Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Relaxin gene family in teleosts: phylogeny, syntenic mapping, selective constraint, andexpression analysis

BMC Evolutionary Biology volume 9, Article number: 293 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In recent years, the relaxin family of signaling molecules has been shown to play diverse roles in mammalian physiology, but little is known about its diversity or physiology in teleosts, an infraclass of the bony fishes comprising ~ 50% of all extant vertebrates. In this paper, 32 relaxin family sequences were obtained by searching genomic and cDNA databases from eight teleost species; phylogenetic, molecular evolutionary, and syntenic data analyses were conducted to understand the relationship and differential patterns of evolution of relaxin family genes in teleosts compared with mammals. Additionally, real-time quantitative PCR was used to confirm and assess the tissues of expression of five relaxin family genes in Danio rerio and in situ hybridization used to assess the site-specific expression of the insulin 3-like gene in D. rerio testis.

Results

Up to six relaxin family genes were identified in each teleost species. Comparative syntenic mapping revealed that fish possess two paralogous copies of human RLN3, which we call rln3a and rln3b, an orthologue of human RLN2, rln, two paralogous copies of human INSL5, insl5a and insl5b, and an orthologue of human INSL3, insl3. Molecular evolutionary analyses indicated that: rln3a, rln3b and rln are under strong evolutionary constraint, that insl3 has been subject to moderate rates of sequence evolution with two amino acids in insl3/INSL3 showing evidence of positively selection, and that insl5b exhibits a higher rate of sequence evolution than its paralogue insl5a suggesting that it may have been neo-functionalized after the teleost whole genome duplication. Quantitative PCR analyses in D. rerio indicated that rln3a and rln3b are expressed in brain, insl3 is highly expressed in gonads, and that there was low expression of both insl5 genes in adult zebrafish. Finally, in situ hybridization of insl3 in D. rerio testes showed highly specific hybridization to interstitial Leydig cells.

Conclusions

Contrary to previous studies, we find convincing evidence that teleosts contain orthologues of four relaxin family peptides. Overall our analyses suggest that in teleosts: 1) rln3 exhibits a similar evolution and expression pattern to mammalian RLN3, 2) insl3 has been subject to positive selection like its mammalian counterpart and shows similar tissue-specific expression in Leydig cells, 3) insl5 genes are highly represented and have a relatively high rate of sequence evolution in teleost genomes, but they exhibited only low levels of expression in adult zebrafish, 4) rln is evolving under very different selective constraints from mammalian RLN. The results presented here should facilitate the development of hypothesis-driven experimental work on the specific roles of relaxin family genes in teleosts.

Background

The relaxin family of peptides belongs to the insulin superfamily and includes a group of signaling molecules that share similar gene and protein secondary structures. The genes have two exons that code for a prepropeptide consisting of a signal peptide, followed by B-, C-, and A-chains. Prohormone processing and activation occurs by removal of the C-chain by prohormone convertases that cleave at dibasic junctions [1]. In the mature peptide, six cysteine residues form three disulfide bonds that give this superfamily its distinctive secondary protein structure. In most mammals, the relaxin family consists of two relaxin peptides, RLN and RLN3, which share the receptor binding domain RXXXRXXI/V and four insulin-like peptides, INSL3, INSL4, INSL5, and INSL6, which have a less conserved motif [2]. Additionally, relaxin family peptides activate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) while other members of the insulin superfamily signal via tyrosine kinases [3].

The hormone RLN was the first member of the family to be studied in detail [2]. Originally characterized as a reproductive hormone [4], RLN is now implicated in diverse physiological processes, via its role in stimulating the production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) which degrade extracellular matrix proteins and cause tissue remodeling [2]. By this action, the hormone is involved in parturition where it softens the connective tissues of the reproductive tract and prepares the mammary glands for lactation [2]; RLN has also been found to be involved in diverse processes involving tissue remodeling such as wound healing, angiogenesis and tumor formation [5, 6]. In mammals, the RLN gene tandemly duplicated to give rise to two additional members of the family, INSL4 and INSL6, both of which are poorly understood, but which are both predominantly expressed in placenta and testis [7]. A more recent duplication of the RLN gene, specific to humans and anthropoid apes, resulted in primates having two copies of RLN, called RLN1 and RLN2, with RLN2 being functionally equivalent to the RLN in other mammals [2]. More recently, other members of the relaxin family have been identified: RLN3 was found to be expressed in the brain and testis of rodents and to exhibit high sequence conservation across mammalian species [8, 9]. This led to predictions that RLN3 may function as a neuropeptide [8], which has received some empirical support because the peptide has been shown to be involved in the modulation of feeding activities, body weight regulation and in stress coordination, learning and memory [10, 11].

Another member of the relaxin family, insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3), attracted the attention of andrologists after it was discovered to play a crucial role in testicular descent in young males of human and mice [12]. There is also evidence that INSL3 is a survival factor for male and female germ cells in mammals [12, 13]: it is expressed in significant amounts in testicular Leydig cells, while in females the distribution of INSL3 producing sites is less specifically localized, detected mainly in ovarian follicular theca cells [12]. However, the receptor for INSL3, RXFP2, has been identified in a broad range of tissues: brain, kidney, muscle, testis, thyroid, uterus, lymphocytes and bone marrow [12]. One of the least understood members of the relaxin family is INSL5, which was originally identified from analyses of expressed sequence tags in the human genome [14], and its expression has been detected in fetal brain, pituitary and colon as well as in the cortex of the thymus gland [15, 16]. The receptor for INSL5, RXFP4, is broadly distributed in the human body, but the colon appears to be the most prominent site of RXFP4 mRNA expression. This is consistent with current hypotheses that it is involved in gut contractility and neuroendocrine signaling [15, 16]. Thus, collectively, the relaxin family is revealing itself to be a group of peptides primarily involved in reproductive processes in mammals, and at the same time plays a broader role in other aspects of mammalian physiology.

Investigation on relaxin family peptides outside mammals has been limited. Relaxin-like peptides have been found in the testis, ovary, and/or alkaline glands of three species of sharks [17–21] and in bird testis [22]. However, there are only a few physiological studies on the expression of relaxin in teleosts [23, 24], which are an infraclass of the bony fishes, and comprise 96% of the 26,000 ray-finned fish species and ~ half of all vertebrates on the planet [25].

Molecular estimates indicate that the common ancestor of teleosts and tetrapods existed ~ 450 million years ago (mya) [25, 26]. A whole genome duplication (WGD), that occurred early in teleost evolution, ~ 350 mya, is hypothesized to have contributed to the rapid divergence of the group in part because of the opportunities that WGD's offer for acquisition of new gene functions [27, 28]. After gene duplication, newly derived paralogous sequences are assumed to share similar functions to the ancestral gene. However, over time, the genes may be non-, sub- or neo-functionalized [29, 30]. Because the teleost WGD event is ancient, examination of the proportional frequency and consequences of non-, sub- and neo-functionalization in teleosts have provided important insights into the role of gene duplication in vertebrates [31–35].

There have been two previous bioinformatics studies on the relaxin family [9, 36]. Neither study focused on the molecular evolution nor expression of the family in teleosts, but they both included sequences of relaxin family genes from teleosts. Additionally, Park et al. [36] performed a syntenic data analysis of relaxin family genes in vertebrates and found that the common ancestor of teleosts and tetrapods harboured three independent relaxin family loci (RFL): RFLA - INSL5-like genes, RFLB - RLN-like genes and RFLC - RLN3-like genes. In this paper we expand upon these previous studies by including 32 relaxin family gene sequences from eight teleost species and by focusing our analyses on understanding the specific forces influencing orthologous and paralogous gene copy evolution of relaxins in teleosts. To this end, detailed analyses of teleost relaxin family genes were performed to assess the number of orthologous and paralogous sequences of relaxins in teleosts, their syntenic relationship to human relaxin family genes, the strength of purifying versus diversifying selection, the role of positive selection at the codon level, the relative expression of relaxin family genes in adult Danio rerio using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and the site-specific expression of insl3 in D. rerio testis using in situ hybridization.

