|
Comparison of conserved optimal codon numbers at paired and unpaired sites. |
|||||
| Method |
Algorithm |
ALL |
GC-ending |
AT-ending |
GC leu & lys |
|
|
|||||
| Genes shorter than 800 bp |
|||||
|
|
|||||
| RNAfold S. cerevisiae |
MFE |
0.646 *** |
0.624 ** |
0.503 *** |
1.353 *** |
| Mc |
0.542 *** |
0.567 *** |
0.422 *** |
0.910 *** |
|
| RNAfold S. paravensis |
MFE |
0.667 *** |
0.608 *** |
0.542 NS |
1.137 *** |
| Mc |
0.560 *** |
0.571 *** |
0.407 ** |
1.119 *** |
|
| RNAfold S. mikitae |
MFE |
0.653 *** |
0.590 *** |
0.544 * |
1.172 *** |
| Mc |
0.572 *** |
0.623 *** |
0.411 *** |
1.131 *** |
|
| RNAfold S. bayanus |
MFE |
0.640 *** |
0.597 ** |
0.502 *** |
1.181 *** |
| Mc |
0.537 ** |
0.557 *** |
0.401 *** |
1.003 *** |
|
| ALIfold |
MFE |
0.638 *** |
0.577 *** |
0.465 NS |
1.499 *** |
| Mc |
0.468 ** |
0.444 *** |
0.326 *** |
0.997 *** |
|
|
|
|||||
| All genes |
|||||
|
|
|||||
| RNAfold S. cerevisiae |
MFE |
0.920 *** |
0.863 *** |
0.751 *** |
1.584 *** |
| Mc |
0.841 *** |
0.866 *** |
0.676 *** |
1.436 *** |
|
| RNAfold S. paravensis |
MFE |
0.878 *** |
0.826 *** |
0.733 *** |
1.497 *** |
| Mc |
0.819 *** |
0.822 *** |
0.659 *** |
1.460 *** |
|
| RNAfold S. mikitae |
MFE |
0.912 *** |
0.814 *** |
0.790 NS |
1.160 *** |
| Mc |
0.839 *** |
0.869 *** |
0.740 NS |
1.404 *** |
|
| RNAfold S. bayanus |
MFE |
0.904 *** |
0.855 *** |
0.742 *** |
1.590 *** |
| Mc |
0.833 *** |
0.840 *** |
0.675 *** |
1.455 *** |
|
| ALIfold |
MFE |
0.899 *** |
0.759 ** |
0.739 NS |
1.937 *** |
| Mc |
0.770 *** |
0.724 *** |
0.645 *** |
1.529 *** |
|
|
I combine contingency tables for all amino acids and genes (ALL) and subsets of amino acids with GC- and AT- ending optimal codons (leu and lys are treated separately, as these two GC-ending amino acids behave very opposing, see below Table 2). Mantel Haenzsel estimators and significances are presented, WMH <1 = lower optimal codon use at paired than at unpaired sites. * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.005, NS = not significant. Structure prediction is based on ALIfold and RNAfold using MFE and McCaskill's (Mc) algorithm. | |||||
Stoletzki BMC Evolutionary Biology 2008 8:224 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-224 |
|||||