Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Evolutionary Biology and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: First International Conference on Phylogenomics

Open Access Research

The role of laterally transferred genes in adaptive evolution

Pradeep Reddy Marri, Weilong Hao and G Brian Golding*

Author Affiliations

Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7(Suppl 1):S8  doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S8

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:


Published:8 February 2007

© 2007 Marri et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Bacterial genomes develop new mechanisms to tide them over the imposing conditions they encounter during the course of their evolution. Acquisition of new genes by lateral gene transfer may be one of the dominant ways of adaptation in bacterial genome evolution. Lateral gene transfer provides the bacterial genome with a new set of genes that help it to explore and adapt to new ecological niches.

Methods

A maximum likelihood analysis was done on the five sequenced corynebacterial genomes to model the rates of gene insertions/deletions at various depths of the phylogeny.

Results

The study shows that most of the laterally acquired genes are transient and the inferred rates of gene movement are higher on the external branches of the phylogeny and decrease as the phylogenetic depth increases. The newly acquired genes are under relaxed selection and evolve faster than their older counterparts. Analysis of some of the functionally characterised LGTs in each species has indicated that they may have a possible adaptive role.

Conclusion

The five Corynebacterial genomes sequenced to date have evolved by acquiring between 8 – 14% of their genomes by LGT and some of these genes may have a role in adaptation.

Background

Bacterial genomes are constantly under pressure from the selective challenges of their surroundings. To overcome these hardships, bacterial genomes evolve via mechanisms in the form of genome modifications by gene loss [1-3], gene genesis by duplication, modifying existing genes by mutations [4,5] or acquisition of new genes by lateral gene transfer (LGT) [6-13]. Recent studies indicate that LGT has a larger role in bacterial evolution than previously anticipated [14-19], accounting for anywhere between 1.6 – 32.6% of the genes in each individual genome [20].

Gene content varies dramatically even among strains belonging to a single bacterial species [21-23]; variations mostly resulting from gene loss [1-3] and/or acquisition of new genes by LGT [6-13]. LGT plays a significant role in the evolution of bacterial genomes and provides them with a ready-to-use novel gene pool that helps them to adapt faster to their ever changing surroundings and foray into new ecological niches. Documented evidence shows that laterally acquired genes can transform an otherwise avirulent bacteria into a virulent form [24,25], protect pathogenic bacteria against antibiotics [26], increase the metabolic diversity of the recipient bacteria [12,27-29] or confer on it abilities to explore new challenging niches [30,31]. Keeping in mind the capability of LGTs to provide diverse adaptive features, we review some of the previous work done on lateral gene transfer in bacteria with an emphasis on the adaptive role of these laterally acquired genes. We also provide evidence about the transient nature of most of the laterally acquired genes based on a maximum likelihood modeling of the gene insertions/deletions at various stages during the evolution of the Corynebacterium species.

For the ease of discussion, we have classified the adaptive features into three major categories and will review each in turn: (1) Pathogenicity related features (2) Metabolic capabilities and (3) Survival under extreme environmental conditions.

Pathogenicity related features

There are many documented instances of the acquisition of virulence determinants in bacteria by the process of LGT [22,25,32-38], selected examples are discussed below. The acquisition of a 35 kb eaeA locus encoding proteins responsible for attaching and effacing lesions has transformed an avirulent Escherischia coli strain into an enteropathogenic strain [39], whereas the acquisition of pathogenicity islands (PAIs) ranging from 70–150 kb and encoding virulence realted proteins resulted in uropathogenic strains [40,41]. Lawrence and Ochman [7] have identified that about 18% of the genome of E.coli MG1655 was acquired by LGT and this laterally acquired DNA has "conferred properties permitting E.coli to explore otherwise unreachable ecological niches".

The genome of Salmonella enterica has two laterally acquired pathogenicity islands, SPI-1 and SPI-2 encoding proteins that help in apoptosis, entry into non-phagocytic cells and systemic infection [42], whereas Bacillus cereus genome has three laterally acquired genomic islands BCGI-1, BCGI-2 and BCGI-3 with genes encoding proteins responsible for antibiotic resistance, ferric anguibactin transport system and lantibiotic biosynthesis leading to a better survival of B. cereus inside the host [43]. The highly pathogenic strains of Yersinia pestis have a 102 kb High Pathogenicity Island (HPI) that contains the hms locus encoding the capacity to store hemin, yersinibactin-pesticin receptor and an iron-regulated high molecular weight protein enabling an increased level of pathogenicity and survival in their hosts [44]. The case with the cag pathogenicity island in Helicobacter pylori is similar. This laterally acquired region encodes many antigenic determinants and virulence factors indicating its role in pathogenesis [45].

A comparison of the virulent and benign strains of Dichelobacter nodosus, a principal causative agent of the ovine footrot, revealed that the acquisition of vap and vrl regions encoding several virulence related genes has transformed an otherwise benign strain into a virulent strain [46,47]. Similarly, the virulent strains of Vibrio cholerae acquired a 45 kb PAI that includes the tcp-acf gene cluster involved in colonization and the toxT gene involved in the regulation of cholera toxin. This region, absent in the corresponding avirulent strains, plays a role in virulence and host adaptation [48].

This data indicates the ability of the laterally acquired genes to transform an otherwise non-pathogenic bacteria into a pathogenic bacteria. Interestingly, all the examples involve the acquisition of an adaptive trait, virulence, by acquiring large islands of linked genes.

Metabolic adaptations

Primary metabolism

A recent study on the evolution of metabolic networks in E. coli by Pal et al [27] suggested that most of the laterally acquired genes have specific adaptive roles. Another study based on subtractive hybridisation by Espinosa and Kolter [49] has shown that the laterally acquired gapC gene has an adaptive role in the survival of E. coli in aquatic environments. Jahreis et al [50] demonstrated that the acquisition of the CTscr94 locus (consisting of scr genes that encode a phosphoenol-dependent phosphotransferase system involved in the sucrose fermentation pathway) broadens the metabolic versatility of Salmonella senftenberg and confers on it the capability to utilise sucrose as the sole carbon source. Sullivan and Ronson [28] have demonstrated that the laterally acquired 500 kb symbiosis island from Mesorhizobium loti ICMP3153 confers symbiotic ability to non-symbiotic Mezorhizobium strains and enables the bacterium to expand its genome to exploit new environmental niches. Similarly, the acquisition of the cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation (nif) genes by Wolinella succinogenes might enable it to survive in environments outside the host [29].

Degradation of xenobiotics

The ability to degrade xenobiotics is a relatively new physiological development in bacteria and several instances of the adaptability of the bacterial communities to xenobiotics have been attributed to the acquisition of genes related to xenobiotic degradation by LGT [12,51,52].

