|
MP and Bayesian ancestral reconstructions of the host ranges and mummy features. |
||||||
| Clade |
Host ranges |
Site of emergence from mummy |
Hardening of mummy |
|||
|
|
||||||
| MP |
Bayesian |
MP |
Bayesian |
MP |
Bayesian |
|
|
|
||||||
| 4. Clinocentrini |
Microlep. |
Microlep. (0.6) |
Equivocal |
Anterior (0.8) |
Equivocal |
Moderate (0.42) |
| 5. Rogadinae |
Microlep. |
Microlep. (0.3) |
Equivocal |
Anterior (0.21) |
Equivocal |
Weak (0.22) |
| 6. Rogadini (excl. Aleiodes clade) + Stiropiini |
Microlep. |
Zygaenoidea (0.59) |
Equivocal |
Anterior (0.44) |
Equivocal |
Weak (0.71) |
| 7. Rogadini (excl. Aleiodes clade) |
Zygaenoidea |
Zygaenoidea (0.98) |
Equivocal |
Posterior (0.82) |
Equivocal |
Weak (0.66) |
| 8. Stiropiini |
Microlep. |
Microlep. (0.52) |
Equivocal |
Anterior (0.83) |
Equivocal |
Weak (0.9) |
| 9. 'Zygaenoid host' clade |
Zygaenoidea |
Zygaenoidea (0.65) |
Posterior |
Posterior (0.34) |
Moderate |
Weak (0.44) |
| 10. 'Colastomion' clade |
Zygaenoidea |
Zygaenoidea (0.43) |
Equivocal |
Posterior (0.4) |
Weak |
Weak (0.64) |
| 11. Aleiodes + Yeliconini |
Microlep. |
Noctuidae (0.7) |
Equivocal |
Posterior (0.86) |
Equivocal |
Moderate (0.41) |
| 12. Yeliconini |
Microlep. |
Microlep. (0.52) |
Equivocal |
Posterior (0.47) |
Equivocal |
Moderate (0.81) |
| 13. Aleiodes clade |
Equivocal |
Noctuidae (0.88) |
Equivocal |
Posterior (0.74) |
Equivocal |
Hard (0.9) |
| 14. Aleiodes clade excl. Arcaleiodes and A. dispar group |
Equivocal |
Noctuidae (0.62) |
Posterior |
Posterior (0.95) |
Hard |
Hard (1.0) |
| 15. Aleiodes clade excl. A. dispar group, Arcaleiodes and Chelonorhogas |
Geometridae |
Geometridae (0.84) |
Posterior |
Posterior (0.85) |
Hard |
Hard (0.95) |
|
Maximum parsimony and Bayesian (using the BayesTraits program) ancestral reconstructions of the three biological features examined in this study. Ancestral posterior probabilities were obtained by multiplying the mean ancestral character state probability of the selected node across all trees by the portion of the trees that recovered the node involved. Numbers on the first column correspond to selected clades that are indicated in the 28S + COI Bayesian topology (see Figures 4 and 5). | ||||||
Zaldívar-Riverón et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2008 8:329 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-329 |
||||||