Table 6

Scaled parameter estimates for IM model as inferred from the combined data of cpDNA and mtDNA.

θ1a

θ2a

θAa

m1b

m2b

N1τc

N2τc

NAτc

2N1m1

2N2m2


A. HiPtd

8.9914

0.2426

10.9320

1.4500

3.5500

4.517*106

1.210*105

5.492*106

6.5188

0.4306

95%HPDLoe

6.4040

0.2426

5.4983

0.6500

1.3500

95%HPDHie

51.8138

2.6683

70.9610

14.0500

7.4500

B. HiPtd

10.0668

0.2860

10.3903

1.9978

4.1023

5.057*106

1.426*105

5.219*106

10.0557

0.5867

95%HPDLoe

7.8028

0.2860

5.2962

0.8820

1.5548

95%HPDHie

79.2004

2.5066

36.1031

16.1243

7.8965

C. HiPtd

9.3231

0.3356

10.6652

1.6345

3.6577

4.683*106

1.674*105

5.358*106

7.6193

0.6138

95%HPDLoe

7.2336

0.3356

5.3365

0.7586

1.4723

95%HPDHie

68.5891

2.4523

65.2581

15.4572

7.6894

Average

9.4604

0.2881

10.6634

1.6941

3.7700

4.753*106

1.437*105

5.358*106

8.0134

0.5431


Note: Values are presented for each of the three runs with different seed numbers (A, B and C).

a The population size parameters for the Japan population (θ1) and Fukien population (θ2) of C. revoluta, and ancestral population (θA).

bMigration rate estimate (m1 – from Japan to Fukien population; m2 – from Fukien to Japan population).

c Effective population size estimate (Nτ: population size × generation time) for Japan population (N1τ) and Fukien population (N2τ) of C. revoluta, and ancestral population (NAτ).

dThe value of the bin with the highest count (HiPt).

eThe lower (HPD95Lo) and upper (HPD95Hi) bound of the estimated 95% highest posterior density (HPD) interval.

Chiang et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009 9:161   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-161

Open Data