in a relational database, called RalstoniaScope. Manual validation of the automatic annotation was performed using the web-based MaGe [64] (Magnifying Genomes) interface, which allows graphic visualization of the annotations enhanced by a synchronized representation of synteny groups in other genomes chosen for comparison. As described by Vallenet et al. [65] the system also offers several functions to guide accurate manual expert annotation. We performed a complete manual annotation of the CMR15 genome and then used it to automatically annotate strong orthologs in PSI07 and CFBP2957. Only 'specific' regions of these two strains, i.e. those containing genes not orthologous to ones in CMR15, were manually annotated. Finally, this expert work was used to update the annotation of GMI1000, which was published in 2002, and to automatically annotate the two other sequenced (but not finished) strains, Molk2 and IPO1609 [24]. Using the available contigs of Molk2 and IPO1909, we were not able to properly organize the corresponding sequences using GMI1000 as a reference genome. Genomes of these two R. solanacearum strains are thus not correctly assembled in MaGe and some analyses remain impossible with these genomes.

Complete sequence data for CFBP2957, CMR15, PSI07, GMI1000, Molk2 and IPO1609 are publicly available via the MaGe interface (RalstoniaScope [66]). Sequences and annotations data of R. solanacearum CFBP2957, CMR15 and PSI07 have also been deposited at the EMBL database [67] [EMBL:FP885897 and EMBL:FP885907 (chromosome and megaplasmid), EMBL:FP885895 and EMBL:FP885896, and EMBL:FP885906 and EMBL:FP885891 respectively. Sequences of plasmids pRSC35 and pRSI13 are available using accession numbers EMBL:FP885893 and EMBL:FP885890].

Genomic Island Identification

We used the RGPfinder tool in the MaGe annotation platform (Roche et al., in preparation) to investigate Regions of Genomic Plasticity (RGPs) in the whole genome sequences of R. solanacearum GMI1000, CMR15, PSIO7, CFBP2957, Molk2 and IPO1609. RGPs are defined as regions of at least 5 kb that are missing in at least one of the genomes compared. This definition makes no assumption about the evolutionary origin or genetic basis of these variable chromosomal segments. RGPfinder searches for synteny breaks between a target genome and a set of closely related bacteria (generally other strains) to define RGPs. It also provides information about composition abnormalities (%G+C deviation, Codon Adaptation Index) and RGP flanking features such as tRNA, IS and repeats, which are common characteristics of genomic islands (GI). Moreover the tool integrates the results of Alien Hunter [68] a method that analyses compositional biases to detect atypical sequences (i.e., sequences potentially acquired by horizontal gene transfer).

Synteny group computation

Sequence data for comparative analyses were obtained from the NCBI database (RefSeq section [69]). Putative orthology relationships between two genomes were defined by gene pairs satisfying either the BBH criterion or an alignment threshold (at least 40% sequence identity over at least 80% of the length of the smallest protein). These relationships were subsequently used to search for synteny groups (i.e., conservation of the chromosomal co-localisation between pairs of orthologous genes from different genomes) among several bacterial genomes using an algorithm based on an exact graph-theoretical approach [70]. This method allowed for multiple correspondences between genes, detection of paralogy relationships, gene fusions, and chromosomal rearrangements (inversion, insertion/deletion). The 'gap' parameter, representing the maximum number of consecutive genes that are not involved in a synteny group, was set to five.

Average nucleotide identity calculation

The average nucleotide identity (ANI) was calculated according to Konstantinidis and Tiedje [51]. Pairwise comparisons between sequences were done separately for chromosomes and megaplasmids (GMI1000, CFBP2957, CMR15 and PSI07), and then for entire genomes (GMI1000, Molk2, IPO1609, CFBP2957, CMR15 and PSI07). Similarity between strains (using Euclidian distance) and dendrogram computation were conducted with the R statistical environment [71], using ape and ade4 libraries [72, 73].

