Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Gene duplication and an accelerated evolutionary rate in 11S globulin genes are associated with higher protein synthesis in dicots as compared to monocots

BMC Evolutionary Biology volume 12, Article number: 15 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Seed storage proteins are a major source of dietary protein, and the content of such proteins determines both the quantity and quality of crop yield. Significantly, examination of the protein content in the seeds of crop plants shows a distinct difference between monocots and dicots. Thus, it is expected that there are different evolutionary patterns in the genes underlying protein synthesis in the seeds of these two groups of plants.

Results

Gene duplication, evolutionary rate and positive selection of a major gene family of seed storage proteins (the 11S globulin genes), were compared in dicots and monocots. The results, obtained from five species in each group, show more gene duplications, a higher evolutionary rate and positive selections of this gene family in dicots, which are rich in 11S globulins, but not in the monocots.

Conclusion

Our findings provide evidence to support the suggestion that gene duplication and an accelerated evolutionary rate may be associated with higher protein synthesis in dicots as compared to monocots.

Background

The plant seed is not only an organ of propagation and dispersal but also the major plant tissue harvested and used either directly as part of the human diet or as feed for animals. At the present time there is concern over long term food security and the impact of the move towards meat-based diets that will lead to a significant increase in the demand for plant protein for animal feed [1]. The amount of protein present in plant seeds varies from ~10% of the dry weight in most monocot (e.g. O. sativa, S. bicolor, S. italica, Z. mays and B. distachyon) to more than 30% in most dicots (e.g. G. max, R. communis, C. sativus and A. thaliana), and forms a major source of dietary protein [2–7]. To determine whether differences in evolutionary patterns may explain the phenotypic differences observed, a comparative investigation of evolutionary divergence in genes underlying protein synthesis in these two groups of plants is thus warranted.

Seed storage proteins can be classified into four groups: albumins, globulins, prolamins and glutelins [8]. Albumins and globulins comprise the storage proteins of dicots, whereas prolamins and glutelins are the major proteins in monocots [4, 9, 10]. 2S albumins, a major class of dicot seed storage proteins, have been most widely studied in the Cruciferae, notably B. napus and A. thaliana [9, 10]. Prolamins, the major endosperm storage proteins of all cereal grains, with the exceptions of oats and rice, can be classified into many subgroups, e.g. sulphur-rich (S-rich), sulphur-poor (S-poor) and high molecular weight (HMW) prolamins [4]. The globulins, the most widely distributed group of storage proteins, are part of the cupin superfamily [11] and are evolved from bacterial enzymes. The globulins are present not only in dicots but also in monocots [9] and can be divided into 7S vicilin-type and 11S legumin-type globulins according to their sedimentation coefficients. It should be noted that the genes encoding the 11S-type globulins in monocots are the same gene family, 11S globulin family, as those in dicots; whereas the genes encoding the 7S-type globulins in monocots are not evolutionarily related to those in dicots [4]. Thus, we focus on the genes encoding the 11S-type globulins in this study.

Many efforts have been made to describe the gene families encoding seed storage proteins. For albumins, they are encoded by multi-gene families in many dicots (e.g., A. thaliana and B. napus); and evolutionary research into the gene families suggests that the albumin genes were duplicated prior to the Brassiceae-Sysimbrieae split, and gene duplication has played a role in their evolution [12, 13]. For prolamins, they are the major seed storage proteins in most grass species (e.g., Z. mays and S. bicolor); and studies have suggested that the prolamin gene families have undergone many rounds of gene duplication [14, 15]. For globulins, eight, four, eleven and fourteen gene have been identified and classified in G. max, A. thaliana, R. communis and O. sativa, respectively [16–24].

From the research described above, it can be concluded that the seed storage protein gene families have expanded in a lineage-specific manner through gene duplication. As a major process in the evolution, gene duplications can provide raw material for evolution by producing new copies. The human globin gene family is a representative example: several globin genes have arisen from a single ancestral precursor, thus making individual genes available to take on specialized roles, with some genes becoming active during embryonic and fetal development, and others becoming active in the adult organism [25]. Gene duplications may also affect phenotype by altering gene dosage: the amount of protein synthesized is often proportional to the number of gene copies present, so extra genes can lead to excess proteins. This applies to many kinds of genes, such as rRNAs, tRNA and histones [26, 27]. A critical question thus can be asked: does gene duplication contribute to the higher levels of protein synthesis in dicots than in monocots? On the other hand, gene duplication usually brings variation in evolutionary rate [26], and such variation has been predicted to be associated with phenotypic differences. For example, Hunt et al. [28] investigated the evolution of genes associated with phenotypically plastic castes, sexes, and developmental stages of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta, and argued that an elevated rate is a precursor to the evolution of phenotypic differences. Thus, we are also interested in another question: does an accelerated evolutionary rate play a role in the evolution of storage protein content?

