Table 2 |
||||||||||||
| Impact of long-branch exclusion on full alignment, A136665 and A133065 data partitions | ||||||||||||
| Subsection Krempfianae ( P . krempfii ) | Pinus merkusii / P . latteri | Subsection Contortae | ||||||||||
| All | No non- Pinus outgroups | Subgenus only | Section + single outgroup | All | No non- Pinus outgroups | Subgenus only | Section + single outgroup | All | No non- Pinus outgroups | Subgenus only | Section + single outgroup | |
| Full Alignment | (K + G) + S | (K + G) + S | (K + G) + S | (K + G) + S | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | C + (A + P) | C + (A + P) | C + (A + P) | C + (A + P) |
| (79) | (61) | (79) | (79) | (53) | (53) | (54) | (78) | (100) | (100) | (100) | (100) | |
| A136665 | (K + G) + S | (K + G) + S | (K + G) + S | (K + G) + S | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | C + (A + P) | C + (A + P) | C + (A + P) | C + (A + P) |
| (71) | (70) | (71) | (54) | (43) | (46) | (47) | (68) | (100) | (100) | (100) | (100) | |
| A133065 | (K + G) + S | (K + G) + S | (K + G) + S | (K + G) + S | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | (M/L + Pina.) + Pinus | P + (C + A) | P + (C + A) | P + (C + A) | C + (A + P) |
| (97) | (97) | (97) | (98) | (99) | (100) | (100) | (99) | (37/42) | (31/36) | (35/42) | (84) | |
For each combination, supported topology is given with maximum likelihood bootstrap support underneath in parentheses. Subsection and species abbreviations are as follows: A = Australes , C = Contortae , G = Gerardianae , K = P. krempfii , M/L = P. merkusii /P. latteri , P = Ponderosae, Pinast. = Pinaster , S = Strobus . Single outgroups used in most exclusive groups are described Methods and Materials.
Parks et al.
Parks et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012 12:100 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-100
