Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Association study of 15q14 and 15q25 with high myopia in the Han Chinese population

Yu Qiang1, Wenjin Li1, Qingzhong Wang1, Kuanjun He1, Zhiqiang Li1, Jianhua Chen12, Zhijian Song1, Jia Qu3, Xiangtian Zhou3, Shengying Qin1, Jiawei Shen1, Zujia Wen1, Jue Ji1 and Yongyong Shi145*

Author Affiliations

1 Bio-X Institutes, Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, P.R China

2 Schizophrenia Program, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, P.R China

3 Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325003, P.R China

4 Shanghai Changning Mental Health Center, 299 Xiehe Road, Shanghai 200042, P.R China

5 Institute of Neuropsychiatric Science and Systems Biological Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200042, P.R China

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Genetics 2014, 15:51  doi:10.1186/1471-2156-15-51

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/15/51


Received:23 October 2013
Accepted:1 April 2014
Published:27 April 2014

© 2014 Qiang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Abstract

Background

Refractive errors and high myopia are the most common ocular disorders, and both of them are leading causes of blindness in the world. Recently, genetic association studies in European and Japanese population identified that common genetic variations located in 15q14 and 15q25 were associated with high myopia. To validate whether the same variations conferred risk to high myopia in the Han Chinese population, we genotyped 1,461 individuals (940 controls and 521 cases samples) recruited of Han Chinese origin.

Result

We found rs8027411 in 15q25 (P = 0.012 after correction, OR = 0.78) was significantly associated with high myopia but rs634990 in 15q14 (P = 0.54 after correction), OR = 0.88) was not.

Conclusions

Our findings supported that 15q25 is a susceptibility locus for high myopia, and gene RASGRF1 was possible to play a role in the pathology of high myopia.

Keywords:
RASGRF1 gene; High myopia; Refractive errors; Single nucleotide polymorphism; Correlation Analysis

Background

Myopia, the most common visual disorder in the world, defined as a spherical refractive error of people who see near objects more clearly than far away objects because the images are focused on the vitreous inside the eye rather than on the retina. There is a high prevalence in populations of Asian (40%–70%) and European (20%–42%) descent [1,2]. And, high myopia, with prevalence 1%–2% in the general population, refers to myopic eyes with very long axial lengths (26 mm) or a high degree of myopic refractive error (6D). High myopia is associated with increased risk of the development of sight-threatening eye diseases, such as glaucoma, macular hemorrhage, retinal detachment, visual impairment, and blindness.

Recently, the incidence of high myopia has been increasing worldwide, especially in the younger East Asian population. In a population of Japanese students 3 to 17 years old, the prevalence of myopia increased from 49.3 to 65.6% [3,4]. In other countries, the prevalence of myopia shows variable ratio (36.7–87.2% in a Chinese, 19.8–62.1% in a general Asian group, 5.2–40.5% in a Caucasian group aged 5–17 years, and 2.3–14.7% in Australian children aged from 4 to 12 years [5,6]. Different countries and regions show considerable variability of prevalence rates [7]. The etiology of refractive errors and myopia is complex, and it is not fully understood. However, it has been agreed that both the environmental factors, such as proximity to work, higher educational background, [8] urbanization, outdoor activity, etc., and genetic factors play a role in developing myopia [9]. Numerous cross-sectional studies suggest that genetic heritability might be as high as 80% [10]. Segregation analyses suggest the involvement of multiple genes rather than a single major gene effect [11]. Linkage studies have reported many candidate genes of high myopia, including MYP1 on Xq28, MYP2 on 18p, MYP3 on 12q, MYP4 on 7q, MYP5 on 17q, MYP6 on 22q12, MYP7 on 11p13, MYP8 on 3q26, MYP9 on 4q12, MYP10 on 8p23, MYP11 on 4q22-q27, MYP12 on 2q37.1, MYP13 on Xq23-q25, and MYP14 on 1p36 [6,12-14].