To shed light on the two questions above, we investigated the process of molecular evolution of the 11S globulin gene family, which is widely distributed in dicot and monocot species, by comparing the differing evolutionary patterns in the two groups. Our analyses suggested that gene duplication and an accelerated evolutionary rate in 11S globulin genes may be associated with higher protein synthesis in dicots than in monocots.

Results

Sequences retrieval and phylogenetic analysis

We collect the sequences of 11S globulin genes through a COG method. This procedure is based a simple notion that, if any proteins from distant genomes are more similar to each other than to any other proteins from the same genomes, they are most likely to belong to an orthologous family. In such a family, there are two kinds of relationship between a pair of sequences, namely symmetrical and asymmetrical BeTs (the Best Hits). If the symmetrical and asymmetrical BeTs are linked respectively by solid and broken lines, the orthologous family would forms a network; and thus all other members in the network can be identified when one member was investigated [29]. The 11S globulin genes from the five dicots and the five monocots form a COG containing 56 sequences (Figure 1). Of these genes, four genes encoding 12S globulins [20] come from A. thaliana; six genes, Gy1-Gy5 and Gy7 [16], come from G. max; twelve genes, all the functional glutelin genes, come from O. sativa [24]; eleven genes described in [7] come from R. communis; and six, seven, six, one, one and two genes come from C. sativus, P. trichocarpa, B. distachyon, Z. mays, S. bicolor and S. italica, respectively.

Figure 1
figure 1

The COG of 11S globulin gene family. Solid lines show symmetrical BeTs (the Best Hits) and broken lines show asymmetrical BeTs. Genes from the same species are adjacent. Gene ID is indicated and the prefix "Rc" denotes IDs from Ricinus communis. Among these IDs, At1g03880, At1g03890, At4g28520 and At5g44120 are known to encode CRB, CRU2, CRC and CRA1, respectively; Glyma03g32030, Glyma03g32020, Glyma19g34780, Glyma10g04280, Glyma13g18450 and Glyma19g34770 to encode Gy1-5 and Gy7, respectively; Rc29600.m000561, Rc29600.m000564, Rc30005.m001289, Rc30005.m001290, Rc29611.m000223, Rc29200.m000169, Rc29629.m001355, Rc29709.m001187, Rc29716.m000305, Rc29200.m000167 and Rc30005.m001288 to encode RcLEG1-1 to RcLEG1-5 and RcLEG2-1 to RcLEG2-6, respectively; and Os01g55690, Os10g26060, Os03g31360, Os02g15169, Os02g15178, Os02g15150, Os02g16820, Os02g16830, Os02g14600, Os02g15070, Os02g25640 and Os02g15090 to encode GluA-1, GluA-2, GluA-3, GluB-1a, GluB-1b, GluB-2, GluB-5, GluB-4, GluB-7, GluB-6, GluC-1 and GluD, respectively.

Full size image

In order to analyze the phylogenetic relationship of the 11S globulin genes from the above ten species, the NJ and Bayesian methods were used to reconstruct the phylogenetic tree. Similar results were achieved (data not shown), and the NJ tree is shown in Figure 2, in which there are three subfamily clades: dicot subfamily 1, dicot subfamily 2 and monocot subfamily. The dicot subfamily 1 contains all the genes from A. thaliana and G. max, two genes from C. sativus, two genes from P. trichocarpa and RcLEG1 of R. communis; the dicot subfamily 2 contains the other genes from C. sativus, P. trichocarpa and R. communis; and the monocot subfamily contains all the genes from the five monocot species. In the three subfamilies, with the exception of rice, genes from the same species form monophyletic groups; and the phylogenetic relationship of the monophyletic groups is largely concordant with the species tree described by [30].

Figure 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic relationships of sequences within the 11S globulin gene family by neighbor joining (NJ) method with bootstrap support above 50% shown at the nodes. Letter A-E indicates the branches used in analysis of evolutionary rate and positive selection.

