|
Characterization of tab mutants |
|||||
| Name |
# alleles |
recessive/dominantb |
identity |
growth at 37°Cd |
Nop1 patterne |
|
|
|||||
| tab1 |
5 |
recessive |
MTR10c |
inviable |
- |
| tab2 |
2 |
recessive |
NET1 |
slow |
- |
| tab3 |
1 |
recessive |
slow |
+ |
|
| TAB5 |
2 |
semi-dominant |
normal |
+ |
|
| TAB6 |
1 |
dominant |
CDC14 |
slow |
+ |
| TAB7 |
3 |
semi-dominant (-1) dominant (-2) |
normal |
+ |
|
| srpl-31a |
recessive |
- |
|||
|
aWe have not determined if srp1-31 is allelic to tab3, TAB5, or TAB7.bAll alleles were tested for recessiveness/dominance of Tab+ except for TAB7-3.cSee Methods. dAll alleles of a single linkage group displayed similar ts growth phenotype. eAll strains were grown to exponential phase at 25°C, and subjected to indirect immunofluorescence using anti-Nop1 antibodies. The wild type staining pattern was scored as "+", and partial delocalization or fragmented staining patterns were scored as "-". | |||||
Shou and Deshaies BMC Genetics 2002 3:4 doi:10.1186/1471-2156-3-4 |
|||||