Table 1 |
|||||
|
Log-likelihoods of a linear fit between all ω values and each of 8 common distributions, with likelihood ratio tests for the differences in distributions calculated for the 3 best distributional fits |
|||||
|
Distribution |
Pearson's ra |
kb |
LRTc |
df |
P-valued |
|
|
|||||
|
Weibull |
.999 |
2 |
186.39 |
2 |
<10-6 |
|
Gamma |
.999 |
2 |
201.67 |
2 |
<10-6 |
|
Exponential |
.998 |
1 |
28.29 |
1 |
<10-6 |
|
Logistic |
.924 |
2 |
-e |
- |
- |
|
Normal |
.923 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Extreme Value |
.903 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Log-Normal |
.854 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Cauchy |
.163 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|||||
|
a. Pearson's r is the linear correlation of the data to the quartiles, based on the maximum likelihood inferred parameters for each family of distributions. b. k is the number of free parameters in the distribution. c. Likelihood ratio test: LRT = 2 * (log-likelihood of metabolic ω values + log-likelihood of non-metabolic ω values) - (log-likelihood for all ω values). d. Distributed χ2. e. Likelihood ratio test only performed for the best distributional fits. |
|||||
|
Hudson and Conant BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011 11:89 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-89 |
|||||