Results

Teleosts possess relaxin family sequences which are orthologous to four human relaxin genes

The syntenic data analysis showed that the six copies of relaxin family sequences analysed in the five teleost species are linked to four loci: two loci are syntenic to human INSL5, termed RFLA by Park et al. (2008), and harbour teleost insl5a and insl5b (Figure 1A); a locus syntenic to the human relaxin cluster (RLN2/RLN1/INSL4/INSL6) termed RFLB (Figure 1B), contains teleost rln; the locus syntenic to human RLN3, RFLCI, contains rln3a and rln3b (Figure 2A), and the locus syntenic to human INSL3, RFLCII, contains teleost insl3 (Figure 2B). RLN3 and INSL3 are ~ 3.8 Mb apart on human chromosome XIX, but they are not linked in teleosts; the genes linked to rln versus insl3 in teleosts split near the equivalent map position at 16 or 17 Mb of human chromosome XIX. A strong support was shown for the orthology between human and teleost relaxin family genes (Figure 1 and 2, Additional File 1: Table S1), although the linkage map for the human relaxin cluster containing RLN1, RLN2, INSL4 and INSL6 was less dense than that for the other chromosomes (Additional File 1: Table S1). Thus, of the six relaxin family genes in teleosts, four were present in the common ancestor of humans and teleosts and two arose as a result of the WGD in teleosts (Figure 3).

Figure 1
figure 1

Synteny maps. Synteny maps comparing the orthologues of the relaxin family loci (RFL) and the genes flanking them in humans (H. sapiens) and five species of teleosts (G. aculeatus, D. rerio, T. nigroviridis, T. rubripes and O. latipes). 1A) RFLA locus contains the INSL5 gene in humans and its teleostean paralogues, insl5a/insl5b; 1B) RFLB locus in humans hosts four relaxin family genes, namely INSL6, INSL4, RLN2 and RLN1; in teleosts this locus is represented by rln gene found as a single copy in all of the analyzed teleost genomes except for D. rerio, in which it is absent; 2A) RFLCI locus is represented by RLN3 in humans, and its paralogues, rln3a/rln3b in teleosts; 2B) RFLCII locus hosts INSL3 in humans, while 3 of the 5 studied teleosts contain single copy orthologues, insl3. The chromosome number (in Roman numerals) and map position of each gene in humans are given on the right. On the left, the genes orthologous to the human RFL are shown by orange hexagons in the central shaded section, and RFL paralogue that arose via the whole genome duplication shown as a white hexagon. Genes flanking the RFL that are syntenic in humans and teleosts are indicated by orange rectangles; the map position of each gene in teleosts is listed in Additional File 1: Table S3. Tandem duplicate copies of genes appear as two rectangles. Genes shown as white rectangles are genes identified on the same chromosome but in more distant locations (Additional File 1: Table S1). The genes PDE4B/SLC35D1/SERBP1/RPE65 (RFLA); JAK2 (RFLB); TNPO2/RFX1/ASF1B/SLC27A1/GLT25D1 (RFLCI); and MED26/NR2F6/UNC13A/KCNN1/MAST3 (RFLCII) were all retained in duplicate in 3 or more species (Additional File 1: Table S1). One gene, NXNL1 RFLCI) was retained tandemly duplicated in 3 species. Three of the 4 RFL linkage groups contained a copy of JAK, and 2 of the 4 contained copies of PDE, SMARCA, RFX and MAST genes.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

Synteny maps. Synteny maps comparing the orthologues of the relaxin family loci (RFL) and the genes flanking them in humans (H. sapiens) and five species of teleosts (G. aculeatus, D. rerio, T. nigroviridis, T. rubripes and O. latipes). 1A) RFLA locus contains the INSL5 gene in humans and its teleostean paralogues, insl5a/insl5b; 1B) RFLB locus in humans hosts four relaxin family genes, namely INSL6, INSL4, RLN2 and RLN1; in teleosts this locus is represented by rln gene found as a single copy in all of the analyzed teleost genomes except for D. rerio, in which it is absent; 2A) RFLCI locus is represented by RLN3 in humans, and its paralogues, rln3a/rln3b in teleosts; 2B) RFLCII locus hosts INSL3 in humans, while 3 of the 5 studied teleosts contain single copy orthologues, insl3. The chromosome number (in Roman numerals) and map position of each gene in humans are given on the right. On the left, the genes orthologous to the human RFL are shown by orange hexagons in the central shaded section, and RFL paralogue that arose via the whole genome duplication shown as a white hexagon. Genes flanking the RFL that are syntenic in humans and teleosts are indicated by orange rectangles; the map position of each gene in teleosts is listed in Additional File 1: Table S3. Tandem duplicate copies of genes appear as two rectangles. Genes shown as white rectangles are genes identified on the same chromosome but in more distant locations (Additional File 1: Table S1). The genes PDE4B/SLC35D1/SERBP1/RPE65 (RFLA); JAK2 (RFLB); TNPO2/RFX1/ASF1B/SLC27A1/GLT25D1 (RFLCI); and MED26/NR2F6/UNC13A/KCNN1/MAST3 (RFLCII) were all retained in duplicate in 3 or more species (Additional File 1: Table S1). One gene, NXNL1 RFLCI) was retained tandemly duplicated in 3 species. Three of the 4 RFL linkage groups contained a copy of JAK, and 2 of the 4 contained copies of PDE, SMARCA, RFX and MAST genes.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Origins of relaxin family genes in teleosts (bottom) and humans (top) determined by synteny map analyses. The ancestral Relaxin Family Loci (AncRFL) that are hypothesized to have been present in the common ancestor of teleosts and humans (tetrapods) are shown in the middle. We infer that AncRFLC duplicated giving rise to RFLCI (rln3) and RFLCII (insl3) prior to the divergence of teleosts and tetrapods. Names for the RFL proposed by Park et al. (2008) are given in brackets and underlined, those not used by Park et al., but inferred from this analyses are given in brackets with a dotted underline. The whole genome duplication (WGD) event resulted in two copies (paralogues) of each of the relaxin family genes in teleosts. AncRFLA gave rise to INSL5 and two paralogues in teleosts, insl5a and insl5b. AncRFLB was the predecessor of three human genes INSL4, INSL6 and RLN2, while the latter additionally underwent a recent duplication in primates producing RLN1. In teleosts, the RFLB gene, rln, is assumed to be orthologous to human RLN2. AncRFLC is hypothesized to have diverged into two loci: RFLCI harbouring RLN3 and the teleostean paralogues, rln3a and rln3b, and RFLCII, harbouring INSL3 and insl3. Duplicated copies of insl3 and rln in teleosts are believed to have been lost due to non-functionalization.

Full size image

Phylogenetic analysis reveals that all teleost relaxin family genes except relaxin group with their mammalian orthologues

Using the nucleotide alignment (Figure 4), hierarchical likelihood ratio tests indicated that the Tamura 3-parameter + Γ (with a = 1.24) model was the most appropriate model of DNA sequence evolution. This model was used for the minimum evolution tree based on the first two codon positions (Figure 5). For the Bayesian trees, the GTR + Γ model of sequence evolution was employed, and partitioning and unlinking the three codon positions revealed that the rate of change was approximately four times higher at the third compared to first and second codon positions (0.51, 0.40 and 2.00 respectively) and that the gamma parameter was 0.98 for the first two positions, but 5.06 for the third position. Hierarchical likelihood tests of the amino acid models included in ProTest v. 1.0.6 and Bayesian methods both strongly supported the WAG + Γ (a = 0.60) model of amino acid sequence evolution which was used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationship among amino acid sequences (Additional File 2: Figure S1). Although the topology of the Bayesian partitioned DNA sequence tree was similar to the Bayesian tree based on amino acid data, the saturation of the third base position lowered confidence in the Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) and led to some problems of long-branch attraction: the two trees shown are the distance (minimum evolution) tree based on DNA (Figure 4) and the Bayesian topology based on the amino acid sequences using the WAG + Γ model of sequence evolution (Additional File 2: Figure S1).

