Table 3 |
|||||
|
Event-based tree reconciliation |
|||||
|
Event costs |
Cost |
Codivergence |
Duplication |
Sorting |
Switching |
|
|
|||||
|
0,0,1,2*** |
50 |
13-14* |
5-7** |
4-10 |
20-23** |
|
1,1,1,1 |
41 |
0-9* |
3-9 |
0-0 |
27-38** |
|
0,1,1,1*** |
32 |
9-13* |
3-5 |
0-4 |
23-29** |
|
1,0,1,1 |
32 |
0-5* |
9-9 |
0-0 |
27-32** |
|
1,1,0,1 |
41 |
0-18 |
3-41 |
0-271 |
0-38 |
|
1,1,1,0 |
3 |
0-0 |
3-3 |
0-0 |
38-38 |
|
|
|||||
|
Event-based analysis of host associations between fig wasp lineages and Ficus species implemented in TreeFitter. Event costs weighting schemes (left column) are ordered as follows: codivergence, duplication, sorting, and switching. Redundant exemplars of the same fig wasp and host-species association were removed for the purposes of the test. * Observed event significantly more than randomised trees P < 0.05. ** Observed events significantly less than randomised trees P < 0.05. *** Total event costs of observed trees were significantly less than the randomised trees P < 0.05. |
|||||
|
McLeish and van Noort BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012 12:1 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-1 |
|||||