Table 2 |
||||||||||||||
|
Procrustes distances between the natural populations (× 10-2) |
||||||||||||||
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) |
(8) |
(9) |
(10) |
(11) |
(12) |
(13 |
(14) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
DOM EGYPT (1) |
||||||||||||||
|
DOM GER FRANKFURT (2) |
2.9 |
|||||||||||||
|
DOM IRAN TEHERAN (3) |
1.8 |
3.5 |
||||||||||||
|
DOM SPAIN PUDEMONT (4) |
3.9 |
2.9 |
4.7 |
|||||||||||
|
DOM IRAN AHVAZ (5) |
2.4 |
3.4 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
||||||||||
|
DOM GER MUNICH (6) |
2.8 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
3.6 |
2.8 |
|||||||||
|
DOM SICILY (7) |
1.6 |
3.2 |
1.9 |
3.9 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
||||||||
|
DOM KER GUILLOU (8) |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
|||||||
|
DOM KER COCHONS (9) |
2.9 |
3.9 |
2.7 |
4.3 |
3.2 |
3.9 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
||||||
|
MUS HUNGARY (10) |
2.3 |
2.0 |
2.8 |
3.1 |
2.7 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
|||||
|
CAS JOHNSTON ATOLL (11) |
2.5 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
||||
|
MAC GREECE (12) |
3.0 |
4.2 |
2.6 |
5.1 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
2.7 |
3.4 |
2.9 |
3.8 |
3.6 |
|||
|
MAC TURKEY (13) |
3.2 |
4.1 |
2.8 |
5.0 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
4.7 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
4.6 |
2.9 |
||
|
SPRE SPAIN PUDEMONT (14) |
3.1 |
3.6 |
2.5 |
4.3 |
2.7 |
3.0 |
2.6 |
4.1 |
3.1 |
2.8 |
3.8 |
3.1 |
2.6 |
|
|
SPRE SPAIN MADRID (15) |
3.1 |
4.3 |
2.2 |
5.3 |
2.9 |
3.1 |
2.4 |
4.5 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
4.3 |
2.7 |
1.5 |
1.9 |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Boell and Tautz BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011 11:306 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-306 |
||||||||||||||