Pseudomonas sp. strain B13 has a genomic island of about 105 kb containing the chlorocatechol degradative (clc) genes that have the ability to degrade 1,2-dichlorobenzene (CB). Ravatn et al [53] have demonstrated that the acquisition of the B13 specific clc genes by Pseudomonas putida increases its metabolic diversity and results in a better adaptation to higher concentrations of CB. Dejonghe et al [54] have demonstrated that the transfer of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) degradation plasmids pEMT1 and pJP4 from P. putida UWC3 into the indigenous bacteria of two different horizons of 2,4-D contaminated soil enhanced the ability of the native bacteria to degrade 2,4-D, whereas de Lipthay et al [55] have demonstrated that lateral transfer of the gene (tfdA) encoding 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid dioxygenase into Ralstonia eutropha and other indigenous phenol degrading strains enhances the phenoxyacetic acid degradative capacity of the recipient strains in soil.

Poelarends et al [56] have indicated that the acquisition of the haloalkane dehalogenase gene (dhaA) was the key factor in the evolution of the haloalkane degradation ability of Rhodococcus rhodochrous, Pseudomonas pavonaceae and Mycobacterium sp. Similarly, the acquisition of the pcpB gene encoding pentalchlorophenol-4-monoxygenase by Sphingomonas chlorophenolicum confers on it the ability to degrade 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol and survive under high concentrations of this chemical compound [57].

From the examples discussed above it is clear that some of the laterally acquired genes have the ability to increase the metabolic diversity of recipient bacteria enabling them to explore new ecological niches.

Survival under extreme environmental conditions

The genome sequence of the radiotolerant bacteria Deinococcus radiodurans has revealed that topoisomerase IB (that plays a role in recombination and for which a knockout mutant is more sensitive to UV radiation) and RNA-binding protein (that is involved in the regulation of UV related damage repair) were acquired by LGT from eukaryotes [58]. D. radiodurans has also acquired the genes belonging to the late embryogenesis abundant (lea) family from plants [58]. These genes give resistance against dessication in plants and might provide D. radiodurans with additional resistance to UV radiation, since there is a positive correlation between resistance to dessication and radioresistance [58].

A comparative genomic analysis of the peizophilic strains of Photobacterium profundum has identified that several genes that are common to all the strains and responsible for high pressure adaptation are probably laterally acquired. Some of these genes are upregulated under high pressure conditions possibly suggesting their involvement in high pressure adaptation of P. profundum [30]. The genome sequence of Colwellia psychrerythraea has revealed that the psychrophilic lifestyle of this organism is due to the acquisition of a few genes by LGT in addition to amino acid content variations. Though LGT was not a primary player in the adaptation of this organism to this lifestyle, some specific lateral acquisitions including some of the cold shock proteins (possibly acquired from Vibrio sp. and Shewanella onediensis) and proteins responsible for the synthesis and degradation of complex high molecular weight organic compounds (acquired from Ralstonia eutropha) are certainly adaptive [31].

The genome sequence of Halobacterium indicates that most of the components of the electron transport chain including NADH dehydrogenase (nuo), menaquinone (men) and cytochrome oxidase (cox) are similar to the corresponding genes in E.coli and D.radiodurans. This suggests the transfer of genes involved in aerobic respiration from eubacteria into Halobacterium by LGT [59]. Another thermophilic archaea, Picrophilus torridus has acquired the genes that have the ability to degrade the organic acids such as acetic and propionic acid, superoxide dismutase, peroxiredoxin and alkyl hydroperoxide reductase to cope with oxidative stress along with the genes that encode the main components of the electron transport chain [60].

In contrast to pathogenic adaptations, these adaptations have largely been acquired by the LGT of a single gene. The above examples spanning different bacterial genomes clearly emphasize the adaptive role of LGTs. However, the examples discussed above are only the success stories of laterally acquired genes. Not all of the laterally acquired genes are adaptive. Of the many genes that are acquired, only a few genes that are adaptive are retained and fixed in a population [61]. There have been some studies suggesting that most of the laterally transferred genes are not useful and are hence reduced to pseudogenes [62] and studies that indicated the inability of LGTs to translate into functional proteins [63]. Given the examples above emphasizing the adaptive role of LGTs and counter-examples that suggest that most of the LGTs are not adaptive, it is important to explore the adaptive nature of LGTs and how frequently they are adaptive, if at all.

Results

To answer the question on the adaptive role of LGTs, we have employed a maximum likelihood method to infer gene insertion/deletion rates at various stages during the evolution of five sequenced Corynebacterium genomes and have performed a systematic study on the species specific genes to further understand the role of the laterally acquired genes.

Insertion and deletion rates

Gene insertions and deletions in closely related genomes can be inferred by looking at the phyletic patterns of gene presence or absence on a phylogenetic tree. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods have been successfully employed to understand the gene insertions/deletions [18,64-70]. The maximum likelihood analysis [70] was performed using the phylogeny derived from a concatenated DNA sequence of the em fusA, gltS, infB, lysS, rplB, rpoB, secY, serS and em ychF genes (Figure 1) and assuming that individual insertion and deletion events occur independently. The insertion/deletion rate of 1.18 (LnL = -10875.4) was obtained using a model which assumes a single constant insertion/deletion rate (μ) on all branches (Model I). Branch lengths are measured relative to the estimated number of base substitutions, suggesting that there is one gene gained/lost for every nucleotide substitution. This rate is higher than that obtained from the study on Bacillus (0.51) [70], and close to that of Streptococcus (1.17) [71]. A second model, Model II, that assumes different insertion/deletion rates on external and internal branches (Figure 1) resulted in a higher rate (1.26) on external branches compared to the internal branches (1.06; Table 1) indicating that gene movement is greater on the external branches. The improvement in the likelihood although small is significant (χ2 = Δ2 LnL > 3.84 with d.f. = 1). A non-hierarchical model, assuming an irreversible gene loss, also shows a similar trend of a higher rate on external branches (1.33) over that on internal branches (0.60) (Table 1). The likelihood surface and the curvature of the likelihood surface are given as supplementary data (See Additional Files 9, 14 and 15).

thumbnailFigure 1. Bayesian tree obtained for the concatenated sequence of fusA, gltS, infB, lysS, rplB, rpoB, secY, serS and ychF genes. The abbreviations are: Cje (Corynebacterium jeikeium), Cdi (C. diphtheriae), Cgl1 (C. glutamicum ATCC 13032, NCBI accession No. NC_006958), Cgl2 (C. glutamicum ATCC 13032, NCBI accession No. NC_006958), Cef (C. efficiens), and Mbo (Mycobacterium bovis) as the outgroup. All branches are supported by posterior probability values of 100%. At least 80% of the trees for the commonly present single copy genes (534 genes in total) support branches 7 (with 82%) and 8 (with 86%), and trees for all genes support the remaining branches. Model I: Constant insertion/deletion rate on all branches. μ = μ1 = μ2 = μ3 = μ4 = μ5 = μ6 = μ7 = μ8. Model II: Branches separated into external and internal branches. External: μ1 = μ2 = μ3 = μ4 = μ5 = μ6; Internal: μ7 = μ8 Model III: Different insertion/deletion rate on each branch.

Table 1. Insertion/deletion rates inferred from the maximum likelihood analysis assuming different rates for external and internal branches.

Additional File 9. Curvature of likelihood change in different models.

Format: PDF Size: 383KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 14. The likelihood value shows a continuous pattern of change as the insertion/deletion rate changes in the reversible gain/loss model.