Figure 4
figure 4

Alignment of the deduced amino acid relaxin sequences from mammals and teleost species used for the phylogenetic analysis. Conserved residues are boxed. Location of the relaxin receptor binding motif residues (RXXXRXXI/V), B-chain, A-chain, and twin dibasic junctions (B/C and C/A) are shown. Amino acids that are underlined are those identified as potential candidates of codon-specific positive selection using the branch-site model A analyses (see text for details), but only the two that are in bold and underlined were found to have a significant probability of being subject to positive selection with a BEB probability >0.95.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure 5

Phylogenetic reconstruction of the relationship among relaxin family DNA sequences. Phylogenetic tree reconstructed using the minimum evolution algorithm (a distance method) and including only the first two positions of each codon and employing the Tamura-3-parameter + Γ model of sequence evolution. Numbers at each node indicate the bootstrap values. Genes located at each of the four relaxin family loci, insl5 (RFLA), rln (RFLB), rln3 (RFLCI) and insl3 (RFLCII), are shown in the same colour. Paralogous copies of insl5 (insl5a and insl5b) and rln3 (rln3a and rln3b) that arose after the teleost WGD are indicated. Mammalian INSL6 is a tandemly duplicated member of the relaxin family that is linked and paralogous to mammalian RLN.

Full size image

The phylogenetic tree reconstructed from the DNA sequence data support the presence of four relaxin family groups in teleosts with reasonably high bootstrap support 1) rln3a and rln3b (81%) 2) rln (91%) 3) insl5a and insl5b (86%) and 4) insl3 (50%). All teleost relaxin family genes cluster with their mammalian orthologues as identified through the syntenic data analyses except teleost rln, which is sister clade to rln3 with high bootstrap support (91%) and exhibits, overall, a closer resemblance to these sequences (Figure 4) than to its true orthologue, mammalian RLN. The three frog sequences cluster with their orthologue basal to the teleost clade: in particular the X. tropicalisrln sequence shows greater similarity to teleost rln than to mammalian RLN. The BPP support for the Bayesian tree reconstructed with amino acid sequences gave similar results and statistical support (Additional File 2: Figure S1) to that based on DNA sequence data, with the main exception that teleost insl3 sequences have higher BPP support (74%) than based on the DNA sequence but they do not group with mammalian INSL3.

Teleost relaxin family genes are subject to different levels of purifying selection

The two-cluster test was performed on the topology shown in Figure 5 and identified the following groups as having differential rates of evolution 1) teleost rln3a and rln3b exhibited accelerated evolution compared to mammalian RLN3, 2) teleost insl5 and insl3 independently exhibited accelerated evolution compared to teleost rln3a, rln3b, rln and mammalian RLN3 and 3) teleost insl5b showed accelerated evolution relative to insl5a.

The average value of dn/ds within each relaxin family gene or within the B- and A-chains ranged from 0.05 (rln3b, A-chain) to 0.48 (insl5b, A-chain) in teleosts and from 0.04 (RLN3, B-chain) to 0.78 (INSL6, B-chain) in mammals (Table 1). Values were generally lower in the B- compared to the A-chain. No gene was found to exhibit, overall, evidence of positive selection in which dn/ds > 1. In general, teleost rln3a, rln3b and rln had few non-synonymous changes in both the B- and A-chains; their dn/ds ratios were less than 0.10 indicating that they are under strong purifying selection comparable to mammalian RLN3 which had a dn/ds ratio of 0.08. Teleost insl5a exhibited similar and moderate levels of purifying selection to mammalian INSL5, with the dn/ds ratio in teleosts (0.25) being similar to that in mammals (0.23). On the other hand, teleost insl5b exhibited weaker purifying selection with an overall dn/ds ratio of 0.40, and having dn/ds ratios more than twice that for insl5a in the B- (0.34) and A-chains (0.48). Teleost insl3 exhibited similar (0.37) overall sequence divergence to insl5b. Although insl5b and insl3 are the teleost genes under the weakest evolutionary constraint (a result also supported by the molecular clock analyses), they are under stronger purifying selection than mammalian RLN and INSL6, which have dn/ds ratios of 0.64 and 0.46 respectively, with the B-chain of mammalian INSL6 exhibiting the highest rate of dn/ds at 0.78.

Table 1 Results of the analyses using the branch-site model A of Yang and Nielsen (2002) on relaxin family orthologues in teleosts.
Full size table

The branch-site model A analyses indicated that only insl3 exhibited evidence of codon-specific selection within teleosts or mammals. The null model was rejected when both teleosts and mammals were used as the foreground branch and two amino acids were identified as being subject to positive selection with Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) values of > 0.95. Using teleosts as the foreground lineage, site 27 in the B/C cut site, which is valine/leucine in teleosts but tryptophan in mammals, shows evidence of positive selection. Setting mammalian INSL3 to the foreground branch, identified site 21 in the B-chain, which is fixed as valine in mammals but to serine in teleosts, is also under positive selection (Table 2). An additional 10 sites were identified by the branch-site model as being potential sites of selection but none had BEB values >0.95. However, it is interesting to note that of the 12 sites identified by the model, 3 are in the B/C cut site (Table 2, Figure 4).

Table 2 Proposed nomenclature for relaxin family loci (RFL) in teleosts.
Full size table

Quantitative PCR analysis showed evidence of significant expression of rln3a/rln3b and insl3 genes in the gonads and brain of zebrafish

DNA sequencing of the products amplified using qPCR confirmed the identity of all D. rerio amplification products (not shown). The results of the expression analyses of relaxin family genes in D. rerio indicated that rln3a and rln3b are predominantly expressed in the brain, although rln3b was also expressed in the gonads, while rln3a was not (Figure 6). Additionally, the data strongly support a role for insl3 in both ovary and testes with additional expression of insl3 in the brain and gill: the expression of insl3 was not significantly lower than that of the housekeeping gene, b2m, in ovary, and was only marginally lower than b2m in testis (data not shown). Lastly, the results showed little evidence of expression of either insl5a or insl5b in any tissue: insl5a was expressed in most tissues (except heart) at low levels while insl5b showed uniformly low, essentially negligible, expression (Figure 6).

Figure 6
figure 6

Relative fold increase (with standard deviation) in mRNA expression of five relaxin family genes in six tissues relative to their expression in eye and normalized by the expression of the housekeeping gene, b2m (see text for details). Relative expression of relaxin family genes rln3a, rln3b, insl3, insl5a and insl5b were assessed in the brain, gill, heart, gut, ovary and testis dissected from adult zebrafish.

Full size image

In situ hybridization identified expression of insl3 in zebrafish testis in Leydig cells

A strong and specific signal of insl3 mRNA was observed in the interstitial area in the Leydig cells (Figure 7A). Higher magnification showed that the cytoplasm of these cells was strongly labeled while the nucleus remained unstained (Figure 7B). Positive cells formed clusters that were often arranged around blood vessels. There were no apparent (rostro-caudal or dorso-ventral) gradients in staining intensity in an adult testis, and all Leydig cells appeared to be labeled strongly. However, although not properly quantified yet, it is possible that the size of the Leydig cell clusters is larger in the periphery than in central areas of the testis. The intratubular area, containing Sertoli and germ cells at different stages of spermatogenesis, remained unlabeled. Taken together, these findings suggest that insl3 is a reliable Leydig cell marker in zebrafish testis tissue. No signal was observed with the sense cRNA insl3 probe (data not shown), indicating the specificity of the antisense probe generated against the sequence of zebrafish insl3 mRNA.

Figure 7
figure 7

Whole mount in situ hybridization of insl3 on zebrafish testis. A) Overview of the positive insl3 in situ hybridization signal in zebrafish testis, clearly showing positive insl3 in situ hybridization signal in the interstitial area. B) Detailed view of A, showing that only the cytoplasm of the Leydig cells in zebrafish testis shows the positive in situ hybridization signal. Blood vessels (encircled by dashes) containing erythrocytes are often visible in the Leydig cell clusters. The seminiferous tubules (ST), containing Sertoli cells and germ cells in different stages of spermatogenesis, remain completely unstained.

