Table 7

Summary of results of the HyperLasso for the simulated data with main and epistatic effects
Parameters True/False positive effectsa
Shapea Inverse scale b Type I error α
0.1 8.5 × 10-4 0.05 17/18
0.05 7.6 × 10-4 19/18
0.01 6.8 × 10-4 19/19
0.1 4.9 × 10-4 0.01 17/7b
0.05 4.4 × 10-4 17/8
0.01 3.9 × 10-4 17/8
0.1 1.3 × 10-4 <a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/14/5/mathml/M92','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/14/5/mathml/M92">View MathML</a> 5/0
0.05 1.1 × 10-4 5/0
0.01 1.0 × 10-4 8/0
0.1 1.1 × 10-4 <a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/14/5/mathml/M93','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/14/5/mathml/M93">View MathML</a> 5/0
0.05 1.0 × 10-4 5/0
0.01 0.9 × 10-4 5/0

aEffects with p-value ≤ 0.05 were considered as significant different from zero.

bThe optimal results chosen for comparison with other methods.

Huang et al.

Huang et al. BMC Genetics 2013 14:5   doi:10.1186/1471-2156-14-5

Open Data