Metabolic network comparison

The metabolic network of each genome was predicted by the "Pathway Tools" software [74] using MetaCyc [75] as a reference pathway database (version 12.0). Starting with the functional annotation performed in MaGe, this software applies selection rules to infer possible metabolic pathways and builds a special database called a PGDB (Pathway/Genome Database). These metabolic networks for each R. solanacearum genome are directly available in the MaGe graphical interface.From those data, a two-dimensional matrix was built, wherein each line represents a Ralstonia genome, and each column a specific pathway measure (according to the Metacyc metabolic classification). Each value corresponds to a pathway completion measure (defined as the number of enzymatic reactions which have been found in a given pathway divided by the total number of reactions in this pathway in Metacyc). This data matrix is the starting point of Principal Component Analysis, which highlights possible metabolic similarities and specificities between the genomes.

All R. solanacearum genomes were considered in this statistical analysis, but only pathways with non-constant completion could be analyzed. After examination of the amount of inertia captured by the method's resulting factors, 2 axes were kept for further analysis (they represent more than 67% of the total dispersion). For graphical representations, the variable (pathways) plot and the individual (genomes) plot were combined, restricting plotted variables to those with a quality of representation greater than 0.75, in order to conserve interpretability. Solely as an additionnal aid to interpretation and to listing readability, for each factorial plane, the pathway variables were hierarchically clustered according to the angles between their vectors. The clustering method used a Euclidean distance and ward's criterion; the number of classes was chosen after manual examination of the cluster tree, and led to 8 classes for the first factorial plane (see also Table S4-A).

CGH microarray experiments

The DNA microarray used in these experiments was generated by C. Boucher and collaborators (INRA-CNRS, Toulouse, France). This spotted microarray consists of 6,516 65-mer and 70-mer oligonucleotides representative of the genes identified from the genomes of R. solanacearum GMI1000 [EMBL:AL646052.1 and EMBL:AL646053.1], IPO1609 [GenBank:NW_002196569.1] and Molk2 [GenBank: NW_002196564.1]. Each gene was represented by a single oligonucleotide except for 115 effector genes, which were represented by two to six oligonucleotides to distinguish allelic forms of a given gene. A limited number of oligonucleotides representative of particular intergenic regions were also included on the microarray. This microarray also includes a set of appropriate negative controls. Each oligonucleotide was spotted twice on the microarray. DNA extraction and labelling, and microarray hybridization were performed as described by Guidot et al [16]. Standard control DNA used for all genome hybridization experiments consisted of an equimolar combination of the genomic DNA from the three sequenced strains GMI1000, IPO1609 and Molk2. Analysis was conducted as previously described using ImaGene and GeneShight (BioDiscovery) softwares [16]. A gene was considered as absent from the tested strain when the base 2 logarithm of the ratio of the normalized hybridization signal of the tested strain over the normalized hybridization signal with the control DNA was lower than the cutoff value of -1 [28].

Abbreviations

ANI:

Average Nucleotide Identity

BBH:

Bidirectional Best Hit

BDB:

Blood Disease Bacterium

CDS:

CoDing Sequence

CFBP:

Collection Française de Bactéries Phytopathogènes

CFU:

Colony Forming Unit

CGH:

Comparative Genomic Hybridization

CWDE:

Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes

EPS:

Exopolysaccharides

GI:

Genomic Island

GR:

Genomic Region

ITS:

Internal Transcribed Spacer

NRPS:

Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthase

PGDB:

Pathway/Genome Database

r3b2:

race3/biovar2

RGP:

Region of Genomic Plsaticity

TTE:

Type Three Effectors

TTSS:

Type Three Secretion System.