Full size image

Discussion

Reconstructing the evolutionary relationship among relaxin family genes in teleosts and tetrapods has highlighted the difficulties of determining orthologous and paralogous relationships in ancient gene families using phylogenetic data alone, in particular for small, relatively quickly evolving genes [25, 26]. Previous phylogenetic studies on relaxin family genes [9, 36] have also found a poor resolution of relaxin family genes, particularly in teleosts: by including more teleost species we find that only teleost rln failed to group with its mammalian orthologue and this is evidently due to very different selective pressures operating on the gene in the two groups (see discussion below). Using syntenic mapping data, we identify that the six relaxin family genes in teleosts are orthologous to four mammalian genes: RLN3, RLN, INSL5 and INSL3 with two of the genes, INSL5 and RLN3, containing paralogous copies in teleosts, insl5a/insl5b and rln3a/rln3b (Figure 3). These results are similar to those presented by Park et al. [36] with the exception that we find evidence that teleosts possess an orthologue to INSL3, while they argue that INSL3 arose via duplication from RLN3 after the divergence of teleosts from tetrapods. We therefore propose that the relaxin family genes that were first identified as RLX3a-3f by Wilkinson et al. [9] be named based on their orthology to the mammalian counterparts: rln3a/rln3b, rln, insl5a/insl5b, and insl3 respectively (Table 3). We encourage the adoption of this nomenclature, since there is currently considerable confusion regarding the identity of relaxin family peptides in teleosts on publically available databases.

Table 3 Average pairwise dn/ds values of relaxin family genes in teleost and mammals.
Full size table

In teleosts, these relaxin family genes are subject to strong or moderate purifying selection: rln3a, rln3b and rln are all similar in sequence and highly conserved, insl5a exhibits a slightly faster rate of molecular evolution, and insl3 and insl5b exhibit the highest levels of molecular evolution in teleosts, the latter having a significantly faster rate of evolution than its paralogue insl5a. Using the branch-site model A test, we find evidence that one codon in teleost insl3 and another in mammalian INSL3 have been subject to positive selection. Lastly, we find evidence that five of the six relaxin family genes present in the model organism Danio rerio are expressed in one or multiple tissues, especially brain and gonads and that insl3 is specifically expressed in interstitial Leydig cells in zebrafish testis. The significance of these results will be discussed first within the context of the comparative analysis of orthologous relaxin family genes in teleosts and mammals and then with respect to the evolution and expression of paralogous relaxin family genes in teleosts.

Relaxin family genes: teleosts versus mammals

Teleost rln is more similar in sequence to rln3 than to its mammalian orthologue RLN

Teleost rln was found in 4 of the 5 species for which the whole genome was available but it is, surprisingly, absent from the D. rerio genome. The close identity of teleost rln to rln3, and yet its striking difference from mammalian RLN, suggest that the gene has been subject to different evolutionary pressures in the two groups. Several processes could potentially have caused this such as: 1) teleost rln has retained the ancestral function of the gene while mammalian RLN has diversified in function or 2) teleost rln has undergone convergent evolution with rln3. Certainly there is support for the hypothesis that mammalian RLN has diversified in function: it exhibits the highest rate of molecular evolution of any of the relaxin family genes except INSL6 and it has duplicated giving rise to four fast-evolving paralogues in humans and anthropoid apes - RLN1, RLN2, INSL4 and INSL6 (Figure 1B), all of which are produced by human reproductive tissues [37, 38]. Thus, the clustering of mammalian RLN with its linked paralogues, rather than with teleost rln, arises in part because the clade has a higher rate of evolution and more recent common ancestry than the clade harbouring teleost rln. This hypothesis is also supported by the phylogenetic clustering of frog and teleost rln sequences (Figure 5). However, the identity of the B-domain of teleost rln with rln3 suggests that some factor such as shared receptor binding domains may have selected for them to retain the same sequence. Until the receptors of teleost relaxin family genes are known and the physiological role of teleost rln understood, it will be difficult to assess this hypothesis. Although the physiological role of relaxin in mammals is primarily associated with the reconstruction of connective tissue during reproduction [2], the gene is involved in several pathways not specific to reproduction, e.g. metalloproteinase activation, wound healing and reduction of fibrosis in non-reproductive tissues, that may reflect the ancestral role of the gene and its potential action in teleosts.

Teleost insl3 shows a similar spatial pattern of expression to mammalian INSL3

Since the descent of testicles from the abdominal cavity is solely specific to therian mammals, insl3 is postulated to have adopted this specialized role prior to the emergence of marsupials [36]. Park et al. [36] propose that the duplication of RFLCI, that gave rise to RFLCII harbouring INSL3, occurred prior to the divergence of amphibians and mammals but after the divergence of teleosts from tetrapods. They base this conclusion on the putative absence of an INSL3-like orthologue in fish. However, by studying more fish species, we find convincing syntenic evidence that the duplication of RFLCI and RFLCII occurred prior to the divergence of fish and tetrapods (Figure 3). Indeed, our qPCR results show that insl3 was the most abundantly expressed relaxin in D. rerio and that it was highly expressed in both ovary and testis, exhibiting only marginally lower expression levels than the housekeeping gene. The in situ hybridization results additionally showed that insl3 is expressed in the interstitial area of D. rerio testis (i.e. in Leydig cells) but is completely absent from the intratubular section (containing Sertoli and germ cells). This pattern of Leydig cell-specific staining has also been identified for Cyp17a1 [39] and for 3βHSD [40], both Leydig cell proteins involved in zebrafish germ cell sexual differentiation.

Park et al. [36] show how specific changes to the receptors for mammalian RLN3 and INSL3, RXFP1 and RXFP2 respectively, during early therian evolution allowed for INSL3 to adopt its specific role in testicular descent in mammals: they further show that the gene products of RFLCI (rln3a and rln3b) activate both rxfp1 and rxfp2 in teleosts. A role for codon-specific positive selection in the evolution of the insl3 gene was also found in this study: insl3 was the only relaxin family gene which exhibited evidence of lineage and site-specific selection in teleosts and mammals. Two amino acids were found to show evidence of positive selection at the 95% significance level when teleosts or mammals were used as the foreground lineage, although a total of twelve sites were included in the most probable posterior model. Interestingly, three of these twelve sites were in the B/C dibasic junction. Prohormone convertases activate hormones by cleaving dibasic chain junctions; our results suggest that different expression patterns between mammalian and teleost relaxin family genes may be mirrored by these convertases [41, 42]. Overall, our data support Park et al.'s [36] conclusion that the co-evolution of INSL3-RXFP2 may have allowed INSL3 to adopt its particular role in mammalian testicular descent, but we also show that INSL3-like genes are present in teleosts and that they are also involved in Leydig cell differentiation.

Teleost rln3 paralogues show similar gene sequence and expression to mammalian RLN3

Examining the spatial and temporal expression of rln3 paralogues, Donizetti et al. [23] recently found evidence for the expression of both genes in adult zebrafish brain. Additionally, they found expression during larval stages for rln3a in the nucleus incertus and for rln3b in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) matter, the latter being implicated in vocal communication in fish. Our qPCR results in adult zebrafish are consistent with theirs, and the putative role of RLN3 as a neuropeptide involved in feeding, body weight regulation, stress coordination, learning and memory [10, 11]. Interestingly, while we find significant expression of rln3b in the ovary, Donizetti et al. [23] showed evidence of expression of rln3b in the testis but not the ovary of adult zebrafish. Even though the difference between the expression of rln3b in the two sexes deserves further attention, the hypothesis that rln3 performs a dual function in teleosts is supported by the work of McGowan et al. [43]. They found evidence for the involvement of RLN3 in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in mice, suggesting that it may be a signal linking nutritional status and reproductive function. Collectively, these data suggest that rln3 (RLN3) may play similar roles in teleosts and mammals, which is further supported by its high degree of sequence conservation between the two groups [[9], this study].

Both teleost insl5 paralogues are well represented but, as in mammals, their role(s) are unclear

Seven of the eight examined species of teleosts harboured insl5a genes, and all the species for which the whole genome had been sequenced, additionally contained the paralogous sequence insl5b. Despite its presence in the genome, the qPCR data in D. rerio were more ambivalent. While some expression of insl5a was found in several tissues, particularly brain and gill, only very low expression of insl5b was found in the examined adult zebrafish tissues.