Format: PDF Size: 8KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 15. The likelihood surface with different rates of insertion/deletion on external/internal branches in the reversible gain/loss model.

Format: PDF Size: 17KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

A third model (Model III) considered a separate rate on each branch and also indicated that the external branches have an enhanced apparent insertion/deletion rate and that the rate of change varies greatly (Table 2). The large change in the likelihood from Model II to Model III with a small change in the number of parameters suggests that the fit of the model is significantly better. Interestingly, the rates on the external branches (μ3, μ4) leading to the two strains of C. glutamicum were higher compared to the other external branches. This is probably due to the larger genome size of C. glutamicum and smaller branch lengths. It is not due to the smaller number of genes differentiating these taxa since if these numbers of genes are halved, the rates remain comparable. Similarly, increased insertion/deletion rates on the branches leading to C. glutamicum strains (μ6) and C. glutamicum and C. efficiens (μ7) could be due to the fact that these represent the branches leading to species having larger genome sizes.

Table 2. Insertion/deletion rates inferred from the maximum likelihood analysis assuming different rates on each branch of the phylogeny.

Species specific genes

Species specific genes were divided into two categories based on BLAST and phylogenetic clustering; (1) Lateral gene transfers and (2) possible multiple deletion or lateral transfers (MDLT) (Table 3). The unique genes that cluster with BLAST homologues (at an E-value cutoff of 1.0 × 10-10) outside actinobacteria were considered as possible LGTs. Genes that were uniquely present in a Corynebacterium species but cluster with BLAST homologues from taxa within actinobacteria were considered as MDLT. The MDLT may possibly be instances of multiple deletions that are specifically retained by a single species or cases of intra-group gene transfers. LGTs reported here do not include the ORFan genes (as defined by [72]; genes with no hits to the NCBI nr database) of these species. As a result, the number of LGTs presented here will be a large under estimate of the actual number of LGTs in each of these species. The list of LGTs and their putative function along with the entire list of species specific genes can be found at [73].

Table 3. Classification of unique genes in Corynebacterium species.

The present study identified 215 genes specific to the C. diphtheriae genome. Of the 215 genes, 48 were possibly acquired by lateral gene transfer whereas the remaining 167 are MDLT. The functions of most of these genes are unknown (81 out of 215 encode hypothetical proteins), however, a comparison of the results with earlier studies on C. diphtheriae [74] indicate that many of these genes might encode proteins that are responsible for virulence related traits.

The study identified 283 C. efficiens specific genes, 225 are designated as MDLT while the remaining 58 are possibly acquired by LGT. A majority (194/283) of the species specific genes encode hypothetical proteins.

A comparison with three other corynebacterial genomes revealed the presence of 659 genes that are uniquely present in C. glutamicum species. These are the genes that are present in both the strains of C. glutamicum and absent in other corynebacterial species. This does not include the set of genes that are unique to a single strain of C. glutamicum. Of the 659 genes, 74 were acquired by LGT, 206 were identified as MDLT due to their presence in other actinobacterial taxa. There were 377 genes present only in the two strains of C. glutamicum and did not have hits in NCBI. Many (346/659) of the species specific genes encode hypothetical proteins. Unlike the other corynebacterial species, C. glutamicum has 58 membrane proteins, 16 regulatory proteins and 15 ABC transport related proteins (as classified in the annotation) indicating a greater metabolic diversity compared to the other species.

The study revealed the presence of 323 genes that are specific to C. jeikeium. Of the 323 genes, 292 are MDLT whereas the remaining 31 genes were possibly acquired by LGT. Again, a majority (179 of 323) of the species specific genes encode hypothetical proteins, however, some of the genes whose function is identified revealed that these genes were involved in the uptake of iron and manganese and hence might have a role in virulence and pathogenesis.

Synonymous/non-synonymous changes and recent vs. ancient transfers

The synonymous substitution rate (Ks), non-synonymous substitution rate (Ka) and their ratio (Ka/Ks) was measured for the orthologous genes between C. glutamicum and C. efficiens. The genes were divided into four groups based on the evolutionary time scale : genes present in C. glutamicum and C. efficiens only, genes present in C. glutamicum, C. effciens and C. diphtheriae only, genes present in all Corynebacterium species and absent in the outgroup and genes present in all the Corynebacterium species along with the outgroup. The genes present only in C. glutamicum and C. efficiens represent the putative most recently acquired genes while the genes present in all the species including the outgroup represent the most ancient genes. The results indicate that the genes that are inferred to have arisen recently via LGT in the phylogeny have more non-synonymous substitution changes than those that were transferred somewhat more anciently (Figure 2A versus 2B is P < 0.01 in a Wilcoxon rank test). As genes are resident in the species for longer periods the non-synonymous changes continue to go down (Figure 2B versus 2C is P < 0.01, Figure 2C versus 2D is P < 0.01). A similar trend was observed for Ks and Ka/Ks where recently acquired genes had a higher rate of Ks (Figure 3) and Ka/Ks (Figure 4) compared to the genes that have been resident longer. The analysis was repeated removing all the genes that did not have any homologs in non-Corynebacterium genomes, assuming that the genes present only in C. glutamicum and C. efficiens, and have no hits in the NCBI nr database are potential annotation artefacts. The distribution of Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks values remains remarkably similar even after removing the uniquely present ORFs (see Additional Files 10, 11, 12) confirming the robustness of the result that recently acquired genes have higher rates of Ka, Ks, as well as a higher Ka/Ks ratio.

thumbnailFigure 2. Non-synonymous change of different group-specific genes. Data is measured using the genes present in Cgl and Cef; genes present only in Cgl and Cef (A); genes present only in Cgl, Cef, and Cdi (B); genes present in only Cgl, Cef, Cdi, and Cje (C); genes present in all Corynebacterium taxa and Mbo (D).

thumbnailFigure 3. Synonymous change of different group-specific genes. Data is measured using the genes present in Cgl and Cef; genes present only in Cgl and Cef (A); genes present only in Cgl, Cef, and Cdi (B); genes present in only Cgl, Cef, Cdi, and Cje (C); genes present in all Corynebacterium taxa and Mbo (D).

thumbnailFigure 4. Ka/Ks ratio of different group-specific genes. Data is measured using the genes present in Cgl and Cef; genes present only in Cgl and Cef (A); genes present only in Cgl, Cef, and Cdi (B); genes present in only Cgl, Cef, Cdi, and Cje (C); genes present in all Corynebacterium taxa and Mbo (D).

Additional File 10. Non-synonymous change of the genes present in Cgl and Cef. A, genes present in Cgl and Cef; B, genes present in Cgl and Cef and having matches in the database. Genes show similar rates of evolution by only looking at the genes having matches elsewhere the genome database.

Format: PDF Size: 7KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 11. Synonymous change of the genes present in Cgl and Cef. A, genes present in Cgl and Cef; B, genes present in Cgl and Cef and having matches in the database. Genes show similar rates of evolution by only looking at the genes having matches elsewhere the genome database.

