BMC Genomics

official impact factor 4.21

Open Access Research article

Systemic treatment of xenografts with vaccinia virus GLV-1h68 reveals the immunologic facet of oncolytic therapy

Andrea Worschech1,2,3, Nanhai Chen1, Yong A Yu1, Qian Zhang1, Zoltan Pos3, Stephanie Weibel1,2, Viktoria Raab1,2, Marianna Sabatino3, Alessandro Monaco3, Hui Liu3, Vladia Monsurró6, R Mark Buller4, David F Stroncek5, Ena Wang3, Aladar A Szalay1,2* and Francesco M Marincola3*

Author Affiliations

1 Genelux Corporation, San Diego Science Center, San Diego, California, USA

2 Virchow Center for Experimental Biomedicine and Institute for Biochemistry, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg, Germany

3 Infectious Disease and Immunogenetics Section (IDIS), Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

4 Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA

5 Cellular Processing Section, Department of Transfusion Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

6 Department of Pathology, Immunology Section, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Genomics 2009, 10:301 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-301

Published: 7 July 2009

Abstract

Background

GLV-1h68 is an attenuated recombinant vaccinia virus (VACV) that selectively colonizes established human xenografts inducing their complete regression.

Results

Here, we explored xenograft/VACV/host interactions in vivo adopting organism-specific expression arrays and tumor cell/VACV in vitro comparing VACV replication patterns. There were no clear-cut differences in vitro among responding and non-responding tumors, however, tumor rejection was associated in vivo with activation of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and innate immune host's effector functions (IEFs) correlating with VACV colonization of the xenografts. These signatures precisely reproduce those observed in humans during immune-mediated tissue-specific destruction (TSD) that causes tumor or allograft rejection, autoimmunity or clearance of pathogens. We recently defined these common pathways in the "immunologic constant of rejection" hypothesis (ICR).

Conclusion

This study provides the first prospective validation of a universal mechanism associated with TSD. Thus, xenograft infection by oncolytic VACV, beyond offering a promising therapy of established cancers, may represent a reliable pre-clinical model to test therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating the central pathways leading to TSD; this information may lead to the identification of principles that could refine the treatment of cancer and chronic infection by immune stimulation or autoimmunity and allograft rejection through immune tolerance.