Table 1 |
|||||
|
Proportion of estimated QTL locations at marker locations according to the population size under H0 |
|||||
|
Number of individuals (s × d × p)1 |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
60 (3 × 1 × 20) |
100 (5 × 1 × 20) |
300 (5 × 2 × 30) |
400 (5 × 2 × 40) |
800 (5 × 4 × 40) |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Proportion2 (%) |
64.2 |
63.8 |
65.3 |
67.1 |
66.0 |
|
|
|||||
|
1The population structure was a mixture of full and half sib families for given numbers of sires (s), dams per sire (d), and progeny per dam (p). 2Proportion of QTL located at a marker position (3 markers at 0 M, 0.2 M and 0.4 M). |
|||||
|
Wang et al. BMC Genetics 2012 13:29 doi:10.1186/1471-2156-13-29 |
|||||
