Table 2 |
|||||
|
Direct assignment of the escapees to sample for different sets of loci. |
|||||
|
SNPs |
|||||
|
Sample |
10 SNP |
25 SNP |
28 unlinked SNPs |
195 mapped SNPs |
300 SNPs |
|
|
|
||||
|
I |
32 |
34 |
34 |
35 |
35 |
|
A-H |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|||||
|
STRs |
|||||
|
Sample |
2 STR |
4 STR |
14 STR |
||
|
|
|
||||
|
I |
42 |
42 |
47 |
||
|
A-H |
6 |
6 |
1 |
||
|
|
|||||
|
STR and SNP combined |
|||||
|
Sample |
4STR + 10 SNP |
4 STR + 25 SNP |
14 STR + 300 SNP |
||
|
|
|
||||
|
I |
46 |
47 |
49 |
||
|
A-H |
3 |
2 |
0 |
||
|
|
|||||
|
SNP loci were selected by highest global FST whereas STRs were selected by number of alleles. 28 unlinked SNPs = highest global FST for each of the linkage groups. 195 mapped SNPs only includes SNPs > 1 cM distance from next SNP. Different total numbers of escapees in the different data sets is due to differences in numbers of individuals genotyped. |
|||||
|
Glover et al. BMC Genetics 2010 11:2 doi:10.1186/1471-2156-11-2 |
|||||