Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Genomics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

A practical comparison of methods for detecting transcription factor binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments

Teemu D Laajala1, Sunil Raghav1, Soile Tuomela12, Riitta Lahesmaa13, Tero Aittokallio14 and Laura L Elo14*

Author Affiliations

1 Turku Centre for Biotechnology, FI-20521 Turku, Finland

2 Turku Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, FI-20520 Turku, Finland

3 Immune Disease Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

4 Department of Mathematics, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Genomics 2009, 10:618  doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-618

Published: 18 December 2009

Abstract

Background

Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with massively parallel sequencing (ChIP-seq) is increasingly being applied to study transcriptional regulation on a genome-wide scale. While numerous algorithms have recently been proposed for analysing the large ChIP-seq datasets, their relative merits and potential limitations remain unclear in practical applications.

Results

The present study compares the state-of-the-art algorithms for detecting transcription factor binding sites in four diverse ChIP-seq datasets under a variety of practical research settings. First, we demonstrate how the biological conclusions may change dramatically when the different algorithms are applied. The reproducibility across biological replicates is then investigated as an internal validation of the detections. Finally, the predicted binding sites with each method are compared to high-scoring binding motifs as well as binding regions confirmed in independent qPCR experiments.

Conclusions

In general, our results indicate that the optimal choice of the computational approach depends heavily on the dataset under analysis. In addition to revealing valuable information to the users of this technology about the characteristics of the binding site detection approaches, the systematic evaluation framework provides also a useful reference to the developers of improved algorithms for ChIP-seq data.