Table 1 |
||||
|
Comparison of alternative tree topologies with AU and wSH tests. |
||||
|
Rank |
Tree topology |
ΔlnL |
AU |
wSH |
|
|
||||
|
1 |
Best tree (see Figure 1) |
0 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
|
2 |
Nuclearia sister of Holozoa |
187.9 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
Nuclearia sister of Opisthokonta |
237.4 |
0 |
0 |
|
4 |
Nuclearia sister of Asco- + Basidio- + Zygomycetes |
418.2 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
Nuclearia sister of Capsaspora + Amoebidium + Sphaeroforma |
478.2 |
0 |
0 |
|
6 |
Nuclearia sister of Metazoa + Monosiga |
495.3 |
0 |
0 |
|
7 |
Nuclearia sister of Allomyces |
511.1 |
0 |
0 |
|
8 |
Nuclearia sister of Spizellomyces |
513.7 |
0 |
0 |
|
9 |
Nuclearia sister of Capsaspora |
534.3 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
Nuclearia sister of Amoebidium + Sphaeroforma |
561.2 |
0 |
0 |
|
11 |
Nuclearia sister of Amoebozoa |
621.2 |
0.002 |
0 |
|
12 |
Nuclearia sister of Opisthokonta + Amoebozoa |
626.8 |
0.002 |
0 |
|
13 |
Nuclearia sister of Asco- + Basidiomycetes |
704.5 |
0 |
0 |
|
14 |
Nuclearia sister of Monosiga |
727.5 |
0 |
0 |
|
15 |
Nuclearia sister of Metazoa |
738.9 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
||||
|
Log likelihood differences and AU and wSH p values of top-ranking trees are listed. |
||||
|
Liu et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009 9:272 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-272 |
||||