Evolution and expression of paralogous genes, rln3 and insl5, in teleosts

Our data show that rln3a/3b and insl5a/5b arose by duplication after the tetrapod-teleost divergence. It has been proposed that duplicate gene copies may 1) accumulate nonsense mutations in regulatory or gene elements and become non-functionalized, 2) diverge in the tissue or timing of expression compared to the ancestral copy and become sub-functionalized, or 3) acquire new functions and be neo-functionalized [30]. Theory suggests that duplicated genes are most likely to be lost or sub-functionalized [44], and genome wide scans indicate that about 80%-85% of teleost genes were non-functionalized after the WGD [29, 45]. The relative rates of sub- versus neo-functionalization are difficult to determine, in part because sub-functionalization may lead to neo-functionalization over long evolutionary timescales [46]. Additionally, changes associated with sub-functionalization often occur in promoter regions that regulate timing or control of gene expression and studies that examine the rate or pattern of molecular evolution in the protein coding region alone may not detect sub-functionalization [44].

The data presented here suggest that the paralogous copies of rln3 and insl5 may have been subjected to different forces of "functionalization" post-duplication. The paralogues rln3a and rln3b, exhibit similar patterns of molecular evolution consistent with sub-functionalization of the duplicated copy. Our qPCR data indicate that rln3b is expressed in the brain and ovary while rln3a is expressed only in the adult zebrafish brain. This result is consistent with the findings of Donizetti et al. [23] although they additionally find evidence of distinct differential expression of these two paralogues during zebrafish embryogenesis. Seemingly, the pattern observed in adult zebrafish for rln3 paralogues differs somewhat from the classical definition of sub-functionalization because sub-functionalized copies are expected to diverge in temporal or spatial expression but collectively span the ancestral expression patterns, although our results are consistent with other data on the expression of paralogous genes [45, 46]. On the other hand, the duplicated copies of insl5 appear to be subject to different selective pressures. The molecular clock analyses revealed that insl5b has had an accelerated rate of evolution compared to insl5a, and the average value of dn/ds was more than twice as high in the B- and A-chains of insl5b compared to insl5a, a pattern identified for other duplicated teleost genes believed to have undergone neo-functionalization [45]. Support for the contention that insl5a, rather than insl5b, has retained the ancestral function is further given by the syntenic data analyses in which many of the genes linked to INSL5 in humans are preferentially linked to insl5a (Figure 1A). The low levels of expression for insl5a and even lower levels for insl5b suggest that either 1) we have not identified the main tissues of expression for these genes and/or 2) they are expressed at developmental stages not included in this preliminary analysis (adult male and female zebrafish): in the future this will be explored using more detailed qPCR studies.

Conclusions

We find that teleosts harbour orthologues of four mammalian relaxin family genes: RLN, RLN3, INSL3 and INSL5. Two of the orthologues exist as paralogous duplicates in teleosts (rln3a/rln3b and insl5a/insl5b) probably as a result of the WGD event that occurred early in the evolution of teleosts. By combining the bioinformatics and expression analyses performed in this study we can draw the following conclusions about each teleost relaxin gene: 1) both rln3 paralogues exhibit similar evolution and expression to mammalian RLN3 and the paralogous copies appear to have been sub-functionalized, 2) teleost insl3 has evolved moderately quickly like its mammalian counterpart and shows similar tissue-specific expression in Leydig cells, has undergone site-specific codon selection in both teleosts and mammals, and additionally exhibited high expression in the ovary of teleosts, 3) insl5 genes are well represented in teleosts, insl5a exhibits similar rates of evolution to insl3, while insl5b shows accelerated evolution compared to insl5a and may have been neo-functionalized, 4) molecular evolutionary analyses indicate that teleost rln is operating under very different selective constraints from mammalian RLN, and appears to mimic rln3 in its sequence evolution. Taken together, these results underscore the diverse roles that relaxin family peptides must play in teleosts: further experimental work is needed to shed light on the similarities and differences of their physiological roles in teleosts.

Methods

Nomenclature of teleost relaxin family genes

Wilkinson et al. (2005) identified six copies of relaxin in Takifugu rubripes and called them RLX3a through RLX3f. Recently, using both syntenic and phylogenetic data, Park et al. (2008) estimated that the ancestor of tetrapods and teleosts harboured three relaxin family loci (RFL): RFLA - hosting INSL5-like genes, RFLB - containing RLN-like genes and RFLCI - including RLN3-like genes; they suggest that the duplication of RFLCII that gave rise to INSL3 occurred just prior to or after the divergence of Amphibia. These previous studies included 11 [9] and 14 [36] teleost sequences, and focused on resolving the phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary patterns of the relaxin family in tetrapods. Here, by searching the genomic databases of five completed teleost genomes, and including 32 teleost sequences, our results generally support the conclusions of Park et al. [36], except that we find that teleosts harbour an orthologue to human INSL3, indicating that the duplication of RFLC occurred prior to the divergence of teleosts and tetrapods. The phylogenetic and syntenic data analyses presented below indicate that the genes originally called RLX3a-3f by Wilkinson et al. [9] pertain to four relaxin family loci and are more accurately named rln3a, rln3b, rln, insl5a, insl5b, and insl3 respectively. The orthologous relationship of these genes to human relaxin family genes and their equivalence in the nomenclature of Wilkinson et al. [9] and Park et al. [36] is provided (Table 3).

Sequence identification and syntenic relationship of relaxin family genes in teleosts

Publicly available databases were searched for relaxin family homologues in the five teleost species for which a significant region of the genome has been sequenced: Tetraodon nigroviridis version 7 (Jaillon et al., 2004,http://www.ensembl.org/Tetraodon_nigroviridis/Info/Index), Takifugu rubripes version 4 (Aparicio et al. 2002, http://www.ensembl.org/Takifugu_rubripes/Info/Index), Danio rerio version 6 (The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/D_rerio and as available at Ensembl, http://www.ensembl.org), Oryzias latipes version 1 (Medaka Genome Project, http://dolphin.lab.nig.ac.jp/medaka) and Gasterosteus aculeatus version 1 http://www.ensembl.org/Gasterosteus_aculeatus/Info/Index. The sequences were first identified by using the algorithms BLASTP and TBLASTN to search for the following D. rerio B-chain protein sequences: YGVKLCGREFIRAVIFTCGGSRW (rln3b), RTVKLCGREFIRAVVYTCGGSRW (insl5a), and VRVKLCGREFVRTVVASCGSFRV (insl3). High-scoring hits (> 65% sequence identity over the entire region) were identified and then the upstream and downstream regions of the candidate relaxin family genes were searched for complete open-reading frames and other relaxin motifs, such as the conserved A-chain structural motif (CXXXCX8C), the B/C and C/A dibasic junctions, and the B-chain relaxin receptor binding motif RXXXRXXI/V, as well as general gene structure before being included in the data analyses. In total 26 genes were identified from these five genomes, 23 of the genes are annotated and identified as belonging to the RLN/INSL family in Ensembl (release 54); all of the relaxin family genes exhibited the expected gene structure for the family, complete open reading frames even through the post-translationally cleaved C-peptide. The Ensembl gene ID of these 23 genes as well as the location of all 26 genes is given (Release 54, Appendix Table two).

All known mammalian relaxin sequences were obtained from Homo sapiens RLN1, RLN2, RLN3, INSL3, INSL 5 and INSL 6; Mus musculus RLN, RLN3, INSL3, INSL5 and INSL6; Rattus norvegicus RLN, RLN3, INSL3 and INSL6; and Canis familiaris RLN, RLN3, INSL3 and INSL6 from GenBank http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, and all known relaxin sequences from Xenopus tropicalis were included. Additionally, six relaxin family genes were identified from other teleost species from cDNA or EST databases at NCBI: Oncorhynchus mykiss rln3a and insl5b; Pimephales promelas rln3b and insl3; and Salmo salar rln3a and insl5a (Appendix Table two) such that a total of 32 teleost relaxin family genes were included. Mammalian sequences for INSL4 were not included in the analysis because the gene contains a large insertion, is present only in mammals, and was the subject of a previous bioinformatic analysis [9].

