 Research articleCophylogeny of the anther smut fungi and their caryophyllaceous hosts: Prevalence of host shifts and importance of delimiting parasite species for inferring cospeciationGuislaine Refrégier1 1 Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, Bâtiment 360, Université Paris-Sud, F-91405 Orsay cedex, France ; CNRS F-91405 Orsay cedex, France 2 Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 3 MNHN UMR 5202, Unité Origine, structure et évolution de la biodiversité, Département Systématique et Evolution, 16 rue Buffon CP 39 75005, France 4 ETH Zurich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Plant Ecological Genetics, Universitätstr. 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland 5 Department of Biology, McGuire Life Sciences Building, Amherst College, Rts 9 & 116, Amherst, MA 01002-5000, USA
BMC Evolutionary Biology 2008, 8:100doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-100
Additional filesAdditional file 1: Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of the Microbotryum strains analyzed in this study based on the γ-tub gene. Statistical supports indicate Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP)/Maximum Parsimony Bootstraps/Neighbor-Joining Bootstraps. Only nodes supported by more than two methods are indicated, the significant statistical supports being considered as higher than respectively 0.9/70/70. The tree is rooted based on previous studies (see text). Taxa labels correspond to the host plant on which fungal strains were collected. Clades not supported in the individual tree are indicated in grey. Format: PPT Size: 195KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer Additional file 2: Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of the Microbotryum strains analyzed in this study based on the Ef1α gene. Statistical supports indicate Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP)/Maximum Parsimony Bootstraps/Neighbor-Joining Bootstraps. Only nodes supported by more than two methods are indicated, the significant statistical supports being considered as higher than respectively 0.9/70/70. The tree is rooted based on previous studies (see text). Taxa labels correspond to the host plant on which fungal strains were collected. Clades not supported in the individual tree are indicated in grey. Format: PPT Size: 217KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer Additional file 3: Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree of the Microbotryum strains analyzed in this study based on the β-tub gene. Statistical supports indicate Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP)/Maximum Parsimony Bootstraps/Neighbor-Joining Bootstraps. Only nodes supported by more than two methods are indicated, the significant statistical supports being considered as higher than respectively 0.9/70/70. The tree is rooted based on previous studies (see text). Taxa labels correspond to the host plant on which fungal strains were collected. Clades not supported in the individual tree are indicated in grey. Format: PPT Size: 228KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer Additional file 4: Host species, name and sampling localities of the Microbotryum smut fungi analysed in this study. Format: DOC Size: 132KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer Additional file 5: Sampling localities of plant samples analysed in this study. Format: DOC Size: 38KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer |
|
|
|
 |  | Log on / register Feedback | Support | My details |
on Google Scholar
author email
corresponding author email|
|
| © 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media. |