References

  1. Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Yano I, Hotta H, Nishiuchi Y: Transfer of two Burkholderia and an Alcaligenes species to Ralstonia gen. Nov.: Proposal of Ralstonia pickettii (Ralston, Palleroni and Doudoroff 1973) comb. Nov., Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith 1896) comb. Nov. and Ralstonia eutropha (Davis 1969) comb. Nov. Microbiol Immunol. 1995, 39: 897-904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hayward AC: Characterristics of Pseudomonas solanacearum. J Appl Bacteriol. 1964, 27: 265-277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buddenhagen I, Kelman A: Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1964, 2: 203-230. 10.1146/annurev.py.02.090164.001223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elphinstone JG: The current bacterial wilt situation: A global overview. Bacterial Wilt: The Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Edited by: Allen C, Prior P, Hayward AC. 2005, St. Paul, Mn, USA: APS Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Janse JD, van den Beld HE, Elphinstone J, Simpkins S, Tjou-Tam-Sin NAA, van Vaerenbergh J: Introduction to Europe of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2, race 3 in Pelargonium zonale cuttings. J Plant Pathol. 2004, 86: 147-155.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Williamson L, Nakaho K, Hudelson B, Allen C: Ralstonia solanacearum race 3, biovar 2 strains isolated from geranium are pathogenic on potato. Plant Disease. 2002, 86: 987-991. 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.9.987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Milling A, Meng F, Denny TP, Allen C: Interactions with Hosts at Cool Temperatures, Not Cold Tolerance, Explain the Unique Epidemiology of Ralstonia solanacearum Race 3 Biovar 2. Phytopathology. 2009, 99: 1127-1134. 10.1094/PHYTO-99-10-1127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lambert CD: Agricultural Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002: Possession, Use, and Transfer of Biological; Agents and Toxins; Interim and Final Rule. Federal Register. 2002, 67: 76907-76938.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vaneechoutte M, Kampfer P, De Baere T, Falsen E, Verschraegen G: Wautersia gen. nov., a novel genus accommodating the phylogenetic lineage including Ralstonia eutropha and related species, and proposal of Ralstonia [Pseudomonas] syzygii (Roberts et al. 1990) comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004, 54: 317-327. 10.1099/ijs.0.02754-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gillings MR, Fahy P: Genomic Fingerprinting: towards a unified view of the Pseudomonas solanacearum species complex. Bacterial wilt: the disease and its causative agent, Pseudomonas solanacearum. Edited by: Hayward AC, Hartman GL. 1994

