Table 1

Results of flow cytometry analyses
  Population code N Coefficient of variation % Relative fluorescence intesity
HEXAPLOID mar_1 5 4.83 (0.35) 165.33 (3.30)
mar_2 8 3.99 (0.49) 177.00 (2.89)
mar_3 4 3.64 (0.18) 173.89 (2.25)
mar_4 6 5.26 (0.73) 166.48 (5.85)
mar_5 5 5.16 (0.76) 171.28 (4.93)
mar_6 8 4.67 (0.42) 174.27 (2.89)
mar_7 6 3.54 (0.30) 194.21 (2.54)
mar_8 9 4.89 (0.16) 164.42 (1.93)
mar_9
Total hexaploid 51 4.52 (0.74) 173.19 (9.56)
DODECAPLOID mar_10 6 5.38 (0.93) 333.97 (9.09)
mar_11 5 4.69 (0.23) 324.62 (5.15)
mar_12 5 4.86 (0.58) 321.78 (5.49)
mar_13 8 4.16 (0.36) 324.90 (9.60)
mar_14 5 3.46 (0.25) 353.78 (5.43)
mar_15 5 3.86 (0.27) 359.44 (5.49)
mar_16 3 4.43 (0.17) 356.47 (7.17)
mar_17 5 3.19 (0.20) 373.15 (4.34)
mar_18 7 3.75 (0.48) 367.04 (12.06)
Total dodecaploid 49 4.24 (0.82) 343.93 (21.14)

Populations codes (as in Table 4), numbers of individual analyzed (N), coefficient of variation in percentage and relative fluorescence intensity, with standard deviation in parentheses, are reported.

Casazza et al.

Casazza et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012 12:56   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-56

Open Data