A syntenic analysis of the relationship between teleost and mammalian relaxin family genes was performed by identifying the position of up to ten genes both up- and downstream of the focal genes in D. rerio, T. nigroviridis, T. rubripes, O. latipes and G. aculeatus. Syntenic maps were constructed based on the information regarding the location of genes available from Ensembl's BioMart data mining tool http://www.ensembl.org/multi/martview and, as needed, verified using the UCSC Genome Bioinformatics web server http://genome.ucsc.edu.

Phylogenetic analyses

For all sequences, the location of the signal peptide was determined using SignalP 3.0 [47] using default settings and then the sequence was removed. Sequence alignment was accomplished by manually aligning the translated B- and A-chain conserved motifs and twin dibasic motifs, the latter correspond to the protease cleavage sites between the B/C and C/A chain (Figure 4). The sequence between the two twin dibasic motifs was removed before alignment, because it contained the non-conserved intron and C-chain, but the entire B- and A-domains plus the four amino acids at the B/C and C/A protease cleavage sites were included since the latter could be potential targets of selection (Figure 4). Relaxin family members have classically been distinguished by the presence of the receptor binding RXXXRXXI/V motif on the B-chain; however, this is not specific enough to identify individual teleost relaxin family genes. Therefore, sequence motifs for the B-chain and dibasic cut sites were identified to characterize potentially important structural and functional residues and to aid in distinguishing teleost relaxin family genes (Additional File 1: Table S3). Teleost rln3a, rln3b and rln share an identical strongly conserved B-chain motif that is also shared by mammalian RLN3 but teleost rln differs from teleost and mammalian RLN3 in its C/A dibasic motif. Teleost insl5a and insl5b are less conserved than rln3a, rln3b and rln and contain unique but related B-chain and dibasic motifs. Finally, insl3 contains the least conserved B-chain but has specific dibasic processing sites that distinguish it from the remaining relaxin family genes (Additional File 1: Table S3).

The most appropriate model of nucleotide sequence evolution was identified using likelihood ratio tests as implemented in Model Test [48]. The phylogenetic relationship among nucleotide sequences was reconstructed using the optimality criteria of both minimum evolution and Bayesian methods as implemented in MEGA 3.1 [49] and MrBayes 3.12 [50] respectively. Preliminary analyses indicated that variation at the third position was saturated and confounded resolution at deep internal nodes. Therefore, trees based on nucleotide data were reconstructed in MrBayes by partitioning the data into first, second and third codon position, and allowing each partition to evolve at its own rate with its own shape (gamma) parameter, or by including only the first two positions when minimum evolution was the optimality criteria. The relationship among amino acid sequences was also reconstructed using Bayesian methods available in MrBayes 3.12 [50] and the appropriate model of amino acid change was determined using hierarchical likelihood tests as implemented in ProTest version 1.0.6 [51] or by Bayesian methods. For the Bayesian analyses, the model of amino acid change was examined by allowing the parameter space explored by the MCMC algorithm in MrBayes to include eight different amino acid models (prset = mixed) and then choosing the model with the highest posterior probability as the best available model. For the Bayesian analyses of both the amino acid and nucleotide data, the MCMC algorithm was run with four simultaneous chains that sampled from the posterior distribution every 300 generations; trees sampled before the cold chain reached stationarity based on plots of the maximum likelihood scores were discarded as "burnin" while sampling continued until convergence was achieved based on the average standard deviation of the split frequencies and the potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) as given in MrBayes. Statistical confidence in the deduced evolutionary trees was assessed by examining the Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) on the majority-rule consensus tree containing branch lengths for the Bayesian analyses or by bootstrapping the sequences for 1000 generations for the minimum evolution analyses.

Evidence for selection at the gene and codon level

To test whether the rates of molecular evolution were homogeneous across gene families, the two-cluster test was employed [52]. This test identifies those clades/genes that have significantly different rates of substitution based on an a priori hypothesis about which clades should be examined. Here, the rate of evolution was compared in nine clades: teleost rln3a, rln3b, rln, insl5a, insl5b and insl3 and mammalian RLN3, INSL3 and INSL5, while mammalian RLN and INSL6 were used as outgroups. The two-cluster test was conducted on the phylogenetic tree generated using minimum evolution using the program TPCV in LINTREE and only those comparisons with Z-scores high enough to give a p < 0.01 were taken as significant.

To assess the strength of purifying selection among genes, we calculated the average proportion of mutations leading to synonymous (ds) versus non-synonymous (dn) changes for all orthologous relaxin family sequences separately in teleosts and mammals. The ratio of dn/ds was calculated in MEGA 3.1 using a Nei-Gojobori model of nucleotide substitution [49]. Pairwise comparisons between teleost relaxin family genes were performed and average dn/ds values calculated across the entire gene, or for only the B-chain and A-chains; additionally the codon-based Z-test was used to determine if dn/ds within each gene or gene region was significantly different from 1.0 using bootstrapping to estimate the variances [49]. Because dn/ds values are calculated pairwise and the average value from all pairwise comparisons reported, the same five teleost species (those for which the whole genomes were available) and four mammalian sequences were included in these analyses.

Positive selection is often restricted to specific lineages and a few amino acid sites, therefore, we further employed the branch-site model A [53] to look for evidence of codon-specific positive selection on orthologous gene families in teleosts versus mammals. The application of this model requires that the user specify a priori which branch is being tested for evidence of positive selection, the so-called foreground branch, while the remaining groups are defined as background branches. Tests of positive selection were made by comparing the branch-site model A in which ω (dn/ds) ≥ 1 (alternative hypothesis) to the model A in which ω = 1 fixed (null hypothesis) and setting the foreground branch to the base of the clade containing the relaxin family orthologue in teleosts and the background branch was set to the same orthologue in mammals or vice versa [54]. Analysis of the branch-site model A was done using CODEML from the PAML package (PAML v. 4.2); models were compared using the Likelihood Ratio Test with 1 degree of freedom and, where significant, the posterior probability that a codon was under positive selection was estimated using the Bayes empirical Bayes (BEB) procedure [55].

Expression of relaxin family genes in zebrafish using real-time, quantitative PCR

We tested for the expression of rln3a, rln3b, insl5a, insl5b and insl3 in D. rerio, which lacks rln (Appendix, Table two), using real-time, quantitative PCR (qPCR). Total RNA was extracted from the brain, heart, gill, gut, ovary, testis, and eye of adult zebrafish using the Aurum total RNA mini kit (BioRad) and first strand cDNA synthesized from 5 μg of total RNA with oligo dT and random hexamer priming (iScript Select cDNA Synthesis Kit, BioRad).

The relative transcript abundance of the five relaxin family genes in D. rerio across tissues was then calculated via qPCR using a MiniOpticon Real-Time detection system (BioRad). Oligonucleotide primers for rln3a, insl5a and insl3 were taken from Wilson et al. (2008), while those for rln3b and insl5b were designed using PRIMER3 software [56]. The primers selected for rln3b were: F:5'-CGGCTCTCGTAGTGTGTCTG-3'and R:5'-CCTGTTCACCTTGTCCCAGT-3' and for insl5b were: F: 5'GCTCAGGCACAGAAAGGTCT-3' and R: 5'-GCTGGAGTCCTGTGCTTCTC-3'. The iQ™SYBR® Green Supermix kit was used according to the manufacturer's suggested protocols (BioRad). Standard curves were generated for all of the used primers to compute the amplification efficiency values for each primer set. The insignificant difference observed among the calculated efficiency values permitted us to calibrate Ct values of the target relaxin family genes in each tissue relative to their expression in eye (low abundance transcript, used as the calibrator in the equation below), and normalize them to a reference, housekeeping gene (b2m), previously shown to exhibit consistent expression across sexes, tissues and developmental stages in D. rerio [57]. This further allowed us to determine the relative fold increase of each relaxin gene relative to the housekeeping gene according to the formula: [58]. Each gene was tested three times and standard errors were calculated so that comparisons could be made across genes and tissues using the coefficient of variation (CV) where: .