Now, genome-wide association study (GWAS) is widely used to reveal the susceptibility genes of many complex diseases. However, no GWAS on refractive error or myopia has previously been reported until Solouki et al.[11] and Hysi et al. carried out GWASs in European descent populations and identified loci at 15q14 and 15q25 to be associated with common myopia and refractive error [10].

In 2011, Hayasbi et al. [3] performed a study to validate whether variations in chromosome 15q14 and 15q25 are associated to refractive error and myopia in the Japanese population, and their results illustrated that rs524952 in 15q14 was associated with high myopia but SNPs in 15q25 were not. Another study of the Han Chinese population conducted by Shi et al.[1] found the most significant loci in 15q14 and 15q25 were not associated with high myopia. However, they did not obtain the replication experiment data genotyping the specific loci in their study by using 419 cases and 669 controls.

In this study, we specifically selected the most significant SNPs reported in 15q14 and 15q25 to be our targets. We genotyped 940 unrelated normal controls and 521 unrelated individuals with high myopia of Han Chinese origin by Taqman technology.

Methods

Ethics statement

The completion of the entire research design and procedures involved were submitted to the ethics committee of Bio-X center Shanghai Jiao Tong University and got approved. We declare that our research was in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration (http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ webcite). Before the study began, each participant was clearly explained about the procedure and purpose of the study and consent to participate to the research. All data were recorded anonymously and participants could withdraw their file if requested.

Samples

Sample information was shown in Table  1. All samples were selected from the east China. 688 controls were randomly recruited from Shanghai city, and 252 controls and 521 cases were recruited from Zhejiang Province. All cases were HM patients with myopia of -6.00D or less suffering from fundus injury. All controls were free of myopia and fundus diseases. The mean age of cases (200 males and 321 females) was 36 ± 14.95, and the mean age of controls was 42.5 ± 13.3 and 31 ± 10.66 based on two batches of samples respectively.

Table 1. Characteristics of the study population

DNA extraction

All DNA samples were extracted from peripheral whole blood of each subject using a Tiangen DNA extraction kit (Biotech, Beijing, China). Genomic DNA was diluted to working concentrations of 10 ng/ml for the genotyping step.

Genotyping

Two SNPs (rs634990, rs8027411) were selected based on their specific presence in two previous GWASs. Genotyping was carried out by a commercially available assay using the Taqman method on two platform (BioMark™96.96 Genotyping array, Fludigm, South San Francisco, CA) (TaqMan SNP assay with the ABI PRISM 7700 system; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The mean call rate for all markers was 99%.

Statistical analysis

For our, association analysis of the sample was conducted by SHEsis (http://analysis.bio-x.cn webcite), including the calculation allele and genotype frequencies, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and pairwise linkage disequilibrium. The significance level was set at α = .05. There was no significant deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the controls (P ≥ .05). To avoid the false positive results, we performed Bonferroni correction for P values.

Results

We genotyped two SNPs (rs634990 and rs8027411) in 940 controls and 521 cases in total. The characteristics of our sample set were listed in Table  1. Results were shown in Table  2. The distribution of the genotypes of those two SNPs was in HWE (P ≥ 0.05).

Table 2. Association between phenotype of high myopia and genetic variants at 15q14 and 15q25 in the Han Chinese Population

Finally, we found SNP rs8027411 in 15q25 was associated with high myopia (P = 0.012), and the risk allele was consistent with the previous report. However, another SNP rs634990 showed no association (P = 0.54, OR = 0.88[0.76-1.04]). According to the genotypic OR analysis, we observed an additive risk effect of allele T of rs8027411 (Table  2), which is consistent with the allelic result. There was no deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the control subjects of each SNP.

