Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Evolutionary Biology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

A model of evolution with constant selective pressure for regulatory DNA sites

Farida N Enikeeva1*, Ekaterina A Kotelnikova24, Mikhail S Gelfand13 and Vsevolod J Makeev25

Author Affiliations

1 Institute for Information Transmission Problems (the Kharkevich Institute) of RAS, Bolshoi Karetny pereulok, 19, GSP-4, Moscow, 127994, Russia

2 State Research Institute of Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms, 1st Dorozhnyj proezd, 1, Moscow, 113535, Russia

3 Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, Vorobyevy Gory 1-73, Moscow, 119992, Russia

4 Ariadne Genomics Inc. 9700 Great Seneca Highway, Suite 113, Rockville, MD 20850, USA

5 Engelgardt Institute of Molecular Biology of RAS, Vavilova 32, Moscow, 119991, Russia

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7:125  doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-125

Published: 27 July 2007

Abstract

Background

Molecular evolution is usually described assuming a neutral or weakly non-neutral substitution model. Recently, new data have become available on evolution of sequence regions under a selective pressure, e.g. transcription factor binding sites. To reconstruct the evolutionary history of such sequences, one needs evolutionary models that take into account a substantial constant selective pressure.

Results

We present a simple evolutionary model with a single preferred (consensus) nucleotide and the neutral substitution model adopted for all other nucleotides. This evolutionary model has a rate matrix in which all substitutions that do not involve the consensus nucleotide occur with the same rate. The model has two time scales for achieving a stationary distribution; in the general case only one of the two rate parameters can be evaluated from the stationary distribution. In the middle-time zone, a counterintuitive behavior was observed for some parameter values, with a probability of conservation for a non-consensus nucleotide greater than that for the consensus nucleotide. Such an effect can be observed only in the case of weak preference for the consensus nucleotide, when the probability to observe the consensus nucleotide in the stationary distribution is less than 1/2. If the substitution rate is represented as a product of mutation and fixation, only the fixation can be calculated from the stationary distribution. The exhibited conservation of non-consensus nucleotides does not take place if the elements of mutation matrix are identical, and can be related to the reduced mutation rate between the non-consensus nucleotides. This bias can have no effect on the stationary distribution of nucleotide frequencies calculated over the ensemble of multiple alignments, e.g. transcription factor binding sites upstream of different sets of co-regulated orthologous genes.

Conclusion

The derived model can be used as a null model when analyzing the evolution of orthologous transcription factor binding sites. In particular, our findings show that a nucleotide preferred at some position of a multiple alignment of binding sites for some transcription factor in the same genome is not necessarily the most conserved nucleotide in an alignment of orthologous sites from different species. However, this effect can take place only in the case of a mutation matrix whose elements are not identical.