In situ hybridization using insl3 on zebrafish testis

A zebrafish-specific insl3-specific PCR product was generated with primer 2126 (5'- GGGCGGGTGTTATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGAGTGAAGATGTGCGAGTGAAGC-3'; containing the T3 RNA polymerase promoter sequence [underlined]) and primer 2127 (5'-CCGGGGGGTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGTACTGAATCAGTT CATTCATGGTGCA-3'; containing the T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence [underlined]). The ~ 450 bp PCR product was gel purified, and served as a template for digoxigenin-labeled cRNA probe synthesis. For digoxigenin-RNA labeling by in vitro transcription, 500 ng PCR product was incubated at 37°C for 2.5 h in a 20 μl reaction volume containing 4 μl 5 × T3/T7 RNA buffer (Invitrogen), 2 μl 0.1 M DTT, 1 μl (29.7 units/μl) RNAguard (GE Healthcare, Fairfield, CT, USA) and 2 μl 10 × DIG RNA labeling mix (Roche), and either 2 μl (50 units/μl) T3 RNA polymerase (Epicentre; for sense cRNA probe synthesis) or 2 μl (50 units/μl) T7 RNA polymerase (Epicentre; for antisense cRNA probe synthesis).

To visualize cellular expression sites of insl3 mRNA in zebrafish testis, whole mount in situ hybridization was performed on zebrafish testicular tissue, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4), as described by Westerfield (2000) http://zfin.org/zf_info/zfbook/chapt9/9.82.html with some modifications to the protocol. Briefly, tissue was treated with 20 μg/ml proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C for 20 min. Moreover, after post-fixation and before pre-hybridization, an acetic anhydride (0.25% in 0.1 M triethanolamine; Merck) treatment was included to reduce background. After termination of NBT/BCIP (Sigma-Aldrich) staining with 3 consecutive PBS washings, tissue was examined with a binocular connected to a digital camera.

References

  1. Marriott D, Gillece-Castro B, Gorman CM: Prohormone convertase-1 will process prorelaxin, a member of the insulin family of hormones. Mol Endocrinol. 1992, 6: 1441-1450. 10.1210/me.6.9.1441.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sherwood OD: Relaxin's physiological roles and other diverse actions. Endocr Rev. 2004, 25: 205-234. 10.1210/er.2003-0013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsu SY, Kudo M, Chen T, Nakabayashi K, Bhalla A, Spek van der PJ, van Duin M, Hsueh AJ: The three subfamilies of leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptors (LGR): identification of LGR6 and LGR7 and the signaling mechanism for LGR7. Mol Endocrinol. 2000, 14: 1257-1271. 10.1210/me.14.8.1257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherwood OD: Relaxin. The physiology of reproduction. Edited by: Knobil E, Neill JD. 1994, New York: Raven Press, 1: 861-1009. 2

    Google Scholar 

  5. McGuane JT, Parry LJ: Relaxin and the extracellular matrix: molecular mechanisms of action and implications for cardiovascular disease. Expert Rev Mol Medicine. 2005, 7: 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho TY, Yan W, Bagnell CA: Relaxin-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression is associated with activation of the NF-kappaB pathway in human THP-1 cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2007, 81: 1303-10. 10.1189/jlb.0906556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Halls ML, Westhuizen van der ET, Bathgate RAD, Summer RJ: Relaxin family peptide receptors - former orphans reunite with their parent ligands to activate multiple signalling pathways. Brit J Pharmacol. 2007, 150: 677-681. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bathgate RA, Samuel CS, Burazin TC, Layfield S, Claasz AA, Reytomas IG, Dawson NF, Zhao C, Bond C, Summers RJ, Parry LJ, Wade JD, Tregear GW: Human relaxin gene 3 (H3) and the equivalent mouse relaxin (M3) gene. Novel members of the relaxin peptide family. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 1148-1157. 10.1074/jbc.M107882200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilkinson TN, Speed TP, Tregear GW, Bathgate RAD: Evolution of the relaxin-like peptide family. BMC Evol Biol. 2005, 5: 14-10.1186/1471-2148-5-14.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka M, Iijima N, Miyamoto Y, Fukusumi S, Itoh Y, Ozawa H, Ibata Y: Neurons expressing relaxin 3/insl 7 in the nucleus incertus respond to stress. Eur J Neurosci. 2005, 21: 1659-1670. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03980.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McGowan B, Stanley S, Smith K, White N, Connolly M, Thompson E, Gardiner JV, Murphy KG, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR: Central relaxin-3 administration causes hyperphagia in male Wistar rats. Endocrinology. 2005, 146: 3295-3300. 10.1210/en.2004-1532.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ivell R, Bathgate RAD: Reproductive biology of the relaxin-like factor (RLF/insl 3). Biol Reprod. 2002, 67: 699-705. 10.1095/biolreprod.102.005199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawamura K, Sudo S, Kumagai J, Pisarska M, Hsu SYT, Bathgate RAD, Wade J, Hsueh AJW: Relaxin research in the postgenomic era. Ann New York Acad Sci, Issue Relaxin and related peptides: Fourth International Conference. 2005, 1041: 1-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Conklin D, Lofton-Day CE, Haldeman BA, Ching A, Whitmore TE, Lok S, Jaspers S: Identification of insl 5, a new member of the insulin superfamily. Genomics. 1999, 60: 50-56. 10.1006/geno.1999.5899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu RZ, Sharma MK, Sun Q, Thisse C, Thisse B, Denovan-Wright EM, Wright JM: Retention of the duplicated cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 1 genes (crabp1a and crabp1b) in the zebrafish genome by subfunctionalization of tissue-specific expression. FEBS J. 2005, 272: 3561-3571. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04775.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dun SL, Brailoiu E, Wang Y, Brailoiu GC, Liu-Chen LY, Yang J, Chang JK, Dun NJ: Insulin-like peptide 5: expression in the mouse brain and mobilization of calcium. Endocrinology. 2006, 147: 3243-3248. 10.1210/en.2006-0237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reinig JW, Daniel LN, Schwabe C, Gowan LK, Steinetz BG, O'Byrne EM: Isolation and characterization of relaxin from the sand tiger shark (Odontaspis taurus). Endocrinol. 1981, 109: 537-543. 10.1210/endo-109-2-537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Büllesbach EE, Gowan LK, Schwabe C, Steinetz BG, O'Byrne E, Callard IP: Isolation, purification, and the sequence of relaxin from spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Eur J Biochem. 1986, 161: 335-341. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb10452.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Büllesbach EE, Schwabe C, Callard IP: Relaxin from an oviparous species, the skate (Raja erinacea). Biochem. 1987, 143: 273-280.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steinetz BG, Schwabe C, Callard IP, Goldsmith LT: Dogfish shark (Squalus acanthias) testes contain a relaxin. J Androl. 1995, 19: 110-115.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gelsleichter J, Steinetz BG, Manire CA, Ange C: Serum relaxin concentrations and reproduction in male bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003, 132: 27-34. 10.1016/S0016-6480(03)00030-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwabe C, Steinetz B, Weiss G, Segaloff A, McDonald JK, O'Byrne E, Hochman J, Carriere B, Goldsmith L: Relaxin. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1978, 34: 123-211.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Donizetti A, Fiengo M, Minucci S, D'Aniello E: Duplicated zebrafish relaxin-3 gene shows a different expression pattern from that of the co-orthologue gene. Devel Growth Differ. 2009, 51: 715-722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson BC, Burnett D, Rappaport R, Parry L, Fletcher E: Relaxin 3 and RXFP3 expression, and steriodogenic actions in the ovary of teleost fish. Comp Biochem and Physiol A. 2009, 153: 69-74. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nelson JS: Fishes of the World. 2006, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 4