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taghavi M, Hayward C, Sly LI, Fegan M: Analysis of the phylogenetic relationships of strains of Burkholderia solanacearum, Pseudomonas syzygii, and the blood disease bacterium of banana based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996, 46: 10-15. 10.1099/00207713-46-1-10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fegan M, Prior P: How complex is the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex?. Bacterial Wilt: The Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Edited by: Allen C, Prior P, Hayward AC. 2005, St. Paul, Mn, USA: APS Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palleroni NJ, Doudoroff M: Phenotypic characterization and deoxyribonucleic acid homologies of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Journal of Bacteriology. 1971, 107: 690-696.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayward AC: Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1991, 29: 67-87. 10.1146/annurev.py.29.090191.000433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prior P, Fegan M: Recent development in the phylogeny and classification of Ralstonia solanacearum. Acta Hort. 2005, 695: 127-136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guidot A, Prior P, Schoenfeld J, Carrère S, Genin S, Boucher C: Genomic structure and phylogeny of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum inferred from gene distribution analysis. Journal of bacteriology. 2007, 189: 377-387. 10.1128/JB.00999-06.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eden-Green SJ, Balfas R, Sutarjo T, Jamalius : Characteristics of transmission of Sumatra disease of cloves by tube-building cercopoids, Hindola spp. Plant Pathol. 1992, 41: 702-712. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1992.tb02553.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang JF, Hanson P, Barnes JA: Worldwide evaluation of an international set of resistance sources to bacterial wilt in tomato. Bacterial Wilt Desease: Molecular and Ecological Aspects. Edited by: Prior P, Allen C, Elphinstone J. 1998, Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  19. Salanoubat M, Genin S, Artiguenave F, Gouzy J, Mangenot S, Arlat M, Billault A, Brottier P, Camus JC, Cattolico L: Genome sequence of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Nature. 2002, 415: 497-502. 10.1038/415497a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Genin S, Boucher C: Lessons learned from the genome analysis of Ralstonia solanacearum. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004, 42: 107-134. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.011204.104301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alfano JR, Collmer A: Type III secretion system effector proteins: double agents in bacterial disease and plant defense. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004, 42: 385-414. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040103.110731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schell MA: Control of virulence and pathogenicity genes of Ralstonia solanacearum by an elaborate sensory network. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2000, 38: 263-292. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Poueymiro M, Genin S: Secreted proteins from Ralstonia solanacearum: a hundred tricks to kill a plant. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009, 12: 44-52. 10.1016/j.mib.2008.11.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guidot A, Elbaz M, Carrere S, Siri MI, Pianzzola MJ, Prior P, Boucher C: Specific genes from the potato brown rot strains of Ralstonia solanacearum and their potential use for strain detection. Phytopathology. 2009, 99: 1105-1112. 10.1094/PHYTO-99-9-1105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gabriel DW, Allen C, Schell M, Denny TP, Greenberg JT, Duan YP, Flores-Cruz Z, Huang Q, Clifford JM, Presting G: Identification of open reading frames unique to a select agent: Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19: 69-79. 10.1094/MPMI-19-0069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Klappenbach JA, Dunbar JM, Schmidt TM: rRNA operon copy number reflects ecological strategies of bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000, 66: 1328-1333. 10.1128/AEM.66.4.1328-1333.2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Medini D, Donati C, Tettelin H, Masignani V, Rappuoli R: The microbial pan-genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005, 15: 589-594. 10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guidot A, Coupat B, Fall S, Prior P, Bertolla F: Horizontal gene transfer between Ralstonia solanacearum strains detected by comparative genomic hybridization on microarrays. ISME J. 2009, 3: 549-562. 10.1038/ismej.2009.14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coupat B, Chaumeille-Dole F, Fall S, Prior P, Simonet P, Nesme X, Bertolla F: Natural transformation in the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex: number and size of DNA that can be transferred. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008, 66: 14-24. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00552.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertolla F, Frostegard A, Brito B, Nesme X, Simonet P: During infection of its host, the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum naturally develops a state of competence and exchanges genetic material. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1999, 12: 467-472. 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.5.467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakamura Y, Itoh T, Matsuda H, Gojobori T: Biased biological functions of horizontally transferred genes in prokaryotic genomes. Nat Genet. 2004, 36: 760-766. 10.1038/ng1381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Loper JE, Henkels MD, Shaffer BT, Valeriote FA, Gross H: Isolation and identification of rhizoxin analogs from Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5 by using a genomic mining strategy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 3085-3093. 10.1128/AEM.02848-07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Partida-Martinez LP, Hertweck C: A gene cluster encoding rhizoxin biosynthesis in "Burkholderia rhizoxina", the bacterial endosymbiont of the fungus Rhizopus microsporus. Chembiochem. 2007, 8: 41-45. 10.1002/cbic.200600393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramette A: Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2007, 62: 142-160. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00375.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Deacon J, Cooper RA: D-Galactonate utilisation by enteric bacteria. The catabolic pathway in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1977, 77: 201-205. 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80234-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Diorio C, Cai J, Marmor J, Shinder R, DuBow MS: An Escherichia coli chromosomal ars operon homolog is functional in arsenic detoxification and is conserved in gram-negative bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177: 2050-2056.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moore LE, Pfeiffer R, Warner M, Clark M, Skibola C, Steinmous C, Alguacil J, Rothman N, Smith MT, Smith AH: Identification of biomarkers of arsenic exposure and metabolism in urine using SELDI technology. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2005, 19: 176-10.1002/jbt.20074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Arnold R, Brandmaier S, Kleine F, Tischler P, Heinz E, Behrens S, Niinikoski A, Mewes HW, Horn M, Rattei T: Sequence-based prediction of type III secreted proteins. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5: e1000376-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000376.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Morales VM, Sequeira L: Indigenous plasmids in Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology. 1985, 75: 767-771. 10.1094/Phyto-75-767.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Meinhart A, Alonso JC, Strater N, Saenger W: Crystal structure of the plasmid maintenance system epsilon/zeta: functional mechanism of toxin zeta and inactivation by epsilon 2 zeta 2 complex formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 1661-1666. 10.1073/pnas.0434325100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ceglowski P, Boitsov A, Chai S, Alonso JC: Analysis of the stabilization system of pSM19035-derived plasmid pBT233 in Bacillus subtilis. Gene. 1993, 136: 1-12. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90441-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zielenkiewicz U, Ceglowski P: The toxin-antitoxin system of the streptococcal plasmid pSM19035. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 6094-6105. 10.1128/JB.187.17.6094-6105.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sussman M, Mieog JC, Doyle J, Victor S, Willis BL, Bourne DG: Vibrio zinc-metalloprotease causes photoinactivation of coral endosymbionts and coral tissue lesions. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e4511-10.1371/journal.pone.0004511.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hase CC, Finkelstein RA: Bacterial extracellular zinc-containing metalloproteases. Microbiol Rev. 1993, 57: 823-837.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dow JM, Davies HA, Daniels MJ: A metalloprotease from Xanthomonas campestris that specifically degrades proline/hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins of the plant extracellular matrix. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1998, 11: 1085-1093. 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.11.1085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Eisenhut M: Investigating the role of bacterial zinc-containing metalloproteases in the pathogenesis of complicated pneumococcal pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2008, 36: 1382-1383. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816a0c02.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. El Yacoubi B, Brunings AM, Yuan Q, Shankar S, Gabriel DW: In planta horizontal transfer of a major pathogenicity effector gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73: 1612-1621. 10.1128/AEM.00261-06.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Christie PJ, Atmakuri K, Krishnamoorthy V, Jakubowski S, Cascales E: Biogenesis, architecture, and function of bacterial type IV secretion systems. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005, 59: 451-485. 10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Covacci A, Rappuoli R: Pertussis toxin export requires accessory genes located downstream from the pertussis toxin operon. Mol Microbiol. 1993, 8: 429-434. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01587.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Vergunst AC, Schrammeijer B, den Dulk-Ras A, de Vlaam CM, Regensburg-Tuink TJ, Hooykaas PJ: VirB/D4-dependent protein translocation from Agrobacterium into plant cells. Science. 2000, 290: 979-982. 10.1126/science.290.5493.979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM: Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 2567-2572. 10.1073/pnas.0409727102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM: DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007, 57: 81-91. 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Stackebrandt E, Frederiksen W, Garrity GM, Grimont PAD, Kämpfer P, Maiden MCJ, Nesme X, Rossello-Mora R, Swings J, Trüper HG: Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002, 52: 1043-1047. 10.1099/ijs.0.02360-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Poussier S, Prior P, Luisetti J, Hayward C, Fegan M: Partial sequencing of the hrpB and endoglucanase genes confirms and expands the known diversity within the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2000, 23: 479-486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Prior P, Steva H: Characteristics of strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from the French West Indies. Plant disease. 1990, 74: 13-17. 10.1094/PD-74-0013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mahbou Somo Toukam G, Cellier G, Wicker E, Guibaud C, Kahane R, Allen C, Prior P: Broad Diversity of Ralstonia solanacearum Strains in Cameroon. Plant disease. 2009, 93: 1123-1130. 10.1094/PDIS-93-11-1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Boucher CA, Barberis PA, Trigalet AP, Demery DA: Transposon mutagenesis of Pseudomonas solanacearum: isolation of Tn5-induced avirulent mutants. J Gen Microbiol. 1985, 131: 2449-2457.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. CFBP: Collection Française de Bactéries Phytopathogènes. [http://www-intranet.angers.inra.fr/cfbp/]

  59. Aury JM, Cruaud C, Barbe V, Rogier O, Mangenot S, Samson G, Poulain J, Anthouard V, Scarpelli C, Artiguenave F, Wincker P: High quality draft sequences for prokaryotic genomes using a mix of new sequencing technologies. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 603-613. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-603.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P: Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 195-202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bocs S, Cruveiller S, Vallenet D, Nuel G, Medigue C: AMIGene: Annotation of MIcrobial Genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3723-3726. 10.1093/nar/gkg590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vallenet D, Labarre L, Rouy Z, Barbe V, Bocs S, Cruveiller S, Lajus A, Pascal G, Scarpelli C, Medigue C: MaGe: a microbial genome annotation system supported by synteny results. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: 53-65. 10.1093/nar/gkj406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Amadou C, Pascal G, Mangenot S, Glew M, Bontemps C, Capela D, Carrère S, Cruveiller S, Dossat C, Lajus A: Genome sequence of the beta-rhizobium Cupriavidus taiwanensis and comparative genomics of rhizobia. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 1472-1483. 10.1101/gr.076448.108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. MaGe (Genoscope). [http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/agc/mage]

  65. Vallenet D, Engelen S, Mornico D, Cruveiller S, Fleury L, Lajus A, Rouy Z, Roche D, Salvignol G, Scarpelli C, Medigue C: MicroScope: a platform for microbial genome annotation and comparative genomics. Database. 2009,2009:bap021,

    Google Scholar 

  66. RalstoniaScope. [http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/agc/mage/ralstoniascope]

  67. EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database. [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/embl/]

  68. Vernikos GS, Parkhill J: Interpolated variable order motifs for identification of horizontally acquired DNA: revisiting the Salmonella pathogenicity islands. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 2196-2203. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. NCBI Database, RefSeq Section. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/RefSeq]

  70. Boyer F, Morgat A, Labarre L, Pothier J, Viari A: Syntons, metabolons and interactons: an exact graph-theoretical approach for exploring neighbourhood between genomic and functional data. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 4209-4215. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ihaka R, Gentleman R: R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 1996, 5: 299-314. 10.2307/1390807.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Doledec S, Olivier JM: ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Statistics and Computing. 1997, 7: 75-83. 10.1023/A:1018513530268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K: APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20: 289-290. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Karp PD, Paley S, Romero P: The Pathway Tools software. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18: S225-232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Caspi R, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Kaipa P, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Paley S, Rhee SY, Shearer AG, Tissier C: The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: D623-D631. 10.1093/nar/gkm900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Digat B, Escudié A: Reconnaissance du flétrissement bactérien des Solanées aux Antilles Françaises. Phytiatrie et Phytopharmacie. 1967, 16: 187-197.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Van Elsas JD, Kastelein P, de Vries PM, Van Overbeek LS: Effects of ecological factors on the survival and physiology of Ralstonia solanacearum bv. 2 in irrigation water. Can J Microbiol. 2001, 47: 842-854. 10.1139/cjm-47-9-842.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Genin for manuscript review prior to submission, and I. Robène-Soustrade, N. Becker, L. Gagnevin, C. Vernière and L. Costet for assistance in manual annotation. We thank also K. Konstantinidis for sharing perl scripts for ANI calculation, and X. Nesme, S. Brisse and J.P. Euzéby for helpful discussion about phylogeny and taxonomy. DNA sequencing was funded by Genoscope (grant No 133/AP2007-2008) under the authority of Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Direction des Sciences du Vivant, Institut de Génomique. This work was funded by the Fédération Nationale des Producteurs de Plants de Pommes de Terre, Mission-DAR, Grant-7124 of the French Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries. The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) of the European Union, Conseil Régional de La Réunion also provided financial support as part of Biorisk programme. This work was supported by the "Agence Nationale de la Recherche" ANR PFTV MicroScope and the GIS IBiSA.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. CIRAD, UMR Peuplements Végétaux et Bioagresseurs en Milieu Tropical, Saint Pierre, F-97410, La Réunion, France

      Benoît Remenant, Gilles Cellier, Emmanuel Wicker & Olivier Pruvost

    2. Université de Lyon, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR CNRS 5557 Ecologie Microbienne, IFR41 Bio Environnement et Santé, Université Lyon I, Villeurbanne cedex, F-69622, France

      Bénédicte Coupat-Goutaland

    3. CNRS-INRA, Laboratoire Interactions Plantes-Microorganismes, UMR2594, BP52627, Castanet-Tolosan, F-31326, France

      Alice Guidot & Mounira Elbaz

    4. AgroParisTech, ENGREF, 19 avenue du Maine, Paris, F-75732, France

      Gilles Cellier

    5. Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

      Caitilyn Allen

    6. Biosciences Research Division, Department of Primary Industries, 475 Mickleham Rd, Attwood, VIC, 3049, Australia

      Mark Fegan

    7. CNRS-UMR 8030, Laboratoire d'Analyse Bioinformatique en Génomique et Métabolisme, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Direction des Sciences du Vivant, Institut de Génomique, Genoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Evry Cedex, Evry cedex, F-91006, France

      Alexandra Calteau, Gregory Salvignol, Damien Mornico & Claudine Médigue

    8. Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA), Direction des Sciences du Vivant, Institut de Génomique, Genoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Evry Cedex, Evry cedex, F-91006, France

      Sophie Mangenot & Valérie Barbe

    9. INRA-CIRAD, UMR Peuplements Végétaux et Bioagresseurs en Milieu Tropical, Saint Pierre, F-97410, La Réunion, France

      Philippe Prior

    Authors
    1. Benoît Remenant
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Bénédicte Coupat-Goutaland
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Alice Guidot
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Gilles Cellier
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Emmanuel Wicker
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Caitilyn Allen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Mark Fegan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Olivier Pruvost
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Mounira Elbaz
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Alexandra Calteau
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Gregory Salvignol
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Damien Mornico
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    13. Sophie Mangenot
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    14. Valérie Barbe
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    15. Claudine Médigue
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    16. Philippe Prior
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Philippe Prior.

    Additional information

    Authors' contributions

    BR, AG, CA, MF, VB, CM and PP wrote the paper. AC, GS, DM, SM, VB and CM performed genomes sequencing and assembly. AG and ME performed CGH microarrays. BR, BCG, AG, GC, MW and PP carried out manual annotation. BR, CA, OP, GS, DM, CM and PP analyzed data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Bénédicte Coupat-Goutaland, Alice Guidot contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    12864_2010_2973_MOESM1_ESM.XLS

    Additional file 1: genomes overview. Main features of CMR15, CFBP2957, PSI07, GMI1000, Molk2 and IPO1609 genomes. (XLS 28 KB)

    12864_2010_2973_MOESM2_ESM.XLS

    Additional file 2: new CDS GMI1000. New CDS detected in GMI1000 chromosome (sheet 1) and megaplasmide (sheet2). (XLS 88 KB)

    12864_2010_2973_MOESM3_ESM.XLS

    Additional file 3: Genomics Islands. Genomic Island predicted in CMR15 (sheet 1 and 2), CFBP2957 (sheet 3 and 4) and PSI07 (sheet 5 and 6) genomes. (XLS 2 MB)

    12864_2010_2973_MOESM4_ESM.XLS

    Additional file 4: Metabolic pathways. Sheet A: class of each pathway class according to figure 6. Sheet B: Pathway completion. (XLS 102 KB)

    Additional file 5: Virulence genes. CDS involved in virulence. (XLS 76 KB)

    Additional file 6: strains (microarray). Strains used in CGH microarray experiments. (XLS 34 KB)

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Remenant, B., Coupat-Goutaland, B., Guidot, A. et al. Genomes of three tomato pathogens within the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex reveal significant evolutionary divergence. BMC Genomics 11, 379 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-379

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-379

    Keywords

    BMC Genomics

    ISSN: 1471-2164

    Contact us