|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 3.
Figure 3 displays the synthesis of 34 alphaproteobacterial genes (atp1, atp6, atp9, cob, cox2, cox3, nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4l, nad5, nad6, nad7,
nad8, nad11, rpl2, rpl5, rpl6, rpl11, rpl14, rpl16, rpoA, rpoB, rpoC, rps7, rps10,
rps12, rps13, rps14, rps19, sdh2, sdh3 and tufA). The proposed vertical-inheritance backbone representing the concatenation tree
is shown in dark blue, with the line thickness of an internal branch corresponding
to the frequency of its support across the whole dataset. Support was considered significant
when clades received > 50% bootstrap support. Putative LGT events are in orange, connecting
donors (circles) with recipients (arrowheads); where there are multiple possible donor
candidates, these converge onto a double arrowhead. This happens when the clade founded
by a past LGT donor may have subsequently had its species membership obfuscated by
later exchanges of genetic material, yielding a non-reference assemblage of species
labels in a presumed lineage. Where the apparent donor of a gene falls outside of
the taxa included in the analysis, one is created as a basal group taxon, indicated
in light blue. In order to avoid graphical congestion, branches in the tree may be
artificially extended, as dotted segments.
Bapteste et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2005 5:33 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-5-33 |