Table 3 |
|||||||
|
Effects of evolutionary age and spatial distance on range and body size |
|||||||
|
Multiple R2 |
SS Model |
MS Model |
SS Residual |
MS Residual |
F |
p |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
SVL tip contrast |
0.621 |
4743.239 |
677.606 |
2900.391 |
67.451 |
10.046 |
<0.0001 |
|
RSA tip contrast |
0.633 |
2632.051 |
376.007 |
1527.497 |
35.524 |
10.585 |
<0.0001 |
|
RSB tip contrast |
0.636 |
2659.325 |
379.903 |
1523.884 |
35.439 |
10.719 |
<0.0001 |
|
|
|||||||
|
Results of factorial regressions through the origin to determine the effect of evolutionary age, of geographic distance and bioclimatic distance, and their interaction terms on body size and range size contrasts using large (RSA) and small (RSB) buffer zones for one- or two locality species in mantellid sister species pairs. |
|||||||
|
Wollenberg et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011 11:217 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-217 |
|||||||