Format: PDF Size: 7KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 12. Ka/Ks ratio of the genes present in Cgl and Cef. A, genes present in Cgl and Cef; B, genes present in Cgl and Cef and having matches in the database. Genes show similar rates of evolution by only looking at the genes having matches elsewhere the genome database.

Format: PDF Size: 9KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Discussion

A maximum likelihood estimation of the gene insertion/deletion rate assuming a constant rate on all the branches was 1.18. This is higher than the inferred base substitution rates on the branches indicating that gene insertion/deletion plays a significant role in the evolution of these genomes. Genome rearrangement has been shown to have a minor role in the evolution of corynebacterial genomes [75] indicating that gene gain/loss might have a greater role in the evolution of Corynebacterium species. A model considering independent rates on each branch confirmed the enhanced rate of insertions/deletions on the external branches clearly showing a decrease in the rate with an increase in phylogenetic depth. The enhanced rate on the external branches of the phylogeny might indicate the transient nature of many of the laterally acquired genes. However, the observed difference between the rates on external and internal branches is not as dramatic as reported for the Bacillus group [70]. This may be due to the different phylogenetic relationship between the studies. If the transient nature of the LGTs holds true, one should expect lower rates of insertions/deletions on long external branches compared to short external branches. In fact, the rate of ins/del on short external branches in the Bacillus cereus group [70] is higher than the rate on external branches in this study. Furthermore, the rate estimation of insertion/deletion is robust for different cutoffs used for determining gene homologues. Different cutoffs (expect value <10-20 with match length >85%, expect value <10-10 with match length >70%, and expect value <10-5 with match length >50%) show the similar trend that external branches tend to have higher rates of insertions/deletions than internal branches (see Additional Files 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).

Additional File 1. The phyletic patterns of the Corynebacterium taxa. (cut-off: expect value less than 10-20 and match length over 85%)

Format: PDF Size: 11KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 2. The phyletic patterns of the Corynebacterium taxa (cut-off: expect value less than 10-10 and match length over 70%)

Format: PDF Size: 12KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 3. The phyletic patterns of the Corynebacterium taxa (cut-off: expect value less than 10-05 and match length over 50%)

Format: PDF Size: 12KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 4. Insertion/deletion rates inferred from the maximum likelihood analysis assuming different rates for external and internal branches (cut-off: expect value less than 10-10 and >70% match length)

Format: PDF Size: 17KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 5. Insertion/deletion rates inferred from the maximum likelihood analysis assuming different rates on each branch of the phylogeny (cut-off: expect value less than 10-10 and >70% match length)

Format: PDF Size: 16KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 6. Insertion/deletion rates inferred from the maximum likelihood analysis assuming different rates for external and internal branches (cut-off: expect value less than 10-05 and >50% match length)

Format: PDF Size: 17KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 7. Insertion/deletion rates inferred from the maximum likelihood analysis assuming different rates on each branch of the phylogeny (cut-off: expect value less than 10-05 and >50% match length)

Format: PDF Size: 16KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

In this study, the maximum likelihood estimation is based on a concatenated phylogeny of DNA sequences of nine genes with Mycobacterium bovis as the outgroup. The phylogenetic topology is supported by ribosomal RNA sequences (data not shown) and by the commonly present genes (Figure 1). The topology is robust regardless of the outgroup chosen from Mycobacterium, which is the closest phylogenetic neighbor of Corynebacterium. Furthermore, possible alternative topologies of the commonly present genes were evaluated using nine concatenated genes. The best supported alternative topology (see 13) is significantly worse than the topology used in the study. However, the maximum likelihood estimation based on the alternative topology still supports that recently acquired genes have high rates of ins/del (see 8). In this model, insertion rate and deletion rate were assumed to be equal. This assumption was based on the fairly constant genome sizes of the closely related taxa and also to ensure that in the long term, genome sizes would not tend to zero or infinity. In the study, all insertions/deletions were assumed to be independent and the rate of insertion/deletion was estimated from the gene phyletic pattern. Because of the difficulty of inferring insertion/deletion events after many genome rearrangements, the number of gene insertions/deletions rather than the actually insertion/deletion events was used in the maximum likelihood estimation. To overcome the simplistic assumptions in this study, more practical parameters, such as block ins/del rates, can be added to make the model more realistic in future studies.

Additional File 13. An alternative topology of the concatenated genes. The insertion/deletion rates on external branches and internal branches were studied.

Format: PDF Size: 25KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

Additional File 8. Insertion/deletion rates inferred from the maximum likelihood analysis assuming different rates for external and internal branches. Likelihood was estimated using the alternative topology and a cutoff with expect value less than 10-20 and >85% match length.

Format: PDF Size: 16KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

The comparison of the synonymous (Ks) and non-synonymous (Ka) substitution rates of the genes that entered at various levels of the phylogeny indicate that the recently acquired genes evolve faster and have a higher proportion of synonymous as well as non-synonymous substitutions compared to their older counterparts (Figures 2,3). These results agree with earlier results indicating faster evolution of the recently acquired genes [70-72]. One of the possible reasons for faster rates of evolution could be that the newly acquired genes are required in the new habitat and are evolving faster to adapt to their new roles/habitat. Alternatively, some of these genes could be under relaxed functional constraint as they are non-functional in the new environment and might be evolving faster until they are deleted [70]. A more recent study has demostrated that low GC content causes seletive silencing of foreign DNA [76]. It was found that recently acquired genes tend to have lower GC content compared with ancient ones (see 16). This also supports the elevated evolutionary rates of recently acquired genes.

Additional File 16. Decreased GC content of recently acquired genes.

Format: PDF Size: 14KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat ReaderOpen Data

In this study, the phyletic patterns were derived primarily from genome annotation. As described previously in [70], non-annotated genes were picked up via a TBLASTN search and genes that are uniquely present in only one studied genome were removed from the study. Furthermore, a comparison was made by removing the ORFs only present in C. glutamicum and C. efficiens but not present in any other complete bacterial genomes (see Additional Files 10, 11, 12). The rates do not change remarkably after removing the Cgl-Cef group unique genes. This suggests that the fast rate of evolution of recently acquired genes is not an artifact of fast evolving non-gene ORFs in C. glutamicum and C. efficiens. A comparison of the corynebacterial genomes revealed that about 9 – 21% of the genes are specific to each species indicating that gene gain/gene loss has a major contribution in the evolution of these genomes. The results indicate that more than 10 – 35% of the species specific genes have been acquired by lateral gene transfer while the remaining are identified as possible MDLT (as inferred by their presence in other actinobacterial genomes).

The LGTs broadly fall into two categories; functionally characterised genes and hypothetical proteins. The analysis of the functionally characterised genes reveals that the pathogenic species C. diphtheriae and C. jeikeium have recruited genes that help in survival, host attachment and virulence. C. diphtheriae has acquired the genes responsible for iron transport [77,78] and siderophore biosynthesis that are directly involved in virulence. The acquisition of the genes encoding fimbrial subunits might indicate an adaptive mechanism whereby it helps in the attachment to the host cell surface [79], whereas the acquisition of the lantibiotic biosynthesis genes might help it to defend itself from other bacteria [80]. C. jeikeium has acquired genes that help in iron uptake. In addition, it has also acquired the genes necessary for uptake of manganese, another important requirement in pathogenesis [81]. The acquisition of the gene cbpA encoding a collagen binding protein might help in the bacterium-host interaction [82], whereas the presence of the genes surA and surB, encoding surface proteins, and the gene acpA, encoding an alkaline phosphatase, might help in virulence [83]. The acquisition of the neuraminidase encoding gene suggests that this might help C. jeikeium to prevent competition by other bacteria [84].

Unlike pathogenic species, the non-pathogenic species appear to have recruited many genes that are directly or indirectly involved in metabolic processes. C. glutamicum has acquired large numbers (53) of genes encoding membrane related proteins compared to the other species. Nishio et al [85] have indicated that many of the genes involved in amino acid biosynthesis are vertically inherited by C. glutamicum and only a few are acquired by lateral gene transfer. Our analysis identified only three genes (brnE, mdh2, scrB) that have been found to have a role in amino acid and vitamin biosynthesis [86]. The analysis of the LGTs in C. efficiens did not give many clues of their function as most of these genes encode hypothetical proteins.

We haven't considered in our study the ORFan genes [72] that account for about 10% of the genes in each of these species. Most of the recent studies on ORFans have confirmed that they are not a result of annotation errors but are in fact true genes, most of them being a part of genomic islands indicating their acquisition by LGT [23,72,87-89]. Given some of the examples reviewed here and based on the results obtained from this study on Corynebacterium species, it is compelling to suggest that at least some of these laterally acquired genes might have a role directly or indirectly in the adaptation of corynebacterial species.

Conclusion

We demonstrate that 13 – 20% of the protein coding genes are specific to each Corynebacterium species and that these species have evolved mostly by LGT and gene loss. Maximum likelihood analysis indicates that there are more lateral transfers inferred at the tips of the phylogeny and that most of the lateral gene transfers are transient. Recently acquired genes evolve faster compared to their native counterparts. The faster rate of evolution of these recently acquired genes might reflect adaptation to new niches or might reflect rapid gene decay.

Methods

Genome sequences used

Five Corynebacterium genome sequences were obtained from NCBI [90] to carry out the analysis. They are C. jeikeium (Cje; [91]), C. diphtheriae (Cdi; [74]), C. glutamicum (NCBI accession No. NC_003450, Cgl1; [92]), C. glutamicum (NCBI accession No. NC_006958, Cgl2; [86]) and C. efficiens (Cef; [93]). Mycobacterium bovis (Mbo; [94]) was used as the outgroup.

Maximum likelihood analysis

The evolutionary history of the Corynebacterium taxa was generated from the concatenated DNA sequences of fusA, gltS, infB, lysS, rplB, rpoB, secY, serS and ychF genes using Mr.Bayes ([95]; 200,000 generations sampled every 100 generations with a gamma distribution model and invariant class). The method to identify members of a gene family has been described in [66]. In brief, potential homologues were measured according to sequence similarities, and all paralogues in each genome were clustered as a single gene family and only one member was used for further analysis. The phyletic patterns (gene presence or absence in each genome) of all genes were used for the maximum likelihood analysis (see 1). The method to estimate likelihood has been described in [70]. Three different models, model I, II and III were used. Model I assumed a constant insertion/deletion rate on all the branches. In model II, the branches were separated into external and internal branches and rates were calculated separately for internal and external branches. In Model III the rates were calculated assuming each individual branch separately.

Identification of species specific genes

The protein sequences from all the genomes were compared to each other using BLASTP [96], with an E-value cutoff set at 1.0 × 10-20 and an additional criteria of match length set at 85% of the query sequence. A set of genes present uniquely in a species and absent in the outgroup were considered as specific to that species. The species specific genes were checked to ensure that they are not simply a result of annotation errors. In the case of C. glutamicum with two intraspecific strains, all the genes that are present in both the strains and absent in other genomes including the outgroup were considered species specific. The genes present uniquely in a single strain were not considered. The species specific genes identified are sensitive to the parameters used in any study and to the number of taxa sampled.

Lateral gene transfer

The unique proteins of each species were compared to the NCBI nr database using BLASTP and with the expect value cutoff set at 1.0 × 10-10 to identify homologs in other organisms. For each protein, the first 50 hits with an expect value less than 1.0 × 10-10 were chosen for further analysis regarding possible lateral gene transfers. The complete protein sequences of these 50 hits were extracted from the GenBank database and a multiple alignment was done using ClustalW [97]. The multiple alignment was used to generate a phylogenetic tree using the neighbor joining (NJ) method [98] as implemented in PHYLIP [69]. The genes identified as LGTs by NJ trees were further confirmed by reconstructing phylogenetic trees using PROML (JTT + invariable class + γ distribution model) with rate paratmeter α calculated by Tree Puzzle [99].

Synonymous/non-synonymous substitution rate

Synonymous changes and non-synonymous changes were measured by the PAML package [100]. The tree length of synonymous changes was calculated as the sum of the branch lengths for the taxa only within Cgl and Cef using the maximum likelihood method from the PAML package. Genes were categorised into four groups based on their presence/absence in different taxa (and hence on the inferred time period when the genes were transferred). The four groups are characterised by genes present in Cgl and Cef; genes present in Cgl, Cef, and Cdi; genes present in Cgl, Cef, Cdi, and Cje; and genes present in Mbo and all Corynebacterium taxa. Single copy protein sequences and their corresponding DNA sequences were extracted from the annotated genomes. Protein sequences were aligned using ClustalW [97], and nucleotide sequence alignments were created from the protein alignments by replacing each amino acid with its corresponding codon.

Authors' contributions

PRM and WH contributed equally to this work. PRM, WH and GBG conceived the idea. WH performed the likelihood analysis and the measurement of Ka/Ks, PRM performed the LGT analysis. PRM, WH and GBG wrote the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grant to GBG.

This article has been published as part of BMC Evolutionary Biology Volume 7 Supplement 1, 2007: First International Conference on Phylogenomics. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcevolbiol/7?issue=S1.

References

  1. Cole ST, Eiglmeier K, Parkhill J, James KD, Thomson NR, Wheeler PR, Honore N, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Mungall K, Basham D, Brown D, Chillingworth T, Connor R, Davies RM, Devlin K, Duthoy S, Feltwell T, Fraser A, Hamlin N, Holroyd S, Hornsby T, Jagels K, Lacroix C, Maclean J, Moule S, Murphy L, Oliver K, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Rutherford KM, Rutter S, Seeger K, Simon S, Simmonds M, Skelton J, Squares R, Squares S, Stevens K, Taylor K, Whitehead S, Woodward JR, Barrell BG: Massive gene decay in leprosy bacillus.

    Nature 2001, 409:1007-1011. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Ogata H, Audic S, Renesto-Audiffren P, Fournier PE, Barbe V, Samson D, Roux V, Cossart P, Weissenbach J, Claverie JM, Raoult D: Mechanisms of evolution in Rickettsia conorii and R. prowazekii.

    Science 2001, 293:2093-2098. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Foster J, Ganatra M, Kamal I, Ware J, Makarova K, Ivanova N, Bhattacharyya A, Kapatral V, Kumar S, Posfai J, Vincze T, Ingram J, Moran L, Lapidus A, Omelchenko M, Kyrpides N, Ghedin E, Wang S, Goltsman E, Joukov V, Ostrovskaya O, Tsukerman K, Mazur M, Comb D, Koonin E, Slatko B: The Wolbachia genome of Brugia malayi : endosymbiont evolution within a human pathogenic nematode.

    PLoS Biol 2005., 3 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Sokurenko EV, Chesnokova V, Dykhuizen DE, Ofek I, Wu XR, Krogfelt KA, Struve C, Schembri MA, Hasty DL: Pathogenic adaptation of Escherichia coli by natural variation of the FimH adhesin.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:8922-8926. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Feldgarden M, Byrd N, Cohan FM: Gradual evolution in bacteria: evidence from Bacillus systematics.

    Microbiology 2003, 149:3565-3573. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Lawrence JG: Selfish operons and speciation by gene transfer.

    Trends Microbiol 1997, 5:355-359. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Lawrence JG, Ochman H: Molecular archaeology of the Escherichia coli genome.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:9413-9417. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  8. Lawrence JG: Gene transfer, speciation, and the evolution of bacterial genomes.

    Curr Opin Microbiol 1999, 2:519-523. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. de Koning AP, Brinkman FS, Jones SJ, Keeling PJ: Lateral gene transfer and metabolic adaptation in the human parasite Trichomonas vaginalis.

    Mol Biol Evol 2000, 17:1769-1773. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA: Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation.

    Nature 2000, 405:299-304. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Lawrence JG, Ochman H: Reconciling the many faces of lateral gene transfer.

    Trends Microbiol 2002, 10:1-4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Springael D, Top EM: Horizontal gene transfer and microbial adaptation to xenobiotics: new types of mobile genetic elements and lessons from ecological studies.

    Trends Microbiol 2004, 12:53-58. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Hughes AL, Friedman R: Poxvirus genome evolution by gene gain and loss.

    Mol Phylogenet Evol 2005, 35:186-195. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Lan R, Reeves PR: Gene transfer is a major factor in bacterial evolution.

    Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:47-55. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Gogarten JP, Doolittle WF, Lawrence JG: Prokaryotic evolution in light of gene transfer.

    Mol Biol Evol 2002, 19:2226-2238. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Jain R, Rivera MC, Moore JE, Lake JA: Horizontal gene transfer accelerates genome innovation and evolution.

    Mol Biol Evol 2003, 20:1598-1602. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Kunin V, Ouzounis CA: The balance of driving forces during genome evolution in prokaryotes.

    Genome Res 2003, 13:1589-1594. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  18. Mirkin BG, Fenner TI, Galperin MY, Koonin EV: Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes.

    BMC Evol Biol 2003, 3:2. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  19. Snel B, Huynen MA, Dutilh BE: Genome trees and the nature of genome evolution.

    Annu Rev Microbiol 2005, 59:191-209. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Aravind L: Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: Quantification and classification.

    Annu Rev Microbiol 2001, 55:709-742. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Lawrence JG, Hendrickson H: Genome evolution in bacteria: order beneath chaos.

    Curr Opin Microbiol 2005, 8:572-578. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Gressmann H, Linz B, Ghai R, Pleissner KP, Schlapbach R, Yamaoka Y, Kraft C, Suerbaum S, Meyer TF, Achtman M: Gain and Loss of Multiple Genes During the Evolution of Helicobacter pylori.

    PLoS Genet 2005., 1 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  23. Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ, Donati C, Medini D, Ward NL, Angiuoli SV, Crabtree J, Jones AL, Durkin AS, Deboy RT, Davidsen TM, Mora M, Scarselli M, Margarit y Ros I, Peterson JD, Hauser CR, Sundaram JP, Nelson WC, Madupu R, Brinkac LM, Dodson RJ, Rosovitz MJ, Sullivan SA, Daugherty SC, Haft DH, Selengut J, Gwinn ML, Zhou L, Zafar N, Khouri H, Radune D, Dimitrov G, Watkins K, O'Connor KJ, Smith S, Utterback TR, White O, Rubens CE, Grandi G, Madoff LC, Kasper DL, Telford JL, Wessels MR, Rappuoli R, Fraser CM: Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae : implications for the microbial "pan-genome".

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:13950-13955. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  24. Wren BW: Microbial genome analysis: insights into virulence, host adaptation and evolution.

    Nat Rev Genet 2000, 1:30-39. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Hacker J, Kaper JB: Pathogenicity islands and the evolution of microbes.

    Annu Rev Microbiol 2000, 54:641-679. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Alcaine SD, Sukhnanand SS, Warnick LD, Su WL, McGann P, McDonough P, Wiedmann M: Ceftiofur-resistant Salmonella strains isolated from dairy farms represent multiple widely distributed subtypes that evolved by independent horizontal gene transfer.

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005, 49:4061-4067. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  27. Pal C, Papp B, Lercher MJ: Adaptive evolution of bacterial metabolic networks by horizontal gene transfer.

    Nat Genet 2005, 37:1372-1375. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Sullivan JT, Ronson CW: Evolution of rhizobia by acquisition of a 500-kb symbiosis island that integrates into a phe-tRNA gene.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:5145-5149. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  29. Baar C, Eppinger M, Raddatz G, Simon J, Lanz C, Klimmek O, Nandakumar R, Gross R, Rosinus A, Keller H, Jagtap P, Linke B, Meyer F, Lederer H, Schuster SC: Complete genome sequence and analysis of Wolinella succinogenes.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:11690-11695. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  30. Campanaro S, Vezzi A, Vitulo N, Lauro FM, D'Angelo M, Simonato F, Cestaro A, Malacrida G, Bertoloni G, Valle G, Bartlett DH: Laterally transferred elements and high pressure adaptation in Photobacterium profundum strains.

    BMC Genomics 2005, 6:122. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  31. Methe BA, Nelson KE, Deming JW, Momen B, Melamud E, Zhang X, Moult J, Madupu R, Nelson WC, Dodson RJ, Brinkac LM, Daugherty SC, Durkin AS, DeBoy RT, Kolonay JF, Sullivan SA, Zhou L, Davidsen TM, Wu M, Huston AL, Lewis M, Weaver B, Weidman JF, Khouri H, Utterback TR, Feldblyum TV, Fraser CM: The psychrophilic lifestyle as revealed by the genome sequence of Colwellia psychrerythraea 34H through genomic and proteomic analyses.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:10913-10918. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  32. Dobrindt U, Hacker J: Whole genome plasticity in pathogenic bacteria.

    Curr Opin Microbiol 2001, 4:550-557. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  33. Hentschel U, Hacker J: Pathogenicity islands: the tip of the iceberg.

    Microbes Infect 2001, 3:545-548. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Hacker J, Carniel E: Ecological fitness, genomic islands and bacterial pathogenicity. A Darwinian view of the evolution of microbes.

    EMBO Rep 2001, 2:376-381. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  35. Hacker J, Blum-Oehler G, Muhldorfer I, Tschape H: Pathogenicity islands of virulent bacteria: structure, function and impact on microbial evolution.

    Mol Microbiol 1997, 23:1089-1097. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  36. Poly F, Threadgill D, Stintzi A: Identification of Campylobacter jejuni ATCC 43431-specific genes by whole microbial genome comparisons.

    J Bacteriol 2004, 186:4781-4795. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  37. Lima WC, Van Sluys MA, Menck CF: Non-gamma-proteobacteria gene islands contribute to the Xanthomonas genome.

    OMICS 2005, 9:160-172. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  38. Gill SR, Fouts DE, Archer GL, Mongodin EF, Deboy RT, Ravel J, Paulsen IT, Kolonay JF, Brinkac L, Beanan M, Dodson RJ, Daugherty SC, Madupu R, Angiuoli SV, Durkin AS, Haft DH, Vamathevan J, Khouri H, Utterback T, Lee C, Dimitrov G, Jiang L, Qin H, Weidman J, Tran K, Kang K, Hance IR, Nelson KE, Fraser CM: Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain.

    J Bacteriol 2005, 187:2426-2438. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  39. Swenson DL, Bukanov NO, Berg DE, Welch RA: Two pathogenicity islands in uropathogenic Escherichia coli J96: cosmid cloning and sample sequencing.

    Infect Immun 1996, 64:3736-3743. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  40. McDaniel TK, Jarvis KG, Donnenberg MS, Kaper JB: A genetic locus of enterocyte effacement conserved among diverse enterobacterial pathogens.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:1664-1668. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  41. Blum G, Ott M, Lischewski A, Ritter A, Imrich H, Tschape H, Hacker J: Excision of large DNA regions termed pathogenicity islands from tRNA-specific loci in the chromosome of an Escherichia coli wild-type pathogen.

    Infect Immun 1994, 62:606-614. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  42. Groisman EA, Ochman H: How Salmonella became a pathogen.

    Trends Microbiol 1997, 5:343-349. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  43. Zhang R, Zhang CT: Identification of genomic islands in the genome of Bacillus cereus by comparative analysis with Bacillus anthracis.

    Physiol Genomics 2003, 16:19-23. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  44. Fetherston JD, Perry RD: The pigmentation locus of Yersinia pestis KIM6+ is flanked by an insertion sequence and includes the structural genes for pesticin sensitivity and HMWP2.

    Mol Microbiol 1994, 13:697-708. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  45. Censini S, Lange C, Xiang Z, Crabtree JE, Ghiara P, Borodovsky M, Rappuoli R, Covacci A: cag, a pathogenicity island of Helicobacter pylori, encodes type I-specific and disease-associated virulence factors.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:14648-14653. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  46. Cheetham BF, Tattersall DB, Bloomfield GA, Rood JI, Katz ME: Identification of a gene encoding a bacteriophage-related integrase in a vap region of the Dichelobacter nodosus genome.

    Gene 1995, 162:53-58. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  47. Billington SJ, Johnston JL, Rood JI: Virulence regions and virulence factors of the ovine footrot pathogen, Dichelobacter nodosus.

    FEMS Microbiol Lett 1996, 145:147-156. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  48. Kovach ME, Shaffer MD, Peterson KM: A putative integrase gene defines the distal end of a large cluster of ToxR-regulated colonization genes in Vibrio cholerae.

    Microbiology 1996, 142:2165-2174. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  49. Espinosa-Urgel M, Kolter R: Escherichia coli genes expressed preferentially in an aquatic environment.

    Mol Microbiol 1998, 28:325-332. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  50. Jahreis K, Bentler L, Bockmann J, Hans S, Meyer A, Siepelmeyer J, Lengeler JW: Adaptation of sucrose metabolism in the Escherichia coli wild-type strain EC3132.

    J Bacteriol 2002, 184:5307-5316. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  51. Diaz E: Bacterial degradation of aromatic pollutants: a paradigm of metabolic versatility.

    Int Microbiol 2004, 7:173-180. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  52. Top EM, Springael D: The role of mobile genetic elements in bacterial adaptation to xenobiotic organic compounds.

    Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003, 14:262-269. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  53. Ravatn R, Zehnder AJ, van der Meer JR: Low-frequency horizontal transfer of an element containing the chlorocatechol degradation genes from Pseudomonas sp. strain B13 to Pseudomonas putida F1 and to indigenous bacteria in laboratory-scale activated-sludge microcosms.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 1998, 64:2126-2132. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  54. Dejonghe W, Goris J, El Fantroussi S, Hofte M, De Vos P, Verstraete W, Top EM: Effect of dissemination of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) degradation plasmids on 2,4-D degradation and on bacterial community structure in two different soil horizons.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2000, 66:3297-3304. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  55. de Lipthay JR, Barkay T, Sorensen SJ: Enhanced degradation of phenoxyacetic acid in soil by horizontal transfer of the tfdA gene encoding a 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid dioxygenase.

    FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2001, 35:75-84. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  56. Poelarends GJ, Kulakov LA, Larkin MJ, van Hylckama Vlieg JE, Janssen DB: Roles of horizontal gene transfer and gene integration in evolution of 1,3-dichloropropene- and 1,2-dibromoethane-degradative pathways.

    J Bacteriol 2000, 182:2191-2199. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  57. Tiirola MA, Wang H, Paulin L, Kulomaa MS: Evidence for natural horizontal transfer of the pcpB gene in the evolution of polychlorophenol-degrading sphingomonads.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68:4495-4501. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  58. Mattimore V, Battista JR: Radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans : functions necessary to survive ionizing radiation are also necessary to survive prolonged desiccation.

    J Bacteriol 1996, 178:633-637. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  59. Kennedy SP, Ng WV, Salzberg SL, Hood L, DasSarma S: Understanding the adaptation of Halobacterium species NRC-1 to its extreme environment through computational analysis of its genome sequence.

    Genome Res 2001, 11:1641-1650. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  60. Futterer O, Angelov A, Liesegang H, Gottschalk G, Schleper C, Schepers B, Dock C, Antranikian G, Liebl W: Genome sequence of Picrophilus torridus and its implications for life around pH 0.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:9091-9096. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  61. Gogarten JP, Townsend JP: Horizontal gene transfer, genome innovation and evolution.

    Nat Rev Microbiol 2005, 3:679-687. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  62. Liu Y, Harrison PM, Kunin V, Gerstein M: Comprehensive analysis of pseudogenes in prokaryotes: widespread gene decay and failure of putative horizontally transferred genes.

    Genome Biol 2004, 5:R64. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  63. Taoka M, Yamauchi Y, Shinkawa T, Kaji H, Motohashi W, Nakayama H, Takahashi N, Isobe T: Only a small subset of the horizontally transferred chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli are translated into proteins.

    Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3:780-787. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  64. Daubin V, Lerat E, Perriere G: The source of laterally transferred genes in bacterial genomes.

    Genome Biol 2003, 4:R57. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  65. Daubin V, Moran NA, Ochman H: Phylogenetics and the cohesion of bacterial genomes.

    Science 2003, 301:829-832. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  66. Hao W, Golding GB: Patterns of bacterial gene movement.

    Mol Biol Evol 2004, 21:1294-1307. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  67. Neyman J: Molecular studies of evolution: A source of novel statistical problems. In Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics. Edited by Gupta SS, Yackel J. New York, USA: Academic Press; 1971:1-27. OpenURL

  68. Gu X: Maximum-likelihood approach for gene family evolution under functional divergence.

    Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18:453-464. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  69. Felsenstein J: Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc; 2004. OpenURL

  70. Hao W, Golding GB: The fate of laterally transferred genes: Life in the fast lane to adaptation or death.

    Genome Res 2006, 16:636-643. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  71. Marri PR, Hao W, Golding GB: Gene gain and gene loss in Streptococcus : Is it driven by habitat?

    Mol Biol Evol 2006, 23:2379-2391. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  72. Daubin V, Ochman H: Bacterial genomes as new gene homes: the genealogy of ORFans in E. coli.

    Genome Res 2004, 14:1036-1042. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  73. Supplementary Information [http://evol.mcmaster.ca/Corynebacterium.html] webcite

  74. Cerdeno-Tarraga AM, Efstratiou A, Dover LG, Holden MT, Pallen M, Bentley SD, Besra GS, Churcher C, James KD, De Zoysa A, Chillingworth T, Cronin A, Dowd L, Feltwell T, Hamlin N, Holroyd S, Jagels K, Moule S, Quail MA, Rabbinowitsch E, Rutherford KM, Thomson NR, Unwin L, Whitehead S, Barrell BG, Parkhill J: The complete genome sequence and analysis of Corynebacterium diphtheriae NCTC13129.

    Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:6516-6523. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  75. Nakagawa I, Kurokawa K, Yamashita A, Nakata M, Tomiyasu Y, Okahashi N, Kawabata S, Yamazaki K, Shiba T, Yasunaga T, Hayashi H, Hattori M, Hamada S: Genome sequence of an M3 strain of Streptococcus pyogenes reveals a large-scale genomic rearrangement in invasive strains and new insights into phage evolution.

    Genome Res 2003, 13:1042-1055. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  76. Navarre WW, Porwollik S, Wang Y, McClelland M, Rosen H, Libby SJ, Fang FC: Selective Silencing of Foreign DNA with Low GC Content by the H-NS Protein in Salmonella.

    Science 2006, 313:236-238. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  77. Qian Y, Lee JH, Holmes RK: Identification of a DtxR-regulated operon that is essential for siderophore-dependent iron uptake in Corynebacterium diphtheriae.

    J Bacteriol 2002, 184:4846-4856. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  78. Andrews SC, Robinson AK, Rodriguez-Quinones F: Bacterial iron homeostasis.

    FEMS Microbiol Rev 2003, 27:215-237. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  79. Pallen MJ, Lam AC, Antonio M, Dunbar K: An embarrassment of sortases – a richness of substrates?

    Trends Microbiol 2001, 9:97-102. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  80. Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP: Bacterial lantibiotics: strategies to improve therapeutic potential.

    Curr Protein Pept Sci 2005, 6:61-75. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  81. Storz G, Imlay JA: Oxidative stress.

    Curr Opin Microbiol 1999, 2:188-194. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  82. Esmay PA, Billington SJ, Link MA, Songer JG, Jost BH: The Arcanobacterium pyogenes collagen-binding protein, CbpA, promotes adhesion to host cells.

    Infect Immun 2003, 71:4368-4374. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  83. Reilly TJ, Baron GS, Nano FE, Kuhlenschmidt MS: Characterization and sequencing of a respiratory burst-inhibiting acid phosphatase from Francisella tularensis.

    J Biol Chem 1996, 271:10973-10983. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  84. Camara M, Boulnois GJ, Andrew PW, Mitchell TJ: A neuraminidase from Streptococcus pneumoniae has the features of a surface protein.

    Infect Immun 1994, 62:3688-3695. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  85. Nishio Y, Nakamura Y, Usuda Y, Sugimoto S, Matsui K, Kawarabayasi Y, Kikuchi H, Gojobori T, Ikeo K: Evolutionary process of amino acid biosynthesis in Corynebacterium at the whole genome level.

    Mol Biol Evol 2004, 21:1683-1691. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  86. Kalinowski J, Bathe B, Bartels D, Bischoff N, Bott M, Burkovski A, Dusch N, Eggeling L, Eikmanns BJ, Gaigalat L, Goesmann A, Hartmann M, Huthmacher K, Kramer R, Linke B, McHardy AC, Meyer F, Mockel B, Pfefferle W, Puhler A, Rey DA, Ruckert C, Rupp O, Sahm H, Wendisch VF, Wiegrabe I, Tauch A: The complete Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome sequence and its impact on the production of L-aspartate-derived amino acids and vitamins.

    J Biotechnol 2003, 104:5-25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  87. Siew N, Fischer D: Analysis of singleton ORFans in fully sequenced microbial genomes.

    Proteins 2003, 53:241-251. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  88. Siew N, Fischer D: Structural biology sheds light on the puzzle of genomic ORFans.

    J Mol Biol 2004, 342:369-373. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  89. Hsiao WW, Ung K, Aeschliman D, Bryan J, Finlay BB, Brinkman FS: Evidence of a Large Novel Gene Pool Associated with Prokaryotic Genomic Islands.

    PLoS Genet 2005., 1 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  90. National Center for Biotechnology Information [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/] webcite

  91. Tauch A, Kaiser O, Hain T, Goesmann A, Weisshaar B, Albersmeier A, Bekel T, Bischoff N, Brune I, Chakraborty T, Kalinowski J, Meyer F, Rupp O, Schneiker S, Viehoever P, Puhler A: Complete genome sequence and analysis of the multiresistant nosocomial pathogen Corynebacterium jeikeium K411, a lipid-requiring bacterium of the human skin flora.

    J Bacteriol 2005, 187:4671-4682. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  92. Ikeda M, Nakagawa S: The Corynebacterium glutamicum genome: features and impacts on biotechnological processes.

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2003, 62:99-109. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  93. Nishio Y, Nakamura Y, Kawarabayasi Y, Usuda Y, Kimura E, Sugimoto S, Matsui K, Yamagishi A, Kikuchi H, Ikeo K, Gojobori T: Comparative complete genome sequence analysis of the amino acid replacements responsible for the thermostability of Corynebacterium efficiens.

    Genome Res 2003, 13:1572-1579. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  94. Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Camus JC, Medina N, Mansoor H, Pryor M, Duthoy S, Grondin S, Lacroix C, Monsempe C, Simon S, Harris B, Atkin R, Doggett J, Mayes R, Keating L, Wheeler PR, Parkhill J, Barrell BG, Cole ST, Gordon SV, Hewinson RG: The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:7877-7882. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  95. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F: MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.

    Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  96. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.

    Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25:3389-3402. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  97. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.

    Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:4673-4680. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  98. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

    Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-422. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  99. Strimmer K, von Haeseler A: Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topoplogies.

    Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:964-969. OpenURL

  100. Yang Z: PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.

    Comput Appl Biosci 1997, 13:555-556. PubMed Abstract OpenURL