ESTimating plant phylogeny: lessons from partitioning

doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-48

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volume 6

Viewing options:

Abstract
Full text
PDF (884KB)
Additional files

Associated material:

Related literature:

Articles citing this article
on BioMed Central
on Google Scholar
on ISI Web of Science
on PubMed Central
Other articles by authors
on Google Scholar

de la Torre JE
Egan MG
Katari MS
Brenner ED
Stevenson DW
Coruzzi GM
DeSalle R

on PubMed

de la Torre JE
Egan MG
Katari MS
Brenner ED
Stevenson DW
Coruzzi GM
DeSalle R
Related articles/pages
on Google

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Tools:

Post to:

Mendeley
Twitter

Research article

ESTimating plant phylogeny: lessons from partitioning

Jose EB de la Torre¹^* , Mary G Egan²^* , Manpreet S Katari¹ , Eric D Brenner¹^,3 , Dennis W Stevenson³ , Gloria M Coruzzi¹ and Rob DeSalle²

¹Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Sq East, New York NY 10003, USA

²American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West @79^thSt., New York, NY 10024, USA

³New York Botanical Garden Bronx, 200th Street and Kazimiroff Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10458, USA

author email corresponding author email* Contributed equally

BMC Evolutionary Biology 2006, 6:48doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-48


Published:	15 June 2006

Additional files

Additional File 1:

Accession numbers for sequences used in the analysis. Accession numbers, by partition name, used to assemble the data matrix. Database of origin is indicated before each number. In some cases, more than one EST was used (i.e. clustered) to assemble a single partition.

Format: XLS Size: 42KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Excel Viewer

Additional File 2:

Table 2 – Data matrix used for analyses in this paper in NEXUS format. This file contains the raw data matrix of characters used in the phylogenetic analysis.

Format: NEX Size: 119KB Download file

Additional File 3:

Table 3 – Proportion of missing characters per taxon and data partition. This file lists the proportion of missing characters used in the analysis.

Format: PDF Size: 9KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader

Additional File 4:

Table 4 – Pairwise analysis of congruence among individual partitions. Table showing significance scores when the Incongruence Length Difference (ILD) test was applied to pairwise comparisons among each individual partition. Statistically significant numbers (i.e. equal or smaller than 0.05), showing phylogenetic incongruence among partitions, are shaded.

Format: PDF Size: 13KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader

Additional File 5:

Table 5 – Key to partition names.

Format: PDF Size: 23KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader