Table 3

QTLs detected with a LOD score higher than 3 in the four trials
QTL Location/LG Methods of QTL detection Position (cM) Length (cM) Closest marker MQM LODc MQM R2(%) Additive effect
HN2009
Qfld.zaas-10a LG10 IM, MQMb 28.7-50.1 21.4 Clm1113 3.94 17.2 0.89
Qfld.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 10.3-37.1 26.8 1_1103 10.59 40.1 1.35
Qnff.zaas-4 LG4 MQM 2-19.4 17.4 1_0504 3.23 9.9 0.48
Qnff.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 10.3-42.3 32 Clm1206 8.44 33.3 0.86
Qpn.zaas-3 LG3 IM, MQM 47.3-61.7 14.4 Clm0614 4.53 20.1 1.7
Qls.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 9.3-42.3 33 1_1103 11.2 42.1 −0.69
SX2009
Qfld.zaas-10 LG10 IM, MQM 31.5-39.7 8.2 VM26 5.6 23.6 0.9
Qfld.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 10.3-42.3 32 1_0043 5.32 22.7 0.89
Qls.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 22.6-36.1 13.5 1_1103 3.51 16.1 −0.32
HN2010
Qfld.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 6.4-42.3 35.9 1_0043 10.54 40.1 1.1
Qnff.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 13.3-41.5 28.2 Clm1135 4.98 22.5 0.61
Qpn.zaas-3 LG3 IM, MQM 49.3-56.6 7.3 Clm0614 5.11 21.9 1.62
Qls.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 11.3-42.3 31 Clm1135 6.98 29 −0.5
SX2010c
Qfld.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 6.4-43.3 36.9 1_0043 5.91 24.8 0.91
Qpn.zaas-2 LG2 IM, MQM 69.4-79.1 9.7 Clm0089 3.56 16.1 2.31
Qpn.zaas-3 LG3 IM, MQM 29.2-61.7 32.5 Clm0614 6.11 26.1 2.17
Qls.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 10.3-42.3 32 Clm0007 6.06 26.7 −0.58

a FLD: days to first flowering, NFF: nodes to first flower, LS: leaf senescence, PN: pod number per plant.

b IM: interval mapping, MQM: multiple-QTL mode mapping.

c The trait of NFF not investigated in this experiment.

Xu et al.

Xu et al. BMC Genetics 2013 14:4   doi:10.1186/1471-2156-14-4

Open Data