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar S, Hedges SB: A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature. 1998, 392: 917-920. 10.1038/31927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McClintock JM, Carlson R, Mann DM, Prince VE: Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrate: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralogue group 1 genes. Development. 2001, 128: 2471-2484.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Woods IG, Wilson C, Friedlander B, Chang P, Reyes DK, Nix R, Kelly PD, Chu F, Postlethwait JH, Talbot WS: The zebrafish gene map defines ancestral vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res. 2005, 15: 1307-1314. 10.1101/gr.4134305.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lynch M, Conery JS: The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 2000, 10: 1151-1155. 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peer Van de Y, Tayor JS, Braasch I, Meyer A: The ghost of selection past: rates of evolution and functional divergence of anciently duplicated genes. J Mol Evol. 2001, 53: 436-446. 10.1007/s002390010233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. de Souza FS, Bumaschny VF, Low MJ, Rubinstein M: ubfunctionalization of expression and peptide domains following the ancient duplication of the proopiomelanocortin gene in teleost fishes. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22: 2417-2427. 10.1093/molbev/msi236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Olinski RP, Lundin LG, Hallbook F: Conserved synteny between the Ciona genome and human paralogons identifies large duplication events in the molecular evolution of the insulin-relaxin gene family. Mol Biol Evol. 2006, 23: 10-22. 10.1093/molbev/msj002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ryynanen HJ, Primmer CR: Varying signals of the effects of natural selection during teleost growth hormone gene evolution. Genome. 2006, 49: 42-53. 10.1139/g05-079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharma MK, Liu R-Z, Thisse C, Thisse B, Denovan-Wright EM, Wright JM: Hierarchical subfunctionalization of fabp1a, fabp1b and fabp10 tissue-specific expression may account for retention of these duplicated genes in the zebrafish Danio rerio genome. FEBS Journal. 2006, 273: 3216-3229. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05330.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Irwin DM: A second insulin gene in fish genomes. Gen Comp Endocrin. 2004, 135: 150-158. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2003.08.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Park J-II, Semyonov J, Chang JC, Yi W, Warren W, Hsu SYT: Origin of insl 3-mediated testicular descent in therian mammals. Genome Research. 2008, 18: 974-985. 10.1101/gr.7119108.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chassin D, Laurent A, Janneau JL, Berger R, Bellet D: Cloning of a new member of the insulin gene superfamily (insl 4) expressed in human placenta. Genomics. 1995, 29: 465-470. 10.1006/geno.1995.9980.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lok S, Johnston DS, Conklin D, Lofton-Day CE, Adams RL, Jelmberg AC, Whitmore TE, Schrader S, Griswold MD, Jaspers SR: Identification of insl 6, a new member of the insulin family that is expressed in the testis of the human and rat. Biol Reprod. 2000, 62: 1593-1599. 10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. de Waal PP, Leal MC, García-López A, Liarte S, de Jonge H, Hinfray N, Brion F, Schulz RW, Bogerd J: Oestrogen-induced androgen insufficiency results in a reduction of proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonia in the zebrafish testis. J Endocrinol. 2009, 202: 287-297. 10.1677/JOE-09-0050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Siegfried KR, Nüsslein-Volhard C: Germ line control of female sex determination in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2008, 324: 277-287. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.09.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ogiwara K, Shinohara M, Takahashi T: Expression of proprotein convertase 2 mRNA in the follicles of the medaka, Oryzias latipes . Gene. 2004, 337: 79-89. 10.1016/j.gene.2004.04.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Smeekens SP, Avruch AS, LaMendola J, Chan SJ, Steiner DF: Identification of a cDNA encoding a second putative prohormone related to PC2 in AtT20 cells and islets of Langerhans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1991, 88: 340-344. 10.1073/pnas.88.2.340.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. McGowan B, Stanley S, Donovan J, Thompson EL, Patterson M, Semjonous NM, Gardiner JV, Murphy KG, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR: Relaxin-3 stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 295: E278-286. 10.1152/ajpendo.00028.2008.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan Y-L, Postlhwaite J: Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics. 1999, 151: 1531-1545.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Brunet FF, Roest Crollius H, Paris H, Aury J-M, Gibert P, Jaillon O, Laudet V, Robinson-Rechavi M: Gene loss and evolutionary rates following whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes. Mol Biol Evol. 2006, 23: 1808-1816. 10.1093/molbev/msl049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. MacCarthy T, Bergman A: The limits of subfunctionalization. BMC Evol Biol. 2007, 7: 213-10.1186/1471-2148-7-213.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S: Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004, 340: 783-795. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Posada D, Crandall KA: Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998, 14: 817-818. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M: MEGA4: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 2004, 5: 150-163. 10.1093/bib/5.2.150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Huelsenbeck J, Ronquist F: MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 754-755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Abascal F, Zardoay R, Posada D: ProTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 2004, 21: 2104-2105. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Takezaki N, Rzhetsky A, Nei M: Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1995, 12: 823-833.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang Z, Nielsen R: Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19: 908-917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang J, Nielsen R, Yang Z: Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22: 2472-2479. 10.1093/molbev/msi237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yang Z, Wong WS, Nielsen R: Bayes empirical Bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22: 1107-1118. 10.1093/molbev/msi097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rozen S, Skaletsky H: Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. 2000, Humana Press Totowa NJ, 365-386.

    Google Scholar 

  57. McCurley AT, Callard GV: Characterization of housekeeping genes in zebrafish: male-female differences and effects of tissue type, developmental stage and chemical treatment. BMC Mol Biol. 2001, 9: 102-10.1186/1471-2199-9-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: e45-10.1093/nar/29.9.e45.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Naoki Takezaki for help with the two-cluster analyses and Dr. B. Civetta for use of the MiniOpticon Real-Time detection system (purchased with RTI funds from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, NSERC) and Drs. Steve Mockford, Todd Smith and John Archibald for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was funded by the NSERC discovery grants to BW and SVG-A, Acadia University Honours Student Research Awards to SY and PG, and a NSERC-USRA to JO.

The authors would like to thank the four reveiwers for suggestions they made that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 2H9, Canada

    Sara V Good-Avila, Sergey Yegorov & Brian C Wilson

  2. Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, B4P 2R6, Canada

    Scott Harron, Peter Glen, James Ozon & Brian C Wilson

  3. Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CH, Netherlands

    Jan Bogerd

Authors
  1. Sara V Good-Avila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sergey Yegorov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott Harron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jan Bogerd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter Glen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. James Ozon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Brian C Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sara V Good-Avila or Brian C Wilson.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

SVG-A. Oversaw the project, performed the phylogenetic, dn/ds, molecular clock, synteny, and codon selection analyses and wrote the bulk of the final paper. SY performed the qPCR laboratory work and analyses, helped with the synteny analyses, drew the synteny figures and helped with the literature search and writing and editing of the manuscript. SH helped collect the sequences, trimmed and aligned them, and devised the teleost gene motifs and helped write a previous version of the paper. JB performed the in situ hybridization analyses and helped with revising the manuscript, PG and JO both helped collect the original sequences and JO tabulated most of the information in Appendix 1, BW helped edit the manuscript and initiated the study. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

12862_2009_1207_MOESM1_ESM.DOC

Additional file 1: Tables describing the map positions of genes covered in the synteny analyses, sequence accession numbers for all relaxin family genes included in the paper and additionally the map positions of those in teleosts, and finally B-chain and dibasic junction sequence motifs of teleost relaxin family genes. Table S1 covers the chromosomal map position of all genes used in the synteny analyses in each of the five teleost genomes on which syntenic mapping was conducted. Table S2 covers the NCBI or Ensemble accession number for each of the relaxin family loci presented, and, for the teleost genes, additionally the map position, intron and C-domain length. Table S3 presents the conserved B-chain motifs and B/C and C/A dibasic junctions for each of the teleost relaxin family loci. (DOC 194 KB)

12862_2009_1207_MOESM2_ESM.DOC

Additional file 2: Bayesian phylogenetic tree based on relaxin family protein sequences. The figure legend and Bayesian phylogenetic tree (in colour) based on amino acid sequences of relaxin family sequences from teleosts and mammals in pdf format. (DOC 518 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Good-Avila, S.V., Yegorov, S., Harron, S. et al. Relaxin gene family in teleosts: phylogeny, syntenic mapping, selective constraint, andexpression analysis. BMC Evol Biol 9, 293 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-293

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-293

Keywords

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us