Table 6

Comparisons of the haplotype diversity of GSTM cluster in populations of Tver, Murom, Kursk and HapMap populations (CEU, CHB, JPT, YRI) *
MUROM KURSK СЕU CHB JPT YRI Number of haploblock The level of significance
TVER 0,5078 0,5183 0,2862 0,0021 <0,0001 0,4485 I 0,0025
0,3202 0,8943 0,2160 <0,0001 <0,0001 <0,0001 II 0,0019
0,9120 0,9206 0,7647 <0,0001 <0,0001 <0,0001 III 0,0025
MUROM 0,6541 0,3994 0,0027 <0,0001 0,5856 I 0,0025
0,4052 0,1369 <0,0001 <0,0001 <0,0001 II 0,0019
0,9392 0,5527 <0,0001 <0,0001 <0,0001 III 0,0025
KURSK 0,0811 0,0313 0,0018 0,1701 I 0,0025
0,0906 <0,0001 <0,0001 <0,0001 II 0,0019
0,8592 <0,0001 <0,0001 <0,0001 III 0,0025

* Pairwise P-values are presented. The last column contains Bonferroni adjusted P-values calculated for each block. The calculations was performed using the formula P = 0.05/ ([n × a] – 1), where “n” is the number of haplotypes and “a” is the number of populations [16].

Filippova et al.

Filippova et al. BMC Genetics 2012 13:89   doi:10.1186/1471-2156-13-89

Open Data