Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Evolutionary Biology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

The limits of subfunctionalization

Thomas MacCarthy1 and Aviv Bergman123*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA

2 Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA

3 Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7:213  doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-213

Published: 7 November 2007

Abstract

Background

The duplication-degeneration-complementation (DDC) model has been proposed as an explanation for the unexpectedly high retention of duplicate genes. The hypothesis proposes that, following gene duplication, the two gene copies degenerate to perform complementary functions that jointly match that of the single ancestral gene, a process also known as subfunctionalization. We distinguish between subfunctionalization at the regulatory level and at the product level (e.g within temporal or spatial expression domains).

Results

In contrast to what is expected under the DDC model, we use in silico modeling to show that regulatory subfunctionalization is expected to peak and then decrease significantly. At the same time, neofunctionalization (recruitment of novel interactions) increases monotonically, eventually affecting the regulatory elements of the majority of genes. Furthermore, since this process occurs under conditions of stabilizing selection, there is no need to invoke positive selection. At the product level, the frequency of subfunctionalization is no higher than would be expected by chance, a finding that was corroborated using yeast microarray time-course data. We also find that product subfunctionalization is not necessarily caused by regulatory subfunctionalization.

Conclusion

Our results suggest a more complex picture of post-duplication evolution in which subfunctionalization plays only a partial role in conjunction with redundancy and neofunctionalization. We argue that this behavior is a consequence of the high evolutionary plasticity in gene networks.