Discussion

High myopia has been thought to be a complex disease which is affected by multiple factors, and many studies have revealed the susceptibility genes associated with high myopia. Several chromosome loci have been reported to be associated with common myopia, high myopia, or both. However, as we mentioned previously, the consistency among those reports is poor. In our study, we validated rs8027411 in 15q25 to be associated with high myopia identified in the Han Chinese population. The same SNP was reported recently in a GWAS of Caucasians, although the Caucasian cohort analysis was population-based and the proportion of patients with high myopia was very rare (1.7%–4.0%).

The validated SNP rs8027411 is on chromosome 15q25 and locates in the transcription initiation site of RASGRF1 (Figure  1), it encodes Ras protein-specific guanine nucleotide-releasing factor1 [10]. The gene RASGRF1 location and SNP rs8027411 information are shown in Figure  1. RASGRF1 is a large gene which extents 130 kb, including 28 known exons and various mRNA transcripts (Figure  1). Hysi et al. found that RASGRF1 expression can activate Ras by encoding protein which is highly expressed in neurons and retina in mice implicating this gene has functional influence on myopia pathogenesis [10]. Furthermore, the expression of RASGRF1 is up-regulated by stimulated level of muscarinic receptors and retinoic acid [15,16]. Another evidence of knockdown model indicating that RASGRF1 is contributed to myopia is that knockdown mouse models remain normal brain structure but have worse performance in exercises including long-term memory than wild-type mice [17]. It is caused by Lack of RASGRF1 encoding, which causes severe deficiencies in photoreception and visual sensory processes though it remains a morphologically complete retina. More profoundly, it can alter downstream expression of many genes, including genes causing severe Mendelian vision disorders [17]. Above all, RASGRF1 appears to be related in the maintenance of normal function of the retina and possibly in the signaling pathways determining myopia.

thumbnailFigure 1. Integrated maps: genomic context and SNPs information of the rs8027411.

Comparatively, C. Klaver et al. identified a susceptibility locus rs634990 in 15q14 with a genome-wide association in a Dutch Population-based study [11]. Previous study showed that the gene GJD2, which is nearest to the susceptibility locus rs634990 and RASGRF1 play important parts in the transmission and processing of visual signals which further continue or halt eye growth originated within the retina [18,19]. However, we found no significant association between rs634990 and high myopia, with P value = 0.54, OR = 0.88 (0.76-1.04). The limitation of sample size or genetic heterogeneity can be the possible reason.

Recently, Verhoeven et al. reported a comprehensive Genome-wide meta-analysis of multi-ancestry cohorts identified multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia [20]. According their findings, rs524952 in 15q14 (P = 1.44 × 10-15) and rs4778879 (P = 4.25 × 10-11) in 15q25 showed genome-wide significant association with myopia. We noticed that rs524952 is adjacent to rs634990 with a distance between them less than 200 bp; and the distance between rs8027411 and rs4778879 is about 88 kb. By a linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis based on HapMap CHB and JPT samples, we got pairwise D’ = 1, r2 = 1 for rs634990 and rs524952, and pairwise D’ = 0.75, r2 = 0.47 for rs8027411 and rs4778879. Our result of rs634990 (adjusted P = 0.54) indicated rs524952 was not associated with HM in the Han Chinese population, while the association of rs4778879 was considered to be supported by our result of rs634990 (adjusted P = 0.012).

Compare to the validation study performed in the Japanese population, we selected extremely high myopia patients to be cases, and all controls were free of myopia and fundus diseases. Moreover, our sample size is larger. However, independent studies with larger sample set will be more helpful. Pathological myopia is distinguished from common myopia or low/moderate myopia by excessive increase in axial length of the eyeball, which is the most important contributor to the myopic refraction. According to Nakanishi et al.’s study in 2009, pathological myopia patients should have axial length greater than 26.0 mm in both eyes, and this criterion is equivalent to “refractive errors greater than -6 D” [20]. Therefore, the HM patients in our study can be considered as pathological myopia patients.

