Fast sequence evolution of Hox and Hox-derived genes in the genus Drosophila

doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-106

BMC Evolutionary Biology
Volume 6

Viewing options:

Abstract
Full text
PDF (1.7MB)
Additional files

Associated material:

Related literature:

Articles citing this article
on Google Scholar
on ISI Web of Science
on PubMed Central
Other articles by authors
on Google Scholar

Casillas S
Negre B
Barbadilla A
Ruiz A

on PubMed

Casillas S
Negre B
Barbadilla A
Ruiz A
Related articles/pages
on Google

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Tools:

Post to:

Research article

Fast sequence evolution of Hox and Hox-derived genes in the genus Drosophila

Sònia Casillas¹ , Bárbara Negre¹^,2 , Antonio Barbadilla¹ and Alfredo Ruiz¹

¹Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain

²Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

author email corresponding author email

BMC Evolutionary Biology 2006, 6:106doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-106


Published:	12 December 2006

Abstract

Background

It is expected that genes that are expressed early in development and have a complex expression pattern are under strong purifying selection and thus evolve slowly. Hox genes fulfill these criteria and thus, should have a low evolutionary rate. However, some observations point to a completely different scenario. Hox genes are usually highly conserved inside the homeobox, but very variable outside it.

Results

We have measured the rates of nucleotide divergence and indel fixation of three Hox genes, labial (lab), proboscipedia (pb) and abdominal-A (abd-A), and compared them with those of three genes derived by duplication from Hox3, bicoid (bcd), zerknüllt (zen) and zerknüllt-related (zen2), and 15 non-Hox genes in sets of orthologous sequences of three species of the genus Drosophila. These rates were compared to test the hypothesis that Hox genes evolve slowly. Our results show that the evolutionary rate of Hox genes is higher than that of non-Hox genes when both amino acid differences and indels are taken into account: 43.39% of the amino acid sequence is altered in Hox genes, versus 30.97% in non-Hox genes and 64.73% in Hox-derived genes. Microsatellites scattered along the coding sequence of Hox genes explain partially, but not fully, their fast sequence evolution.

Conclusion

These results show that Hox genes have a higher evolutionary dynamics than other developmental genes, and emphasize the need to take into account indels in addition to nucleotide substitutions in order to accurately estimate evolutionary rates.