Full size image

Gene duplication in 11S globulin gene family

In the 11S globulin gene family, there are four or more genes from C. sativus, P. trichocarpa, R. communis, A. thaliana, G. max, B. distachyon and O. sativa, suggesting that the 11S globulin genes in these species have undergone two or more rounds of duplication. Among these duplications, tandem duplication is a major type, and occurred in all the species above, e.g. Rc30005.m001289-Rc30005.m001290 and At1g03880-At1g03890 and Os02g16820-Os02g16830. Furthermore, most of the 11S globulin genes from the dicot species are located on the chromosome segments that share conserved synteny with each other [18], suggesting that segment duplication or whole genome duplication (WGD) is the major origin of duplicate genes.

Evolutionary rate of 11S globulin gene family

To determine whether there were different evolutionary patterns across different subfamilies of the 11S globulin genes in monocots and dicots, the ω values for these genes were calculated by a branch-specific model.

In the branch-specific model, three cases were considered in this study. One is a two-ratio model that suggests there are distinct monocot (ω0) and dicot subfamilies (ω1), one is a three-ratio model that suggests there is one monocot (ω0) and two dicot subfamilies 1 (ω1) and 2 (ω2), and one is a six-ratio model that suggests there are subclades under the branches A-E (ω1 ~ ω5) and the other (ω0). All the above models were favored over the one-ratio model by the likelihood ratio test (P < 0.05, Table 1) and in the two-, three- and six-ratio models, the ω estimate for the dicot subfamily is considerably higher than that for the monocot subfamily. These results suggest that the dicot 11S globulin genes are under reduced evolutionary constraints, and thus evolve at a higher evolutionary rate. We should point out that in the six-ratio model, the genes from S. italica, Z. mays and S. bicolor were not taken into account, because they may have a different evolutionary pattern due to the fact that 11S globulins are minor components [4, 31] and there are only one or two 11S globulin gene copies in these species; and that branches A-E were chosen because five branches can be grouped for the phylogenetic tree.

Table 1 Evolutionary rate analysis of 11S globulin family using branch-specific model of PAML
Full size table

Positive selection in the 11S globulin genes

To test for positive selection in the 11S globulin gene family, branches A, B, C, D and E were independently defined as the foreground branch in the branch-site model (Figure 2). When branches A, B, C or D were defined as the foreground branch, the null hypothesis is rejected (P < 0.01); and the estimated parameters of the alternative hypotheses indicate that about 5%-11% sites on these branches were under positive selection with a ω value (ω2) larger than one. When branch E was brought to the foreground, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, and thus no significant positive selection was detected (Table 2). This result suggests that positive selection mainly occurred in the 11S globulin genes in dicots.

Table 2 Summary statistics for detecting selection using branch-site models of PAML
Full size table

Discussion and Conclusions

Gene duplication may be associated with the higher 11S globulin content in dicots

In our duplication analyses, we found four or more 11S globulin genes in each of the five dicot species analyzed. It appears that higher number of duplicates is a feature of the dicot 11S globulin genes, rather than being randomly produced by the hitchhiking effect of genome duplication, because:

i) The copy number of the dicot 11S globulin gene is higher than the average copy number of the genome; for example, in the genome of A. thaliana, 80% of genes recovered to single copy through gene loss in a short period after the duplications, resulting an average of 2.3 copies per family [32], which is lower than the 4 duplicates in the 11S globulin gene family; in the genome of G. max, 74.1% and 56.6% genes were lost following the early and the recent WGD, respectively, resulting an average of about 3 copies per family [33, 34], which is lower than the 6 duplicates in the globulin gene family;

ii) In each of the five dicots, there are 11S globulin genes that arose from tandem duplications; and

iii) The genomes of S. italica, Z. mays and S. bicolor are thought to have undergone several rounds of duplications [35, 36], but they contain only one or two 11S globulin genes, suggesting that gene losses are common in the family, and thus implying that the duplicates of the 11S globulin genes are preferentially retained in the dicot species.

We hypothesize that the higher number of duplicates may be associated with higher 11S globulin content in dicots. The reasons are as follows.

First, the seed 11S globulin content in the species with a higher copy number of 11S globulin genes is greater than that in those with a lower copy number (Table 3). In the dicot species A. thaliana, R. communis, G. max and C. sativus, the copy number of 11S globulin genes is four or more, and the 11S globulins are predominant among the seed storage proteins [2, 5, 20, 37–41]. In the monocot species S. italica, Z. mays and S. bicolor, the copy number of 11S globulin genes is one or two, and 11S globulins are minor [4, 31]. However, there are two exceptions, O. sativa and B. distachyon (monocots). In these two species, the copy number of 11S globulin genes is six or more and the 11S globulins are predominant among the seed storage proteins [6, 42–44], although the overall protein content is low.

Table 3 The content of seed 11S globulins and the copy number of their genes
Full size table

Second, the presence of duplicate genes leads to the production of an extra amount of protein, because extra mRNA can be produced [26]. There is some evidence for this viewpoint: i) the absence of, or preferential expression of, the 11S globulin genes in G. max leads to glycinin deficiency or greater accumulation, respectively [45, 46]; ii) of the glycinin gene groups I (Gy1-Gy3), IIa (Gy4) and IIb (Gy5) in G. max, a mutation with the absence of one or two groups of genes leads to a decrease in glycinin content [47]; and simultaneous mutation of all the genes leads to the lack of all the glycinin polypeptides [48]. Third, enlarging the 2S albumin gene family of A. thaliana by introducing an extra member leads to an increase in transcript production [49].

Finally, in the investigation of ancestral whole genome duplication in seed plants and angiosperms, Jiao et al. [50] proposed that there were two WGDs in ancestral lineages shortly before the diversification of extant seed plants and extant angiosperms respectively, and argued that these ancestral WGDs i) resulted in the diversification of regulatory genes important to seed and flower development; ii) were involved in major innovations that ultimately contributed to the rise and eventual dominance of seed plants and angiosperms; and iii) enabled flowering plants to enjoy a distinct evolutionary advantage that allowed them to survive harsh climatic changes and even mass extinctions. The seed storage proteins provide essential nutrition for seed germination and development, and thus are vital for species survival and adaptation. Therefore, the genes governing the seed storage proteins are expected to have a higher number of duplications, leading to improved phenotypic robustness and an evolutionary advantage.

Higher evolutionary rate may be associated with the higher 11S globulin content in dicots

In the evolutionary rate analyses, a consistent conclusion, that the dicot 11S globulin genes evolve more rapidly, was achieved from the three branch-specific models, i.e. two-, three- and six-ratio models (Table 1). We hypothesize that accelerated evolutionary rate may also be associated with the higher 11S globulin content in dicots. The reasons are as follows.

Positive selection leads to an accelerated evolutionary rate of the 11S globulin genes in dicots, and may also lead to a higher ability of dicots to produce 11S globulins. Positive selection is a major factor affecting the evolutionary rate of a gene [51]. To investigate evidence for positive selection in the 11S globulin genes, we analyzed five branches, i.e. branches A-E (Figure 2), which represent the major origin events in the evolution of the 11S globulin gene families, e.g. branch B represents the origin of G. max 11S globulin gene family. Of these branches, branches A-D, being the dicot 11S globulin genes, were proved to have undergone positive selection, whereas branch E, being the monocot 11S globulin genes, did not. This result provides evidence that positive selection may lead to a higher ability of dicots to produce 11S globulins.

To shed more light on the role of gene duplication and accelerated rates of evolution in producing the observed patterns of divergence in protein synthesis between dicots and monocots, future studies investigating other types of seed storage proteins and a broader range of plant species will be needed.

Methods

Sequences Retrieval and Comparisons

Sequences retrieval and comparisons were performed using the method described by Tatusov et al. [29] with a slight modification. Briefly, our method included the following steps:

1) Amino acid sequences of proteins were downloaded from JGI (http://www.phytozome.net/), the maize sequence from http://www.maizesequence.org, and used to construct a local BLAST database using BLAST 2.2.24. The species are listed in Table 4.

Table 4 Source of the 11S globulin genes used in this study
Full size table

2) An all-against-all protein sequence comparison was carried out.

3) In all the comparisons produced in the step 2, the ones with G. max Gy1 [16] as a query were identified, and the obvious paralogs were collapsed.

4) All interspecies Best Hits (BeTs) of Gy1 and their paralogs were detected.

5) Steps 3) and 4) were repeated, with the resulting sequences as secondary BLASTp queries until no new sequence was found.

6) The protocol of Tatusov et al. [29] was applied to all the sequences from the analysis above and used to form a Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG).

7) A case-by-case analysis of the COG was conducted. This analysis served to eliminate false-positives and to ensure all homologs were included.

This approach was based on the consistency between genome-specific best hits, rather than the absolute level of similarity; it therefore allows the detection of orthologs among both slowly and quickly evolving genes.

Phylogenetic Analyses

The cDNA sequences were aligned using the codon model of program PRANK (100701 version) using the default options [52], and were then translated into amino acid sequences. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction was carried out using both Neighbor-Joining (NJ) and Bayesian approaches based on the aligned amino acid sequences. In the NJ method, the phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the MEGA 5 program [53]. The parameter setups were as follows: model, Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) [54]; bootstrap, 1000 replicates; and gap/missing data, pairwise-deletion.

In the Bayesian method, the analyses were conducted using MrBayes v3.1 [55]. The parameter setups were as follows: JTT substitution model, four chains, one million generations, two runs, sampling every 100 generations and discarding a burn-in of 250,000 generations.

Estimation of dN/dSRatios

The coding sequences were aligned using the codon model of PRANK software (100701 version) using the default options [52], and alignment gaps were deleted manually.

On the basis of the aligned coding sequences, the pairwise ratio of non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site (dN) to the synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (dS) (ω value) of homologous genes was calculated by the maximum likelihood method in Codeml from the PAML package v4.4 [56]. Saturation effects were avoided by discarding the gene pairs for which dS > 2 [57].

The branch-specific model, which allows the ω ratio to vary among the branches in the phylogeny, was used to test whether there are different ω values on particular lineages [58]. If the ω ratio among all the branches is a constant, the model can be changed into the one-ratio model. Thus the likelihood ratio test (LRT) was used to test whether the data fit the branch-specific model significantly better than the one-ratio model [58].

Detection of Positive Selection

The aligned codon sequences were used to test positive selection using the branch-site model implemented in the program Codeml of PAML 4.4 [56]. This model allows ω to vary both among sites in the sequences and across branches on the tree and its purpose is to detect positive selection affecting a few sites along particular lineages (called foreground branches). The model assumes that there are four site classes in the sequence. The first class of sites is highly conserved in all lineages with a small ω ratio, ω0. The second class includes neutral or weakly constrained sites for which ω = ω1, where ω1 is near or smaller than 1. In the third and fourth classes, the background lineages show ω0 or ω1, but foreground branches have ω2, which may be greater than 1. In the LRT, the null hypothesis fixes ω2 = 1 (neutral selection) and the alternative hypothesis constrains ω2 ≥ 1 (positive selection) [59, 60]. In the existence of positive selection, the posterior probabilities for the sites with positive selection were calculated by the Bayes empirical Bayes method (BEB) [61].

Abbreviations

BEB:

the Bayes empirical Bayes

BeTs:

Best Hits

COG:

Clusters of Orthologous Groups

HMW:

high molecular weight

JTT:

Jones-Taylor-Thornton

LRT:

likelihood ratio test

NJ:

Neighbor Joining

WGD:

whole genome duplication

References

  1. OECD/FAO: OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011-2020, OECD Publishing and FOA. 2011, [http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2011-en]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jacks TJ, Hensarling TP, Yatsu LY: Cucurbit seeds: I. Characterizations and uses of oils and proteins. A Review. Econ Bot. 1972, 26: 135-141. 10.1007/BF02860774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Derbyshire E, Wright DJ, Boulter D: Legumin and vicilin, storage proteins of legume seeds. Phytochemistry. 1976, 15: 3-24. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)89046-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shewry PR, Halford NG: Cereal seed storage proteins: structures, properties and role in grain utilization. J Exp Bot. 2002, 53: 947-958. 10.1093/jexbot/53.370.947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baud S, Dubreucq B, Miquel M, Rochat C, Lepiniec L: Storage reserve accumulation in Arabidopsis: metabolic and developmental control of seed filling. The Arabidopsis Book. 2008, 6: e0113-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Larré C, Penninck S, Bouchet B, Lollier V, Tranquet O, Denery-Papini S, Guillon F, Rogniaux H: Brachypodium distachyon grain: identification and subcellular localization of storage proteins. J Exp Bot. 2010, 61: 1771-1783. 10.1093/jxb/erq050.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chileh T, Esteban-García B, Alonso DL, García-Maroto F: Characterization of the 11S globulin gene family in the castor plant Ricinus communis L. J Agric Food Chem. 2010, 58: 272-281. 10.1021/jf902970p.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Osborne TB: The Vegetable Proteins. Monographs in Biochemistry. 1924, London: Longmans, Green and Co, xiii+154-

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shewry PR, Napier JA, Tatham AS: Seed storage proteins: structures and biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 1995, 7: 945-956.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandal S, Mandal RK: Seed storage proteins and approaches for improvement of their nutritional quality by genetic engineering. Curr Sci. 2000, 79: 576-589.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dunwell JM, Purvis A, Khuri S: Cupins: The most functionally diverse protein superfamily?. Phytochemistry. 2004, 65: 7-17. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2003.08.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krebbers E, Herdies L, De Clercq A, Seurinck J, Leemans J, Van Damme J, Segura M, Gheysen G, Van Montagu M, Vandekerckhove J: Determination of the processing sites of an Arabidopsis 2S albumin and characterization of the complete gene family. Plant Physiol. 1988, 87: 859-866. 10.1104/pp.87.4.859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Boutilier K, Hattori J, Baum BR, Miki BL: Evolution of 2S albumin seed storage protein genes in the Brassicaceae. Biochem Syst Ecol. 1999, 27: 223-234. 10.1016/S0305-1978(98)00103-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu JH, Messing J: Organization of the prolamin gene family provides insight into the evolution of the maize genome and gene duplications in grass species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 14330-14335. 10.1073/pnas.0807026105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu JH, Bennetzen JL, Messing J: Dynamic gene copy number variation in collinear regions of grass genomes. Mol Biol Evol

  16. Nielsen NC, Dickinson CD, Cho TJ, Thanh VH, Scallon BJ, Fischer RL, Sims TL, Drews GN, Goldberg RB: Characterization of the glycinin gene family in soybean. Plant Cell. 1989, 1: 313-328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Beilinson V, Chen Z, Shoemaker RC, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Nielsen NC: Genomic organization of glycinin genes in soybean. Theor Appl Genet. 2002, 104: 1132-1140. 10.1007/s00122-002-0884-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li C, Zhang YM: Molecular evolution of glycinin and β-conglycinin gene families in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Heredity. 2011, 106: 633-641. 10.1038/hdy.2010.97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pang PP, Pruitt RE, Meyerowitz EM: Molecular cloning, genome organization, expression and evolution of 12S seed storage protein genes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 1988, 11: 805-820. 10.1007/BF00019521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujiwara T, Nambara E, Yamagishi K, Goto DB, Naito S: Storage proteins. The Arabidopsis Book. 2002, 1: e0020-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Higuchi W, Fukazawa C: A rice glutelin and a soybean glycinin have evolved from a common ancestral gene. Gene. 1987, 55: 245-253. 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90284-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takaiwa F, Kikuchi S, Oono K: A rice glutelin gene family: a major type of glutelin mRNAs can be divided into 2 classes. Mol Gen Genet. 1987, 208: 15-22. 10.1007/BF00330416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takaiwa F, Oono K, Wing D, Kato A: Sequence of three members and expression of a new major subfamily of glutelin genes from rice. Plant Mol Biol. 1991, 17: 875-885. 10.1007/BF00037068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kawakatsu T, Yamamoto MP, Hirose S, Yano M, Takaiwa F: Characterization of a new rice glutelin gene GluD-1 expressed in the starchy endosperm. J Exp Bot. 2008, 59: 4233-4245. 10.1093/jxb/ern265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hardison R, Slightom JL, Gumucio DL, Goodman M, Stojanovic N, Miller W: Locus control regions of mammalian beta-globin gene clusters: combining phylogenetic analyses and experimental results to gain functional insights. Gene. 1997, 205: 73-94. 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00474-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang JZ: Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003, 18: 292-298. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00033-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clancy S, Shaw K: DNA deletion and duplication and the associated genetic disorders. Nature Education. 2008, 1 -(1). [http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/DNA-Deletion-and-Duplication-and-the-Associated-331]

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hunt BG, Ometto L, Wurm Y, Shoemaker D, Yi SV, Keller L, Goodisman MA: Relaxed selection is a precursor to the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108: 15936-15941. 10.1073/pnas.1104825108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV: The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 33-36. 10.1093/nar/28.1.33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Soltis PS, Soltis DE: The origin and diversification of angiosperms. Am J Bot. 2004, 91: 1614-1626. 10.3732/ajb.91.10.1614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sabelli PA, Larkins BA: The development of endosperm in grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149: 14-26. 10.1104/pp.108.129437.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative: Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000, 408: 796-815. 10.1038/35048692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shoemaker RC, Schlueter J, Doyle JJ: Paleopolyploidy and genome duplication in soybean and other legumes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006, 9: 104-109. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, Hyten DL, Song Q, Thelen JJ, Cheng J, Xu D, Hellsten U, May GD, Yu Y, Sakurai T, Umezawa T, Bhattacharyya MK, Sandhu D, Valliyodan B, Lindquist E, Peto M, Grant D, Shu S, Goodstein D, Barry K, Futrell-Griggs M, Abernathy B, Du J, Tian Z, Zhu L, et al: Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature. 2010, 463: 178-183. 10.1038/nature08670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Swigonová Z, Lai J, Ma J, Ramakrishna W, Llaca V, Bennetzen JL, Messing J: Close split of sorghum and maize genome progenitors. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 1916-1923. 10.1101/gr.2332504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Tang H, Bowers JE, Wang X, Paterson AH: Angiosperm genome comparisons reveal early polyploidy in the monocot lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 472-477. 10.1073/pnas.0908007107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Youle RJ, Huang AH: Protein bodies from the endosperm of castor bean: Subfractionation, protein components, lectins, and changes during germination. Plant Physiol. 1976, 58: 703-709. 10.1104/pp.58.6.703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hara I, Ohmiya M, Matsubara H: Pumpkin (Cucurbita sp) seed globulins III. Comparison of subunit structures among seed globulins of various Cucurbita species and characterization of peptide components. Plant Cell Physiol. 1978, 19: 237-243.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hara-Nishimura I, Nishimura M, Matsubara H, Akazawa T: Suborganellar localization of proteinase catalyzing the limited hydrolysis of pumpkin globulin. Plant Physiol. 1982, 70: 699-703. 10.1104/pp.70.3.699.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Utsumi S: Plant food protein engineering. Advances in food and nutrition research. Edited by: Kinsella JE. 1992, San Diego: Academic Press, 36: 89-208.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Krishnan HB: Biochemistry and molecular biology of soybean seed storage proteins. J New Seeds. 2000, 2: 1-25. 10.1300/J153v02n04_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yamagata H, Sugimoto T, Tanaka K, Kasai Z: Biosynthesis of storage proteins in developing rice seeds. Plant Physiol. 1982, 70: 1094-1100. 10.1104/pp.70.4.1094.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Furuta M, Yamagata H, Tanaka K, Kasai Z, Fujii S: Cell-free synthesis of the rice glutelin precursor. Plant Cell Physiol. 1986, 27: 1201-1204.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Laudencia-Chingcuanco DL, Vensel WH: Globulins are the main seed storage proteins in Brachypodium distachyon. Theor Appl Genet. 2008, 117: 555-563. 10.1007/s00122-008-0799-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Krishnan HB, Natarajan SS, Mahmoud AA, Nelson RL: Identification of glycinin and β-conglycinin subunits that contribute to the increased protein content of high-protein soybean lines. J Agric Food Chem. 2007, 55: 1839-1845. 10.1021/jf062497n.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Narikawa T, Tamura T, Yagasaki K, Terauchi K, Sanmiya K, Ishimaru Y, Abe K, Asakura T: Expression of the stress-related genes for glutathione S-transferase and ascorbate peroxidase in the most-glycinin-deficient soybean cultivar Tousan205 during seed maturation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010, 74: 1976-1979. 10.1271/bbb.100479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yagasaki K, Takagi T, Sakai M, Kitamura K: Biochemical characterization of soybean protein consisting of different subunits of glycinin. J Agric Food Chem. 1997, 45: 656-660. 10.1021/jf9604394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Takahashi M, Uematsu Y, Kashiwaba K, Yagasaki K, Hajika M, Matsunaga R, Komatsu K, Ishimoto M: Accumulation of high levels of free amino acids in soybean seeds through integration of mutations conferring seed protein deficiency. Planta. 2003, 217: 577-586. 10.1007/s00425-003-1026-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Guerche P, Tire C, De Sa FG, De Clercq A, Van Montagu M, Krebbers E: Differential expression of the Arabidopsis 2S albumin genes and the effect of increasing gene family size. Plant Cell. 1990, 2: 469-478.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, Tomsho LP, Hu Y, Liang H, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Clifton SW, Schlarbaum SE, Schuster SC, Ma H, Leebens-Mack J, dePamphilis CW: Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature. 2011, 473: 97-100. 10.1038/nature09916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ridley M: Evolution. 2004, Blackwell Science Ltd: Blackwell, 1-91. 3th version

    Google Scholar 

  52. Löytynoja A, Goldman N: An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 10557-10562. 10.1073/pnas.0409137102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol

  54. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM: The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Bio Sci. 1992, 8: 275-282.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 1572-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang Z: PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1586-1591. 10.1093/molbev/msm088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ramsay H, Rieseberg LH, Ritland K: The correlation of evolutionary rate with pathway position in plant terpenoid biosynthesis. Mol Biol Evol. 2009, 26: 1045-1053. 10.1093/molbev/msp021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yang Z: Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1998, 15: 568-573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yang Z, Nielsen R: Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19: 908-917. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang J, Nielsen R, Yang Z: Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22: 2472-2479. 10.1093/molbev/msi237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Yang Z, Wong WSW, Nielsen R: Bayes empirical Bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22: 1107-1118. 10.1093/molbev/msi097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative: Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000, 408: 796-815. 10.1038/35048692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Huang S, Li R, Zhang Z, Gu X, Fan W, Lucas W, Wang X, Xie B, Ni P, Ren Y, Zhu H, Li J, Lin K, Jin W, Fei Z, Li G, Staub J, Kilian A, van der Vossen EAG, Wu Y, Guo J, He J, Jia Z, Ren Y, Tian G, Lu Y, Ruan J, Qian W, Wang M, Huang Q, et al: The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Nat Genet. 2009, 41: 1275-1281. 10.1038/ng.475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov , A Schein J, Sterck L, Aerts A, Bhalerao RR, Bhalerao RP, Blaudez D, Boerjan W, Brun A, Brunner A, Busov V, Campbell M, Carlson J, Chalot M, Chapman J, Chen GL, Cooper D, Coutinho PM, Couturier J, Covert S, Cronk Q, et al: The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science. 2006, 313: 1596-1604. 10.1126/science.1128691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Chan AP, Crabtree J, Zhao Q, Lorenzi H, Orvis J, Puiu D, Melake-Berhan A, Jones KM, Redman J, Chen G, Cahoon EB, Gedil M, Stanke M, Haas BJ, Wortman JR, Fraser-Liggett CM, Ravel J, Rabinowicz PD, et al: Draft genome sequence of the oilseed species Ricinus communis. Nat Biotechnol. 2010, 28: 951-956. 10.1038/nbt.1674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. The International Brachypodium Initiative: Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature. 2010, 463: 763-768. 10.1038/nature08747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ouyang S, Zhu W, Hamilton J, Lin H, Campbell M, Childs K, Thibaud-Nissen F, Malek RL, Lee Y, Zheng L, Orvis J, Haas B, Wortman J, Buell CR: The TIGR Rice Genome Annotation Resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, D883-887. 35 Database

  68. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, Liang C, Zhang J, Fulton L, Graves TA, Minx P, Reily AD, Courtney L, Kruchowski SS, Tomlinson C, Strong C, Delehaunty K, Fronick C, Courtney B, Rock SM, Belter E, Du F, Kim K, Abbott RM, Cotton M, Levy A, Marchetto P, Ochoa K, Jackson SM, Gillam B, et al: The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. 2009, 326: 1112-1115. 10.1126/science.1178534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov A, Schmutz J, Spannagl M, Tang H, Wang X, Wicker T, Bharti AK, Chapman J, Feltus FA, Gowik U, Grigoriev IV, Lyons E, Maher CA, Martis M, Narechania A, Otillar RP, Penning BW, Salamov AA, Wang Y, Zhang L, Carpita NC, et al: The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature. 2009, 457: 551-556. 10.1038/nature07723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Hugo Zheng at McGill University for help with improvements to the English text. This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB109300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30971848), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (KYT201002, KJ2011003), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20100097110035), and a Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, P R China

      Chun Li, Meng Li & Yuan-Ming Zhang

    2. Henan Sesame Research Center, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, P R China

      Chun Li

    3. School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK

      Jim M Dunwell

    Authors
    1. Chun Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Meng Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Jim M Dunwell
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Yuan-Ming Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Yuan-Ming Zhang.

    Additional information

    Authors' contributions

    YMZ designed the study, coordinated and supervised the analysis. CL and ML performed the analysis and drafted the paper. YMZ and JMD revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Chun Li, Meng Li contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

    Authors’ original file for figure 1

    Authors’ original file for figure 2

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Li, C., Li, M., Dunwell, J.M. et al. Gene duplication and an accelerated evolutionary rate in 11S globulin genes are associated with higher protein synthesis in dicots as compared to monocots. BMC Evol Biol 12, 15 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-15

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-15

    Keywords

    BMC Ecology and Evolution

    ISSN: 2730-7182

    Contact us