Conclusion

We found that SNP rs8027411 is significantly associated to high myopia in the Han Chinese population. The association of rs634990 in 15q14 was not validated. Moreover, RASGRF1 gene in 15q25 is considered to be the susceptibility gene, and it is involved in learning, visual processing and muscarinic signaling pathways, all of which are considered to be correlated with myopia [10]. The identification of this locus in large Han Chinese sample set may give valid evidence to the research of the pathogenesis of high myopia.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

YS conceived, designed the study, and supervised the study. YQ carried out the population-based genetic studies, participated in the genotyping and drafted the manuscript. WL and QW participated in the genotyping and data analysis. ZL, KH and JC performed the statistical analysis. JQ, XZ and SQ organized sample selecting part. ZS and JS participated in the manuscript drafting. ZW and JJ helped the data collection and data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgement

We are sincerely thankful to all the participants for their participation in this study and all the doctors working on this project. We also thank editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (31325014, 81130022, 81272302, 31000553, 81121001), the National 863 project (2012AA02A515), the 973 Program (2010CB529600), Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT1025), the National Key Technology R & D Program (2012BAI01B09), the Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China (201026), Shanghai Rising-Star Program (12QA1401900), and “Shu Guang” project supported by Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation (12SG17). No biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest declared.

References

  1. Shi Y, Qu J, Zhang D, Zhao P, Zhang Q, Tam PO, Sun L, Zuo X, Zhou X, Xiao X, Hu J, Li Y, Cai L, Liu X, Lu F, Liao S, Chen B, He F, Gong B, Lin H, Ma S, Cheng J, Zhang J, Chen Y, Zhao F, Yang X, Chen Y, Yang C, Lam DS, Li X, et al.: Genetic variants at 13q12.12 are associated with high myopia in the Han Chinese population.

    Am J Hum Genet 2011, 88(6):805-813. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. He M, Zheng Y, Xiang F: Prevalence of myopia in urban and rural children in mainland China.

    Optom Vis Sci 2009, 86(1):40-44. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Hayashi H, Yamashiro K, Nakanishi H, Nakata I, Kurashige Y, Tsujikawa A, Moriyama M, Ohno-Matsui K, Mochizuki M, Ozaki M, Yamada R, Matsuda F, Yoshimura N: Association of 15q14 and 15q25 with high myopia in Japanese.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011, 52(7):4853-4858. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Bar Dayan Y, Levin A, Morad Y, Grotto I, Ben-David R, Goldberg A, Onn E, Avni I, Levi Y, Benyamini OG: The changing prevalence of myopia in young adults: a 13-year series of population-based prevalence surveys.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005, 46(8):2760-2765. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Kempen JH, Mitchell P, Lee KE, Tielsch JM, Broman AT, Taylor HR, Ikram MK, Congdon NG, O'Colmain BJ, Eye Diseases Prevalence Research G: The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia.

    Arch Ophthal 2004, 122(4):495-505. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Nishizaki R, Ota M, Inoko H, Meguro A, Shiota T, Okada E, Mok J, Oka A, Ohno S, Mizuki N: New susceptibility locus for high myopia is linked to the uromodulin-like 1 (UMODL1) gene region on chromosome 21q22.3.

    Eye 2009, 23(1):222-229. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC, Chua WH: Myopia and associated pathological complications.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005, 25(5):381-391. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Seah SK: Education, socioeconomic status, and ocular dimensions in Chinese adults: the Tanjong Pagar Survey.

    Br J Ophthalmol 2002, 86(9):963-968. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  9. Lyhne N, Sjolie AK, Kyvik KO, Green A: The importance of genes and environment for ocular refraction and its determiners: a population based study among 20-45 year old twins.

    Br J Ophthalmol 2001, 85(12):1470-1476. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  10. Hysi PG, Young TL, Mackey DA, Andrew T, Fernandez-Medarde A, Solouki AM, Hewitt AW, Macgregor S, Vingerling JR, Li YJ, Ikram MK, Fai LY, Sham PC, Manyes L, Porteros A, Lopes MC, Carbonaro F, Fahy SJ, Martin NG, Duijn CM, Spector TD, Rahi JS, Santos E, Klaver CC, Hammond CJ: A genome-wide association study for myopia and refractive error identifies a susceptibility locus at 15q25.

    Nat Genet 2010, 42(10):902-905. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Solouki AM, Verhoeven VJ, van Duijn CM, Verkerk AJ, Ikram MK, Hysi PG, Despriet DD, van Koolwijk LM, Ho L, Ramdas WD, Czudowska M, Kuijpers RW, Amin N, Struchalin M, Aulchenko YS, Rij G, Riemslag FC, Young TL, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Gorgels TG, Willemse-Assink JJ, Isaacs A, Kramer R, Swagemakers SM, Bergen AA, Oosterhout AA, Oostra BA, Rivadeneira F, Uitterlinden AG, et al.: A genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus for refractive errors and myopia at 15q14.

    Nat genetics 2010, 42(10):897-901. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Hammond CJ, Andrew T, Mak YT, Spector TD: A susceptibility locus for myopia in the normal population is linked to the PAX6 gene region on chromosome 11: a genomewide scan of dizygotic twins.

    Am J Hum Genet 2004, 75(2):294-304. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  13. Young TL, Ronan SM, Alvear AB, Wildenberg SC, Oetting WS, Atwood LD, Wilkin DJ, King RA: A second locus for familial high myopia maps to chromosome 12q.

    Am J Hum Genet 1998, 63(5):1419-1424. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  14. Paluru P, Ronan SM, Heon E, Devoto M, Wildenberg SC, Scavello G, Holleschau A, Makitie O, Cole WG, King RA, Czudowska M, Kuijpers RW, Amin N, Struchalin M, Aulchenko YS, Rij G, Riemslag FC, Young TL, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Gorgels TG, Willemse-Assink JJ, Isaacs A, Kramer R, Swagemakers SM, Bergen AA, Oosterhout AA, Oostra BA, Rivadeneira F, Uitterlinden AF, et al.: New locus for autosomal dominant high myopia maps to the long arm of chromosome 17.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003, 44(5):1830-1836. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Tonini R, Mancinelli E, Balestrini M, Mazzanti M, Martegani E, Ferroni A, Sturani E, Zippel R: Expression of Ras-GRF in the SK-N-BE neuroblastoma accelerates retinoic-acid-induced neuronal differentiation and increases the functional expression of the IRK1 potassium channel.

    Eur J Neurosci 1999, 11(3):959-966. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Mattingly RR, Macara IG: Phosphorylation-dependent activation of the Ras-GRF/CDC25Mm exchange factor by muscarinic receptors and G-protein beta gamma subunits.

    Nature 1996, 382(6588):268-272. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Brambilla R, Gnesutta N, Minichiello L, White G, Roylance AJ, Herron CE, Ramsey M, Wolfer DP, Cestari V, Rossi-Arnaud C, Grant SG, Chapman PF, Lipp HP, Sturani E, Klein R: A role for the Ras signalling pathway in synaptic transmission and long-term memory.

    Nature 1997, 390(6657):281-286. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Deans MR, Volgyi B, Goodenough DA, Bloomfield SA, Paul DL: Connexin36 is essential for transmission of rod-mediated visual signals in the mammalian retina.

    Neuron 2002, 36(4):703-712. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  19. Fernandez-Medarde A, Barhoum R, Riquelme R, Porteros A, Nunez A, de Luis A, de Las RJ, de la Villa P, Varela-Nieto I, Santos E: RasGRF1 disruption causes retinal photoreception defects and associated transcriptomic alterations.

    J Neurochem 2009, 110(2):641-652. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Verhoeven VJ, Hysi PG, Wojciechowski R, Fan Q, Guggenheim JA, Höhn R, MacGregor S, Hewitt AW, Nag A, Cheng C-Y: Genome-wide meta-analyses of multiancestry cohorts identify multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia.

    Nat Genet 2013, 45(3):314-318. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL